COVID MOA 2

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
User avatar
BTD
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1506
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by BTD »

tailgunner wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:15 am BTD,
Fair point.
I would guess that the 6 month term of this MOA will cover a period of very reduced flying hours. I suppose that if the flying miraculously picks up, we could not extend it March 1 2021.
Cheers
Unfortunately we don’t make that decision. The MEC does. Note point 38 of the MOA. This is a one time vote. Once it is in, we are out of the loop.
---------- ADS -----------
 
planebored
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:24 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by planebored »

What a steaming pile of shit webinar that was.

32 minutes. Zero questions answered.

Reading lines off slides.

:lol:

NO
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by altiplano »

Vote is already open, closing in only 7 days, and we still have guys that don't even know there's a new MOA out yet, let alone a vote open on it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
planebored
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:24 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by planebored »

RIP us
---------- ADS -----------
 
RippleRock
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 637
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:15 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by RippleRock »

altiplano wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:47 am
Dockjock wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:25 am The 10-yr deal was supposed to carry us through this. We gave up massive upside during the best years of aviation in history to secure ourselves through recession. Just because a large portion of the membership wasn’t on the property in 2014 doesn’t make it less true. We gave up the right to strike, bargain during 2015-2019 (Best Years EverTM), and now we’re throwing away what we traded for? 6 months to reassess was needed, prolonging the MOA further is insane.
Right on.

And it's extendable without member say.

THAT's the kicker.

The MEC gets a mandate from the Membership to extend the MOA "INDEFINITELY" at their discretion.

That's DEAD WRONG. Get the word out. This thing needs to be stopped.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mrbobmarly111
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:29 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by Mrbobmarly111 »

I have to say you guys are all nuts. This is a great deal. The Furloughs stay at 600 and 80 get recalled immediately. Someone on flat pay gets 75 credits guaranteed. And others 67 ish (that's up from 55 credits across the board from MOA #1) .. like jesus its great so fortunate we were able to negotiate this. Looks at westjet, transat, sunwing etc etc. Its a great deal and the people who have a problem with it need to remember we are operating at 5% capacity. The reason for allowing the scope to be breached is because they want to have Jazz and Sky operate lots of flight compared to AC. Because filling a RJ and flying it to YWG is better than a half full 320. So w.e who cares if they let them do that for the next few months. It makes financial sense! I want this company to survive and im happy we have a Union that isn't dumb banging its fists on the table saying we want raises as if its pre covid times. Some crazy conspiracy peeps will tell you they want to buy transat and do some kinda crazy back door deal once the scope is open for this 6 months. Bull $h!t and if they do great! Once the 6 months are up the company will have to pay harrrrrd to keep it because it will be back to the status quo contract. relax everyone and vote yes. And alittle info about myself i have over 10 years in the Canadian aviation industry and I am one of the 600 who will remain Furloughed with this MOA. If i could id vote yes.

Anyways have a nice fall and a spooky Halloween.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dry Guy
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by Dry Guy »

The "I already took my layoff hit now it's your turn. There's nothing in it for me" is ugly to read. A contrarian, knee-jerk No reaction is natural but they aren't considering how bad things could really get. Not just for other people but for them too. Voting is open for a week so I urge people to take their time and really consider their decision.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
BTD
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1506
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by BTD »

Mrbobmarly111 wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:58 pm I have to say you guys are all nuts. This is a great deal. The Furloughs stay at 600 and 80 get recalled immediately. Someone on flat pay gets 75 credits guaranteed. And others 67 ish (that's up from 55 credits across the board from MOA #1) .. like jesus its great so fortunate we were able to negotiate this. Looks at westjet, transat, sunwing etc etc. Its a great deal and the people who have a problem with it need to remember we are operating at 5% capacity. The reason for allowing the scope to be breached is because they want to have Jazz and Sky operate lots of flight compared to AC. Because filling a RJ and flying it to YWG is better than a half full 320. So w.e who cares if they let them do that for the next few months. It makes financial sense! I want this company to survive and im happy we have a Union that isn't dumb banging its fists on the table saying we want raises as if its pre covid times. Some crazy conspiracy peeps will tell you they want to buy transat and do some kinda crazy back door deal once the scope is open for this 6 months. Bull $h!t and if they do great! Once the 6 months are up the company will have to pay harrrrrd to keep it because it will be back to the status quo contract. relax everyone and vote yes. And alittle info about myself i have over 10 years in the Canadian aviation industry and I am one of the 600 who will remain Furloughed with this MOA. If i could id vote yes.

Anyways have a nice fall and a spooky Halloween.
You may have had been able to make some good arguments in there, but your facts are somewhat off.

There is no let on CPA flying. We are not allowing scope to be breached for an RJ going to YWG, in fact there is an open grievance filed for that. The hours would also be 63 MBG not 67. Please read all the fine details in the MOA.

