"VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore
"VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
I see and read some of these companies that operate the likes of the B1900 that ask for a Valid group 1 IFR rating, and I know there are rules of keeping the ifr valid through the IPC (instrument proficiency check) applies.
My question is , what if you get a job offer but haven't completed the IPC proficency check does it matter?
When the company hires you and send you for the PPC training that will validate the IPC ( instrument proficiency check) or do you need to do the IPC before getting hired?
Appreciate some comments and feedback.
My question is , what if you get a job offer but haven't completed the IPC proficency check does it matter?
When the company hires you and send you for the PPC training that will validate the IPC ( instrument proficiency check) or do you need to do the IPC before getting hired?
Appreciate some comments and feedback.
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
...
Last edited by a313 on Sun Sep 29, 2019 10:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 12:30 pm
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
A PPC does reset your clock, which is why you don’t see airline pilots kicking around in the redbird at your local flying school every few years doing an IPC.
The biggest reason why an employer wants you to have a valid and current IFR rating prior to employing you is pretty simple. They want to spend money on training a proficient IFR pilot how to fly their aircraft. They don’t want to spend extra on knocking the rust off of your IFR knowledge and approach flying abilities.
An IPC is for all intents and purposes a flight test. If an employer hires someone with a fresh IPC, it tells them that at the very least you should be somewhat close to TC standard, and therefore won’t take as much money and time to get to PPC standard on their aircraft.
The biggest reason why an employer wants you to have a valid and current IFR rating prior to employing you is pretty simple. They want to spend money on training a proficient IFR pilot how to fly their aircraft. They don’t want to spend extra on knocking the rust off of your IFR knowledge and approach flying abilities.
An IPC is for all intents and purposes a flight test. If an employer hires someone with a fresh IPC, it tells them that at the very least you should be somewhat close to TC standard, and therefore won’t take as much money and time to get to PPC standard on their aircraft.
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
LifeAt90Kts wrote: ↑Tue Sep 04, 2018 4:42 pm A PPC does reset your clock, which is why you don’t see airline pilots kicking around in the redbird at your local flying school every few years doing an IPC.
The biggest reason why an employer wants you to have a valid and current IFR rating prior to employing you is pretty simple. They want to spend money on training a proficient IFR pilot how to fly their aircraft. They don’t want to spend extra on knocking the rust off of your IFR knowledge and approach flying abilities.
An IPC is for all intents and purposes a flight test. If an employer hires someone with a fresh IPC, it tells them that at the very least you should be somewhat close to TC standard, and therefore won’t take as much money and time to get to PPC standard on their aircraft.
So I will have a greater chance on landing the job with a fresh IPC.
Olay, thanks.
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 12:30 pm
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
How far out of date are you? As in when was the last time you flew IFR?
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
If you will be doing a pcc ride instead of a ppc, as would be the case on a banana like Navajo and possibly a b1900 or king air, you would need a current IFR.
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
1900 is over 12500, pcc need not apply. dont know of any operators that run their K/A FO's with pcc's instead of ppc's. Employers look for someone smart rather then checking all the boxes, not waisting your money needlessly is smart. if you cant get a job in this industry now, its time to quit.
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
leftoftrack wrote: ↑Tue Sep 04, 2018 10:05 pm 1900 is over 12500, pcc need not apply. dont know of any operators that run their K/A FO's with pcc's instead of ppc's. Employers look for someone smart rather then checking all the boxes, not waisting your money needlessly is smart. if you cant get a job in this industry now, its time to quit.
So money wise, save it on the IPC as when they train you for the PPC on the 1900 the PPC will activate the IPC.
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
What approaches are needed now on the IPC?
ILS and GNSS approaches?
Thanks and what does the ride in the simulator look like these days?
ILS and GNSS approaches?
Thanks and what does the ride in the simulator look like these days?
if you are on the ground I guess there is now way but to look up!
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
You need one traditional navaid approach and one GNSS. One of them has to be done without vertical guidance.
I did one an IPC a week ago, did a SID, then unusual attitudes, then an approach to a missed, hold for a bit, then one single engine approach to a full stop
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
I’m rusty I admit and presently doing the IPC training. I’m at 5 training sessions and my instructor ( excellent) told me at least one more to put it together.LifeAt90Kts wrote: ↑Tue Sep 04, 2018 4:42 pm A PPC does reset your clock, which is why you don’t see airline pilots kicking around in the redbird at your local flying school every few years doing an IPC.
