English Vs French on the Radio.

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, ahramin, sky's the limit, sepia, I WAS Birddog

digits_
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2890
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by digits_ »

AuxBatOn wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 7:05 pm
Partly because most people can understand.
Honest question: wouldn't an English transmission be understood by more people, even in Quebec?

I admit my encounters with Quebec pilots are limited, but all pilots I've met know English. Is it common for Quebec people to understand English?
English pilots flying in Quebec usually don't understand French enough though.
---------- ADS -----------
  
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship

photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7908
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Making aviation exhausting, everywhere

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by photofly »

rookiepilot wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 7:38 pm
Not advocating an impractical change in any "rules".
We misunderstood. You did write "Why is English not mandatory on the radio in Canada?" That does sound like you want to change the rules to make it mandatory.

What are you advocating for?
---------- ADS -----------
  
Strike me down with all of your hatred & your journey towards the dark side will be complete!

User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by rookiepilot »

Common sense, which even mentioning is as obviously a waste of time as advocating a rule change.

I actually asked some questions, which of course go unanswered
---------- ADS -----------
  

ahramin
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5977
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by ahramin »

Your common sense doesn't have much sense, but I'll agree on the waste of time. However, if you really want to know, the main reason the French are so rabid about speaking French on the radio is because they keep getting attacked for speaking French.

If you don't know how this all started, I'll try to sum up though my history lesson is distant and I'm fuzzy on some details. English used to be the only language in aviation in Canada. We were a bilingual nation, but not in the air. Then one day a French controller said to another French controller sitting next to him "L'avion blablabla va faire bloubloublou" and the supervisor overheard them. Of course this was totally VERBOTEN (there's really no English word that conveys the proper level Forbidenness). Both controllers were suspended or censured or something because "French is unsafe in aviation" (sounds like familiar not so sensical common sense). So the union or civil liberties association or local militia or whatever took up a call to arms over the issue and after Transport Canada failed to resolve it quickly Trudeau stepped in and mandated the creation of the current system (French allowed and required to be available for all level of service in Québec and Ottawa). Anglophone pilots went on strike, Ontario politicians went bananas, but Trudeau being a true federalist felt that it was important not to piss off the Québecers over small issues with little benefit. Keep in mind that if the original supervisor had used some common sense, we mightn't be here today and non English speakers might well be relegated to non towered airports in Québec.

So I can understand why over 40 years of continued and common nonsense of "French on the radio is dangerous" and "There's going to be an accident" has made them a little deranged to the point where they feel they need to speak French on the radio to prove a point. Maybe if some common sense is used in the next 40 years to say "geez, it makes ME uncomfortable but it makes a lot of THEM more comfortable and there's absolutely no data to support my point of view, maybe I'll just leave it alone" and everyone stops trying to force them to stop when they know it's not going to happen, maybe, just maybe, they'll give it up and choose the safer option. Maybe ... but we're talking about a nation that have Je Me Souvien on their licence plate parbleu. I mean they're still talking about how some farmers with muskets got their asses kicked sur les plaines d'Abraham by British Red Coats. Red Coats for smegs sake. Professional soldiers that could fire 4 rounds a minute and if you killed half of them, would respond by closing up ranks and continue firing. Against farmers with minimal training, none of it with live rounds.

It's as bad as those phsycho Air Canada pilots still monumentally pissed 20 years later that they didn't get to destroy the careers of their peers at Canadian and instead were expected to act like adults and make the best of an unfortunate situation.
---------- ADS -----------
  

Braun
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:32 pm

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by Braun »

Geee, thanks for quoting me and starting a bonfire. I've read enough of your posts here and there to not get into an argument with you, you're clearly more knowledgeable on what is safer and better for us. So thanks! I'll make sure the whole VFR GA population that doesn't speak English in Quebec (and yes there are people who don't speak English to an adequate level) stop flying and attend your language and communication school.

