Flair Receivership
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:09 am
- RRJetPilot
- Rank 4
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2017 10:43 am
Re: Flair Receivership
That’s 32,400,000 Cunukistan loonies a year In interest. How many flights a day does flair have? 10? Just spitballing. But that’s 9k in interest per flight they fly….. 47$ of each seat goes to pay back the interest of the loan.
I just don’t get the numbers. Someone smarter than me can explain?
I just don’t get the numbers. Someone smarter than me can explain?
- Lt. Daniel Kaffee
- Rank 3
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:43 am
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:09 am
-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:34 am
Re: Flair Receivership
Well well..all of a sudden things are not looking so well..too good to be true..pie in the sky you know the standard Canadian grifter
Re: Flair Receivership
Trying to figure this out, maybe someone can fill in the blanks?
In 2018 Prescott owned 68% of Flair, they needed to pay off debt and brought in 777 Partners who loaned Flair 140M. It was a loan to payoff another loan but... don't call it a buy-in because that would push the foreign ownership beyond limits. However, now Prescott is saying 777 Partners began running the airlines growth plan and they don't agree with it and want 777 Partners to buy them out. While 777 Partners is threatening to withdrawn their investment (with interest). Messy.
In 2018 Prescott owned 68% of Flair, they needed to pay off debt and brought in 777 Partners who loaned Flair 140M. It was a loan to payoff another loan but... don't call it a buy-in because that would push the foreign ownership beyond limits. However, now Prescott is saying 777 Partners began running the airlines growth plan and they don't agree with it and want 777 Partners to buy them out. While 777 Partners is threatening to withdrawn their investment (with interest). Messy.
- Ash Ketchum
- Rank 6
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2019 11:52 am
Re: Flair Receivership
My non pilot friends are all praising Flair for their low prices to fly across Canada. I knew it sounded too good to be true and that the company likely wasn't turning a profit.
Re: Flair Receivership
The CTA will have to keep a close eye on the goings on at FLAIR re: foreign ownership and/or control.
Re: Flair Receivership
Can any of you people show us where that 18% figure actually comes from? I see it posted here but can't seem to find any official references to it. Serious question.
Re: Flair Receivership
In the article it says the majority of the 140 is at 18 percent… so that could mean 71 million is at 18 percent and the rest is at something way more reasonable. It doesn’t make it specifically clear exactly what the terms are. So best case half of it is at 18 percent.
Re: Flair Receivership
Contrary to any false rumors, Flair is not in receivership nor is it going bankrupt!
Have a great day!
Have a great day!
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 514
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2020 9:49 am
Re: Flair Receivership
I hope that you are correct and that this point remains correct for a good amount of time to come.
Re: Flair Receivership
Happy to hear that people are realizing they have options other than paying ridiculous fares that they were being charged before Flair came into the market. We're looking forward to continuing to make travel affordable in many more markets as we growAsh Ketchum wrote: ↑Mon Jul 12, 2021 6:59 am My non pilot friends are all praising Flair for their low prices to fly across Canada. I knew it sounded too good to be true and that the company likely wasn't turning a profit.

Re: Flair Receivership
Why is the title of this thread Flair Receivership?
Re: Flair Receivership
I imagine it is because of the allegation by the plaintiff in the article:
"Meanwhile, directors of 777 Partners have allegedly threatened to call in Flair’s debt and put it into receivership if it doesn’t proceed with the leases and expansion plans, which Prescott claims are not in Flair’s best interest."
"Meanwhile, directors of 777 Partners have allegedly threatened to call in Flair’s debt and put it into receivership if it doesn’t proceed with the leases and expansion plans, which Prescott claims are not in Flair’s best interest."
Re: Flair Receivership
To be clear - having a lender “call in debt” was exactly what put Skyservice in to receivership.FurHat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 13, 2021 12:02 pm I imagine it is because of the allegation by the plaintiff in the article:
"Meanwhile, directors of 777 Partners have allegedly threatened to call in Flair’s debt and put it into receivership if it doesn’t proceed with the leases and expansion plans, which Prescott claims are not in Flair’s best interest."
Third party issues are just as relevant as first and second party issues.
- CaptainHaddock
- Rank 4
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:22 am
- Location: Nowhere fast
Re: Flair Receivership
Reasonable airline ticket prices? It cost more to fill up your truck then it does to fly. A $59 ticket is as absurd as the $1 Jetsgo tickets were. Why everybody thinks airline tickets should be so cheap is bizarre. $1.70L for gas, average Canadian house cost is $680000, $5 for a litre of milk-but heh, airline tickets should be cheap. 737 Max’s aren’t cheap, they burn 6000lbs of fuel an hour, plus all the ancillary fees the government charges. Anyway, off topic a bit, I find the cheap ticket mantra strange.
Billions of Bilious Blue Blistering Barnacles!
- flying4dollars
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am
Re: Flair Receivership
Airlines know they don't make money off just the base $59 or whatever the sector bottom line fare is for a flight. But it's not JUST $59. It's the add-ons. And in the ULCC world, there is a lot of that and it adds up.CaptainHaddock wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 7:16 pm Reasonable airline ticket prices? It cost more to fill up your truck then it does to fly. A $59 ticket is as absurd as the $1 Jetsgo tickets were. Why everybody thinks airline tickets should be so cheap is bizarre. $1.70L for gas, average Canadian house cost is $680000, $5 for a litre of milk-but heh, airline tickets should be cheap. 737 Max’s aren’t cheap, they burn 6000lbs of fuel an hour, plus all the ancillary fees the government charges. Anyway, off topic a bit, I find the cheap ticket mantra strange.
