SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Discuss topics relating to Westjet.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Alpa Male
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2018 11:13 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Alpa Male »

jjj wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 3:05 pm Alpha Male,

We've never needed the OTS guys at Swoop. We need a fair wage for a fair day's work on a 37.

As far as the original OTS guys at Swoop went - they were hardly cream of the crop. Some serious problems with hands and feet. Scary stuff.

JJJ
Oh, and there's no proof to validate your last statement. Only forum conjecture, based on hearsay and bias.

At any rate, disappointed or not, making things up just out of anger and disappointment is never wise as it leads to misunderstanding and misinformation and just not very helpful. Right, Cloak?
---------- ADS -----------
 
cloak
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:08 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by cloak »

jjj, M.80@410 and a few others speak of "OTS" as if they came into this world at WestJet as baby pilots, LOL!!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
jjj
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 746
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 12:53 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by jjj »

Alpa Male wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 3:48 pm
jjj wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 3:05 pm Alpha Male,

We've never needed the OTS guys at Swoop. We need a fair wage for a fair day's work on a 37.

As far as the original OTS guys at Swoop went - they were hardly cream of the crop. Some serious problems with hands and feet. Scary stuff.

JJJ
Ok, but here lies the hypocrisy in that - why is it ok for anyone at WJ/Encore to bid onto Swoop? Why do they get a pass? Why aren't they accused of "lowering the bar"? It's a little disingenuous to discredit an OTS pilot for lowering the bar when WJ pilots line up for the same position. Hi pot, meet kettle.
There is no hypocrisy in WJ/Encore bidding onto Swoop. They are bidding into a position by seniority. They are not trying to circumvent a labour group and dispute like the original OTS guys did. The ones that stuck around have another shot at bidding their crappy jobs back.

I too share everyone's concern about experience levels of some guys bidding Swoop. From what I can tell - it's unlikely that all whom are awarded will be able to pass training.
---------- ADS -----------
 
jjj
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 746
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 12:53 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by jjj »

Alpa Male wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 3:56 pm
jjj wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 3:05 pm Alpha Male,

We've never needed the OTS guys at Swoop. We need a fair wage for a fair day's work on a 37.

As far as the original OTS guys at Swoop went - they were hardly cream of the crop. Some serious problems with hands and feet. Scary stuff.

JJJ
Oh, and there's no proof to validate your last statement. Only forum conjecture, based on hearsay and bias.

At any rate, disappointed or not, making things up just out of anger and disappointment is never wise as it leads to misunderstanding and misinformation and just not very helpful. Right, Cloak?

Ask around and you'll get your answer. Not likely though that you'll get an answer on the record.

JJJ
---------- ADS -----------
 
Alpa Male
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2018 11:13 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Alpa Male »

jjj wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 5:39 pm
Alpa Male wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 3:48 pm
jjj wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 3:05 pm Alpha Male,

We've never needed the OTS guys at Swoop. We need a fair wage for a fair day's work on a 37.

As far as the original OTS guys at Swoop went - they were hardly cream of the crop. Some serious problems with hands and feet. Scary stuff.

JJJ
Ok, but here lies the hypocrisy in that - why is it ok for anyone at WJ/Encore to bid onto Swoop? Why do they get a pass? Why aren't they accused of "lowering the bar"? It's a little disingenuous to discredit an OTS pilot for lowering the bar when WJ pilots line up for the same position. Hi pot, meet kettle.
There is no hypocrisy in WJ/Encore bidding onto Swoop. They are bidding into a position by seniority. They are not trying to circumvent a labour group and dispute like the original OTS guys did. The ones that stuck around have another shot at bidding their crappy jobs back.

I too share everyone's concern about experience levels of some guys bidding Swoop. From what I can tell - it's unlikely that all whom are awarded will be able to pass training.
See, that's where you're wrong. There's significant hypocrisy in your position. In one breathe, you lament about experience levels and the next you wave the seniority card. Honour seniority, regardless of ability and experience. You demand that WJ waste money and resources on people you say "won't be able to pass the training anyways." That is a wasteful, arrogant and entitled demand to place on your employer. One of the many demands that will "f*ck this airline into the ground."

Your statement regarding "those awarded not being able to pass training" also blows holes in your other argument regarding the OTS pilots ability - every OTS captain passed the training. If this isn't hypocrisy, I don't know what the hell is. But I'll be sure to "ask around."

