It’s all nicey nice to say but when you have comments like this;iflyroads wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:56 am The company will do what it needs to for survival, you cannot justify the current capacity on some of those routes using mainline (and in the near future rouge) equipment.
On the other hand, ACPA will do what it needs to for optics. They need to ensure that a precedent is set that ANY contract violation that comes about will be addressed and if a resolution cannot be found, will be grieved. If they don't do this, where does it end?
Fighting over this now makes no sense, when this grievance wont be resolved for at-least another year if not longer. Who knows what the industry will even look like by then.
This grievance is between ACPA vs. AC.
NOT ACPA pilots vs Express Pilots.
Act accordingly
Planebored wrote:
Once ACPA wins the scope grievance Jazz will prob end up having to lay off again.
No 76+ seat jets should be operating at Jazz right now.
21cdnflyer wrote:
I mean when company can literally end your operation, I would have to agree with Genius here. This is AC flying, Jazz is lucky to have the contract. Without Air Canada, Jazz would be tarnished to the levels of bush flying. Air Canada pilots deserve and have the right to fly anything and everything with their brand on it. At the end of the day you guys are regionals, and if WestJet swept up your loyalties would change overnight. Not the case for the real employees
And
When ACPA pilots are jobless and regional guys are getting paycheck, there’s a major issue. So yes, the Air Canada pilot’s stake is what matters here; and is more important.