Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
Flew into Thompson early Friday morning on a Medevac and heard someone talking on the radio about a metro going off the runway the night before. Anyone have any details?
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 3:25 am
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
Perimeter Aviation Swearingen SA-227-AC, registration C-FLRY performing positioning flight PAG-959 from Gods River,MB to Thompson,MB (Canada) with 2 crew, was descending towards Thompson about 40nm from the aerodrome when the crew advised they had a low oil indication for one of their engines (TPE331) and might need to shut it down. The aircraft continued to Thompson but veered off the runway at about 19:07L (00:07Z Nov 3rd). The crew declared Mayday and evacuated the aircraft. Both crew were taken to a hospital with minor injuries, the aircraft sustained substantial damage.
The Canadian TSB dispatched investigators on site and opened an investigation. The regional manager reported the aircraft went off the runway (runway excursion) and sustained damage to gear, belly and a propeller.
NAV Canada repored the runway needed to be closed due to the disabled aircraft and fuel on the runway.
Metars:
CYTH 030200Z 33003KT 15SM -SN BKN013 OVC033 M20/M22 A3041 RMK SC6SC2 SLP328=
CYTH 030100Z 35003KT 15SM -SN FEW013 BKN033 M19/M22 A3040 RMK SC2SC4 SLP325=
CYTH 030000Z 32005KT 15SM -SN BKN037 M18/M21 A3040 RMK SC6 SLP323=
CYTH 022300Z 33005KT 15SM -SN BKN034 M17/M21 A3039 RMK SC6 SLP320=
CYTH 022200Z 35006KT 15SM -SN BKN035 M17/M21 A3037 RMK SC6 SLP315=
CYTH 022100Z 35004KT 320V020 15SM -SN OVC035 M16/M20 A3037 RMK SC8 SLP314=
CYTH 022000Z 34005KT 15SM -SN BKN030 OVC037 M17/M21 A3037 RMK SC5SC3 SLP313=
The Canadian TSB dispatched investigators on site and opened an investigation. The regional manager reported the aircraft went off the runway (runway excursion) and sustained damage to gear, belly and a propeller.
NAV Canada repored the runway needed to be closed due to the disabled aircraft and fuel on the runway.
Metars:
CYTH 030200Z 33003KT 15SM -SN BKN013 OVC033 M20/M22 A3041 RMK SC6SC2 SLP328=
CYTH 030100Z 35003KT 15SM -SN FEW013 BKN033 M19/M22 A3040 RMK SC2SC4 SLP325=
CYTH 030000Z 32005KT 15SM -SN BKN037 M18/M21 A3040 RMK SC6 SLP323=
CYTH 022300Z 33005KT 15SM -SN BKN034 M17/M21 A3039 RMK SC6 SLP320=
CYTH 022200Z 35006KT 15SM -SN BKN035 M17/M21 A3037 RMK SC6 SLP315=
CYTH 022100Z 35004KT 320V020 15SM -SN OVC035 M16/M20 A3037 RMK SC8 SLP314=
CYTH 022000Z 34005KT 15SM -SN BKN030 OVC037 M17/M21 A3037 RMK SC5SC3 SLP313=
"I'd rather have it and not need than to need it and not have it" Capt. Augustus McCrae.
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
I wonder if this like that King Air crash in Vancouver with the loose oil cap.
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
No oil cap per say on a Metro 3. Metro 2, yes but 3, no. Sight gauge with a ball floating in a small window. Open a small flap on the engine nacelle.
The average pilot, despite the somewhat swaggering exterior, is very much capable of such feelings as love, affection, intimacy and caring.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
I met up for coffee with one of their metro captains last night and he mentioned that the Metro was on it's way back to Thompson empty due to a hydraulic issue. The flight was done with the gear down and closer to Thompson one of the engines oil pressure started to fluctuate. Maintenance advised them to keep the engine running and the engine failed short final, new Captain just out of line indoc.
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
Wow that is a very unfortunate set of circumstances. Engine failure on short final can turn ugly very quickly. Glad to hear everyone made it out ok!!Stretcher wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:47 am I met up for coffee with one of their metro captains last night and he mentioned that the Metro was on it's way back to Thompson empty due to a hydraulic issue. The flight was done with the gear down and closer to Thompson one of the engines oil pressure started to fluctuate. Maintenance advised them to keep the engine running and the engine failed short final, new Captain just out of line indoc.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
I'm genuinely curious. Would the Metro be able to maintain altitude on one engine with the gear extended?
