Railroad vs Aviation

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

User avatar
Panama Jack
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3255
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:10 am
Location: Back here

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by Panama Jack »

In British Columbia, the CPR hired workers from China, called coolies. A navvy received between $1 and $2.50 per day, but had to pay for his own food, clothing, transportation to the job site, mail and medical care. After 2-1/2 months of back-breaking labour, they could net as little as $16. Chinese coolies in British Columbia made only between 75 cents and $1.25 a day, paid in rice mats, and not including expenses, leaving barely anything to send home. They did the most dangerous construction jobs, such as working with explosives to clear tunnels through rock. The families of the Chinese who were killed received no compensation, or even notification of loss of life. Many of the men who survived did not have enough money to return to their families in China, although Chinese labour contractors had promised that as part of their responsibilities. Many spent years in lonely, sad and often poor conditions. Yet the Chinese were hard working and played a key role in building the western stretch of the railway; even some boys as young as 12 years old served as tea-boys. In 2006 the Canadian government issued a formal apology to the Chinese population in Canada for their treatment both during and following the construction of the CPR.
Wow, sounds very similar to the plight of laborers from the Indian Sub-Continent in the Middle East today.
---------- ADS -----------
 
frozen solid
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 527
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 6:29 pm

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by frozen solid »

Inverted2 wrote: but it must be hard to get in with no prior experience other than an H.O. train set when I was a kid.
Actually when I applied that's exactly what got me the job. Other than the expected H.R. questions (and this BS was in its infancy 20 years ago, at least where I was) most of the interview centered around a guy (later he turned out to be the rules instructor) showing me track diagrams and asking me to explain how locomotive "A" would get from one side of the train to the other, or how it would negotiate a Wye, how I thought continuous air brakes and knuckle couplers worked, and stuff like that. HO scale trains was how I learned about all that stuff.

All those noise complaints? For an entire summer that was me on the night shift bashing coal and grain cars together and watching the lights come on in neighborhoods beside the tracks. Pure heaven. (for me, not you if you live beside the tracks. I like making noise)
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Expat
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2383
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:58 am
Location: Central Asia

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by Expat »

Panama Jack wrote:
In British Columbia, the CPR hired workers from China, called coolies. A navvy received between $1 and $2.50 per day, but had to pay for his own food, clothing, transportation to the job site, mail and medical care. After 2-1/2 months of back-breaking labour, they could net as little as $16. Chinese coolies in British Columbia made only between 75 cents and $1.25 a day, paid in rice mats, and not including expenses, leaving barely anything to send home. They did the most dangerous construction jobs, such as working with explosives to clear tunnels through rock. The families of the Chinese who were killed received no compensation, or even notification of loss of life. Many of the men who survived did not have enough money to return to their families in China, although Chinese labour contractors had promised that as part of their responsibilities. Many spent years in lonely, sad and often poor conditions. Yet the Chinese were hard working and played a key role in building the western stretch of the railway; even some boys as young as 12 years old served as tea-boys. In 2006 the Canadian government issued a formal apology to the Chinese population in Canada for their treatment both during and following the construction of the CPR.
Wow, sounds very similar to the plight of laborers from the Indian Sub-Continent in the Middle East today.
So true! Except the Emirs will never apologize for anything. :prayer:
---------- ADS -----------
 
floatpilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:18 am

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by floatpilot »

Seniority at cp is determined the same way. It starts from the time they received your application. They usually hire in big groups(class), so a bunch of guys all hired the same day, seniority is based on application times. I was basically a shoe in here in Kenora as I had family working there, I still had to go through the process of all cp bullshit interviews. The first run was a room with about 150 guys who had thier application selected. They made us do some bullshit essay that had absolutely nothing to do with trains or railroads, it was a test to see how we could follow specific directions. I'm sure they didn't even read the essay. They put a red pen, blue pen and a pencil in front of you, then asked to print your name in the bottom left corner of the page with the blue pen, date in the top right corner with the red etc. that's how they weeded out the first 100 people! If you made it you were asked to come back in the room. Then it was aptitude tests for a couple hours. Then if you made it from there you were contacted a few days later and given a date for a behavioral based interview, which was reall strange to go through. If you passed the interview, onto drug and criminal recor tests. The process took 2 weeks. Then the gave you a hire on date and show up for class. It was a bit of a shit show to say the keast
---------- ADS -----------
 
