Chapter 11.

Discuss topics relating to airlines.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore

flyinhigh
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2987
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: my couch

Chapter 11.

Post by flyinhigh »

While all the Canadian airlines have a healthy bank account, I feel (only due to my pure hatred of the liberals) that all companies should file Chapter 11. Could you imagine the shit show in YOW if AC, WS, TS, Sunwing and the likes say enough is enough we can't shed anymore, only way out is Chapter 11.

I feel the liberals want everyone to burn their rainy day funds into the red before anything happens, yet in 10 years when this occurs again we will be in a worse off position. So with that, everyone file. I mean 1.6 Billion lose and nothing out of YOW, COME ON......
---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3704
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am
Location: Turdistan

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by Inverted2 »

I unfortunately think it’s going to happen on its own, very soon for some companies. Those who aren’t already struggling to keep the bills paid won’t be able to take any vacations this winter if you have to quarantine for 2 weeks without pay after your vacation. Airlines can’t rely on domestic travel alone.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Let’s Go Brandon
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3859
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by rudder »

flyinhigh wrote: Tue Aug 04, 2020 9:03 am While all the Canadian airlines have a healthy bank account, I feel (only due to my pure hatred of the liberals) that all companies should file Chapter 11. Could you imagine the shit show in YOW if AC, WS, TS, Sunwing and the likes say enough is enough we can't shed anymore, only way out is Chapter 11.

I feel the liberals want everyone to burn their rainy day funds into the red before anything happens, yet in 10 years when this occurs again we will be in a worse off position. So with that, everyone file. I mean 1.6 Billion lose and nothing out of YOW, COME ON......
Here in Canada, you mean CCAA.

I highly doubt that YOW could care less about shareholders being wiped out or aircraft leasing companies stuck with prematurely returned aircraft in any corporate restructuring while under court supervised protection from creditor claims.

My guess is the only eye opener would be a liquidation result vs a restructured result for one or more carriers. However, some might say that it is the best way to remove excess capacity.
---------- ADS -----------
 
sunk
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:51 pm

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by sunk »

Let them go broke, why should they be bailed out. Poor service offered by all airlines, to many flights to the same city, at roughly the same time. I’m tired of private companies getting free money. Let the weak go broke and the strong survive, or new one start up.
---------- ADS -----------
 
mixturerich
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2015 7:04 pm

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by mixturerich »

sunk wrote: Tue Aug 04, 2020 7:40 pm Let them go broke, why should they be bailed out. Poor service offered by all airlines, to many flights to the same city, at roughly the same time. I’m tired of private companies getting free money. Let the weak go broke and the strong survive, or new one start up.
Have you no compassion. A very large number of airline employees have little effect on the type or quality of service offered. These people would lose their jobs (and all of their seniority).

Go fly a kite.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dh8Classic
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 300
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:30 am

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by Dh8Classic »

sunk wrote: Tue Aug 04, 2020 7:40 pm Let them go broke, why should they be bailed out. Poor service offered by all airlines, to many flights to the same city, at roughly the same time. I’m tired of private companies getting free money. Let the weak go broke and the strong survive, or new one start up.
It is time for a major change in the entrenched industry. And the bottom line is, why should taxpayers money be used to keep something much bigger than it needs to be.

I see a new airline starting up right now. Good opportunity for those excluded by the mainline carriers.
---------- ADS -----------
 
sunk
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:51 pm

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by sunk »

People lose their jobs all the time, supply and demand. Should the government bail out every company that is going broke? Hell no.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5970
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by digits_ »

mixturerich wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 12:00 am

Have you no compassion. A very large number of airline employees have little effect on the type or quality of service offered. These people would lose their jobs (and all of their seniority).
It could be a trigger to throw out the seniority principle and pay based on experience. If the worst happens (busted airlines), it could be a silver lining.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by iflyforpie »

I’m willing to bet the largest benefactors of airline seniority are the biggest whiners about taxes and handouts.