All of your union expectations only delay the inevitable, and I hold to my original statement - nothing has been resolved, just delayed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Alpa Male on Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alpa Male
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2018 11:13 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Alpa Male »

Coupled with the apparent hypocrisy of WJ/Encore pilots being absolved of "lowering the bar," makes for one messy and convoluted double standard.
---------- ADS -----------
 
av8ts
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:31 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by av8ts »

Alpa Male wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:22 pm
av8ts wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:02 am If they are qualified, why not?
1500 hours and an ATPL makes you "qualified"? Sorry, you're not qualified. Give your head a shake. It's that kind of arrogance and entitlement that led me to say, "you're f*cking this airline into the ground". Saving face and honouring "seniority" comes before any semblance of common sense. You're entitled to your entitlements. Damn practicality and safety. You're owed something.

Aviation is littered with the wreckage of perfectly airworthy aircraft, piloted by guys with that attitude. You'd rather hold onto your principles and arrogance than admit that you have no idea what you're doing. In your world its about "who's right, not what's right". Yes, that attitude will fu*k this airline into the ground.

And I think this sums it up...
SwoopStar wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:14 am What does WestJet management think of 1500hr new hire FOs at SWOOP? That's what SWOOP is targeting for recruitment. SWOOP leadership acknowledges it will be single pilot IFR in a B737-800.

Meanwhile our competitor has the luxury to pick from a pool of 5000+hr 737NG pilots.

Sadly, I feel the common sense and expertise of the second floor is being ignored in the pursuit of an Ultra Low Cost Pilot.
This is exactly WHY we needed/need the OTS pilots.

Just cause it hurts your ego, doesn't make it wrong. Grow up!
Whoa, easy there Mr butt hurt. I didn’t say 1500 hours MAKES you qualified. I said IF they are qualified then they should get the job
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by av8ts on Fri Feb 22, 2019 5:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
jjj
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 746
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 12:53 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by jjj »

Alpa Male wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:03 pm
jjj wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 5:39 pm
Alpa Male wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 3:48 pm

Ok, but here lies the hypocrisy in that - why is it ok for anyone at WJ/Encore to bid onto Swoop? Why do they get a pass? Why aren't they accused of "lowering the bar"? It's a little disingenuous to discredit an OTS pilot for lowering the bar when WJ pilots line up for the same position. Hi pot, meet kettle.
There is no hypocrisy in WJ/Encore bidding onto Swoop. They are bidding into a position by seniority. They are not trying to circumvent a labour group and dispute like the original OTS guys did. The ones that stuck around have another shot at bidding their crappy jobs back.

I too share everyone's concern about experience levels of some guys bidding Swoop. From what I can tell - it's unlikely that all whom are awarded will be able to pass training.
See, that's where you're wrong. There's significant hypocrisy in your position. In one breathe, you lament about experience levels and the next you wave the seniority card. Honour seniority, regardless of ability and experience. You demand that WJ waste money and resources on people you say "won't be able to pass the training anyways." That is a wasteful, arrogant and entitled demand to place on your employer. One of the many demands that will "f*ck this airline into the ground."

Your statement regarding "those awarded not being able to pass training" also blows holes in your other argument regarding the OTS pilots ability - every OTS captain passed the training. If this isn't hypocrisy, I don't know what the hell is. But I'll be sure to "ask around."

All of your union expectations only delay the inevitable, and I hold to my original statement - nothing has been resolved, just delayed.
Alpha,

As in other airlines - seniority rules. After that - you need to meet standard. I prefer it when my 8+ year 737 FOs upgrade because they exceed standard.

I never said to honour seniority at the expense of a standard. You have to be able to do the job. When you join an airline you go to the bottom - regardless of experience. Right or wrong that's how it works. That's why I can't escape here and go to AC as a Max Captain and be paid a wage commiserate with my experience. Odds are i bring more to a resume than your average pilot in the hiring pool at AC these days but unfortunately - nobody cares. If I was offered the job it is at the bottom regardless if the mothership would be better served by me doing something closer to what I do now.

Maybe the OTS met the mighty standard of a PPC ride. Doesn't mean it was up to par with the employee group they were circumventing.

When you're done reading this - Google "Straw Man Argument." It's a logical fallacy prominent in your writings. Read it through. Logical fallacies don't even require a response but I did so anyhow as a courtesy.