True North
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:39 pm

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by True North »

I've always been curious, whenever we fly a new type of airplane we need at least a type check. If you go from say, and SD40-2 to an AC4400 do you need any differences training or is it always just put it in forward, select Run 1 and go?
---------- ADS -----------
 
floatpilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:18 am

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by floatpilot »

They are all the same for the most part. Guys got some traing when they installed the FTO(fuel trip optimizer) its like auto pilot. It's ran by gps satellite, it knows where the train is on the subdivisions it's running on and uses hills and corners to gain or lose speed. It's a brutal system. So to answer your question there are no type certificates, or ratings. Once trained as a hogger you drive whatever you get.

Lots of guys prefer the old sd's to the newer power because the throttle response is really poor on some of the new units, they take some time to load up where the sd40 is instant, which makes it the choice for yards and switching. Being in a sd40 is kinda like being in an old otter, hot and loud and shakes like a bastard in throttle 8.
---------- ADS -----------
 
True North
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:39 pm

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by True North »

floatpilot wrote:They are all the same for the most part. Guys got some traing when they installed the FTO(fuel trip optimizer) its like auto pilot. It's ran by gps satellite, it knows where the train is on the subdivisions it's running on and uses hills and corners to gain or lose speed. It's a brutal system. So to answer your question there are no type certificates, or ratings. Once trained as a hogger you drive whatever you get.
When you say the FTO is brutal do you mean it doesn't anticipate well? It's not smooth? Are you mandated to use it or can you just hand bomb it?
Lots of guys prefer the old sd's to the newer power because the throttle response is really poor on some of the new units, they take some time to load up where the sd40 is instant, which makes it the choice for yards and switching.
Is all the new power ac traction motors or do they still make dc too?
Being in a sd40 is kinda like being in an old otter, hot and loud and shakes like a bastard in throttle 8.
Great comparison. I scrounged a cab ride in an sd40 once, it was awesome. :P

Thanks for answering all my stupid questions about trains on an aviation forum. :rolleyes:
---------- ADS -----------
 
flatface
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:43 am

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by flatface »

Deleted
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by flatface on Fri May 30, 2014 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
floatpilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:18 am

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by floatpilot »

I shoul have explained the FTO better. You guessed correct, it has a hard time sometimes controlling speeds at parts of a sub. It never goes too fast it's always way under. what this does is ruin the "swing" as we call it and there is no way you are saving anything. Burning way more fuel and add time on the trip. The FTO can not control a train as well as a human can by a long shot. It is always allowing the slack to run in and out and that us very bad for a conductor at 2 in the morning when he has to change a knuckle a mile back because the it broke your train in half or more. I've seen the FTO rip a train in 4 chunks. It is getting better but is still needs a long way. It is mandatory to use FTO on units equipped with it and non compliance is punished with demerit points. We can get to sixty then fired! Driving a train is all about when to get on the gas and when to get off of it, old hoggers make it look so easy, but I'll assure you that there is lots going on. It's all mental and really mowing the lay of the land, it is really hard to see the grade as in my area they are very suddle. Once you have your subdivision memorized then it's time to learn how to run different kinds of trains..they are all different. The big long double stack container trains you see are usually the fast freights and are about the easiest to control because the weights on the cars for the most part are the same and the train in total us fairly light. A grain train or crude oil are classified as bulk trains and are big heavy pigs, swing is everything on these. These trains are fairly easy to run as well just heavy. The worst trains are the mixed train, with big weights all over the place. These are a little tricky and you need to be very carful with the slack, always try to keep it stretched. a good hogger does this, FTO can not. The very worst are the short heavy trains, like a ballast train. Mabe only 50 to 100 short cars long but can get away from a guy in a hurry if not paying attention. The longer trains things take more time to happen, shirt ones thing happen fast. Most trains cp runs are under 10000 feet. The hundred series will be right up there, grain and oil are usually 6500 feet or so and about 286 thousand pounds per car.

One thing about railroading that is still a little nerve racking is meeting a train at 60 mph at night. You can see the other guy for a long ways away and it always looks like he's on your track! Or running track speed through snow or fog, or some guys will shut the lights out. It takes time to get used to going 60 mph into absolutely zero vis.


