Antivaxxer nutbars disrupt Remembrance Day ceremonies.

[‘Bob’]

Im all for freedom of speech, but this was not the time or place.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british- ... -1.6246356

https://bc.ctvnews.ca/it-s-just-so-perv ... -1.5662657


Freedom of speech has necessary limitations, and always has consequences…. … ….. and with RCMP looking for video I hope they make examples out of them.

[TeePeeCreeper]

Regardless of which side of the fence one stands on, that kind behaviour is absolutely repulsive. I hope charges will be laid.

TPC

[CYERCaptainPooping]

Im all for freedom of speech, but this was not the time or place.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british- ... -1.6246356

https://bc.ctvnews.ca/it-s-just-so-perv ... -1.5662657


Freedom of speech has necessary limitations, and always has consequences…. … ….. and with RCMP looking for video I hope they make examples out of them.

What do you mean make an example out of them? What law did they break? Didn't they just bring a mic out to a public place and speak? No example to be made if they didn't break the law. Distasteful, yes. But protest usually comes with disruption.

[AirFrame]

What do you mean make an example out of them? What law did they break? Didn't they just bring a mic out to a public place and speak? No example to be made if they didn't break the law. Distasteful, yes. But protest usually comes with disruption.

... and there's the Dunning-Kreuger candidate, right on time.

[imjustlurking]

Im all for freedom of speech, but this was not the time or place.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british- ... -1.6246356

https://bc.ctvnews.ca/it-s-just-so-perv ... -1.5662657


Freedom of speech has necessary limitations, and always has consequences…. … ….. and with RCMP looking for video I hope they make examples out of them.

What do you mean make an example out of them? What law did they break? Didn't they just bring a mic out to a public place and speak? No example to be made if they didn't break the law. Distasteful, yes. But protest usually comes with disruption.

They could be charged with Mischief.

Canada Criminal Code 430 (1)(d)

Every one commits mischief who wilfully obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property.

In fact, there are additional charges and punishments for those who commit mischief in relation to a war memorial.

430 (4.11)

(4.11) Everyone who commits mischief in relation to property that is a building, structure or part thereof that primarily serves as a monument to honour persons who were killed or died as a consequence of a war, including a war memorial or cenotaph, or an object associated with honouring or remembering those persons that is located in or on the grounds of such a building or structure, or a cemetery is guilty of an indictable offence or an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable,

(a) whether the offence is prosecuted by indictment or punishable on summary conviction, to the following minimum punishment, namely,

(i) for a first offence, to a fine of not less than $1,000,

(ii) for a second offence, to imprisonment for not less than 14 days, and

(iii) for each subsequent offence, to imprisonment for not less than 30 days;

(b) if the offence is prosecuted by indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years; and

(c) if the offence is punishable on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day.