79 Airplanes Retired

[rudder]

For those in the know - what was the rationale behind eliminating all of the LCC 319 and WB RP positions?

Also, why the reductions on the 737?

WB RP is mostly a junior seat also, I'm just guessing majority will fall into this layoff, they can eliminate them immediately and cover the flying with existing FOs.

There are also covering RP flying by increasing all WB positions except obviously the 767 and 777 CA YYZ. Saving a lot of money here by reducing the amount of down training required. Imagine how many training events would a reduced 787 CA create!

In my opinion, it's a very strategic bid made by the company. It really looks like a paper bid so far, pretty sure a lot of the down training won't happen, at least in the short term. They will focus on who they need to down train first that will save them money first.

So it wasn’t a coincidence that each Base shows net zero vacancy/reductions?

[altiplano]

This is far from a paper bid... there's always a lot of jigging and massaging on the CMSC, but there will be a ton of moves and training happening right away.

There will be reduced 787/777/330 CAs too. Probably 40 or 50 reduced 767 CAs, and L767 CAs have the seniority to bump in there and I'm sure they will. The company may not move the guys getting bumped out though, at least not right away. Wait to see what the recovery will be, see if more retirements come, etc.

But this definitely gives them the opportunity to balance the rest of the positions out, esp the on the 320 and WB FOs. We'll see those filled and trained quickly from the LCC and junior NB CA reductions.

[Fanblade]

For those in the know - what was the rationale behind eliminating all of the LCC 319 and WB RP positions?

Also, why the reductions on the 737?

A previous bid had all 61 737’s on it. That number has since been reduced to 50.

The L319 rational has a few reasons.

Fleet utilization. They can park the EMJ/319 and older 320 immediately by pulling Rouges 320’s back to mainline.

Keeping pilots on payroll not doing anything would reduce the surplus. CR didn’t sound that optimistic that the type of flying Rouge does would come back very quickly.

Also mentioned this gives AC a chance to simplify its NB fleet. No further explanation as to what this meant. The 320 split between mainline and a Rouge was never the intent. It was supposed to be 737 mainline and 320 Rouge. Does Rouge become a brand only after this? They deploy anything they want (320/737/220) into the market? Do they deploy the Max into Rouge and mainline stays 320? Just speculation.
I’m leaning, no that’s not true my bias is showing. I’m hoping Rouge becomes a brand run from within the same operating certificate.

The RP reduction. While waiting for a rebound FO/CA cover the shortfall. Less courses.

[TheRealPapaK]

I realize the Transat merger is the farfrom everyone's mind, but I wonder if swiping away Rouge is setting up for ACA for an acquisition and to keep the Transat brand as the new "rouge". Pure speculation.

[sanjet]

.

[Fanblade]

I realize the Transat merger is the farfrom everyone's mind, but I wonder if swiping away Rouge is setting up for ACA for an acquisition and to keep the Transat brand as the new "rouge". Pure speculation.

It might. I think the move allows AC to play this either way without commitment right now. Due to ACPA scope, Rouge was going to have to be shrunk anyway because of the cutbacks. The Transat purchase on top of that means significant reductions to both. With Transat grounded and Rouge now dissolved, temporarily or not, AC is in a position that they can do whatever makes sense coming out of this. I am sure it is no coincidence that AC has set this up so that all options are open to them.

The question will be what makes sense coming out of this, Rouge or Transat? And when? Both are grounded so that part will figure itself out as markets demand it. My bet is AC hasn’t decided on anything and have deliberately positioned themselves to do whatever makes sense when they please.

[Fanblade]

For those in the know - what was the rationale behind eliminating all of the LCC 319 and WB RP positions?

Also, why the reductions on the 737?

A previous bid had all 61 737’s on it. That number has since been reduced to 50.

The L319 rational has a few reasons.

Fleet utilization. They can park the EMJ/319 and older 320 immediately by pulling Rouges 320’s back to mainline.

Keeping pilots on payroll not doing anything would reduce the surplus. CR didn’t sound that optimistic that the type of flying Rouge does would come back very quickly.

Also mentioned this gives AC a chance to simplify its NB fleet. No further explanation as to what this meant. The 320 split between mainline and a Rouge was never the intent. It was supposed to be 737 mainline and 320 Rouge. Does Rouge become a brand only after this? They deploy anything they want (320/737/220) into the market? Do they deploy the Max into Rouge and mainline stays 320? Just speculation.
I’m leaning, no that’s not true my bias is showing. I’m hoping Rouge becomes a brand run from within the same operating certificate.

The RP reduction. While waiting for a rebound FO/CA cover the shortfall. Less courses.

Just had it pointed out that by getting rid of the RP position AC will flush out all the grandfathered pay rates.

[rudder]

For those in the know - what was the rationale behind eliminating all of the LCC 319 and WB RP positions?

Also, why the reductions on the 737?

A previous bid had all 61 737’s on it. That number has since been reduced to 50.

The L319 rational has a few reasons.

Fleet utilization. They can park the EMJ/319 and older 320 immediately by pulling Rouges 320’s back to mainline.

Keeping pilots on payroll not doing anything would reduce the surplus. CR didn’t sound that optimistic that the type of flying Rouge does would come back very quickly.

Also mentioned this gives AC a chance to simplify its NB fleet. No further explanation as to what this meant. The 320 split between mainline and a Rouge was never the intent. It was supposed to be 737 mainline and 320 Rouge. Does Rouge become a brand only after this? They deploy anything they want (320/737/220) into the market? Do they deploy the Max into Rouge and mainline stays 320? Just speculation.
I’m leaning, no that’s not true my bias is showing. I’m hoping Rouge becomes a brand run from within the same operating certificate.