Edit to add. The slack on a train can be up to 3 or 4 hundred feet!
---------- ADS -----------
 
I_Drive_Planes
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 357
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Prince George

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by I_Drive_Planes »

True North wrote: Is all the new power ac traction motors or do they still make dc too?
DC power is still being made. CN just received its first AC locomotives last year, they make a big difference hauling coal trains over the mountains when traction conditions are poor.
flatface wrote:
What are the visual acuity requirements to get a job there?
You absolutely must have perfect colour vision. I'm not sure what the actual acuity requirements are, but I believe that you must be correctable to normal, or near normal vision.
floatpilot wrote:I shoul have explained the FTO better. You guessed correct, it has a hard time sometimes controlling speeds at parts of a sub. It never goes too fast it's always way under. what this does is ruin the "swing" as we call it and there is no way you are saving anything. Burning way more fuel and add time on the trip. The FTO can not control a train as well as a human can by a long shot. It is always allowing the slack to run in and out and that us very bad for a conductor at 2 in the morning when he has to change a knuckle a mile back because the it broke your train in half or more. I've seen the FTO rip a train in 4 chunks. It is getting better but is still needs a long way. It is mandatory to use FTO on units equipped with it and non compliance is punished with demerit points. We can get to sixty then fired! Driving a train is all about when to get on the gas and when to get off of it, old hoggers make it look so easy, but I'll assure you that there is lots going on. It's all mental and really mowing the lay of the land, it is really hard to see the grade as in my area they are very suddle. Once you have your subdivision memorized then it's time to learn how to run different kinds of trains..they are all different. The big long double stack container trains you see are usually the fast freights and are about the easiest to control because the weights on the cars for the most part are the same and the train in total us fairly light. A grain train or crude oil are classified as bulk trains and are big heavy pigs, swing is everything on these. These trains are fairly easy to run as well just heavy. The worst trains are the mixed train, with big weights all over the place. These are a little tricky and you need to be very carful with the slack, always try to keep it stretched. a good hogger does this, FTO can not. The very worst are the short heavy trains, like a ballast train. Mabe only 50 to 100 short cars long but can get away from a guy in a hurry if not paying attention. The longer trains things take more time to happen, shirt ones thing happen fast. Most trains cp runs are under 10000 feet. The hundred series will be right up there, grain and oil are usually 6500 feet or so and about 286 thousand pounds per car.

One thing about railroading that is still a little nerve racking is meeting a train at 60 mph at night. You can see the other guy for a long ways away and it always looks like he's on your track! Or running track speed through snow or fog, or some guys will shut the lights out. It takes time to get used to going 60 mph into absolutely zero vis.


Edit to add. The slack on a train can be up to 3 or 4 hundred feet!
Luckily they haven't refined trip optimizer to the point that it can control trains where I work so I'm enjoying getting to actually drive the things while I still can!
---------- ADS -----------
 
casey
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:26 am
Location: Northern Ont

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by casey »

What do you mean the slack is that the play in the couplings between cars
---------- ADS -----------
 
True North
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:39 pm

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by True North »

casey wrote:What do you mean the slack is that the play in the couplings between cars
Correct.

And that is what you can hear sometimes when a train starts up or stops. If there is slack in the train when it starts you here a bang from each car as it starts to move, that is the slack coming out and you can hear it run right from the front all the way to the last car. Conversely, when a train stops, and I might be wrong about this part, if the engineer were to only use dynamic braking or locomotive brakes but no train brakes, then the cars would all pile into one another starting at the front and you would hear the slack going in all the way to the last car again.
---------- ADS -----------
 
