Airbus C295W water bomber

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
magic wand
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:08 pm

Airbus C295W water bomber

Post by magic wand »

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-c ... -1.3312324

Says that a company in BC is going to supply a water dropping tank for the aircraft.
The Airbus 295 is in the running to replace our SAR Buffalo aircraft.
Do you think having it available as a water bomber will sweeten the pot?

They say it will create jobs in BC.
http://www.cheknews.ca/alberni-valley-c ... ny-122231/

They claim it can be converted in a very short time from one role to another.
Sounds like a win win and could be used to back up fire bombing during peak periods.

Any thoughts?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
skybaron
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Hotel De Glace

Re: Airbus C295W water bomber

Post by skybaron »

Coulson should opt for the DASH 8 Q400-MR instead to compound the interest in providing not only a way better aircraft in terms of performance, but also keeping/creating jobs in BC/Canada.

Cascade Aviation out of YXX tricks out the Q for a water bombing role.
Even the French have purchased 2 of these machines. Go figure.

I think the Q400 is the only option. 2x the power than that crappy Airbus, and virtually the same cost - cheaper maybe in long run too as it is a Cdn aircraft.

No shortage of dash trash drivers out there either. Win win.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
skybaron
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Hotel De Glace

Re: Airbus C295W water bomber

Post by skybaron »

---------- ADS -----------
 
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5602
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Re: Airbus C295W water bomber

Post by North Shore »

Hmm...I kinda wonder about the airframe longevity of those tanked Dashes - the wings are really thin at the root.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
xsbank
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5655
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: "The Coast"

Re: Airbus C295W water bomber

Post by xsbank »

I'm kinda thin at the root too but it never affected my ability to bomb...
---------- ADS -----------
 
"What's it doing now?"
"Fly low and slow and throttle back in the turns."
medi-whacked
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:37 pm

Re: Airbus C295W water bomber

Post by medi-whacked »

It does sound like it would make the aircraft more utilitarian. I am not sure how many Buffalo replacement aircraft
we are going to buy, but having these stationed across the country does make sense. It would be another role the aircraft could do.
Is the Dash 8-400 being considered for the Buffalo replacement?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Gannet167
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 589
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:23 pm

Re: Airbus C295W water bomber

Post by Gannet167 »

The 295 is grossly inadequate as a SAR replacement aircraft. It's range is limited, it doesn't have sufficient space inside for all the kit, or for SAR Techs to stand up and walk around. It's proposal hinges on building and maintaining tons of extra SAR bases all over the country making the cost completely beyond other more capable airframes.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
dashx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:51 am

Re: Airbus C295W water bomber

Post by dashx »

wings are really thin at the root
I'd say most (aircraft) wings are kind of thin at the roots.
---------- ADS -----------
 
SAR_YQQ
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 665
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: CANADA

Re: Airbus C295W water bomber

Post by SAR_YQQ »

Military SAR does not include water bombing...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”