SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Discuss topics relating to Westjet.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
User avatar
CaptainHaddock
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:22 am
Location: Nowhere fast

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by CaptainHaddock »

Swoop is a shit show to be sure. If they do tell you before hand which company you are being hired for and you hear Swoop-run. Honestly even for WJ mainline I’m not sure what the plan is these days, if they grow Swoop mainline will stagnate (90% is the guarantee). Lots are leaving for AC currently so that’s the main driver of hiring. The first 787 has shown up, but they are coming pretty slowly. There are another 30 or so Max’s coming over the next few years, but Swoop is taking 4 more current 800NG’s plus a possible 20 more. So.... It should be a pretty exciting time at Westjet with the new routes and aircraft, but they’re just so cheap and petty. I think the plan is to embrace tier 2 working conditions and just have a huge turnover with lots of training.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Billions of Bilious Blue Blistering Barnacles!
Bacunayagua
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:00 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Bacunayagua »

Any updates on the status of the "one list", between WJ and Encore?
---------- ADS -----------
 
sstaurus
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:32 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by sstaurus »

Nope. Next meeting is in the coming week. Management just keeps saying 'it's complicated'... all while they refuse to negotiate on any other meaningful terms with Encore. Feels like we've been down this path before recently...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Bacunayagua
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:00 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Bacunayagua »

Interesting, I would have thought this issue would have been ironed out already since I keep on hearing "everyone has agreed to it".

Thanks.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Yieldermatik
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 8:47 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Yieldermatik »

Just to get up to speed, can someone tell me in so many words what "the one list" is? Thanks...
---------- ADS -----------
 
DropTanks
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 7:56 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by DropTanks »

.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by DropTanks on Wed Feb 05, 2020 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
WarmSandDreams
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2018 12:33 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by WarmSandDreams »

Ok so here's a question. Bill C-86's equal pay for equal work clause was brought up in a thread about jazz and ggn. Would swoop employees be able to use that to force mainline rates on swoop aircraft given that it's the exact same job through the same employer? This seems to be the exact thing that bill was fighting.
---------- ADS -----------
 
tps8903
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:40 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by tps8903 »

WarmSandDreams wrote: Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:41 pm Ok so here's a question. Bill C-86's equal pay for equal work clause was brought up in a thread about jazz and ggn. Would swoop employees be able to use that to force mainline rates on swoop aircraft given that it's the exact same job through the same employer? This seems to be the exact thing that bill was fighting.
Looks more like a gender equality bill for pay. That being said, if Swoop was to have more female pilots per capita than Mainline, then there is an argument that it could be successfully applied.
---------- ADS -----------
 
V1Vr
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2019 4:29 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by V1Vr »

WarmSandDreams wrote: Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:41 pm Ok so here's a question. Bill C-86's equal pay for equal work clause was brought up in a thread about jazz and ggn. Would swoop employees be able to use that to force mainline rates on swoop aircraft given that it's the exact same job through the same employer? This seems to be the exact thing that bill was fighting.
Lol no.
---------- ADS -----------
 
FurHat
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 9:33 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by FurHat »

 The Act is amended by adding the following after section 182:
Prohibition — rate of wages
182.‍1 (1) An employer is prohibited from paying one employee a rate of wages that is less than the rate paid to another of that employer’s employees due to a difference in their employment status, if
(a) they work in the same industrial establishment;
(b) they perform substantially the same kind of work;
(c) the performance of that work requires substantially the same skill, effort and responsibility;
(d) their work is performed under similar working conditions; and
(e) any other factor that may be prescribed by regulation is present.
Exception
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the difference in employees’ rates of wages is due to a system based on
(a) seniority;
(b) merit;
(c) the quantity or quality of each employee’s production; or
(d) any other criterion that may be prescribed by regulation.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rowdy
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5165
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: On Borrowed Wings

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Rowdy »

So thats why they 'blended' our scale so quickly. Instead of being forced to revert to the A scale.
---------- ADS -----------
 
goingnowherefast
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1983
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by goingnowherefast »

