Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
...
Last edited by A346Dude on Sun Apr 01, 2018 6:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
If you're monitoring then I can ask if you're able to climb or alter your heading 10 degrees, increasing your enroute time by a few seconds while keeping the airline traffic moving.photofly wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:45 pm But these are not restrictions caused by VFR traffic not monitoring the tower, or not stating intentions. These are restrictions caused by VFR traffic being there in the first place. Even if I monitor the frequency or state my intentions you still can't depart that traffic.
I am not arguing anything close to that.
Yes you can, and it's equally ill advised. The attitude that it's allowed, so I'm going to do it, is justification for increasing the amount of rules and restrictions which is ostensibly what you are against.photofly wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:45 pm And, your arguments apply well outside control zones too: I can loiter overhead any of the bedpost fixes for CYYZ at 8,000 for as long as like and cause all sorts of headaches for ATC. Or practice my holds over the FAF for any one of dozens of different ILS approaches outside the relevant control zones.
Last edited by A346Dude on Sun Apr 01, 2018 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
I'm arguing for rules and restrictions that I don't need to be guilt-tripped into "voluntarily" extending, for the sake of everyone else's efficiency. Instead I ask that the system tells me the rules it expects me to follow. After which I expect the system and the people who operate it to be happy and leave me alone, as long as I follow those rules. I ask not to be offered "grey areas", extra "rules of thumb" and "please voluntarily don't enter this airspace if I want to be a nice guy".
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
OK, so you are arguing for more rules then. Because the system only works as well as it usually does because most pilots are willing to accept some grey and go beyond the rules to keep things running smoothly. If everyone did their VFR holds and approaches NORDO just outside the zone you would very quickly find those 10 mile, 6000 ft Class C's a reality.
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
I call bullshit on you. (Sorry.)A346Dude wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:24 pm OK, so you are arguing for more rules then. Because the system only works as well as it usually does because most pilots are willing to accept some grey and go beyond the rules to keep things running smoothly. If everyone did their VFR holds and approaches NORDO just outside the zone you would very quickly find those 10 mile, 6000 ft Class C's a reality.
My local flight school’s TC-sanctioned practice area abuts a class D control zone and sits right in the middle of the instrument approach to the airport’s longest runway. Dozens of students and instructors from that one and at least two other FTUs are out there every VFR day doing their thing right up to the 5nm zone limit, monitoring and transmitting to each other on the CTAF, not talking to the tower or monitoring the tower frequency. And they have been, for twenty years and more.
Nobody has asked to increase the size of the control zone, and they’re not going to.
The system works just fine.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
...
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
Thanks—I think that was the kind of constructive input the OP was looking for with his/her innocent question.
A negative (voluntary) rule like this is just as much a rule as a positive one, but perhaps we should avoid the term "rules" and just call them "guidelines" to avoid triggering the more-sensitive libertarian types on the list.
@CYRO
- Redneck_pilot86
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
- Location: between 60 and 70
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
So we're obligated to call in 5 minutes prior to entering the zone (assuming there is no terminal freq we're already on)
We're typically cleared on route 5 miles from the airport on departure.
The "grey" area is that between 5 minutes and 5 miles out - are you on tower, or not? Not all aircraft have multiple comms.
We're typically cleared on route 5 miles from the airport on departure.
The "grey" area is that between 5 minutes and 5 miles out - are you on tower, or not? Not all aircraft have multiple comms.
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
Are you mixing up a couple of different things? You’re not obligated to call anyone any specific number of minutes or miles prior to entering any airspace.Redneck_pilot86 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 3:11 pm So we're obligated to call in 5 minutes prior to entering the zone (assuming there is no terminal freq we're already on)
We're typically cleared on route 5 miles from the airport on departure.
The "grey" area is that between 5 minutes and 5 miles out - are you on tower, or not? Not all aircraft have multiple comms.
If there’s an MF area then if VFR you must call before entering it stating the required information. And, where practicable, five minutes before entering. (602.101) Talking to ATC on a terminal frequency doesn’t absolve you either of these duties. IFR traffic must report five minutes before commencing an approach at an uncontrolled aerodrome, MF or not (602.104)
If there’s a class C or D control zone your bligation (VFR) is to have a clearance (601.108) or be in radio contact with the controlling agency (601.109) before entering the control zone. There’s no extra five mile or five minute rule.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
That's great. I regularly reach out to flight school aircraft 5-15 miles from the airport, who usually monitor tower frequency, advise them of high speed traffic inbound and suggest an alternative location to do their airwork. They seem to appreciate it and I suspect the airline pilots who don't have a TCAS target right on their approach 5 minutes later appreciate it too.photofly wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:06 pm I call bullshit on you. (Sorry.)
My local flight school’s TC-sanctioned practice area abuts a class D control zone and sits right in the middle of the instrument approach to the airport’s longest runway. Dozens of students and instructors from that one and at least two other FTUs are out there every VFR day doing their thing right up to the 5nm zone limit, monitoring and transmitting to each other on the CTAF, not talking to the tower or monitoring the tower frequency. And they have been, for twenty years and more.
- Redneck_pilot86
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
- Location: between 60 and 70
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
OK, the 5 minutes prior is not an obligation. But still a potential problem. If you switch to the MF or tower to call up 5 minutes prior to entering, on your only COM radio, do you then switch back to the enrolee frequency and ignore all calls from the tower, or do you stay with tower and ignore all the calls on the on route frequency? Maybe its best to only call tower at 5.1 miles away, 2 minutes from landing and just hope that there isn't anyone 4.9 miles out on departure.photofly wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 5:43 pmAre you mixing up a couple of different things? You’re not obligated to call anyone any specific number of minutes or miles prior to entering any airspace.Redneck_pilot86 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 3:11 pm So we're obligated to call in 5 minutes prior to entering the zone (assuming there is no terminal freq we're already on)
We're typically cleared on route 5 miles from the airport on departure.
