Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
No, I wouldn't. If I would have cared to elaborate, I'd have elaborated when I wrote the post.
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
- Jean-Pierre
- Rank 5
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:56 pm
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
The autopilot can be turned off with a click of a button. Unless you are saying this pilot could not hand fly the approach. It happens these day.
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
I'm saying what I'm saying. You're making up what I'm saying. Know the difference.
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
A lot of flight instructors have very little actual IFR experience. I know when I did my instrument rating they wouldn't fly in IMC. If he was relying on the autopilot and it failed having to suddenly hand fly and manage the approach could have been overwhelming.
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
I would highly suspect ice induced tailplane stall when flaps selected coming on to the LOC at CYCD, there was freezing drizzle in the VTA that day from about 6000-SFC, there appears to be a history of issues with these aircraft in icing conditions.
It had been flying at FL250 [-35C]for about 3 hours, prior to entering the precip........
It had been flying at FL250 [-35C]for about 3 hours, prior to entering the precip........
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
C-FQYW, a privately operated Piper Aerostar PA60-602P, departed Bishop Airport (KBIH), CA for a
flight to Nanaimo (CYCD), BC with 1 pilot and 2 passengers on board. At approximately 1803 PST
the pilot informed ATC that they had a mechanical issue and required a new heading. ATC supplied
several instructions attempting to assist the aircraft, which was in IMC. Shortly after, the aircraft lost
contact with ATC and struck terrain into a forested area on Gabriola Island, 8.5nm N of CYCD. The
aircraft sustained a post impact fire; the ELT did not alert. The 3 persons on board were fatally
injured.
flight to Nanaimo (CYCD), BC with 1 pilot and 2 passengers on board. At approximately 1803 PST
the pilot informed ATC that they had a mechanical issue and required a new heading. ATC supplied
several instructions attempting to assist the aircraft, which was in IMC. Shortly after, the aircraft lost
contact with ATC and struck terrain into a forested area on Gabriola Island, 8.5nm N of CYCD. The
aircraft sustained a post impact fire; the ELT did not alert. The 3 persons on board were fatally
injured.
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
The TSB has issued its report on this accident - looks like another attitude indicator failure but this aircraft had no back-up. Eerily similar to the Tindi accident - AI fails, airplane crashes.
With peanut gyros so inexpensive, surely aircraft like this accident one would invest in a back-up if you are going to fly IFR.
With peanut gyros so inexpensive, surely aircraft like this accident one would invest in a back-up if you are going to fly IFR.
- Jean-Pierre
- Rank 5
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:56 pm
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
No apology necessarytrey kule wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 8:57 amPDW...is that you?Sounds like a a partial panel situation with the low weather being a factor. A graveyard spiral is a spiraling dive that can happen when you become disoriented, and when you have little or no visual reference to the horizon. Unfortunately, lots of graveyard spirals end with the airplane impacting the ground in a high rate-of-descent, banked turn like in this case.
-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:27 pm
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
I'm not sure what's more depressing: That everyone has a price, or how low the price always is.
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
I wonder if Alex knew he was flying an RCAP approach. With Foreflight it's not always obvious that an ops spec is required for a given approach.
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
Non-commercial operations can fly RCAP at will. Commercial ops need an ops spec amendment to their AOC.
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: West Coast
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
This statement is not correct. Do not use an RCAP procedure unless you have the required Special Authorization
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
What is interesting is that if you read the report in detail, Alex was right seat. The left seat pilot had no me or IFR rating and 320 hours. I don’t think he had a second set of flight instruments on the right side of the plane. He may have had to try coaching his less experienced left seater in how to react or view the turn coordinator and DG from across the cockpit for partial panel.
Just speculating.
