Well, I dont know what to say... Please re-read my post (take your time now). I clearly stated that "risk management and expirience" are paramount, I dont remember saying that if he was a COM pilot he would have faired any better....Jimmy Mack wrote:carholme wrote: Prairie and Northern
August 17, 2007
CAR 602.01
A private pilot flying a Cessna 152 flew the aircraft with a passenger on board at approximately 100 feet above the ground to take pictures. The aircraft subsequently hit a power line while flying into the sun that caused significant damage to the rudder and the tail section. The pilot was sanctioned with a $1,000.00 monetary penalty for flying the aircraft in a negligent manner.It's funny that we see the word "private pilot" and assume the person has a fresh license with only 60 hours and no extensive training. The actual fact is the pilot in question was finishing up his CPL and was only about 5 hours away, already having completed the flight test. So if this had happened a week later, he would be a Commercial Pilot, who should have had more training? A new piece of paper would have caused him to think his decisions through more thoroughly? I find that hard to accept.twotterflogger wrote:Your point Carl?
Let's face it, its all about risk management, and expirience. Not some PPL holder renting a 152' making bad decisions combined with an obvious lack of training.
JM
Now you might want to let your CAME know that you need to get another eye exam