The "grey" area is that between 5 minutes and 5 miles out - are you on tower, or not? Not all aircraft have multiple comms.
If there’s an MF area then if VFR you must call before entering it stating the required information. And, where practicable, five minutes before entering. (602.101) Talking to ATC on a terminal frequency doesn’t absolve you either of these duties. IFR traffic must report five minutes before commencing an approach at an uncontrolled aerodrome, MF or not (602.104)
If there’s a class C or D control zone your bligation (VFR) is to have a clearance (601.108) or be in radio contact with the controlling agency (601.109) before entering the control zone. There’s no extra five mile or five minute rule.
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
MF frequencies are associated only with uncontrolled aerodromes that don't have a control tower, and controlled airports (which have control towers) have class C or D control zones, not MF areas, so the problem isn't quite as bad as you imagine.Redneck_pilot86 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 03, 2018 10:09 amOK, the 5 minutes prior is not an obligation. But still a potential problem. If you switch to the MF or tower to call up 5 minutes prior to entering, on your only COM radio, do you then switch back to the enrolee frequency and ignore all calls from the tower, or do you stay with tower and ignore all the calls on the on route frequency? Maybe its best to only call tower at 5.1 miles away, 2 minutes from landing and just hope that there isn't anyone 4.9 miles out on departure.
But there was a thread here last year where some pilots of faster aircraft were having to report on the MF frequency sixty miles out, to the chagrin of others. And if I remember right, someone got busted by FSS for not reporting before entering an MF area because ATC refused to release them from a centre frequency in time.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
- rookiepilot
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4413
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
How can that be justified?
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
I probably don't have the details correct; but there was a discussion about why some pilots were calling FSS sixty miles out, and something of that sort came up.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
I only have one radio in my plane and I also do a bit of single pilot IFR in other aircraft. In both cases I'm not going to be on 2 frequencies at once. I've never had a problem going off an enroute frequency in order to call FSS or check an ATIS. You ask center if you can go off frequency for 2 minutes, they approve it, and you call them when you are back. Now that I think about it, I'm not sure it's legal, but it sure works fine as long as you plan it ahead.
Getting back to the original question though, with one radio I'm forced to choose between 126.7 and the local center frequency for flight following. I've always picked center. It never occurred to me that this might work with a nearby tower so I'll try it. I have my doubts about how useful it will be, but I'm certainly ready to be proven wrong and I'm definitely going to try it several times. Having someone with a radar watching you is always better than a position report on 126.7.
Getting back to the original question though, with one radio I'm forced to choose between 126.7 and the local center frequency for flight following. I've always picked center. It never occurred to me that this might work with a nearby tower so I'll try it. I have my doubts about how useful it will be, but I'm certainly ready to be proven wrong and I'm definitely going to try it several times. Having someone with a radar watching you is always better than a position report on 126.7.
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:14 pm
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
As a VFR controller, some of the responses in this thread anger me...
Take the zero
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
Oh you tease, you.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 6:29 am
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
Does a pilot need to communicate with ATC while flying VFR (during departure, flight or departure) or does it depend on type of flight (like private, commercial, etc.)?
Or is it required for pilot to inform ATC only during arrival and departure for runway clearance and altitudes?
If a pilot does not remain in contact with ATC during the flight, how does ATC know what pilot's intentions are?
Or is it required for pilot to inform ATC only during arrival and departure for runway clearance and altitudes?
If a pilot does not remain in contact with ATC during the flight, how does ATC know what pilot's intentions are?
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
Welcome to forums on the internet.northernexplorer123 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 12, 2018 2:02 pm As a VFR controller, some of the responses in this thread anger me...
I think this exchange very much falls in with all the 126.7 threads that have popped up over time. Essentially, people are recommending that more radio calls should be made than are actually required. And it's all in the name of supposed "safety" so how can it be wrong?
Well, it's wrong in a number of ways. Mainly it's wrong since there are no actual rules, so there's no way to know who is and who isn't complying with any rules of thumb or personal guidelines. Therefore there are pilots and controllers operating with personal expectations that may or may not be fulfilled by others in the system with no way of knowing who is or isn't. Any supposed safety measure that doesn't have some sort of reasonable expectation of compliance by all involved doesn't really enhance safety at all.
With 126.7 the sheer volume of calls and the unscripted content (since there are no specific rules governing them) leads to massive congestion, crosstalk, and many times incomprehensible noise. Wide adoption of "rule of thumb" calls near and around control zones could arguably lead to similar problems.
But the real problem I see with both is the assumption/expectation that radio calls are a replacement for effectively looking outside. The most basic safety rule for VFR flight is and always has been "see and be seen".
In congested areas where aircraft tend to come together frequently and "see and be seen" becomes more difficult it is determined that traffic control via radio communication is necessary and the procedures and content of calls is quite clearly defined. Additionally, the extent to which it is geographically necessary is also determined and appropriate area boundaries are defined. Beyond those boundaries there is no need for such protocol so none is defined. Should the defined boundaries not be satisfactory and actual safety conflicts arise (not just inconveniences or personal nervousness or uncertainty) they need to be changed - officially and for everybody.
In the meantime, use and learn the system as it is and everyone will be fine.
Being stupid around airplanes is a capital offence and nature is a hanging judge!
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.”
Mark Twain
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.”
Mark Twain
- rookiepilot
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4413
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Should VFR traffic near control zones contact ATC?
I'd actually like to know why.northernexplorer123 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 12, 2018 2:02 pm As a VFR controller, some of the responses in this thread anger me...
Anger from a controller isn't a good thing.
We are all here to learn, including from controllers