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
Does anybody find it unusual/hazardous that the King KI 256 FCI(artificial horizon) has no indicator to let the pilot know that the instrument has failed. Take a look at it in the link below. It is a serious IFR instrument. I am surprised that an instrument like this would even be allowed. Somehow, I assume that most artificial horizons have some sort of failure flag, but maybe it is just the power source itself. Not sure now.
https://www.google.ca/search?q=king+ki2 ... NsXCE80K-M
https://www.google.ca/search?q=king+ki2 ... NsXCE80K-M
-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:27 pm
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
Indeed. The type of approach doesn't seem to matter since the problem stems from disorientation. One good pilot in the left seat may have come through this. One good pilot trying to manage a not as good pilot in the left seat would be tough for anyone to do. Flying instruments from the right seat with instruments on the left is extra difficult. Doing it perhaps partial panel more so. Possibly making a partial panel recovery if the less experienced pilot perhaps got disoriented an even bigger challenge, and god forbid if this was dual instruction in progress, with the additional challenge of changing who's controlling things.milotron wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:07 pm
What is interesting is that if you read the report in detail, Alex was right seat. The left seat pilot had no me or IFR rating and 320 hours. I don’t think he had a second set of flight instruments on the right side of the plane. He may have had to try coaching his less experienced left seater in how to react or view the turn coordinator and DG from across the cockpit for partial panel.
Just speculating.
I'm not sure what's more depressing: That everyone has a price, or how low the price always is.
- rookiepilot
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4413
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
This statement is false: only commercial operators with an OPS SPEC to fly GPS approaches may use these RCAP procedures.
Procedures that go into the RCAP on the surface look like any other RNAV approach. There are generally two issues that cause them to be in the RCAP and not the CAP. These are:
- deviation to the design criteria for instrument approaches (TP 308) and a non-standard missed approach climb gradient (> 200 ft/nm) is the most common deviation
- the aerodrome does not comply with any known aerodrome standard for obstacle clearance in and around the runway area (think of a runway cut out of the trees versus a runway with no obstacles in the approach/departure path or abeam the runway.
Transport Canada recently made changes to the aerodrome standards for registered aerodromes that will see many of the approaches go from the CAP to the RCAP for the reason I noted above. You will also see many identical approaches where there is a CAP approach for Category A/B aircraft and an RCAP approach for Category C/D aircraft. The runway meets the standards for a Category A/B aircraft (hence it is in a CAP) but it does not meet the standards for Category C/D aircraft (and hence it goes into the RCAP). Soon, the CAP and RCAP will be the size of New York City phone books but fortunately now its all electronic.
Transport Canada's changes to the registered aerodrome standards was ill-conceived and poorly researched and it going to cause a lot of grief at a lot of airports for a lot of pilots, both private and commercial.
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: West Coast
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
Sorry for the thread drift but in the interests of accuracy, private operators that hold a Private Operators Registration Document can also apply for approval to fly RCAP approaches.
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
There are more aircraft flying out there like this than not. They have loss of power flags but for a gyro failure while the instrument is still powered very few will tell you that. This is why aircraft have comparator systems that monitors instruments from both sides. Light aircraft rarely have these, sh1t they don't even have a full instrument panel on the right side.Does anybody find it unusual/hazardous that the King KI 256 FCI(artificial horizon) has no indicator to let the pilot know that the instrument has failed. Take a look at it in the link below. It is a serious IFR instrument. I am surprised that an instrument like this would even be allowed. Somehow, I assume that most artificial horizons have some sort of failure flag, but maybe it is just the power source itself. Not sure now.
Black air has no lift - extra fuel has no weight
http://www.blackair.ca
http://www.blackair.ca
Re: Fatal Crash - Gabriola Island - Dec 10, 2019
You are correct that private operators, i.e. 604 operators with an OPS SPEC, can do GPS approaches as well as CAR’s 700 operators with an OPS SPEC. At one time the OPS SPEC page spelled that out.Big Pistons Forever wrote: ↑Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:02 amSorry for the thread drift but in the interests of accuracy, private operators that hold a Private Operators Registration Document can also apply for approval to fly RCAP approaches.
But aircraft that are not flown as 702, 703, 704, 705 and 604 cannot do RCAP (edited from GPS earlier) approaches.
Last edited by L39Guy on Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.