For many of us it isn’t that the points you have made above aren’t valid, just that we have been screwed enough times so we want to make sure to read between the lines.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mrbobmarly111
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:29 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by Mrbobmarly111 »

Ofcourse take your time and make a educated decision. But I have a feeling it will pass with around 65-70% in favor. Anyone else want to give a guess for fun?
---------- ADS -----------
 
RippleRock
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 637
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:15 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by RippleRock »

Mrbobmarly111 wrote: Tue Sep 22, 2020 8:29 am Ofcourse take your time and make a educated decision. But I have a feeling it will pass with around 65-70% in favor. Anyone else want to give a guess for fun?
So you think this is just about securing jobs at the bottom end and a 75 hour paycheque?.

TransAt will be purchased in December. In an election year Trudope will not let a Quebec based company implode. You will have voted an "open-ended" Scope LET that is extendable "without your input". READ THE LANGUAGE.

You will be burned by opening the Scope "Pandora's box". Some people obviously have no clue. Many of us "have the tee-shirt". We've been down this road before. AC pilots used to fly 50 seat RJ's and 75 seat EMJ 175's. How many jobs have been lost by us not "drawing a line in the sand" over Scope??

How many pilots would be junior to YOU if we had "held our ground" on Scope? You want it opened up with no snap-back, no ability to even contest it? Seriously? Watch.

If you are not prepared to take a stand for Article 1----the very definition on which all other articles in our Contract are based--- Get out of the way, cuz you don't deserve to be here anyway. The career will erode until it is just a temporary job until you can be replaced. Period.


Quote me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
291/2chev
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 4:54 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by 291/2chev »

The scope let alone is more than enough reason to vote a hard NO to this MOA !!
My NO is already in the system full stop!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Ki-ll
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:16 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by Ki-ll »

RippleRock wrote: Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:28 am Quote me.
I’ll quote you.
What makes you think that pilots have the pull to set strategic aims of an airline i.e. low-cost carrier, regional subsidiaries etc.?
If the company decided to violate CPA scope maybe during the pandemic it’s not worth paper it’s written on. What makes you so sure that this grievance will be resolved to the satisfaction of the pilots? Do you think you’ll somehow get RJs back to mainline and put Rouge back into the box just because it’s in the contract?
---------- ADS -----------
 
planebored
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:24 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by planebored »

Mrbobmarly111 wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:58 pm I have to say you guys are all nuts. This is a great deal. The Furloughs stay at 600 and 80 get recalled immediately. Someone on flat pay gets 75 credits guaranteed. And others 67 ish (that's up from 55 credits across the board from MOA #1) .. like jesus its great so fortunate we were able to negotiate this. Looks at westjet, transat, sunwing etc etc. Its a great deal and the people who have a problem with it need to remember we are operating at 5% capacity. The reason for allowing the scope to be breached is because they want to have Jazz and Sky operate lots of flight compared to AC. Because filling a RJ and flying it to YWG is better than a half full 320. So w.e who cares if they let them do that for the next few months. It makes financial sense! I want this company to survive and im happy we have a Union that isn't dumb banging its fists on the table saying we want raises as if its pre covid times. Some crazy conspiracy peeps will tell you they want to buy transat and do some kinda crazy back door deal once the scope is open for this 6 months. Bull $h!t and if they do great! Once the 6 months are up the company will have to pay harrrrrd to keep it because it will be back to the status quo contract. relax everyone and vote yes. And alittle info about myself i have over 10 years in the Canadian aviation industry and I am one of the 600 who will remain Furloughed with this MOA. If i could id vote yes.

Anyways have a nice fall and a spooky Halloween.
Vote no, furloughs can still stay at zero (you think AC is going to lay of thousands of pilots?! LOL)
Flat pay still gets 75
Formula pay get 60/65
And there's not wishy washy language around scope JV/CS and we don't agree to allowing the MEC to extend this indefinitely.

Sounds like a steaming pile of turd to me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mrbobmarly111
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:29 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by Mrbobmarly111 »

Just curious what people think it will pass or fail by. Give it your best guess. Should be interesting to see.

I think itll pass. Lots of grumpy sky is falling people thinking there is a deep state conspiracy between the union and the company.

68-75% in favor is my vote. I wont be writing anything here till the results are in.
---------- ADS -----------
 
planebored
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:24 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by planebored »

Pass by a hair. Mid 50%. As is tradition with anything ACPA puts forward for a vote (including any MEC votes these days being split 50/50 :lol: )

Lots of voting already done, 25% of eligible voters in day one. My guess is most of those are going to be the vocal NO's.

At the end of the day people are going to look out for their self interests only.

They may talk a big game about how they will vote NO but when time comes to click that button....
---------- ADS -----------
 
'97 Tercel
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:19 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by '97 Tercel »

'webinar' ...they use a ridiculous word in hopes nobody shows up.


Napoleon once said: "When I die, I hope it's during a webinar because the transition from life to death would be so subtle."
---------- ADS -----------
 
planebored
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:24 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by planebored »

How about "Live Online MOA2 Roadshow"

I bet a lot more people would log on.

