Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
Our Canadian Dollar is presently worth .75 cents in the U.S.A., The electric motor conversion will take place in the U.SA. Is this an affront to an historical Canadian airframe? A Canadian aviation icon goes to America for a conversion? Whahhh...? Trudeau post-nationalist's would, of course, approve of this. The CEO of Harbour Air should consider converting his piston-powered fleet of DHC-2 Beavers to kerosene powered P&W PT6Ds. A Canadian solution. Employ a few Canadians eh?
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 3:59 pm
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
You're conflating being a luddite with being a realist. No one is suggesting we shun technological advancement in energy production. However, if you can't see this for the obvious PR move that it is, you're a fool. It will be a long, long time before we have electric powered float planes. I certainly won't see it in the remaining span of my career.200hr Wonder wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 11:51 am I laugh at all the nay sayers... we need to stick to our 100 year old piston engines damit.
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:00 am
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
I agree the article reads like an advertisement...
"top seaplane airline"
"I'll be the first guy to fly one"
Entertainment Tonight
"top seaplane airline"
"I'll be the first guy to fly one"
Entertainment Tonight
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5868
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: West Coast
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
Car battery capacity has roughly doubled in the last 4 years. Double it again and the numbers start to work.
I bet the technology to allow a 30 min sightsee or Vancouver to Nanaimo will be fully there in 3 years.
One big issue that has not been mentioned is certification standards. Currently there are no provisions in CAR Part 5 to certify an electric propulsion system in a certified airframe
I bet the technology to allow a 30 min sightsee or Vancouver to Nanaimo will be fully there in 3 years.
One big issue that has not been mentioned is certification standards. Currently there are no provisions in CAR Part 5 to certify an electric propulsion system in a certified airframe
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
I consulted for the better part of a year toward a similar project. It can. and will be done, but there are a lot of operational and certification hurtles to overcome. It's more than two years off, and when it arrives, the charging will be the ongoing challenge.I imagine they will have that STC "within months"
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
Better hope you ever get a “Batt hot” light up front.
As for the batteries sustaining themselves long term, I used to be a pretty negative person towards them but some really high mileage Toyota Prius’s have proved me wrong.
As for the batteries sustaining themselves long term, I used to be a pretty negative person towards them but some really high mileage Toyota Prius’s have proved me wrong.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
- Location: On final so get off the damn runway!
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
I'm quite curious about how much smaller the noise footprint will be with sound coming from just the prop.
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
My guess is not much "less" just different
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
judging by how loud drones are I'd say not much less, a 2 blade 185 is one of the loudest airplanes there is on takeoff and its all from the prop.
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
Which begs the question: new motor and same prop? Or will they make in upgraded 3 or even 4+ bladed prop for the new motor?
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:23 pm
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
can you say R&D money?
It has some merit .
I think you could remove 1200-1400 lbs from a beaver .
Install batteries and engine 2000lbs and fly for 2.5 hours on battery ,. maybe in a few years .
The biggest hurdle will be water based charging systems . Battery /range with reserves.
but what do i know
It has some merit .
I think you could remove 1200-1400 lbs from a beaver .
Install batteries and engine 2000lbs and fly for 2.5 hours on battery ,. maybe in a few years .
The biggest hurdle will be water based charging systems . Battery /range with reserves.
but what do i know
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1982
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
I'm sure it will be a different prop, especially on the beaver. It won't have to handle the power pulses from a piston engine and can be made lighter. Probably look more like the prop from the turbo beaver.
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
You can run a lighter prop because there are almost no power pulses.
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
That's what I'm saying. Most of the noise is the prop so how much quieter depends on if they stick to the prop or if they end up with a 5 bladed composite scimitar style with tips etc etc.
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2565
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:07 pm
- Location: Negative sequencial vortex
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
Almost certainly not the same prop, unless they want to equip their electric powerplant with some kind of auxiliary oil pump to make the pitch-change apparatus and governors work. I wonder how the available torque available from brushless electric motors would dictate any change to the RPM/Pitch relationship between powerplant and prop.
If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1982
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
I wonder if the torque profile of an electric motor would allow the use of a fixed pitch prop? Beavers fly in a narrow speed window, so wouldn't be drastic here. It's not like you need to decrease engine RPM to gain drastic efficiency or decrease engine wear either.
Electric motors are generally pretty high torque, so you'd still get decent take-off power, even at slightly reduced RPM.
Electric motors are generally pretty high torque, so you'd still get decent take-off power, even at slightly reduced RPM.