True North
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:39 pm

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by True North »

floatpilot wrote:I shoul have explained the FTO better. You guessed correct, it has a hard time sometimes controlling speeds at parts of a sub. It never goes too fast it's always way under. what this does is ruin the "swing" as we call it and there is no way you are saving anything. Burning way more fuel and add time on the trip. The FTO can not control a train as well as a human can by a long shot. It is always allowing the slack to run in and out and that us very bad for a conductor at 2 in the morning when he has to change a knuckle a mile back because the it broke your train in half or more. I've seen the FTO rip a train in 4 chunks. It is getting better but is still needs a long way. It is mandatory to use FTO on units equipped with it and non compliance is punished with demerit points. We can get to sixty then fired! Driving a train is all about when to get on the gas and when to get off of it, old hoggers make it look so easy, but I'll assure you that there is lots going on. It's all mental and really mowing the lay of the land, it is really hard to see the grade as in my area they are very suddle. Once you have your subdivision memorized then it's time to learn how to run different kinds of trains..they are all different. The big long double stack container trains you see are usually the fast freights and are about the easiest to control because the weights on the cars for the most part are the same and the train in total us fairly light. A grain train or crude oil are classified as bulk trains and are big heavy pigs, swing is everything on these. These trains are fairly easy to run as well just heavy. The worst trains are the mixed train, with big weights all over the place. These are a little tricky and you need to be very carful with the slack, always try to keep it stretched. a good hogger does this, FTO can not. The very worst are the short heavy trains, like a ballast train. Mabe only 50 to 100 short cars long but can get away from a guy in a hurry if not paying attention. The longer trains things take more time to happen, shirt ones thing happen fast. Most trains cp runs are under 10000 feet. The hundred series will be right up there, grain and oil are usually 6500 feet or so and about 286 thousand pounds per car.

One thing about railroading that is still a little nerve racking is meeting a train at 60 mph at night. You can see the other guy for a long ways away and it always looks like he's on your track! Or running track speed through snow or fog, or some guys will shut the lights out. It takes time to get used to going 60 mph into absolutely zero vis.


Edit to add. The slack on a train can be up to 3 or 4 hundred feet!
Thanks for sharing that floatpilot. Personally I find this stuff fascinating. :supz:
---------- ADS -----------
 
W5
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 985
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Edmonton,AB

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by W5 »

Very interesting! Always wondered about that stuff.
---------- ADS -----------
 
floatpilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:18 am

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by floatpilot »

You can use the dynamic on it own, but are limited to the amount of horsepower you can use depending on the weights. You have to come off the throttle gradually then set up into dynamic and ease into it allowing the train to bunch up, once bunched then you can use what's available. You have to be careful using dynamic because you have to keep in mind what your train is doing behind, your head end may be going down hill, the middle may be up hill and the tail end is down. Very easy to rip appart. In the area I'm in we dont need to use the air brakes very often, mabe a heavy grain train once and a while. The air brakes on a train have 3 parts to them. Train brakes, locomotive, and emergency brakes. The brakes are applied with two leavers, one is called the automatic(train brakes) the other is the independent. When the hogger moves the leaver on the automatic he is setting the brake by making a reduction of air. When he makes the reduction he will bail the brakes off the unit by pushing the control to the side, thus letting the train slow the unit and not the unit causing brake action and bunching the slack. Brake systems on trains work the opposite of air brakes on trucks with the exception of the emergency resiviors. The air is pumped throught the train, average about 80 to 90 lbs will be at the tail end. There are gauges that show your resiviors,train line,and any flow. If you have low resiviors and high flow then there is a leak somewhere. The air pressure is holding the brakes off so when a reduction is ade by the hogger the brakes will apply. If there is a sudden drop in air pressure then the emergency brakes will apply, this sets all the brakes rapidly. If a train sits or a car for any period of time the resiviors will bleed off and the brakes will realese. In trucks the brakes will be set if there is no air. The brake system on railway cars is like this so you can move them around without always needing to do the hoses up, and for switching and kicking cars.

There is lots to know on how to use the brakes on a train, like I say in my parts we get away with using the dynamic or the lay of the land. I'm am certainly no expert as all my knowledge cones from sitting across the cab in the comfy conductors chair! I am soon to start my piglet traing, I think in the next month or 2. Within a few years I'll be a full time engineer here, the movement here with guys retiring is very fast. There will be 60 guys going in the next 5 years there must have been 20 since I started in 08 and there is 10 guys on pre retirement vacation right now, with a bunch more going over thus summer. Every guy that leaves is another rung up the seniority ladder. Some guys worked 25 years of spare board and layoffs before they got a good turn. I was hired in 08 trained for the winter and was ready to qualify as a conductor then our class and 3 a classes above us were laid off for 3.5 years! I went back to float flying. I got called back 2 years ago and have now been working full time since. I hold the pools from April till christmas time then spare board for the winter.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Dash-Ate
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1760
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:15 pm
Location: Placarded INOP

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by Dash-Ate »

Youtube "suggested" this for me. I wonder how they knew...