The RP reduction. While waiting for a rebound FO/CA cover the shortfall. Less courses.

Just had it pointed out that by getting rid of the RP position AC will flush out all the grandfathered pay rates.

Thx.

So the Coles Notes of the bid is 795 surplus (layoff) and 601 less CA awards vs Bid 19-04?

[DBC]

For those in the know - what was the rationale behind eliminating all of the LCC 319 and WB RP positions?

Also, why the reductions on the 737?

A previous bid had all 61 737’s on it. That number has since been reduced to 50.

The L319 rational has a few reasons.

Fleet utilization. They can park the EMJ/319 and older 320 immediately by pulling Rouges 320’s back to mainline.

Keeping pilots on payroll not doing anything would reduce the surplus. CR didn’t sound that optimistic that the type of flying Rouge does would come back very quickly.

Also mentioned this gives AC a chance to simplify its NB fleet. No further explanation as to what this meant. The 320 split between mainline and a Rouge was never the intent. It was supposed to be 737 mainline and 320 Rouge. Does Rouge become a brand only after this? They deploy anything they want (320/737/220) into the market? Do they deploy the Max into Rouge and mainline stays 320? Just speculation.
I’m leaning, no that’s not true my bias is showing. I’m hoping Rouge becomes a brand run from within the same operating certificate.

The RP reduction. While waiting for a rebound FO/CA cover the shortfall. Less courses.

Just had it pointed out that by getting rid of the RP position AC will flush out all the grandfathered pay rates.

Weren't there only like 10 people left on the grandfathered RP pay rates? Assuming you mean Pre Position Group rates.

[altiplano]

So the Coles Notes of the bid is 795 surplus (layoff) and 601 less CA awards vs Bid 19-04?

Surplus ≠ Layoff

[hithere]

Ok semantics. 795 surplus of which 600 max can be laid off(but probably will just stay on payroll and collect CEWS until CEWS ends or September, whichever is later) and the remaining 195 could be laid off starting in September?

[altiplano]

Ok semantics. 795 surplus of which 600 max can be laid off(but probably will just stay on payroll and collect CEWS until CEWS ends or September, whichever is later) and the remaining 195 could be laid off starting in September?

No it's not just semantics. They have two different meanings.

Just because you show surplus does not mean you are getting a furlough.

[CZBBYYZPilot]

Just because you show surplus does not mean you are getting a furlough.

Not immediately you mean? Eventually it will lead to furlough right? Unless the next bid changes the Outlook. But surplus and furlough are two separate things. One is based on the bid, and the other will depend on ACPA MOA, etc. Am I missing something? Thanks.
.

[altiplano]

Just because you show surplus does not mean you are getting a furlough.

Not immediately you mean? Eventually it will lead to furlough right? Unless the next bid changes the Outlook. But surplus and furlough are two separate things. One is based on the bid, and the other will depend on ACPA MOA, etc. Am I missing something? Thanks.
.

You aren't furloughed until you're furloughed. Guys have showed as surplus in the past and ultimately not been furloughed. Things can take time. Now with the situation of multiple airplanes and positions completely cleaned off, that could accelerate things depending on their needs and how things sit.

But surplus does not equal furlough.

[TCAS II]

So am I correct in understanding that any RP will not be entitled to a RIR because any position they move to is an upgraded position?

Therefore, even if the company offered the RP position in the future, the original RPs would have to no RP CR except UR CR to make the move back?
This would open it up to junior pilots on recall?

[sanjet]

So am I correct in understanding that any RP will not be entitled to a RIR because any position they move to is an upgraded position?

Therefore, even if the company offered the RP position in the future, the original RPs would have to no RP CR except UR CR to make the move back?
This would open it up to junior pilots on recall?

Without the GF clause why would you return to RP? I did it 2 years, was fun but it was time to move on.

[altiplano]

So am I correct in understanding that any RP will not be entitled to a RIR because any position they move to is an upgraded position?

Therefore, even if the company offered the RP position in the future, the original RPs would have to no RP CR except UR CR to make the move back?
This would open it up to junior pilots on recall?

Without the GF clause why would you return to RP? I did it 2 years, was fun but it was time to move on.

I agree, why go back, and hopefully this is the end of RP at Air Canada.

But if you are forced to a higher rated position, I believe you get an RIR/CR to the type ie. 787 RP RIR/CR. You don't get the blanket RP CR back.

[TCAS II]

Part of asking the question was to know what change to expect the WB FO list if there was a re-introduction of the RP position along with a reduction to WB FO.

I agree, why go back to RP, except if you’re stuck junior WB FO indefinitely and want a simple course.

[DBC]

So am I correct in understanding that any RP will not be entitled to a RIR because any position they move to is an upgraded position?

Therefore, even if the company offered the RP position in the future, the original RPs would have to no RP CR except UR CR to make the move back?
This would open it up to junior pilots on recall?

Without the GF clause why would you return to RP? I did it 2 years, was fun but it was time to move on.

Same reason year 3 RPs didn't bid those empty FO slots, it's the same pay for a way worse schedule.

[aV1aTOr]

So am I correct in understanding that any RP will not be entitled to a RIR because any position they move to is an upgraded position?

Therefore, even if the company offered the RP position in the future, the original RPs would have to no RP CR except UR CR to make the move back?
This would open it up to junior pilots on recall?

Without the GF clause why would you return to RP? I did it 2 years, was fun but it was time to move on.

I agree, why go back, and hopefully this is the end of RP at Air Canada.

But if you are forced to a higher rated position, I believe you get an RIR/CR to the type ie. 787 RP RIR/CR. You don't get the blanket RP CR back.

.