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
That may be one of the most intelligent things brought up on this forum, I think you are onto somethinggoingnowherefast wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 3:03 pm I wonder if the torque profile of an electric motor would allow the use of a fixed pitch prop? Beavers fly in a narrow speed window, so wouldn't be drastic here. It's not like you need to decrease engine RPM to gain drastic efficiency or decrease engine wear either.
Electric motors are generally pretty high torque, so you'd still get decent take-off power, even at slightly reduced RPM.
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2565
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:07 pm
- Location: Negative sequencial vortex
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
I was thinking along similar lines, but I wonder too if the best compromise efficiency-wise would result in unacceptably longer takeoff runs, or conversely unacceptable noise in the cruise regime. Regardless of torque profile, a fixed-pitch prop would represent a compromise one way or the other, even on a relatively slow plane. There is a phenomenon in model aviation whereby a fixed-pitch propeller is still being turned by the motor, but at a lower theoretical pitch than the airspeed would call for, resulting in a zone of very disturbed air behind the prop and resulting control problems in the wake of the prop. Not unlike what happens say on a turbo-beaver when the prop is discing and rudder control is lost on the roll-out. The effect is worse on brushless electric motors and fixed-pitch props, due to the fact that a brushless motor will not be spun faster by airflow as long as the electronic speed control is commanding a specific RPM, which is how they work. For this reason alone I can imagine a variable-pitch prop would be safer.
One thing that would definitely reduce complexity is the fact that the electronic speed controls on brushless motors work by responding to an operator demand for a certain RPM: they are "throttled" by tight control over revolutions. Therefore a constant-speed unit or propeller governor would not be necessary, even if variable-pitch was deemed to be an asset.
In terms of available power compared to battery useage, the model-plane community has some fairly well-developed guidelines that allow them to calculate in Watts the power requirements of a given plane, and the voltage, available amp-hours, propeller pitch (the theoretical distance forward travelled in one rotation of the propeller) all play a part. This is of course for fixed-pitch propellers and brushless motors. Brushless motors are actually pretty impressive, having really only one moving part. For aeronautical purposes redundancy in the electronic speed-control would be a very important issue.
The whole thing is actually quite fascinating. The torque band available from the typical brushless electric motor is so broad, they can be used to drive turbine impellers as well as conventional propellers with virtually no modification to the basic motor. I have seen functional brushless electric turbines the size of your thumb.
I feel like any real-world application of this technology will draw heavily on the experiences of the model-aviation hobby, which has become incredibly advanced in the hands of motivated amateurs.
One thing that would definitely reduce complexity is the fact that the electronic speed controls on brushless motors work by responding to an operator demand for a certain RPM: they are "throttled" by tight control over revolutions. Therefore a constant-speed unit or propeller governor would not be necessary, even if variable-pitch was deemed to be an asset.
In terms of available power compared to battery useage, the model-plane community has some fairly well-developed guidelines that allow them to calculate in Watts the power requirements of a given plane, and the voltage, available amp-hours, propeller pitch (the theoretical distance forward travelled in one rotation of the propeller) all play a part. This is of course for fixed-pitch propellers and brushless motors. Brushless motors are actually pretty impressive, having really only one moving part. For aeronautical purposes redundancy in the electronic speed-control would be a very important issue.
The whole thing is actually quite fascinating. The torque band available from the typical brushless electric motor is so broad, they can be used to drive turbine impellers as well as conventional propellers with virtually no modification to the basic motor. I have seen functional brushless electric turbines the size of your thumb.
I feel like any real-world application of this technology will draw heavily on the experiences of the model-aviation hobby, which has become incredibly advanced in the hands of motivated amateurs.
If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself
- Beefitarian
- Top Poster
- Posts: 6605
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
- Location: A couple of meters away from others.
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
Calgary can go back to being a stop on the #1 for people driving between Vancouver and the east. Except it will be for folks needing to grab a steak and charge their battery.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 6:36 pm I'd be getting very scared for Albertas long term future.
Maybe if the population drops off the fishing can go back to normal. I might need to get a horse... Sounds ok.
-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:45 pm
Re: Harbour Air switching to battery powered planes
https://www.pilotcareercentre.com/Aviat ... red-flight
According to this article Harbour Air is going to have a plane ready for test flying by November, doesn't seem very believable. One thing that is for sure in this article is that Carol James is in fact "stunned" .
According to this article Harbour Air is going to have a plane ready for test flying by November, doesn't seem very believable. One thing that is for sure in this article is that Carol James is in fact "stunned" .