Re: Flair Receivership
Even if they make $100 profit on a seat and there are 160ish seats(?) that is only $16000. I don't know how any airline would make any money on that, especially with YYZ landing fees, NAV Canada fees, aircraft leasing costs etc. Fuel isn't free either. 6000lbs/hr on a 3 hour flight would be 10229 litres. I have no idea what airlines pay for a litre of jet fuel.
I don't know how they do it. I hope Flair does ok though.
I don't know how they do it. I hope Flair does ok though.
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
- flying4dollars
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am
Re: Flair Receivership
189 seats. I don't know what the profit margins are to be honest, but I know it's not $100 per seat. I'd say $10-20 per seat. Let's say it's $10. With 189 seats and 35 sectors on a given day, that's a total profit of $66,150 for the day or just under $2M for the month if the flights were ALWAYS full. Let's use a current average of 100 seats sold. That's $35,000 for the day or $1M for the month. Remember that's profit, after expenses. Total revenue will be higher but revenue doesn't include expenses. This number will grow as loads continue to increase, combined with additional routes, tails and sectors. Airline margins are very thin, especially for legacy carriers with legacy costs. Unless I missed something in that break down, it's not a bad start if you ask me.Inverted2 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:24 pm Even if they make $100 profit on a seat and there are 160ish seats(?) that is only $16000. I don't know how any airline would make any money on that, especially with YYZ landing fees, NAV Canada fees, aircraft leasing costs etc. Fuel isn't free either. 6000lbs/hr on a 3 hour flight would be 10229 litres. I have no idea what airlines pay for a litre of jet fuel.
I don't know how they do it. I hope Flair does ok though.
Re: Flair Receivership
$100 profit is a lot. Does AC even make that much? Looking at the ticket break downs, so much of it is taxes and fees. What's left is then divvied up though leasing costs, fuel costs, crew, real estate, other employee salary etc. AC and WJ make their money on volume.Inverted2 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:24 pm Even if they make $100 profit on a seat and there are 160ish seats(?) that is only $16000. I don't know how any airline would make any money on that, especially with YYZ landing fees, NAV Canada fees, aircraft leasing costs etc. Fuel isn't free either. 6000lbs/hr on a 3 hour flight would be 10229 litres. I have no idea what airlines pay for a litre of jet fuel.
I don't know how they do it. I hope Flair does ok though.
Re: Flair Receivership
It’s not profit if you have to use it for expenses etc.
Re: Flair Receivership
LOL! OK......if your grade 6 math was reality - there wouldn't be an airline anywhere that couldn't turn a healthy profit!flying4dollars wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:56 pm189 seats. I don't know what the profit margins are to be honest, but I know it's not $100 per seat. I'd say $10-20 per seat. Let's say it's $10. With 189 seats and 35 sectors on a given day, that's a total profit of $66,150 for the day or just under $2M for the month if the flights were ALWAYS full. Let's use a current average of 100 seats sold. That's $35,000 for the day or $1M for the month. Remember that's profit, after expenses. Total revenue will be higher but revenue doesn't include expenses. This number will grow as loads continue to increase, combined with additional routes, tails and sectors. Airline margins are very thin, especially for legacy carriers with legacy costs. Unless I missed something in that break down, it's not a bad start if you ask me.Inverted2 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:24 pm Even if they make $100 profit on a seat and there are 160ish seats(?) that is only $16000. I don't know how any airline would make any money on that, especially with YYZ landing fees, NAV Canada fees, aircraft leasing costs etc. Fuel isn't free either. 6000lbs/hr on a 3 hour flight would be 10229 litres. I have no idea what airlines pay for a litre of jet fuel.
I don't know how they do it. I hope Flair does ok though.
Yea - you missed a lot. For one - you do know that you cant use a fixed scale for cost? By your math - you simply could sell 10 seats and still make a profit of $10,500 for the month! Everyone here knows you cant make any money by only selling 10 seats on a 737.
The average cost of a 737 Max is in the neighborhood of $3700 USD per block hour. 35 sectors divided by 8 aircraft is (rounded off) 4 sectors. Lets be generous and average 5 block hours per sector. $3700 (per block hour) x 20 (block hours) x 30 (days) = $2,200,000 USD per month just for the aircraft. And you have 8 aircraft.
Lets break that down even more......4 (sectors a day) x 100 (your stated average seat sell) x 30 = 12,000 seats per month meaning that (after conversion) those 100 seats would each have to sell for $235.00 cad just for the aircraft to break even. Now add in the government taxes, Nav Canada fees, airport fees, contract fees, operating expenses for the company, interest on loans, plus a little profit and you need to charge about $500 per seat (based on 100 seats)
There are a lot of variables in there that could easily drive that cost up. Usually airlines need about a 60% load factor to break even (113 seats = about $470 per seat), and I suspect that Flairs block hour cost is a little higher than stated. I don't think your making $1 million profit a month.