Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

This forum is for non aviation related topics, political debate, random thoughts, and everything else that just doesn't seem to fit in the normal forums. ALL FORUM RULES STILL APPLY.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

Locked
CD
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2731
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 5:13 pm
Location: Canada

Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by CD »

Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

A British pilot has been dismissed for “buzzing” a control tower in a Top Gun-style stunt during the maiden flight of a Boeing jumbo jet.

Captain Ian Wilkinson astonished passengers by taking the 230-tonne Cathay Pacific jet to within 28ft (8.5m) of the ground shortly after take-off from Boeing’s US manufacturing plant.

The 322mph fly-by was cheered by onlookers, and the pilot, who is said to be one of the most senior aviators with the airline, later toasted the flight with champagne.

Footage of the stunt on January 30 was leaked on to the internet, however, and Mr Wilkinson was suspended. Cathay Pacific executives took a dim view of his actions, which were carried out without authorisation, and he was dismissed after a disciplinary meeting last week.

Ray Middleton, his British co-pilot, who had been unaware that the fly-by was performed without official permission, was suspended from training duties for six months.

Chris Pratt, the chairman of Cathay Pacific, is said to have been among the VIP passengers who were on board the £100 million plane, a 777-300ER that had taken off from the plant in Everett, Washington, en route for Hong Kong, where the airline is based.

Mr Wilkinson, who is in his mid-fifties and has lived in Hong Kong for more than 15 years, earned more than £250,000 a year.

Cathay Pacific is conducting an internal investigation and will submit a report to aviation authorities.

A spokesman said: “The pilot in command of the flight was dismissed as he had neither sought nor obtained the necessary company approval to undertake such a fly-by.”

The airline had a well-established approval process for such manoeuvres and had conducted them in the past at air shows but only “with proper approval in place”.

A Cathay Pacific pilot has claimed that Mr Wilkinson’s job was put in jeopardy only after footage of the incident appeared on the internet.

He said: “Wilkinson was very much one of the elite in Cathay Pacific and would have been very chummy with the airline executives he was flying that day. If no one else had found out about it the incident would probably have gone no further, but once it began circulating on the internet and Hong Kong’s Civil Aviation Authority got hold of it, that was the end of him.”

Mr Wilkinson is thought to be considering an appeal against his dismissal.

The swoop has become a hot topic on internet forums for pilots, with some praising the stunt but others criticising it as dangerous. Cathay Pacific has issued a notice to all crew reminding them of the company’s policy.

Story here...
Apparently, the videos are being systematically removed by the company but there are still some photos available on the web:

Boeing Aircraft Deliveries Blog
---------- ADS -----------
 
sky's the limit
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 4614
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:38 am
Location: Now where's the starter button on this thing???

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by sky's the limit »

Sexy paint job....

The part that gets me is, he's paid 250,000 POUNDS/yr???? For what? Obviously not flyby's.

Good grief, that's a lot of dough.

stl
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
rotateandfly
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 7:53 am
Location: right here

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by rotateandfly »

except that it wasn't a Jumbo Jet, it was a 777:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/25/777_flypast/
---------- ADS -----------
 
200hr Wonder
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: CYVR
Contact:

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by 200hr Wonder »

He is going to be dismissed for six or so months let this boil over then he will quietly be re-hired. We all know that all the VIPs on the plane wanted to do the fly by too.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cheers,

200hr Wonder
Hedley
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 10430
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 6:40 am
Location: CYSH
Contact:

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by Hedley »

Not sure what all the fuss is about ... for straight
and level, 28 feet is up there in the stratosphere :wink:

Image

Here's an outside snap roll, from inverted at around 10 feet:

http://www.bulldogairshows.com/video/20 ... 0water.mpg

Airline pilots, who get paid MUCH more than airshow pilots
should therefore have much better stick & rudder skills
than the guys above, so what's the problem with straight
and level flight?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by Rockie »

Airline pilots get paid to exercise many things besides stick and rudder skills Hedley, one of them is judgement. That goes many times over for this chap who is a chief pilot and who would not hesitate to sack some other poor slob under him for doing the same thing. This was nowhere near the level of stupidity exhibited by the TAP pilot in the 310, but it showed poor judgement none the less.
---------- ADS -----------
 
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5602
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by North Shore »

too bad he didn't try this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ546BEps-M

can you even do that in a f-b-w plane?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
FL_CH
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:59 am
Location: Toronto

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by FL_CH »

Fly By Wire is just an architecture, it doesn't necessarily mean protections. Airbus has them, unsure about Boeing, bet it doesn't
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Then from 1000 ft AGL until the final capture altitude, the A/C accelerates backwards up along the altitude profile with idle thrust"
Blue Side Down
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 11:27 am

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by Blue Side Down »

Hedley wrote:Not sure what all the fuss is about ... for straight
and level, 28 feet is up there in the stratosphere :wink:

Image

Was this in his first or second S1? :rolleyes:
---------- ADS -----------
 
ZBBYLW
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 571
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:28 am

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by ZBBYLW »

sky's the limit wrote:Sexy paint job....

The part that gets me is, he's paid 250,000 POUNDS/yr???? For what? Obviously not flyby's.

Good grief, that's a lot of dough.

stl
The reason he was getting paid so much is he was CX's chief pilot.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Walker
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Left Coast... (CYYJ)

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by Walker »

im now on a mission to find and download the REAL video not just the SLR pic's....
Me thinks this is an example of a PC bureaucracy run amuck...
---------- ADS -----------
 
CD
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2731
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 5:13 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by CD »

Liveleak has a copy of the video now...

Pilot fired for 28ft flyby with landing gear up
---------- ADS -----------
 
chechko
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:18 pm

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by chechko »

Man that was loww! And with people aboard? oh man...
---------- ADS -----------
 
g5
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:07 am

Re: Jumbo jet pilot sacked for ‘fly-by’ at 28 feet

Post by g5 »

Not really that big a deal, not much more than a Cat2 miss... at least he didn't roll the bloody thing over Seattle...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Locked

Return to “The Water Cooler”