Minima's

This forum has been developed to discuss flight instruction/University and College programs.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Right Seat Captain, lilfssister, North Shore

Post Reply
Let410
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:56 am

Minima's

Post by Let410 »

Hi

What do they mean when they refer to 600-2? There are more but can not remember them off hand.

Is the 600 a height? Is the 2 in reference to Minimum Visibility Aeroplane Table?

Help pls. I am reading the CAPs now but still not 100% sure.
---------- ADS -----------
 
A346Dude
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: Minima's

Post by A346Dude »

600 is the forecast ceiling, 2 is the forecast visibility. So if there is 1 usable precision approach, you must have a TAF showing at least 600ft and 2 miles to use the airport as an alternate.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Zaibatsu
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 602
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:37 am

Re: Minima's

Post by Zaibatsu »

To expand on A346’s very detailed answer, we must note that it also depends on the language of the TAF. If BCMG is used... it must be based on the weather before the period until the end of the period if it’s an improvement, or the weather after BCMG at the time it starts to change if it’s deteriorating. The worst weather in TEMPO must also be observed.

In the case of a PROB... weather can be below alternate minima but not landing minima.

Also remember that this is for planning purposes. Once you’re in the air, any approach is fine unless you’re approach banned... but airmanship dictates that you should always have a backup plan.

Unlike hold entries and NDB tracking and interpreting a LO chart, you will use these everyday when flying IFR.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
youhavecontrol
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:17 am

Re: Minima's

Post by youhavecontrol »

Read through the CAP GEN section on approach minimas. It actually explains it pretty decently. Also, you can read through the minima section in the AIM (TC AIM RAC 9.18): https://www.tc.gc.ca/media/documents/ca ... ACCESS.pdf
---------- ADS -----------
 
"I found that Right Rudder you kept asking for."
Let410
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:56 am

Re: Minima's

Post by Let410 »

Thanks for the help
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
JasonE
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 8:26 pm

Re: Minima's

Post by JasonE »

One usable approach = 600-2 OR 300-1 above lowest usable HAT and vis, whichever is greater.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Carelessness and overconfidence are more dangerous than deliberately accepted risk." -Wilbur Wright
clairvoyant
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Minima's

Post by clairvoyant »

JasonE wrote: Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:47 pm One usable approach = 600-2 OR 300-1 above lowest usable HAT and vis, whichever is greater.
I guess you have to check the airport NOTAM that at least one usable approach available during the ETA.
---------- ADS -----------
 
joshiscool26
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 6:57 pm

Re: Minima's

Post by joshiscool26 »

clairvoyant wrote: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:49 am
JasonE wrote: Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:47 pm One usable approach = 600-2 OR 300-1 above lowest usable HAT and vis, whichever is greater.
I guess you have to check the airport NOTAM that at least one usable approach available during the ETA.
It would also mean that you couldn't take credit for an approach that is forecast to be out of tailwind limitations for your A/C as well.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Flight Training”