50 hours and no solo

This forum has been developed to discuss flight instruction/University and College programs.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, ahramin, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Right Seat Captain

User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1750
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by rookiepilot »

PilotDAR wrote:
Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:28 pm
If an OC holder broke a Canadian regulation, then yes, we depend upon TC to regulate them - out of business, if appropriate. TC enforces TC's safety regulations. Those regulations don't really apply to the commercial side of business conduct, and TC isn't going to get involved in that side - it's not their mandate.
Fine. I don't agree with their mandate. Now, Talking about safety.

My understanding on the St Catherine's case, is notwithstanding the other facts of the accident flight, the flight itself was illegal under the Cars.

Did TC take, in your view, appropriate action against the OC holder?
---------- ADS -----------
  

User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3149
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by PilotDAR »

Did TC take, in your view, appropriate action against the OC holder?
I have no view, I don't know the details of the situation in sufficient detail to know who was responsible for what. Sometimes I simply trust people to do the job assigned to them the best they can. Sometimes I'm disappointed. I've also learned first hand in life that usually, it's better to fix the problem, than to fix the blame.
---------- ADS -----------
  

Aviatard
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:45 am
Location: In a box behind Walmart

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by Aviatard »

rookiepilot wrote:
Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:42 pm

My understanding on the St Catherine's case, is notwithstanding the other facts of the accident flight, the flight itself was illegal under the Cars.

Did TC take, in your view, appropriate action against the OC holder?
Which of the CARs was violated? I don't know what action was taken. Is there a report somewhere?
---------- ADS -----------
  

User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1750
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by rookiepilot »

Aviatard wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:50 am
rookiepilot wrote:
Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:42 pm

My understanding on the St Catherine's case, is notwithstanding the other facts of the accident flight, the flight itself was illegal under the Cars.

Did TC take, in your view, appropriate action against the OC holder?
Which of the CARs was violated? I don't know what action was taken. Is there a report somewhere?
Per the report: (quote photofly)

"The instructor/PIC was conducting his first night flight for nearly 10 months. He could not have met the requirements of regulation 401.05 in respect of the carriage at night of the two passengers who died with him.

This was his first ever flight into IMC. And he was doing it from the right seat."
---------- ADS -----------
  

User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1750
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by rookiepilot »

PilotDAR wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:03 am
Did TC take, in your view, appropriate action against the OC holder?
I have no view, I don't know the details of the situation in sufficient detail to know who was responsible for what. Sometimes I simply trust people to do the job assigned to them the best they can. Sometimes I'm disappointed. I've also learned first hand in life that usually, it's better to fix the problem, than to fix the blame.
You appear to me to be a lot more understanding of one of the worst GA accident situations I've certainly ever heard of, than I am.

Sometimes black is black, white is white. Not gray.
---------- ADS -----------
  

User avatar
AirFrame
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Sidney, BC
Contact:

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by AirFrame »

rookiepilot wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:23 am
"... And he was doing it from the right seat."
I wonder how that's relevant... Did the plane not have dual instruments?
---------- ADS -----------
  

User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1750
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by rookiepilot »

AirFrame wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:48 am
rookiepilot wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:23 am
"... And he was doing it from the right seat."
I wonder how that's relevant... Did the plane not have dual instruments?
https://www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.avia ... 017&akey=1
---------- ADS -----------
  

photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7653
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Making aviation exhausting, everywhere

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by photofly »

AirFrame wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:48 am
rookiepilot wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:23 am
"... And he was doing it from the right seat."
I wonder how that's relevant... Did the plane not have dual instruments?
It was a 160HP Piper Warrior. How many of those have you flown with dual instruments?

Allegedly there was a vacuum pump failure, and the normal position of the (electric) turn coordinator is on the far left of the instrument panel. The only licenced pilot was sitting in the right seat, and even he had never flown in real IMC before.

Let's see you fly through a frontal system, at night, on partial panel, in an underpowered piston single, with the only instruments on the other side of the airplane.

How can it not be relevant?
---------- ADS -----------
  
Strike me down with all of your hatred & your journey towards the dark side will be complete!

User avatar
AirFrame
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Sidney, BC
Contact:

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by AirFrame »

photofly wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:22 am
Let's see you fly through a frontal system, at night, on partial panel, in an underpowered piston single, with the only instruments on the other side of the airplane.

How can it not be relevant?
Okay, okay, unbunch the panties. The quote stopped at "he was doing it from the right seat" as if that should mean anything specific. Maybe it should have mentioned that it only had one set of primary instruments. It was an honest question, not intended to trigger anyone.

Thanks Rookie for the link to the report.
---------- ADS -----------
  

photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7653
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Making aviation exhausting, everywhere

Re: 50 hours and no solo

Post by photofly »

Sorry. I thought I'd exorcised all my existential angst on the other thread, but apparently there was a bit left over.
---------- ADS -----------
  
Strike me down with all of your hatred & your journey towards the dark side will be complete!

Post Reply

Return to “Flight Training”