The biggest reason why an employer wants you to have a valid and current IFR rating prior to employing you is pretty simple. They want to spend money on training a proficient IFR pilot how to fly their aircraft. They don’t want to spend extra on knocking the rust off of your IFR knowledge and approach flying abilities.
An IPC is for all intents and purposes a flight test. If an employer hires someone with a fresh IPC, it tells them that at the very least you should be somewhat close to TC standard, and therefore won’t take as much money and time to get to PPC standard on their aircraft.
I’m trying to get a feel what the average time it takes to get to flight test ready , I could use a bit more as the last thing I need is a job interview in a sim and look like a deer in headlights !
Fly safe
if you are on the ground I guess there is now way but to look up!
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:23 am
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
Don't focus on the average time. Focus on being prepared and confident for your ride and interview/sim. Right now, treat this as an investment you are getting your skills polished and to standards. I redid my IPC after not flying IFR for 16 years and I can tell you right now that I learned more during the IPC training and assessment than I did on my initial MIFR. It helped tremendously both for my job interview a month later and PPC that followed.ellinas wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:22 pmI’m rusty I admit and presently doing the IPC training. I’m at 5 training sessions and my instructor ( excellent) told me at least one more to put it together.LifeAt90Kts wrote: ↑Tue Sep 04, 2018 4:42 pm A PPC does reset your clock, which is why you don’t see airline pilots kicking around in the redbird at your local flying school every few years doing an IPC.
The biggest reason why an employer wants you to have a valid and current IFR rating prior to employing you is pretty simple. They want to spend money on training a proficient IFR pilot how to fly their aircraft. They don’t want to spend extra on knocking the rust off of your IFR knowledge and approach flying abilities.
An IPC is for all intents and purposes a flight test. If an employer hires someone with a fresh IPC, it tells them that at the very least you should be somewhat close to TC standard, and therefore won’t take as much money and time to get to PPC standard on their aircraft.
I’m trying to get a feel what the average time it takes to get to flight test ready , I could use a bit more as the last thing I need is a job interview in a sim and look like a deer in headlights !
Fly safe
As LifeAt90kts stated, employers will be teaching you to fly the aircraft they don't have time to polish up your IFR knowledge/skills. Take as much time you need.
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
Quick question and direction, finished all my IPC training and next is the “flight test”. Just got hired by an operator flying twins and they’re going to be training me for the PPC on their aircraft (12.500 and under).
Should I spend the hundreds on getting the IPC at the school where I finished the IPC training?
Thoughts
Should I spend the hundreds on getting the IPC at the school where I finished the IPC training?
Thoughts
if you are on the ground I guess there is now way but to look up!
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: in the bush
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
Was having a valid IR a requirement in order to obtain the position?ellinas wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:21 pm Quick question and direction, finished all my IPC training and next is the “flight test”. Just got hired by an operator flying twins and they’re going to be training me for the PPC on their aircraft (12.500 and under).
Should I spend the hundreds on getting the IPC at the school where I finished the IPC training?
Thoughts
TPC
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
It didn’t say valid as long as you have one as they will train you. I guess I should ask, again I’ve completed the IPC training except the examiners stamp.TeePeeCreeper wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:19 amWas having a valid IR a requirement in order to obtain the position?ellinas wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:21 pm Quick question and direction, finished all my IPC training and next is the “flight test”. Just got hired by an operator flying twins and they’re going to be training me for the PPC on their aircraft (12.500 and under).
Should I spend the hundreds on getting the IPC at the school where I finished the IPC training?
Thoughts
TPC
if you are on the ground I guess there is now way but to look up!
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:49 am
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
Why wouldn’t you ask your new employer that directly instead of asking random people on the internet that don’t have enough actual specific information on the requirements of your new job to answer?ellinas wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:21 pm Quick question and direction, finished all my IPC training and next is the “flight test”. Just got hired by an operator flying twins and they’re going to be training me for the PPC on their aircraft (12.500 and under).
Should I spend the hundreds on getting the IPC at the school where I finished the IPC training?
Thoughts
Re: "VALID" Group 1 IFR rating ( inlusive of the IPC - instrument proficiency check)
'valid' is pretty much meaningless these days since instrument ratings don't expire.
If they require you to be recent/current, they should specify those requirements.
If they require you to be recent/current, they should specify those requirements.
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship