Well commended all of you on your loyalty to the company. Maybe it was that trait that i was laking when i went trough who knows. But that fact remain that your success as a trainee a lot to do with who is your instructor. I have no problem admitting that i was CT by my own mistakes. My first mistak...

Well obviously they has been very little posting from people who CTed. So most of you don't even know what i had to endure. The point of a class action suit would be a commitment from them to change the following points: 1. Better selection process in order to achieve a higher success rate than 35% ...

I did not ask for personal bashing but thank you for your reply. My point is Nav Canada should do a better job at selecting its trainee. I am no alone in this ordeal. After a year an half of training an a month away of going on the floor, i was CT with very little warning or remedial training (1 wee...

Here another one that is very interesting. 95% for the FAA.

http://gns.gannettonline.com/misc/wfplan.pdf

I did the research some years ago but i will dig it out. In the mean time here is to links for you: One from Sweden and the other one from the UK clearly stating their success rate. http://www.edu.avesta.se/domarhagsskolan/gymnasie/pdf/syv/satsa.pdf http://atcocareers.co.uk/application-process.html ...

Having been an IFR Student with Nav-Canada a few years ago (2003-2004 Winnipeg ACC), I would like to know if some of you feel that a class action is warranted against Nav-Canada based on the following criteria: 1. While other countries have a success rate of well over 80%, Nav-Canada has a success r...