I heard there's people out on the line that don't even know there's and MOA out for ratification!

I'm interested to hear what is different tomorrow. I hope they spend a solid hour at least answering questions, and not just fluff answers.
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by altiplano »

'97 Tercel wrote: Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:36 pm 'webinar' ...they use a ridiculous word in hopes nobody shows up.


Napoleon once said: "When I die, I hope it's during a webinar because the transition from life to death would be so subtle."
Perfect.

They hope nobody gets their questions in by the 12:00 EDT deadline either... Like we don't have the ability to submit questions during the webinar. Maybe as they come up and people learn about the deal. Or sometimes you need a follow up question.

THE TECHNOLOGY IS THERE.

They really just want this to quietly pass, and they're worried now so are going through the motions. They won't take the hard questions, and will give canned answers without depth

Plus 30% have already voted!

Initially I thought we'd probably get turnout in the 60s, pass in the 60s - so less than 50% total member support... but talking to senior and junior, I'm honestly not sure this passes and it's because of a lack of trust in ACPA.

Then again, I was shocked the last TA went through... I don't seem to know anyone that voted for it
---------- ADS -----------
 
planebored
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:24 am

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by planebored »

altiplano wrote: Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:07 am
'97 Tercel wrote: Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:36 pm 'webinar' ...they use a ridiculous word in hopes nobody shows up.


Napoleon once said: "When I die, I hope it's during a webinar because the transition from life to death would be so subtle."
Perfect.

They hope nobody gets their questions in by the 12:00 EDT deadline either... Like we don't have the ability to submit questions during the webinar. Maybe as they come up and people learn about the deal. Or sometimes you need a follow up question.

THE TECHNOLOGY IS THERE.

They really just want this to quietly pass, and they're worried now so are going through the motions. They won't take the hard questions, and will give canned answers without depth

Plus 30% have already voted!

Initially I thought we'd probably get turnout in the 60s, pass in the 60s - so less than 50% total member support... but talking to senior and junior, I'm honestly not sure this passes and it's because of a lack of trust in ACPA.

Then again, I was shocked the last TA went through... I don't seem to know anyone that voted for it
100% a lack of trust. After years of being sold on every deal that comes, issues with ethics in the MEC Chair office, seeing the things slip through after a ratification because of grey language etc...

It's no wonder there's trust issues. Maybe this MOA is all fine and dandy and everyone is making a big deal about nothing.

The fact everyone is making a big deal is the fundamental problem and proof we need to make some major changes and figure out how to regain the TRUST of the pilots.

That starts with fall elections and getting rid of the Chair.
---------- ADS -----------
 
PostmasterGeneral
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 846
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:50 pm

Re: COVID MOA 2

Post by PostmasterGeneral »

Mrbobmarly111 wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:58 pm I have to say you guys are all nuts. This is a great deal. The Furloughs stay at 600 and 80 get recalled immediately. Someone on flat pay gets 75 credits guaranteed. And others 67 ish (that's up from 55 credits across the board from MOA #1) .. like jesus its great so fortunate we were able to negotiate this. Looks at westjet, transat, sunwing etc etc. Its a great deal and the people who have a problem with it need to remember we are operating at 5% capacity. The reason for allowing the scope to be breached is because they want to have Jazz and Sky operate lots of flight compared to AC. Because filling a RJ and flying it to YWG is better than a half full 320. So w.e who cares if they let them do that for the next few months. It makes financial sense! I want this company to survive and im happy we have a Union that isn't dumb banging its fists on the table saying we want raises as if its pre covid times. Some crazy conspiracy peeps will tell you they want to buy transat and do some kinda crazy back door deal once the scope is open for this 6 months. Bull $h!t and if they do great! Once the 6 months are up the company will have to pay harrrrrd to keep it because it will be back to the status quo contract. relax everyone and vote yes. And alittle info about myself i have over 10 years in the Canadian aviation industry and I am one of the 600 who will remain Furloughed with this MOA. If i could id vote yes.

Anyways have a nice fall and a spooky Halloween.
I gotta stop you right there... I am currently furloughed so I'm ineligible to vote on this, but even if it meant I got my job back, I would be voting a HARD NO on this one. Sure, the short term victory is there for guys like me, but at what cost? I've got another 25 years at this gig, I don't think we should be giving up the farm for something so short sighted. This MOA is bullshit, plain and simple. The fact they're able to extend it at will, how quickly they're moving forward with the vote, it's all just fishy to me. Reeks of "farmer jones used cars" where they're trying to rush you into a deal so they can laugh as you drive off the lot. It doesn't feel right.

I'm posting this here because I can't vote, and I don't want anyone who does vote yes to think they're doing me any favours. Maybe in the short term, sure, but long term it could really f*ck a guy like me over long after you've retired. Please, don't give up anything in our scope for such a short sighted list of garbage.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”