ALPApolicy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:08 am
altiplano wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:22 am
3. WJ contract so damn awful? They extracted large gains in their 1st contract.
1st contract.
Ummm, I've been at WJ since 2003. Do tell about this extraction of large gains. Specifics please. I'm prepared to be as unbiased as possible, but other than YOS, I fail to see how this contract was in any way a win for the pilots. There are many, many negatives that outweigh the gains, in my opinion.
The decision making and power structure of ALPA surprised many once certification happened. We are probably better off as a result of certifying, given the Onex sale, but I'm not prepared to admit that we are better off with ALPA than with any other certification option.
John
Specifics:
• Narrowbody career compensation comparison (old work rules vs new Collective Agreement):
Previous agreement under the WJPA:
25-year career = $4,768,565
30-year career = $5,998,321
ALPA Awarded Collective Agreement:
25-year career = $5,345,170
30-year career = $6,628,530
*Difference
25-year career = +$576,605
30-year career = +$630,206
*Comparison above of expected career earnings, based on:
Pay rates and rues as of 5/1/18; 960 hours per year; 20% ESPP; stock options per current book ($10,298/year for CA and $7,312/year for FO (except for Year 1)); upgrade to CA at Year 8; CA rates based on time-in-seat ALPA awarded Collective Agreement Award Pay rates as of 1/1/19; 984 credit hours per year; 20% ESPP; stock options per current book ($10,298/year for CA and $7,312/year for FO (except for Year 1)); upgrade to CA at Year 8; CA rate based on years-of-service
• ALPA Economic and financial analysis costing over $1.5 billion over life of the agreement
• Increase of $180 million over the life of the collective agreement in WestJet pilots’ pocketsfrom previous working agreement under the WestJet Pilots Association (WJPA) (13.5% average increase year over year through the 4-year term)
• ALPA spent over $2,000,000, not including ALPA specific resources (Legal, E&FA etc.), on their negotiations.
• Scope provisions around codeshare, joint venture
• Scope around 76 seat jet flying
• Scope around 78 seat turboprop flying (more restrictive than AC, which has turboprop scope of 80 seats)
• No codeshare with any companies above 76 seats within Canada (more restrictive than AC, since AC allows arctic codeshare)
• 30 narrowbody airframe maximums at Swoop, with no widebodies permitted
• Canadian industry-leading reserve system with long-call reserve provisions (not found in other reserve systems in Canada, only in U.S. CBA’s)
• Proactive pick up for reserve pilots, and max 16-days work for mixed line reserve holders
• Achieved Air Canada comparable trip and duty rigs (a considerable achievement since there were no rigs previously in place)
• Achieved years of service pay, thereby reducing career pay progression from 22 years to 12.
• Codified 20% Employee stock purchase plan, profit share plan, stock option plan (which has subsequently been leveraged into an annual bonus program with sale to Onex), Owners performance award.
////
I don't work there though, but this is my understanding of it. Are those numbers are wrong?
$20K+ per year vs. your WJPA agreement. That's a big gain.
$180 million over 4 years? That's a big gain.
Scope, where none existed previously? That's a big gain.
Capped ULCC? Big gain.
Duty rigs where none existed? Big gain.
Industry leading reserve? Big gain.
YOS on upgrades? Huge gain.
Industry leading representation into the Onex sale? And now with Covid? Priceless.
Again, just me looking in though... what are the specifics of what you lost.