What are the starting salaries like?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOac5bYqLRA

Day in the Life of a Conductor
.
CPCareersCPCareers·3 videos
---------- ADS -----------
 
True North
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:39 pm

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by True North »

floatpilot wrote:You can use the dynamic on it own, but are limited to the amount of horsepower you can use depending on the weights. You have to come off the throttle gradually then set up into dynamic and ease into it allowing the train to bunch up, once bunched then you can use what's available. You have to be careful using dynamic because you have to keep in mind what your train is doing behind, your head end may be going down hill, the middle may be up hill and the tail end is down. Very easy to rip appart. In the area I'm in we dont need to use the air brakes very often, mabe a heavy grain train once and a while. The air brakes on a train have 3 parts to them. Train brakes, locomotive, and emergency brakes. The brakes are applied with two leavers, one is called the automatic(train brakes) the other is the independent. When the hogger moves the leaver on the automatic he is setting the brake by making a reduction of air. When he makes the reduction he will bail the brakes off the unit by pushing the control to the side, thus letting the train slow the unit and not the unit causing brake action and bunching the slack. Brake systems on trains work the opposite of air brakes on trucks with the exception of the emergency resiviors. The air is pumped throught the train, average about 80 to 90 lbs will be at the tail end. There are gauges that show your resiviors,train line,and any flow. If you have low resiviors and high flow then there is a leak somewhere. The air pressure is holding the brakes off so when a reduction is ade by the hogger the brakes will apply. If there is a sudden drop in air pressure then the emergency brakes will apply, this sets all the brakes rapidly. If a train sits or a car for any period of time the resiviors will bleed off and the brakes will realese. In trucks the brakes will be set if there is no air. The brake system on railway cars is like this so you can move them around without always needing to do the hoses up, and for switching and kicking cars.

Okay. I think I'm ready for my interview! :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
True North
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:39 pm

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by True North »

Something else I've been wondering about. When you are starting out and the train has the slack in, obviously you can't accelerate until all the slack is out. How do you know when the last car is moving? Does the end of train device on the last coupler send a signal to the cab?
---------- ADS -----------
 
floatpilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:18 am

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by floatpilot »

If the unit has the FTO there is a display on the screen in front of the hogger that shows your train and the track profile that it's on. You can see the tail end move on that. Other than that when you "lift"a train it's all by feel. Most guys look out the side window at the ground when starting and stopping. You can feel the slack coming out as you start to pull. Once your moving, keep it in throttle 1 or 2 for till your sure the slack is out. The draw bars and knuckles were designed to make joints up to 4 mph so they can take a fair amount. The units have counters in them that we start when going over road crossings and places where we need to know where the tail end is.

Starting wage is 85% for 6 months. 90% for 6 months. 95% for 6 months...100% for a conductor is around 1.80 to 1.90 per mile. Guaranteed 3800 miles per month max. They set the pools up according to the traffic so a guy that's set up in the pool will make the miles per month. Spare board pays a little less then conductor as your on a brake mans wage. It's about 1.65/mile. There is a guarantee of 3400 miles paid if you work or not. It's a good deal. I guy can have another job and double dip!
You also get paid held away wich is when your at the away from home terminal at the bunk house and it starts after 10 hours and pays 12 and a half miles per hour. We also make money for switching and other things all based on hourly rates. A full time conductor working the pool and makes all his trips will take home about 2500 in 2 weeks. A hogger close to 3
---------- ADS -----------
 
I_Drive_Planes
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 357
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Prince George

Re: Railroad vs Aviation

Post by I_Drive_Planes »

True North wrote:Something else I've been wondering about. When you are starting out and the train has the slack in, obviously you can't accelerate until all the slack is out. How do you know when the last car is moving? Does the end of train device on the last coupler send a signal to the cab?
You got it. When I'm parked in a siding I can also tell when the train I'm meeting reaches my tail end because the ground vibration will tell me my tail end is moving when it is actually stationary.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”