I think a R/C model in 1/18 scale is doable of this to show that a affordable space exploration is doable.
What do you think ?

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister
Minor nit... When the re-entry vehicle pitches up, the "wings" will blanket the front of the side-mounted speedbrakes, making them ineffective. The rear of the side speedbrakes will be left exposed in the airflow, and at an angle that will catch wind from the bottom... They're likely to get ripped off.takatiki wrote:Here is the orbiter / re-entry vehicle.
Yes you are quite right. This is just a fast sketch. Certainly it is not going to be like this...if ever anything.AirFrame wrote:Minor nit... When the re-entry vehicle pitches up, the "wings" will blanket the front of the side-mounted speedbrakes, making them ineffective. The rear of the side speedbrakes will be left exposed in the airflow, and at an angle that will catch wind from the bottom... They're likely to get ripped off.takatiki wrote:Here is the orbiter / re-entry vehicle.
I am absolutely no-one ( space cadet is a nice term ).....but I am a bit annoyed that we haven't been able get of the Earth orbit in 50 years.Jungle Jim wrote:Jukka,
I don't know about the "Farmer Astronaut" but you are pushing the boundaries of being a space cadet! I doubt you will get anyone interested in this. The span alone is 98000mm which is about 321 ft. Where will you find a building to assemble this? The drawing is nice but you will need a lot more details and sound engineering data to get anyone interested. This is beyond what a few guys or a club can put tackle. Also, you are an unknown in the industry. What sort of track record do you have to make the project believable and viable? How many of your other designs have flown successfully?
Regards,
Jim
AF any better now ? Too big to be carried under the glider...but capable to go to Mars if reloaded on LEO.AirFrame wrote:Minor nit... When the re-entry vehicle pitches up, the "wings" will blanket the front of the side-mounted speedbrakes, making them ineffective. The rear of the side speedbrakes will be left exposed in the airflow, and at an angle that will catch wind from the bottom... They're likely to get ripped off.takatiki wrote:Here is the orbiter / re-entry vehicle.
Well that is just the tip of the ICE BERG.AirFrame wrote:On a craft that small, this is your mission to Mars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjXktSdsKxg
How about now...still 14 m shorter spanning than Stratolaunch.http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/ ... 806097.jpgAirFrame wrote:On a craft that small, this is your mission to Mars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjXktSdsKxg
You got it GyvAir !GyvAir wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2017 4:42 pm I see by your moto that you are a proponent of simplication and liteness. Wise objectives indeed, but I think the craft would be significantly improved, if upgraded with twin trimulators. I’m not sure why you’ll need two of them, or what the “u” will be signifying, but it definitely makes it roll off the tongue a little smoother for the narration in the all-important promotional videos.