I expect because it is such a low volume product Industry decided to consolidate all production in one place to make it economically viable. FWIW I was told the petroleum industry doesn’t even call call Avgas “gasoline” it is is referred to as a specialty chemical product.SuperchargedRS wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 7:53 am Who's bright idea was it to rely nearly entirely on one supplier??
Avgas
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: West Coast
Re: Avgas
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 am
- Location: the stars playground
Re: Avgas
Big Pistons Forever wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:08 amI expect because it is such a low volume product Industry decided to consolidate all production in one place to make it economically viable. FWIW I was told the petroleum industry doesn’t even call call Avgas “gasoline” it is is referred to as a specialty chemical product.SuperchargedRS wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 7:53 am Who's bright idea was it to rely nearly entirely on one supplier??
Low volume compared to say auto fuel, but still more than enough of a need, especially in places most of Canada or Alaska, that one shouldn't put all their eggs in one basket.
Re: Avgas
Back when I worked in the gas for airplanes business, I was told that avgas production was .025% of gasoline production, with all other product being conventional gasoline of some type. Though both fuels burn in spark ignition internal combustion engines, avgas is not "gasoline" in the conventional sense. So yes, it's a specialty fuel.
Gasoline is a blend of various chemicals, with tolerances for contaminants. Avgas is wholly one mixed chemical. When you spill gasoline on your hand, some of it will evaporate, but a thick, oily residue will be left on your skin. Whereas, avgas will evaporate entirely, 'cause it's all one chemical. I was told by a refiner decades back that there had been a case where 100,000 gallons of molasses had spoiled, and was no longer food safe. They were not allowed to "dump" it, so it was blended off into gasoline at a low enough concentration that it did not take the gasoline off spec for contaminates.
Gasoline is a blend of various chemicals, with tolerances for contaminants. Avgas is wholly one mixed chemical. When you spill gasoline on your hand, some of it will evaporate, but a thick, oily residue will be left on your skin. Whereas, avgas will evaporate entirely, 'cause it's all one chemical. I was told by a refiner decades back that there had been a case where 100,000 gallons of molasses had spoiled, and was no longer food safe. They were not allowed to "dump" it, so it was blended off into gasoline at a low enough concentration that it did not take the gasoline off spec for contaminates.
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:47 am
Re: Avgas
Would bet that percentage is even lower. I was told that only 1% of the aviation fuel produced in Canada is AvGas, the other 99% is Jet A. Even that number seemed high to me based on the number of jets buzzing around compared to 100LL burners. Compare that to the number of Mogas burners stuck on the 401 any given day, could easily add another 0 to that number.
Re: Avgas
I used to work for a competitor of Imperial's. The "industry" didn't decide anything. The market is what it is and the individual companies in the space made their decisions accordingly. When I participated in strategy sessions, we always discussed whether we should get into Avgas (we called it "Avgas") but decided that it wasn't the best play for us. My former employer could decide differently tomorrow and I suspect other companies make the same types of decisions.Big Pistons Forever wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:08 amI expect because it is such a low volume product Industry decided to consolidate all production in one place to make it economically viable. FWIW I was told the petroleum industry doesn’t even call call Avgas “gasoline” it is is referred to as a specialty chemical product.SuperchargedRS wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 7:53 am Who's bright idea was it to rely nearly entirely on one supplier??
Re: Avgas
You need not guess - StatsCan publishes the data.Broken Slinky wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:09 amWould bet that percentage is even lower. I was told that only 1% of the aviation fuel produced in Canada is AvGas, the other 99% is Jet A. Even that number seemed high to me based on the number of jets buzzing around compared to 100LL burners. Compare that to the number of Mogas burners stuck on the 401 any given day, could easily add another 0 to that number.
http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?la ... +products
Re: Avgas
0.25% is 1/4 of 1%
0.025% is 1/40.
Taking Nov 2017, the amount of "Aviation turbo fuel" is 462,432. The amount of "Aviation gasoline" is 8,373. "Total refined petroleum products" is 9,192,621.RevT wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 12:06 pm You need not guess - StatsCan publishes the data.
http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?la ... +products
100LL is about 1.77% of total aviation fuel, and only 0.091% of total refined petroleum products (about 1/1000).
Re: Avgas
Seems the story from Esso keeps changing. Now it's only deliveries from December 28th - and apparently the majority of these deliveries are to airports/distributors in Western Canada.
I still question how the hell it is possible that it took this long to note a quality control issue...
I still question how the hell it is possible that it took this long to note a quality control issue...
Re: Avgas
Have any actual performance issues or damage been noted? I have flown with this fuel several times in the last month with no issues, but I have float type level sensors.
Hopefully it is not a bunch of ethanol in the blend.
Is anyone staying grounded because of this?
Hopefully it is not a bunch of ethanol in the blend.
Is anyone staying grounded because of this?
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:28 pm
- Location: YKF
Re: Avgas
I highly doubt there's ethanol in the blend (and it would be very easy to test). Ethanol is blended at the distribution hub, not at the refinery nor is it sent by pipeline. I'd be very surprised if it was possible for them to blend ethanol in a product that is substantially different than car gasoline (for the most part).
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:55 am
Re: Avgas
180039 CYQM MONCTON/GREATER MONCTON R.LEBLANC INTL
CYQM FUEL 100LL NOT AVBL
1802161341 TIL 1802171600
We've been grounded since Thursday in Moncton. I guess all the fuel comes from that one refinery in Alberta.
CYQM FUEL 100LL NOT AVBL
1802161341 TIL 1802171600
We've been grounded since Thursday in Moncton. I guess all the fuel comes from that one refinery in Alberta.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 am
- Location: the stars playground
Re: Avgas
superbilly24 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:07 am 180039 CYQM MONCTON/GREATER MONCTON R.LEBLANC INTL
CYQM FUEL 100LL NOT AVBL
1802161341 TIL 1802171600
We've been grounded since Thursday in Moncton. I guess all the fuel comes from that one refinery in Alberta.
You guys can't tanker in fuel from elsewhere?
Re: Avgas
Are you grounded due to lack of fuel, or to fear of damage or operational issues?superbilly24 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:07 am 180039 CYQM MONCTON/GREATER MONCTON R.LEBLANC INTL
CYQM FUEL 100LL NOT AVBL
1802161341 TIL 1802171600
We've been grounded since Thursday in Moncton. I guess all the fuel comes from that one refinery in Alberta.
Re: Avgas
They're grounded, because they've likely received fuel produced at Esso's Edmonton refinery. The instruction from Esso is to immediately quarantine all suspect fuel - as use of it is prohibited due to the conductivity issues.
Re: Avgas
Curious, where you found , “ as use of it is prohibited due to conductivity issues” quote?
Re: Avgas
Is there actually any prohibition on the use of this fuel, if it is already in your aircraft? We've filled up our RV-7a at Springbank several times since December 28, and haven't observed any issues. Is there any reason why we can't fly off the fuel that is currently in the tanks?