Honestly, I'd be happy to just get adequate readbacks (in whatever language) by ''professional'' pilots. To me that is much more of a safety issue.
---------- ADS -----------
  

TeePeeCreeper
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: in the bush

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by TeePeeCreeper »

Braun wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 9:00 pm
Geee, thanks for quoting me and starting a bonfire. I've read enough of your posts here and there to not get into an argument with you, you're clearly more knowledgeable on what is safer and better for us. So thanks! I'll make sure the whole VFR GA population that doesn't speak English in Quebec (and yes there are people who don't speak English to an adequate level) stop flying and attend your language and communication school.

Honestly, I'd be happy to just get adequate readbacks (in whatever language) by ''professional'' pilots. To me that is much more of a safety issue.
Braun,

I have no idea if your native tongue is English or Français.
Your previous response on another recent thread was read and most appreciated by myself as I too have always wondered about odd vectors into YUL.

The above post above yours is either a rant or a clever rambling to infuse some humour into this discussion.

I take no issue to either. (Although he could have been kind in posting said message in both Official languages) 8)

My fellow brethern,

Can we put this non issue to rest already?

Merci à tous!

TPC
---------- ADS -----------
  

Heliian
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1766
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by Heliian »

If you cannot understand, ask them to repeat in English.
---------- ADS -----------
  

Jet Jockey
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:42 am
Location: CYUL

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by Jet Jockey »

ahramin wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 8:34 pm
It's as bad as those phsycho Air Canada pilots still monumentally pissed 20 years later that they didn't get to destroy the careers of their peers at Canadian and instead were expected to act like adults and make the best of an unfortunate situation.

OMFG... I almost sh!t my pants, too funny!

Having friends that worked at Air Canada and Canadian at the time (and still are) this is right on... Can’t believe how arrogant the pr!cks at Air Canada were.

Anyway, I’m not going to debate on this subject too long and all I’m going to say is that I totally agree with the use of French for communications in the air whether in controlled or uncontrolled airspace in Quebec and perhaps Ottawa!

Having worked in Europe for 3 years and having flown all over the world where local languages are also used at all sorts of airports, I cannot agree with the philosophy that only “English” should be used. There are many areas of the world where locals, even airline pilots are not proficient in english or not enough to communicate properly so it makes sense for them to talk to ATC or do position reports in their own language.

Now, If I find myself in a situation where an anglo only pilot communicates on a MF freq going into an uncontrolled airport in Quebec, I will do my position reports both in French and English as a professional courtesy... I will also interact with the the anglo pilot in english to avoid any distress to him.
---------- ADS -----------
  

User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by rookiepilot »

ahramin wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 8:34 pm
Your common sense doesn't have much sense, but I'll agree on the waste of time. However, if you really want to know, the main reason the French are so rabid about speaking French on the radio is because they keep getting attacked for speaking French.

If you don't know how this all started, I'll try to sum up though my history lesson is distant and I'm fuzzy on some details. English used to be the only language in aviation in Canada. We were a bilingual nation, but not in the air. Then one day a French controller said to another French controller sitting next to him "L'avion blablabla va faire bloubloublou" and the supervisor overheard them. Of course this was totally VERBOTEN (there's really no English word that conveys the proper level Forbidenness). Both controllers were suspended or censured or something because "French is unsafe in aviation" (sounds like familiar not so sensical common sense). So the union or civil liberties association or local militia or whatever took up a call to arms over the issue and after Transport Canada failed to resolve it quickly Trudeau stepped in and mandated the creation of the current system (French allowed and required to be available for all level of service in Québec and Ottawa). Anglophone pilots went on strike, Ontario politicians went bananas, but Trudeau being a true federalist felt that it was important not to piss off the Québecers over small issues with little benefit. Keep in mind that if the original supervisor had used some common sense, we mightn't be here today and non English speakers might well be relegated to non towered airports in Québec.