Cheers.

JJJ
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by jjj on Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:13 pm, edited 6 times in total.
jjj
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 746
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 12:53 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by jjj »

EDIT
---------- ADS -----------
 
fish4life
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2405
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:32 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by fish4life »

I’ve heard people asking about some sort of “matrix” at encore for captains, does Swoop have one?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Freeport_Flyer
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:30 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Freeport_Flyer »

Alpa Male wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:22 pm
av8ts wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:02 am If they are qualified, why not?
1500 hours and an ATPL makes you "qualified"? Sorry, you're not qualified. Give your head a shake. It's that kind of arrogance and entitlement that led me to say, "you're f*cking this airline into the ground". Saving face and honouring "seniority" comes before any semblance of common sense.
I think that making a broad based assessment of "qualified" based solely on a number is a dangerous way to view a pilot. I have known many 5000+hr pilots who have half the proficiency / talent as a pilot with less than 1000hrs! While I agree that there needs to be familiarity with an operation, what difference does it make to have an FO from a Q400 be an FO on 737? There is still a proficient and experienced pilot in the left seat that should be able to effectively mentor the new FO. That FO holds an ATPL and has gained enough experience / passed tests to be there. So why does the type make a difference?

Would you say that a 1500hr CF-18 pilot, intercepting a Russian bear in the high arctic isn't "qualified" to operate a single seat fighter?

I would argue that the truth of the matter is that there is a lot of hand-holding in a multi-crew cockpit and while there are situations the FO will not have seen, simply barring someone from position based on a number seems to be short sighted.

I get it... It's not how the industry used to be and plenty of people had to slug it out for years, and thousands of hours, before they got to see a jet cockpit. That's not how it is anymore and this pisses off a lot of people, and I continually hear moaning from others that all starts with "When I was a new FO..."

Having an FO from Encore bid on and get an FO position at Swoop shows the desire for advancement and that probably comes with initiative and drive. The industry will eventually beat that out of them, but why are you trying so hard to do it first?
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5931
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by digits_ »

SwoopStar wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:14 am What does WestJet management think of 1500hr new hire FOs at SWOOP? That's what SWOOP is targeting for recruitment. SWOOP leadership acknowledges it will be single pilot IFR in a B737-800.
Whether the captain expects it will be single pilot IFR or a working multi crew environment, he will be right either way.

And that does not depend on the amount of hours the FO has.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
sstaurus
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:32 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by sstaurus »

Alpa Male wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:36 pm Coupled with the apparent hypocrisy of WJ/Encore pilots being absolved of "lowering the bar," makes for one messy and convoluted double standard.
I don't know about hypocrisy on this board, but to be fair most pilots at Encore do not want to support the conditions at Swoop. Like said before, there are always a few outliers who need that instagram selfie on a shiny jet, or are scared of the prospect of 5-6 years at Encore... But the majority, aren't interested.
---------- ADS -----------
 
eyebrow737
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:33 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by eyebrow737 »

sstaurus wrote: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:50 am
Alpa Male wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:36 pm Coupled with the apparent hypocrisy of WJ/Encore pilots being absolved of "lowering the bar," makes for one messy and convoluted double standard.
I don't know about hypocrisy on this board, but to be fair most pilots at Encore do not want to support the conditions at Swoop. Like said before, there are always a few outliers who need that instagram selfie on a shiny jet, or are scared of the prospect of 5-6 years at Encore... But the majority, aren't interested.
As someone who has been in this industry just over 30 years, you have a very naive understanding of your fellow pilots
---------- ADS -----------
 
JBI
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1064
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:21 am
Location: YYC / LGA

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by JBI »

eyebrow737 wrote: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:58 am
As someone who has been in this industry just over 30 years, you have a very naive understanding of your fellow pilots
For the latest Swoop bid, a grand total of 6 of the 550 or so Encore pilots bid on the position. Of those 6, only 1 actually met the company's requirement of having been at Encore for over a year. Perhaps it's not sstaurus that is naive...

