But don't take my word for it here is when Fauci said the test is BS https://alethonews.com/2020/11/03/dr-fa ... in-the-us/ .
https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-202 ... rs-2020-05
https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/18/who ... positives/
If airlines and governments are going to use this as the key to travel wouldn't it make more sense to also require a gold standard on how to get accurate results. How I think governments should fix this make the labs put on the results how many cycles they used to get the result needed for travel. Why aren't these tests standardized to meet the standards of the WHO to provide accurate results? Anyone else find it criminal that some of these labs are using over 35 cycles on these PCR tests? If the plan is to quarantine everyone then why even require a useless inaccurate test.“In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably this study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.
The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even fearmonger-in-chief Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable.”
