"...he supports a very divisive issue amongst his peers and is now, possibly always has been part of the problem, not the solution."
Is he wrong?
Or would you rather not know?
I suppose to prove him wrong, you'd have to invest as much time in research as he and you may not have the interest in doing so.
And why is it a 'divisive issue'? Is it because somebody is realizing that they were led down the garden path?
Or is it something else?
I was never in a union so don't know the 'ins and outs' of such entities. (Well, I was in an "association" one time, but we weren't very militant about things)
SWOOP startup/WJ Tail loss
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:17 pm
- Location: The Okanagan
Re: SWOOP startup/WJ Tail loss
What, one can't browse a forum without posting?The Tenth Man wrote: ↑Thu Jan 03, 2019 6:26 amUh huh. That's quite the attack I made. Of course one claiming that a forum is falling apart is legit.Rowdy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 02, 2019 9:44 amSo the guy that shits on people for making personal attacks.. turns around and then makes personal attacks. Oh the humanity!The Tenth Man wrote: ↑Wed Jan 02, 2019 6:13 am
Lightchop, you can use the rules to your benefit as well by changing your name to Chicken Little or Henny Penny. Both are appropriate.
I just find it curious that Lightchop Joined:Mon May 28, 2018 1:03 pm, or some 7 months ago, but claims that the forum has been "falling apart...for the last few years". Why would one join a forum if you knew it had been falling apart for years?
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:17 pm
- Location: The Okanagan
Re: SWOOP startup/WJ Tail loss
I've been on this site since 2008 under this c/s and well prior to that under another; given the plethora of threads displayed now, I don't see how one could aver that the site is going down hill.
Just because someone is not in agreement with some of the viewpoints doesn't mean a negative vector on the website.
JMS
Just because someone is not in agreement with some of the viewpoints doesn't mean a negative vector on the website.
JMS