Near ground collision in Trail

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

Post Reply
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4576
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Re: Near ground collision in Trail

Post by co-joe »

There is a difference. The C burns less due to having less powerful engines. Do you need me to connect the dots more than that?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
cncpc
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:17 am

Re: Near ground collision in Trail

Post by cncpc »

co-joe wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 4:33 pm There is a difference. The C burns less due to having less powerful engines. Do you need me to connect the dots more than that?
I don't picture you as a dot connector. More as a guy with an axe to grind with Pacific Coastal.

All of the information 5 see online is that the the BFL is 3811 or in one site, just over 3700.

Transport Canada has had some interest in this issue after an accident on a snowy and icy runway. It came out of that that the published numbers for the 1900D do not include icy runway conditions.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”