So I can understand why over 40 years of continued and common nonsense of "French on the radio is dangerous" and "There's going to be an accident" has made them a little deranged to the point where they feel they need to speak French on the radio to prove a point. Maybe if some common sense is used in the next 40 years to say "geez, it makes ME uncomfortable but it makes a lot of THEM more comfortable and there's absolutely no data to support my point of view, maybe I'll just leave it alone" and everyone stops trying to force them to stop when they know it's not going to happen, maybe, just maybe, they'll give it up and choose the safer option. Maybe ... but we're talking about a nation that have Je Me Souvien on their licence plate parbleu. I mean they're still talking about how some farmers with muskets got their asses kicked sur les plaines d'Abraham by British Red Coats. Red Coats for smegs sake. Professional soldiers that could fire 4 rounds a minute and if you killed half of them, would respond by closing up ranks and continue firing. Against farmers with minimal training, none of it with live rounds.

It's as bad as those phsycho Air Canada pilots still monumentally pissed 20 years later that they didn't get to destroy the careers of their peers at Canadian and instead were expected to act like adults and make the best of an unfortunate situation.
Actually I was unaware of the history on this issue. So thanks for this. Most interesting.

FWIW--- to everyone as it seems I've stirred the hornets nest over language rights: :roll:

I don't have any particular issue with pilots using French in Quebec controlled or otherwise. Ok? Peace?

In Ontario -- which I repeatedly referenced was the basis of my own experiences -- and particularly west of Ottawa, might be a different story.

Now I'm off to my Mandarin class, so I can use that the next time I fly to BC....... :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
  

photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7908
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Making aviation exhausting, everywhere

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by photofly »

I don't have any particular issue with pilots using French in Quebec controlled or otherwise. Ok? Peace?

In Ontario -- which I repeatedly referenced was the basis of my own experiences -- and particularly west of Ottawa, might be a different story.
Why the distinction? It's a safety issue, right? Language misunderstandings that cause accidents don't stop at provincial boundaries so why are you only concerned in Ontario?
---------- ADS -----------
  
Strike me down with all of your hatred & your journey towards the dark side will be complete!

ahramin
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5977
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by ahramin »

rookiepilot wrote:
Tue Apr 23, 2019 6:26 am
In Ontario -- which I repeatedly referenced was the basis of my own experiences -- and particularly west of Ottawa, might be a different story.
So do share your experience. If there is an actual problem as you claim then the more people who know about it the better. Transport Canada has been know to take up issues like this with circulars and information drives. Transport Canada routinely requires the bilingual airlines in Canada to publish memos reminding everyone not to use French unless both crews understand. I'd like to support your position but you're not making it possible. You have referenced a midair in Carp but there doesn't seem to be anything pertaining to that midair that supports your argument. You have claimed that pilots are speaking French on the radio in other parts of Ontario, but I can't seem to wrap my head around how you know they are in Ontario since they are speaking French and the whole problem with French on the radio seems to be that you don't know where they are.

Other than Trumpisms stating that you know it's happening or Rumsfeldian hypotheticals, please share your actual relevant experiences so that the rest of us can share your concerns.
---------- ADS -----------
  

TG
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1688
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 11:32 am
Location: Around

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by TG »

Jet Jockey wrote:
Tue Apr 23, 2019 6:24 am
having flown all over the world where local languages are also used at all sorts of airports, I cannot agree with the philosophy that only “English” should be used. There are many areas of the world where locals, even airline pilots are not proficient in english or not enough to communicate properly so it makes sense for them to talk to ATC or do position reports in their own language.
Very true!
I recall asking permission to speak in French with Bamako's tower one time (Mali has French as official language) Since none of us in the cockpit could figure out what he was "saying" in English.
"None" is including one English speaking only guy! And boom! Communication problems solved :mrgreen:
Same thing in Annaba, Algeria, which truly cut short 50% of our radio's exchanges, confusion and all...

