Champagne Service Lawsuit

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

7ECA
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1281
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:33 pm

Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by 7ECA »

Apparently Sunwing should've know better than to serve sparkling wine in place of their advertised bubbly.
A Canadian man has filed a lawsuit against Sunwing Airlines for promising a champagne service and instead serving sparkling wine.

Daniel Macduff booked a holiday to Cuba through Sunwing that advertised a complimentary on-board champagne toast.

Mr Macduff, from Quebec, said he received a cheaper bubbly instead - and only on the outgoing flight.

The airline said it believes the lawsuit "to be frivolous and without merit".

Mr Macduff's lawyer says the class action hinges on misleading marketing and not the quality of the wine served.
Emphasis is mine...

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41669611
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1887
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by linecrew »

I hate when people are too stupid to realize that they should be ashamed of themselves and/or their actions....
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4413
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by rookiepilot »

Lawsuit? Frivolous. My perception of considering Sunwing a travel company to be remotely quoted in the same sentence as "Champagne Service"? Ditto, frivolous.
---------- ADS -----------
 
crazyaviator
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by crazyaviator »

Daniel Macduff
Must be from the entitlement part of the country !
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
confusedalot
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 959
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: location, location, is what matters

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by confusedalot »

crazyaviator wrote:
Daniel Macduff
Must be from the entitlement part of the country !
Sooo....which part of the country has a preponderance of Scottish heritage? :)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Attempting to understand the world. I have not succeeded.

veni, vidi,...... vici non fecit.

:?
User avatar
complexintentions
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2183
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: of my pants is unknown.

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by complexintentions »

Well, I guess now we know photofly's real name! :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
I’m still waiting for my white male privilege membership card. Must have gotten lost in the mail.
crazyaviator
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by crazyaviator »

Maybe French AND Scottish !
---------- ADS -----------
 
JBI
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1072
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:21 am
Location: YYC / LGA

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by JBI »

The article straight up says he's from Quebec. Not that it matters too much, I've dealt with frivolous lawsuits from all over the country.

Truthfully I find this one pretty funny. I've never practised law in Quebec so am not completely familiar with their civil code and couldn't say how the Quebec Courts will determine damages if there was a breach of contract. However, in common law provinces, even if it were determined that there was a cause of action that was outside the scope of the Montreal Convention, the plaintiff still has to prove damages. How much could someone reasonably argue they were owed because they were given Sparkling Wine instead of Champagne? (Difference between cost of a glass of cheap champagne and cheap Sparkling Wine?)

All that being said, if MacDuff (killer of Macbeth in Shakespeare's play) really wanted his champagne and has financed a lawyer, this would be a fun lawsuit to be involved in.
---------- ADS -----------
 
lownslow
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1710
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:56 am

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by lownslow »

Woe be he who cries, "Hold! Enough!"
---------- ADS -----------
 
lownslow
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1710
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:56 am

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by lownslow »

Oh, and lest we forget the lawsuit that came up from ordering a 7up on a plane and getting a Sprite. That was what, seven million, or one million for each 'up' the plaintiff felt they were shorted?
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1887
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by linecrew »

lownslow wrote:Oh, and lest we forget the lawsuit that came up from ordering a 7up on a plane and getting a Sprite. That was what, seven million, or one million for each 'up' the plaintiff felt they were shorted?
That'll buy them a lot of Epipens... :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by photofly »

complexintentions wrote:Well, I guess now we know photofly's real name! :mrgreen:
I don't think it's taken so seriously in Canada, but in Europe Champagne is a protected term; it's illegal to refer to a drink as Champagne unless it's sparkling wine from the Champagne region of France produced under the "applellation" system as "Apellation Champagne controllée". Oherwise there are big big fines.

Similarly Parma ham can only refer to ham from Parma, Scotch whisky must come from Scotland, only cheese from the traditional producing region can be called Parmesan, and lots of others. Greek yoghurt has to be made in Greece, otherwise it must be labelled Greek-style yoghurt.

As for this case, I don't drink, so I don't really care what they serve, half a cup of cheap plonk or not. I would want them to get me to my destination on time and avoid indeterminate ground delays.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
TG
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2090
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 11:32 am
Location: Around

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by TG »

Yes, might sound like a "frivolous" lawsuit but it is pretty misleading to call some random sparkling wine Champagne!



It would be like advertising a Bud Light as a Guinness :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
rookiepilot
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4413
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by rookiepilot »

These guys have a bit more of a case. Can't even get a refund.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/ ... -1.4317282

Champagne service? Not by my taste buds....
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by photofly »

Or you could get put in a seat with bedbugs...
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41685266
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
User avatar
confusedalot
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 959
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: location, location, is what matters

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by confusedalot »

Is it possible that one who expects Dom Perignon on a cut rate vacation may possibly be somewhat out of touch with reality?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Attempting to understand the world. I have not succeeded.

veni, vidi,...... vici non fecit.

:?
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by photofly »

Certainly. But “if you think we’re providing what we say we’re providing you must be out of touch with reality” is a curious defense strategy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
sanjet
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:54 am

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by sanjet »

Maybe he is actually right? Why is it justified to falsely market a product/service regardless of what you pay.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by photofly »

He is right. But most people would consider a lawsuit a very heavy hammer to crack a tiny tiny nut.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Champagne Service Lawsuit

Post by Bede »

I'm pretty sure that any reasonable person sees the term "Champagne" as the level of service, not a product that you actually get. On my team, we have WestJet Gold rewards or something like that. I have yet to see us reward anyone with any gold, real or imagined.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”