I've always said I won't judge a particular person for taking a particular position. I don't know their individual situations. I don't find the discussions about "scabs", "lowering the bar" etc. at all fruitful. Most of the pilots that I know that have gone to Swoop live near YEG or YHM, don't want to commute (or drive 2+ hours on the 401/QEW to YYZ) and while the conditions at Swoop suck, the benefit of not commuting outweighs that. All fair enough. Here's the thing though, there simply are not enough pilots in Canada that live in YEG or YHM that would be willing to take those positions with the current wages and working conditions to fill the 20 or 30 planes that Swoop has suggested it wants to grow to. As disappointing and frustrating as the positions are, my response is: Good luck filling those positions!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by JBI on Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
JBI
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1064
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:21 am
Location: YYC / LGA

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by JBI »

-double post-
---------- ADS -----------
 
goingnowherefast
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1948
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by goingnowherefast »

I hope they simply can't fill the positions. I hope WJ management is forced to approach the WJ MEC to negotiate raises and improved working conditions for pilots at swoop. Might take 6 months of charters and parked pink planes, but I predict it will happen.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Hangry
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:05 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Hangry »

Maybe the die hards will step up and bid these positions for the good of the company. I mean seniority doesn’t matter right? And the pay is fair.

Cmon boys. Don’t wuss out. Mothercorp needs you!
---------- ADS -----------
 
tps8903
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:40 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by tps8903 »

JBI wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:57 am
eyebrow737 wrote: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:58 am
As someone who has been in this industry just over 30 years, you have a very naive understanding of your fellow pilots
For the latest Swoop bid, a grand total of 6 of the 550 or so Encore pilots bid on the position. Of those 6, only 1 actually met the company's requirement of having been at Encore for over a year. Perhaps it's not sstaurus that is naive...

I've always said I won't judge a particular person for taking a particular position. I don't know their individual situations. I don't find the discussions about "scabs", "lowering the bar" etc. at all fruitful. Most of the pilots that I know that have gone to Swoop live near YEG or YHM, don't want to commute (or drive 2+ hours on the 401/QEW to YYZ) and while the conditions at Swoop suck, the benefit of not commuting outweighs that. All fair enough. Here's the thing though, there simply are not enough pilots in Canada that live in YEG or YHM that would be willing to take those positions with the current wages and working conditions to fill the 20 or 30 planes that Swoop has suggested it wants to grow to. As disappointing and frustrating as the positions are, my response is: Good luck filling those positions!
+1

If the bidding goes by the same ratio next go around they will have 2 more people from Encore and then the Encore list will have been exhausted. 8 people of about 550, that's a pretty firm statement from the Encore crew.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Alpa Male
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2018 11:13 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Alpa Male »

jjj wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:07 pm
Alpha,

As in other airlines - seniority rules. After that - you need to meet standard. I prefer it when my 8+ year 737 FOs upgrade because they exceed standard.

I never said to honour seniority at the expense of a standard. You have to be able to do the job. When you join an airline you go to the bottom - regardless of experience. Right or wrong that's how it works. That's why I can't escape here and go to AC as a Max Captain and be paid a wage commiserate with my experience. Odds are i bring more to a resume than your average pilot in the hiring pool at AC these days but unfortunately - nobody cares. If I was offered the job it is at the bottom regardless if the mothership would be better served by me doing something closer to what I do now.

Maybe the OTS met the mighty standard of a PPC ride. Doesn't mean it was up to par with the employee group they were circumventing.

When you're done reading this - Google "Straw Man Argument." It's a logical fallacy prominent in your writings. Read it through. Logical fallacies don't even require a response but I did so anyhow as a courtesy.

Cheers.

JJJ
Wow, someone was the captain of their high school debate team! :)

You know what, jjj. You're right. It would appear that my arguments were somewhat fallacious. That was never my intention, but merely an emotional response to what I perceive as a general degradation to the attitude of this pilot group. An inflated sense of entitlement has taken over, and I genuinely believe that we wont survive another five years of this. I've been here a very long time, and have had the privilege of witnessing some fantastic things. I was a part of record-breaking growth and prosperity, and there's no reason that that can not continue. I know I say that I don't care because my time here is coming to an end, but that's not true. I care a great deal. As much as management need to reengage, this pilot group is in dire need of an attitude change. WestJets survival depends on it.

My posts, as argumentive and miscalculated as they may seem to you, are based on my personal experience. Not only from reading scathing and toxic reviews of our employer online but from sharing flight decks with pilots who tear this company to shreds. It wears on a person, and at times I respond in an emotional manner that tends to veer offside.

However, your last post made sense, and I appreciate what you said.

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “WestJet”