A profound irony.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
User avatar
CaptainHaddock
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:22 am
Location: Nowhere fast

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by CaptainHaddock »

It’s very shortsighted to just say ‘let them go broke’, their previous size was built from demand for air travel by Canadians (which will return). The pandemic and associated restrictions are well outside the airlines (or any industries) radar or control. Saying a new airline will come up to meet the demand is also a bit short sighted. The ‘new Airline’ will only service profitable routes to start. It would take years (decade?) for smaller cities to get competitive regional service.
You might get your wish anyway, with travel restrictions in place domestically and internationally and large virus spikes in other countries. There won’t be any new airlines starting up in the current environment either. So you are hoping the current ones burn through all their current financial resources, go bankrupt and lay off the remaining 20-30000 employees-then the ‘New Airline’ comes in flush with financing and starts friendly ultra cheap service to Wabush.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Billions of Bilious Blue Blistering Barnacles!
Woop_de_doo
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:40 pm

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by Woop_de_doo »

Hah
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Woop_de_doo on Wed Aug 05, 2020 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
goldeneagle
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1187
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:28 pm

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by goldeneagle »

flyinhigh wrote: Tue Aug 04, 2020 9:03 am I feel the liberals want everyone to burn their rainy day funds into the red before anything happens
That's what a rainy day fund is for......
---------- ADS -----------
 
McKinley
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 11:19 pm

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by McKinley »

Just me personally, but I think this situation goes beyond what one could consider as a rainy day fund.

Air travel denuded by 90% and a pandemic with little information known about the virus, waves of the virus and a total global economic shutdown, and closed borders for the foreseeable future..... there’s recessions that are a part of the economy’s life cycle .. fine, yes, one should be prepared for that.. but this is on a whole different level....just my .02.

It would suck to see the airlines pull the bankruptcy card but I won’t be surprised if it goes down. JT bailed out big oil (highly hypocritical),the arts and everything in between but not the main mode of transportation in Canada. WTF?!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Eric Janson
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1250
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:44 am

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by Eric Janson »

Hate to say it but it will come down to a simple Business case imho.

Keeping the company running will cost X.

Closing it down and starting again from zero will cost Y.

When Y becomes the cheaper option - it may very well happen.

There are pluses and minuses associated with each option.

There will be winners and losers no matter which way this goes.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find in this business
fish4life
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2414
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:32 am

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by fish4life »

First of all companies can just declare CCAA, they have to prove in court why it’s required and open the books.

Second the best thing Canadian airlines could do is all stop operating the same day and if they are an “essential service” the. Government would be forced to do something.
---------- ADS -----------
 
goldeneagle
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1187
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:28 pm

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by goldeneagle »

fish4life wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:20 am Second the best thing Canadian airlines could do is all stop operating the same day and if they are an “essential service” the. Government would be forced to do something.
The government has already facilitated a multi billion dollar interest free loan for the airlines in the form of 'no refunds'. This is a festering issue that wont really rear its head until flights get going again. But the example that's going to create a shit-storm. Joe bought a ticket to Kona for 349, then the flight was cancelled, Joe got a 'travel credit'. Wind the clock forward, now that same airline has put a price of 650 on the ticket to Kona, so the travel credit is rather worthless unless Joe wants to fork up another 300 bucks on top of what he already paid. It basically turns into a massive government approved bait and switch for billions of dollars.

How much more do you want ????
---------- ADS -----------
 
Gilles Hudicourt
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:51 am
Location: YUL

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by Gilles Hudicourt »

Can you provide a specific example of a ticket that was sold at at price Which it now double ?
What i’ve heard these days are that prices are dirt cheap......
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by Bede »

fish4life wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:20 am First of all companies can just declare CCAA, they have to prove in court why it’s required and open the books.
That is true, but my guess is that any Canadian airline would be granted creditor protection. If I recall, the CCAA sets the bar at owing more than $5M to creditors, which I'm sure that they all do. I've never heard of a company applying for creditor protection and being denied.
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyinhigh
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2987
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: my couch

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by flyinhigh »

Correct. However I do not believe it would be to hard for any airline to get protection when they show that at current cash flow rates there will be zero cash in 5-6 months.
fish4life wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:20 am First of all companies can just declare CCAA, they have to prove in court why it’s required and open the books.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
RRJetPilot
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed May 10, 2017 10:43 am

Re: Chapter 11.

Post by RRJetPilot »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Airline Industry Comments”