1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Right Seat Captain, lilfssister, North Shore
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
I was too young to see Airport at the theatre. I did see the other Airport movies first run. Dean Martin was great in this movie.
Last edited by kevind on Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 6:16 pm
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Good thread with some great info. I think one of the best things I did during my flight training is went with an instructor and another passenger to a *relatively* short grass strip several times to really get a feel it. It's one thing practicing on a 3000 foot runway, but it feels different when the trees are rushing towards you and there is a great temptation to haul it off early. We regularly went to a 1900' strip nearby fully loaded or close to it with standard power M and N models, but I usually try to keep it to about 200 lb under gross when I do it in my 145 hp model. We also did a 1500' strip with just two of us. These trips were all at 3500'+ density altitude. Landing in that distance was never an issue as long as you are precise in your approach speed and touch down where you intend. If you are having trouble getting down in time or are getting a lot of float, go around. Before you take off, I would suggest you mark the halfway point with something prominent and follow Sparky Imeson's rule that if you don't have 70% takeoff speed at the halfway point then abort.
"People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it." -George Bernard Shaw
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 9:49 pm
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Thanks again everyone for the input. I'll let you guys know how it goes.
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Canuck1988 wrote:I have a friend who has access to a 1470ft grass strip, and wants to fly her 172N into it (with me in it ).
Thanks,Canuck1988 wrote:Thanks again everyone for the input. I'll let you guys know how it goes.
Keep us up to date on all the details. Baseball terminology will do just fine.
Last edited by pelmet on Wed Jun 17, 2015 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
We should treat this kind of like an open flight plan; if you don't post back in a week we'll assume you crashed and send in the pony soldiers.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
- Beefitarian
- Top Poster
- Posts: 6605
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
- Location: A couple of meters away from others.
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Remember some tarps for signaling if photofly comes snooping around..
LL F that sort of thing.
LL F that sort of thing.
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
All well... require food and water!?
Do I look like a Boston Pizza delivery service!?
Do I look like a Boston Pizza delivery service!?
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5868
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: West Coast
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Yah and if you are not there in 30 minutes it is freephotofly wrote:All well... require food and water!?
Do I look like a Boston Pizza delivery service!?
- Beefitarian
- Top Poster
- Posts: 6605
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
- Location: A couple of meters away from others.
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Well let's see. Pellet suggested the lady was trying to get him to a secluded place, suddenly you're offering to show up. It takes four tarps to build LL. and a whole bunch to write, Photofly go away we are naked. If things go well for a while they might not be in trouble yet run out of supplies, you may as well make yourself useful.
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
OK. I'll bring chocolate and nibbles, and a packet of wet-wipes.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
I was going to post about the dangers of damp grass, but now it just seems dirty...
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Went into a 1800ft grass field with the Cherokee 140:
160hp
30 gals fuel
No passengers
Short field technique against brakes
25 degree flaps
Winds calm
grass was slightly wet, you could see the dampness on the tires after rolling to park
Airborne around 900 feet (definitely was under 1000).
I'd do it with passengers now no problem, but wouldn't want to get near gross.
160hp
30 gals fuel
No passengers
Short field technique against brakes
25 degree flaps
Winds calm
grass was slightly wet, you could see the dampness on the tires after rolling to park
Airborne around 900 feet (definitely was under 1000).
I'd do it with passengers now no problem, but wouldn't want to get near gross.
"Carelessness and overconfidence are more dangerous than deliberately accepted risk." -Wilbur Wright
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
I often fly a 172M (150HP) into a 2000' field near my house to pick up the girlfriend. Even with 3 on board and pretty close to gross I'm airborne by the halfway point. No worries at all in that plane.
The 150 on the other hand...
The 150 on the other hand...
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Well with the same 3 people aboard, I can imagine the concern!The 150 on the other hand...
However, a 150 will do just fine in and out of any "normal" 2000 foot grass runway, in common conditions. For my first season at my home runway, 700 feet of length had to do, until I removed a stone fence, and most days, that was just fine....
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
The problem with this field is that it peaks right at the midpoint, so you're driving upslope when you want your acceleration to be at it's best. I was still able to break ground just after the halfway point but a 150 at gross doesn't climb all that well and this field has power lines and big trees around it.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:52 pm
- Location: Ontario
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
Ground effect is your friend and rolling resistance is minimal on a firm ground, therefore, DONT drag the plane up early because the extra drag is harder to overcome than what you gain in speed while on the ground ,,,,also remember that you attain Best angle speed while 2 inches above ground not 2 feet!!! Push for best rate ( in a floatplane ) then zoom over the trees and go for best angle or slightly less to clear, then back to a cruise climb. Flap scheduling is best done ASAP. After rotation, dont drag the plane over the trees but rather fly to their roots , then GENTLY pull back to clear . You dont want to be stuck in the downdraft layer but in the horizontal portion below the trees, above the trees, its horizontal again .
Re: 1470ft Grass Field in a 172N
My plan is to slowly increase the weight on board each time I go there to see how much effect it has...Chris M wrote:I often fly a 172M (150HP) into a 2000' field near my house to pick up the girlfriend. Even with 3 on board and pretty close to gross I'm airborne by the halfway point. No worries at all in that plane.
The 150 on the other hand...
"Carelessness and overconfidence are more dangerous than deliberately accepted risk." -Wilbur Wright