Hard Floatplane Landing

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

Post Reply
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7157
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by pelmet »

From a few years ago. They put on a bit of an airshow for July 1 but it didn't end up well with the hard landing....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fC5yscm9dsI
---------- ADS -----------
 
doiwannabeapilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:46 pm

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by doiwannabeapilot »

Was this in the 1970s ?
---------- ADS -----------
 
jakeandelwood
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 453
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:45 pm

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by jakeandelwood »

Jesus, he came down hard.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4053
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by PilotDAR »

Jesus, he came down hard.
Well, yes....

More to the point, is that the plane was pretty well stalled on the way down, and when he pulled to flare, nothing happened, as he just deepened the stall. Fortunately for him, it hit the water before the plane could aerodynamically pitch down - but it was about to! Whether he had some power on or not really was not making much difference at that point, though full power might have helped the situation.

It is exactly this type of unarrested/unarrestable descent which I train pilots to prevent by not flying slower than Vy, unless absolutely necessary. The pilots who drag the plane off the surface, and then climb away steeply below Vy put themselves in exactly this situation. If it quits, they will likely get the nose down, and enter a glide, but they may not accelerate to Vy, or a suitable glide speed to provide the reserve of speed needed to allow the plane to flare. Pull, the nose may come up, but the plane will keep going down.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Heliian
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by Heliian »

doiwannabeapilot wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 11:33 am Was this in the 1970s ?
Mid to late 90s
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
valleyboy
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 797
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by valleyboy »

I watched that and it's difficult to judge with a movie but I have to say yes it was a total screw up and a sold hit but I wonder if a factory built and certified aircraft the end results would be the same. The engine came right off the mounts and prop cut the float from what I can tell. I've seen landing that the aircraft survived unscathed with similar impacts. One thing is apparent that a homebuilt can be less robust. Those are terrible floats and was he in rough water at some point before this incident - talk about swiss cheese, many holes lined up ----
---------- ADS -----------
 
Black air has no lift - extra fuel has no weight
http://www.blackair.ca
Mick G
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 7:21 pm
Location: Alberta

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by Mick G »

Murphy Rebel Kit......after seeing this, I really am doubting the integrity of the engine mount. Does anyone know if this was addressed and or strengthened? I agree that had the engine not fallen off and cut the float, there is a high probability that the aircraft would have stayed upright.
---------- ADS -----------
 
mosky
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 12:08 pm

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by mosky »

This is one of the things that can give an amateur built airplane a bad name very quickly. Builder installed a larger engine against the kit manufacturer's recommendations and also did not strengthen the firewall or beef up the engine mounts. Add to that the airbag (Full Lotus it looks like) flat bottom floats which would not cushion such a hard arrival and you have the holes being lined up in the Swiss cheese more by design than by accident. I believe the original Full Lotus floats started out on lightweight ultralights and microlights and have evolved into being installed on larger (and heavier) aircraft. I can't see a flat bottom float absorbing much of that impact with the water. Not saying that the engine would not have fallen off with a conventional float but I would like to hope that the impact transferred up to the airframe would have been slightly less with some sort of a Vee bottom float.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Schooner69A
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:17 pm
Location: The Okanagan

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by Schooner69A »

About the integrity of the Murphy design: I think it was mentioned in the video that the owner wanted to upgrade the engine; the designer said "No". Owner did it anyway. Engine mount could not handle it...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mick G
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 7:21 pm
Location: Alberta

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by Mick G »

Schooner69A wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 7:18 am About the integrity of the Murphy design: I think it was mentioned in the video that the owner wanted to upgrade the engine; the designer said "No". Owner did it anyway. Engine mount could not handle it...
How do they go about getting certified if against manufacturers recommendation? Experimental category?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
AirFrame
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2610
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Sidney, BC
Contact:

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by AirFrame »

Mick G wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 5:31 pmHow do they go about getting certified if against manufacturers recommendation? Experimental category?
No, Amateur-Built category.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4053
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by PilotDAR »

[YouTube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdXWMKZpapk[/YouTube]

Similar outcome. Decent landing, 'just selected much too rough water...
---------- ADS -----------
 
beaverpuq
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:33 pm

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by beaverpuq »

Just a nice little Walleye chop there!
---------- ADS -----------
 
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4576
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by co-joe »

Any landing you can swim away from...?
---------- ADS -----------
 
jakeandelwood
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 453
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:45 pm

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by jakeandelwood »

That engine just didn't want to quit
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4053
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by PilotDAR »

Any landing you can swim away from...?
Nope, I'm a poster child for that one not being right!
---------- ADS -----------
 
pdw
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1625
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:51 am
Location: right base 24 CYSN

Re: Hard Floatplane Landing

Post by pdw »

Idling in flat with zero-flap here ends up in potential to expose to then unavailable spoolup-time for getting back extra/lost bournouli ... than when having out that flap & some additional rpm for slowing approach. Obviously a real sudden drop-away of lift .... wow. (It's not a new thing to experience the futile sink-rate set up like that... by surprise and rather unexpected.)

It's surely a less familiar surrounding for the show demo approach and possibly this same config routine skill is well honed at the home airport, likely already many times (without draggy floats) with never a problem.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”