GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

Post Reply
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2860
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by rigpiggy »

http://globalnews.ca/news/2819252/air-c ... paign=2014

An investigation is underway following a hard landing at the Calgary International Airport on Tuesday.

Air Canada Express flight AC7212 landed safely at around 7:20 a.m., but a spokesperson for Air Canada said the “nose gear collapsed when the aircraft came to a stop.”

“We recognize that this would have been disconcerting to passengers, and can confirm that our regional Express partners are trained to handle events such as this and to look after our customers with care,” Angela Mah said in an email to Global News.

The flight, operated by Air Georgian, was travelling from Lethbridge to Calgary.

According to Mah, Air Georgian is inspecting the aircraft and will be “taking care of its maintenance as required.”

Fifteen people were on board the plane, a Beechcraft 1900 aircraft.

Passengers were able to leave the plane through the usual exit. They were then bussed to their terminal.

No injuries were reported.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2860
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by rigpiggy »

According to the CADOR's it's a CL-600 LOLOLOLOL.


An Air Georgian Limited Canadair CL-600-2B19 (GGN7212) from Medicine Hat, AB (CYXH) to Calgary, AB (CYYC) reported that the nose gear was possibly not fully extended. GGN7212 did a fly-by, tower observed that the nose gear was not fully extended, tilted aft. GGN7212 declared an emergency and landed Runway 35R. The nose gear did collapse on landing and aircraft came to a stop on the runway abeam Taxiway D4. Runway 35R NOTAM closed until 1930Z. Arrival rate reduced to 24 on single runway operation.
---------- ADS -----------
 
porcsord
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 352
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by porcsord »

There's a lot of conflicting information between those two posts... Different departure aerodromes, different aircraft types. Although there is one constant... a very shitty operator.
---------- ADS -----------
 
atphat
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 462
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:01 pm

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by atphat »

:roll: Give it a rest. You sound like a dumped ex.
---------- ADS -----------
 
timel
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1209
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:50 am

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by timel »

---------- ADS -----------
 
porcsord
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 352
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by porcsord »

atphat wrote: Give it a rest. You sound like a dumped ex.
Perhaps, although I've never dated this particular gal. For reasons that I stated in my last post.
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1887
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by linecrew »

rigpiggy wrote:
According to the CADOR's it's a CL-600 LOLOLOLOL.
That's because it IS a CL-600. Any other name given is for marketing.

https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/ ... e-4059.htm
---------- ADS -----------
 
NotDirty!
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 4:04 pm

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by NotDirty! »

linecrew wrote:
rigpiggy wrote:
According to the CADOR's it's a CL-600 LOLOLOLOL.
That's because it IS a CL-600. Any other name given is for marketing.

https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/ ... e-4059.htm
rigpiggy wrote: Fifteen people were on board the plane, a Beechcraft 1900 aircraft.
Bombardier is doing some pretty weird marketing if they call their/Canadair's regional jet a Beechcraft...
---------- ADS -----------
 
GyvAir
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1804
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by GyvAir »

Correction: Change to the aircraft type. An Air Georgian Limited Beech 1900D (GGN7212) from Medicine Hat, AB (CYXH) to Calgary, AB (CYYC) reported that the nose gear was possibly not fully extended. GGN7212 did a fly-by, tower observed that the nose gear was not fully extended, tilted aft. GGN7212 declared an emergency and landed Runway 35R. The nose gear did collapse on landing and aircraft came to a stop on the runway abeam Taxiway D4. Runway 35R NOTAM closed until 1930Z. Arrival rate reduced to 24 on single runway operation.

In case anyone watching the video wasn't sure what aircraft type they were watching having it's prop blades shortened.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JL
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: Edmonton

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by JL »

---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
MZUNGO
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: YVR

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by MZUNGO »

some 1900 operators lubricate and inspect that stop bolt every 100 hours.
---------- ADS -----------
 
BE02 Driver
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 185
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:43 am

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by BE02 Driver »

JL wrote: Tue May 29, 2018 10:29 am TSB final report http://www.bst.gc.ca/eng/rapports-repor ... 6w0092.asp
Best part of the report:

TC has given Air Georgian a high-risk rating for several years and predicted that the risk rating would stay the same in the near future. With this level of risk, TC indicated that there was a low likelihood that risks were being managed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Redneck_pilot86
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1329
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: between 60 and 70

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by Redneck_pilot86 »

Captain only had 8 hours off prior to duty?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
fish4life
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2411
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:32 am

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by fish4life »

Redneck_pilot86 wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 9:14 pm Captain only had 8 hours off prior to duty?
That was the biggest thing that caught my eye as well. The CARS say a pilot needs opportunity for 8 hours of SLEEP + all the time required to eat, shower etc. How was 8 hours off duty not considered a giant red flag since its impossible to get 8 hours of sleep with only 8 hours off, need more along the lines of 9.5-10 hours.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
C-GGGQ
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2052
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 12:33 pm

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by C-GGGQ »

While that paints a pretty clear and bleak picture of GGN as a whole, pretty sure the bolt in question didn't know he only had 8 off :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Redneck_pilot86
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1329
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: between 60 and 70

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by Redneck_pilot86 »

C-GGGQ wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 8:08 am While that paints a pretty clear and bleak picture of GGN as a whole, pretty sure the bolt in question didn't know he only had 8 off :mrgreen:
Sure, but it demonstrates Georgians lack of adherence to the CARs, which increases the likelihood that the failure was also due to the company culture and not just a fluke incident.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
User avatar
Axial Flow
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 507
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 6:00 pm

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by Axial Flow »

Transport Canada should post risk levels on their website for each operator and optimize Google searches of Airlines to show the rating...maybe that would be a better motivator for SMS processes to be followed or ya know...just maintaining airplanes so they don't cause accident/incidents if that isn't motivation enough.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
C-GGGQ
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2052
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 12:33 pm

Re: GGN NLG Failure in YYC

Post by C-GGGQ »

Axial Flow wrote: Sun Jun 03, 2018 9:52 pm Transport Canada should post risk levels on their website for each operator and optimize Google searches of Airlines to show the rating...maybe that would be a better motivator for SMS processes to be followed or ya know...just maintaining airplanes so they don't cause accident/incidents if that isn't motivation enough.
This is done in trucking. Called a csa score. All shippers can look up a companies score to decide who to award contracts to.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”