I recon they are extreme examples. Just that sometime it is safer to let it done in Native official language when English proficiency is well below par.
---------- ADS -----------
  

ahramin
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5977
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by ahramin »

Ha, just try to figure out what the controllers in Edinburgh are saying.

---------- ADS -----------
  

User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by rookiepilot »

The point is, ever exercising one's "rights" in aviation, in any regard, at the willful expense of safety, is being a jerk.

The regs should mean bare minimum to a safe pilot.

Airmanship should be everything, and it really sucks in so many ways, (that I've personally observed) because of everyone's preoccupation with their "rights".
---------- ADS -----------
  

AuxBatOn
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3163
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:13 pm
Location: North America, sometimes

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by AuxBatOn »

Again, either provide facts (incident/accident reports with language as a root cause or contributing factors) or first hand experiences where language was a safety issue, not your relatively inexperienced aviator’s opinion.
---------- ADS -----------
  
Going for the deck at corner

trey kule
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4617
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:09 pm

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by trey kule »

No, I won't. Because a quick look at the accident rate shows that there is no safety risk in flying through China without being able to speak Mandarin. What's silly is claiming that not learning a language is safe unless it's someone else that doesn't learn a language in which case it's dangerous.
Your claim is in dispute. The number of airports you can fly into in mainland China is very limited; the majority are Mandarin only. The ATC folks at ?all the non international airports there do not speak a word of English. There is no safety risk because you can’tdo it.

And, other than in some small pockets all fights in China are IFR. And kept on an a tight leash.
---------- ADS -----------
  
Everyone is a genius in hindsight

User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by rookiepilot »

ABO:
rookiepilot wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 3:35 pm

I'm a GA pilot who has flown into Quebec but more often into Eastern Ontario. I'd heard French both in controlled and uncontrolled airspace, the latter certainly is a safety concern for someone with extremely rusty French when it gets really busy.
Multiple occasions heard, (over the years) at low altitude, well inside Ontario -- over 100 nm -- on 126.70 and different Unicom frequencies while I was transiting. Can't recall one when I was actually landing -- to be fair, except perhaps Ottawa, which was controlled.

The logic of doing that, makes no sense to me. If I can be enlightened, I'm all ears.

Here's an interesting stat: (OTTAWA)
"As such it is the largest city in Canada with both English and French as co-official languages.... [T]hose with French as their mother tongue make up 14.2 percent of the population."

And for that small amount // dual language everything.

(RICHMOND BC).

"In Richmond, 44.8% indicated Chinese as their mother tongue, 33.1% indicated English".

Why isn't there approaches and the ATIS offered in Chinese at YVR?
---------- ADS -----------
  

AuxBatOn
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3163
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:13 pm
Location: North America, sometimes

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by AuxBatOn »

Because you hear French and don’t understand doesn’t mean is any less safe. That’s just your perception. Language and communications is one of many barriers preventing accidents in aviation.
---------- ADS -----------
  
Going for the deck at corner

User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by rookiepilot »

AuxBatOn wrote:
Tue Apr 23, 2019 6:21 pm
Because you hear French and don’t understand doesn’t mean is any less safe. That’s just your perception. Language and communications is one of many barriers preventing accidents in aviation.
By that rational we should allow Chinese in the lower mainland.

Why not choose the safest option when possible?
---------- ADS -----------
  

trey kule
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4617
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:09 pm

Re: English Vs French on the Radio.

Post by trey kule »

Auxbat posted
Again, either provide facts (incident/accident reports with language as a root cause or contributing factors) or first hand experiences where language was a safety issue, not your relatively inexperienced aviator’s opinion.Again, either provide facts (incident/accident reports with language as a root cause or contributing factors) or first hand experiences where language was a safety issue, not your relatively inexperienced aviator’s opinion?
What he said......

Rookie. You show some hard facts, from CADORs, TSB investigations,etc. , and I will wholeheartedly support you.
---------- ADS -----------
  
Everyone is a genius in hindsight

Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”