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
If what I was told is 100 % true, the first thing I thought of was Bearskin in Red Lake and how that played out. Time will tell, it sounds like these guys were handed some bad cards to deal with.goingnowherefast wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:49 am I'm genuinely curious. Would the Metro be able to maintain altitude on one engine with the gear extended?
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
I don't think it would be certified if it couldn't maintain altitude on one engine. It wouldn't be able to do a V1 cut.
- Cat Driver
- Top Poster
- Posts: 18921
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
Why did they not fix it in Thompson rather than fly it with the gear down?
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
Cat, reading comprehension! It was broken in Gods River and ferrying back to Thompson to get fixed.
I was thinking of the Bearskin crash and also the conditions during the 1st segment (positive rate required with gear down). They're also old, the rigging could be a bit off, rough paint, prop filed a few too many times, etc. Not exactly in the same condition as the flight test aircraft. Hence why I asked.
I was thinking of the Bearskin crash and also the conditions during the 1st segment (positive rate required with gear down). They're also old, the rigging could be a bit off, rough paint, prop filed a few too many times, etc. Not exactly in the same condition as the flight test aircraft. Hence why I asked.
- Cat Driver
- Top Poster
- Posts: 18921
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
My apology for not reading all the info available..Cat, reading comprehension! It was broken in Gods River and ferrying back to Thompson to get fixed
I obviously focused on one factor, which was why did they not get it fixed where it was determined to need fixing rather than attempt a ferry flight with the intention of flying with the gear down.
I assume it was done with a ferry permit from TC?
Personally I would not accept such a flight in case something else might go wrong such as losing power on one of the engines.
But that could't happen could it.
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
Single engine sure I know they can easily fly... single engine gear down is another scenario.
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 3:25 am
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
I assume it was done with a ferry permit from TC?
I don't think Perimeter and most larger AMOs need to involve TC for a simple ferry permit.
Personally I would not accept such a flight in case something else might go wrong such as losing power on one of the engines.
That's kind of sad because there are so many fixed gear aircraft in commercial service. Of course you should consider an engine failure enroute. IF the gear was indeed fixed down, and we don't know if it was, then you might keep the gross weight very light and/or treat it like a single engine. Maybe the crew did this. Most of us have flown fixed gear single engine aircraft at one time or another. Even the disgusting tricycle gear types.
What might throw you off in this case is if the sick engine went into NTS right in the flare. I wonder if they considered pulling the Stop and Feather on final approach. Hmmmm
I don't think Perimeter and most larger AMOs need to involve TC for a simple ferry permit.
Personally I would not accept such a flight in case something else might go wrong such as losing power on one of the engines.
That's kind of sad because there are so many fixed gear aircraft in commercial service. Of course you should consider an engine failure enroute. IF the gear was indeed fixed down, and we don't know if it was, then you might keep the gross weight very light and/or treat it like a single engine. Maybe the crew did this. Most of us have flown fixed gear single engine aircraft at one time or another. Even the disgusting tricycle gear types.
What might throw you off in this case is if the sick engine went into NTS right in the flare. I wonder if they considered pulling the Stop and Feather on final approach. Hmmmm
"I'd rather have it and not need than to need it and not have it" Capt. Augustus McCrae.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:14 pm
- Location: The Gulag Archipelago
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
Wouldn’t be flying any twin gear down IF it won’t come up. End of story.
Illya
Illya
Wish I didn't know now, what I didn't know then.
- Cat Driver
- Top Poster
- Posts: 18921
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
Why would anyone even consider it?Wouldn’t be flying any twin gear down IF it won’t come up. End of story.
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:03 am
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
An empty Metro 3 at -15C would definitely maintain on one engine.
I’ve got a 1000 hrs in a twin otter with -20’s on floats loaded to the nuts with lots of time where landing on water isn’t an option. I’ll take the flight in the empty Metro thanks.
I’ve got a 1000 hrs in a twin otter with -20’s on floats loaded to the nuts with lots of time where landing on water isn’t an option. I’ll take the flight in the empty Metro thanks.
- Cat Driver
- Top Poster
- Posts: 18921
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
There is a big difference between an Islander and most other twin engine airplanes.
The Islander is certified as a fixed gear airplane whereas most other twin engine airplanes are retractable gear machines.
Here is a question.
If a Metro has a gear problem that prevents the gear from being retracted after take off is the C of A valid in that condition?
The Islander is certified as a fixed gear airplane whereas most other twin engine airplanes are retractable gear machines.
Here is a question.
If a Metro has a gear problem that prevents the gear from being retracted after take off is the C of A valid in that condition?
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Re: Perimeter off the runway in Thompson
A metro will fly perfectly fine on one engine and the gear down when it's empty which it was. Loaded be a different story specially if it was hot