Swoop and mainline WJ are not similar working conditions. WJ has better pay AND working conditions. :lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
mbav8r
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Manitoba

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by mbav8r »

(c) the quantity or quality of each employee’s production; or

I’m not a lawyer but I saw one on TV once, pretty sure they could argue the employees production and quality is reduced at Swoop.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Stand-by, I'm inverted"
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4576
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by co-joe »

Not trying to start anything, but today someone told me that there's only currently a 10% flow from Encore to WS. Is that real? 90% OTS hiring?
---------- ADS -----------
 
JBI
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1072
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:21 am
Location: YYC / LGA

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by JBI »

co-joe wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:47 pm Not trying to start anything, but today someone told me that there's only currently a 10% flow from Encore to WS. Is that real? 90% OTS hiring?
Not correct. Currently flow is minimum 50% for the duration of the contract (not specific GS classes). I don't know the specifics of where things stand, but the company has been quite good at having 50% or more of new WS ground schools filled with Encore pilots including a few recent classes that were 100% Encore pilots.

Lots of unknowns in the future and lots of room for improvement, but that statement isn't correct.
---------- ADS -----------
 
tkdowell
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:02 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by tkdowell »

JBI wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:15 pm
co-joe wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:47 pm Not trying to start anything, but today someone told me that there's only currently a 10% flow from Encore to WS. Is that real? 90% OTS hiring?
Not correct. Currently flow is minimum 50% for the duration of the contract (not specific GS classes). I don't know the specifics of where things stand, but the company has been quite good at having 50% or more of new WS ground schools filled with Encore pilots including a few recent classes that were 100% Encore pilots.

Lots of unknowns in the future and lots of room for improvement, but that statement isn't correct.
The last class had 70% from Encore
---------- ADS -----------
 
tps8903
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:40 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by tps8903 »

tkdowell wrote: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:33 am
JBI wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:15 pm
co-joe wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:47 pm Not trying to start anything, but today someone told me that there's only currently a 10% flow from Encore to WS. Is that real? 90% OTS hiring?
Not correct. Currently flow is minimum 50% for the duration of the contract (not specific GS classes). I don't know the specifics of where things stand, but the company has been quite good at having 50% or more of new WS ground schools filled with Encore pilots including a few recent classes that were 100% Encore pilots.

Lots of unknowns in the future and lots of room for improvement, but that statement isn't correct.
The last class had 70% from Encore
Now there is also “back-flow” from Swoop. All the pilots that bid out are transitioning back to WJ. As mentioned Encore is given 50% or more spots on an contractual basis. So with the Encore and Swoop flow on the go I’d say there will be very little OTS for mainline. I would say most OTS will be for Swoop for the next year and a bit.
---------- ADS -----------
 
goingnowherefast
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1983
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by goingnowherefast »

Good luck. I hope to see many swoop planes holding down the pavement due to lack of pilots while WJ aircraft and crews operate the flights.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ant_321
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:43 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by ant_321 »

A couple nights ago I heard a pilot correct himself after saying empress instead of swoop a couple times and then after landing I saw a Canadian North airplane at a gate. Is Canadian north doing uplift for swoop?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dizzy D
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:12 pm

Re: SWOOP - A New Hires Future

Post by Dizzy D »

ant_321 wrote: Sun Feb 17, 2019 7:38 am A couple nights ago I heard a pilot correct himself after saying empress instead of swoop a couple times and then after landing I saw a Canadian North airplane at a gate. Is Canadian north doing uplift for swoop?
Swoop had to charter Canadian North because nobody would pick up OT in irrops. Can’t say I blame swoop pilots for not picking up, it hardly seems worth it. Maybe swoop management should get more money for those pilots.

On a side note, Encore had to break their own requirements to flow pilots to swoop. Current requirements are 1 year from initial line indoc at Encore. Nobody wants to go there, so the company is desperate.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “WestJet”