Flair Receivership

Discuss topics relating to airlines.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

dialdriver
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:09 am

Flair Receivership

Post by dialdriver »

---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
RRJetPilot
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 264
Joined: Wed May 10, 2017 10:43 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by RRJetPilot »

That’s 32,400,000 Cunukistan loonies a year In interest. How many flights a day does flair have? 10? Just spitballing. But that’s 9k in interest per flight they fly….. 47$ of each seat goes to pay back the interest of the loan.

I just don’t get the numbers. Someone smarter than me can explain?
---------- ADS -----------
 
boeingboy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1620
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:57 pm
Location: West coast

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by boeingboy »

Why would any of that surprise you?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Lt. Daniel Kaffee
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:43 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by Lt. Daniel Kaffee »

18% of $140,000,000 works out to $25,200,000
---------- ADS -----------
 
dialdriver
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:09 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by dialdriver »

It's called growing bankrupt.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ALPApolicy
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 451
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:34 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by ALPApolicy »

Lt. Daniel Kaffee wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 5:17 pm 18% of $140,000,000 works out to $25,200,000
USD denominated loans?
---------- ADS -----------
 
palebird
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 265
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:17 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by palebird »

Well well..all of a sudden things are not looking so well..too good to be true..pie in the sky you know the standard Canadian grifter
---------- ADS -----------
 
TheStig
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 870
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:34 pm

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by TheStig »

Trying to figure this out, maybe someone can fill in the blanks?

In 2018 Prescott owned 68% of Flair, they needed to pay off debt and brought in 777 Partners who loaned Flair 140M. It was a loan to payoff another loan but... don't call it a buy-in because that would push the foreign ownership beyond limits. However, now Prescott is saying 777 Partners began running the airlines growth plan and they don't agree with it and want 777 Partners to buy them out. While 777 Partners is threatening to withdrawn their investment (with interest). Messy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Ash Ketchum
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 451
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2019 11:52 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by Ash Ketchum »

My non pilot friends are all praising Flair for their low prices to fly across Canada. I knew it sounded too good to be true and that the company likely wasn't turning a profit.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by rudder »

The CTA will have to keep a close eye on the goings on at FLAIR re: foreign ownership and/or control.
---------- ADS -----------
 
GRK2
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 5:04 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by GRK2 »

Can any of you people show us where that 18% figure actually comes from? I see it posted here but can't seem to find any official references to it. Serious question.
---------- ADS -----------
 
montado
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:13 pm

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by montado »

GRK2 wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 8:40 am Can any of you people show us where that 18% figure actually comes from? I see it posted here but can't seem to find any official references to it. Serious question.
In the article it says the majority of the 140 is at 18 percent… so that could mean 71 million is at 18 percent and the rest is at something way more reasonable. It doesn’t make it specifically clear exactly what the terms are. So best case half of it is at 18 percent.
---------- ADS -----------
 
atpilot
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 244
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:41 pm

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by atpilot »

Contrary to any false rumors, Flair is not in receivership nor is it going bankrupt!
Have a great day!
---------- ADS -----------
 
notwhoyouthinkIam
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 514
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2020 9:49 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by notwhoyouthinkIam »

atpilot wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 6:27 am Contrary to any false rumors, Flair is not in receivership nor is it going bankrupt!
Have a great day!
I hope that you are correct and that this point remains correct for a good amount of time to come.
---------- ADS -----------
 
tbaylx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1231
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:30 pm

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by tbaylx »

Ash Ketchum wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 6:59 am My non pilot friends are all praising Flair for their low prices to fly across Canada. I knew it sounded too good to be true and that the company likely wasn't turning a profit.
Happy to hear that people are realizing they have options other than paying ridiculous fares that they were being charged before Flair came into the market. We're looking forward to continuing to make travel affordable in many more markets as we grow :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2537
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by DanWEC »

Why is the title of this thread Flair Receivership?
---------- ADS -----------
 
FurHat
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 9:33 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by FurHat »

I imagine it is because of the allegation by the plaintiff in the article:

"Meanwhile, directors of 777 Partners have allegedly threatened to call in Flair’s debt and put it into receivership if it doesn’t proceed with the leases and expansion plans, which Prescott claims are not in Flair’s best interest."
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by rudder »

FurHat wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 12:02 pm I imagine it is because of the allegation by the plaintiff in the article:

"Meanwhile, directors of 777 Partners have allegedly threatened to call in Flair’s debt and put it into receivership if it doesn’t proceed with the leases and expansion plans, which Prescott claims are not in Flair’s best interest."
To be clear - having a lender “call in debt” was exactly what put Skyservice in to receivership.

Third party issues are just as relevant as first and second party issues.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
CaptainHaddock
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:22 am
Location: Nowhere fast

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by CaptainHaddock »

Reasonable airline ticket prices? It cost more to fill up your truck then it does to fly. A $59 ticket is as absurd as the $1 Jetsgo tickets were. Why everybody thinks airline tickets should be so cheap is bizarre. $1.70L for gas, average Canadian house cost is $680000, $5 for a litre of milk-but heh, airline tickets should be cheap. 737 Max’s aren’t cheap, they burn 6000lbs of fuel an hour, plus all the ancillary fees the government charges. Anyway, off topic a bit, I find the cheap ticket mantra strange.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Billions of Bilious Blue Blistering Barnacles!
User avatar
flying4dollars
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by flying4dollars »

CaptainHaddock wrote: Sat Jul 17, 2021 7:16 pm Reasonable airline ticket prices? It cost more to fill up your truck then it does to fly. A $59 ticket is as absurd as the $1 Jetsgo tickets were. Why everybody thinks airline tickets should be so cheap is bizarre. $1.70L for gas, average Canadian house cost is $680000, $5 for a litre of milk-but heh, airline tickets should be cheap. 737 Max’s aren’t cheap, they burn 6000lbs of fuel an hour, plus all the ancillary fees the government charges. Anyway, off topic a bit, I find the cheap ticket mantra strange.
Airlines know they don't make money off just the base $59 or whatever the sector bottom line fare is for a flight. But it's not JUST $59. It's the add-ons. And in the ULCC world, there is a lot of that and it adds up.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3882
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by Inverted2 »

Even if they make $100 profit on a seat and there are 160ish seats(?) that is only $16000. I don't know how any airline would make any money on that, especially with YYZ landing fees, NAV Canada fees, aircraft leasing costs etc. Fuel isn't free either. 6000lbs/hr on a 3 hour flight would be 10229 litres. I have no idea what airlines pay for a litre of jet fuel.

I don't know how they do it. I hope Flair does ok though.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
User avatar
flying4dollars
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by flying4dollars »

Inverted2 wrote: Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:24 pm Even if they make $100 profit on a seat and there are 160ish seats(?) that is only $16000. I don't know how any airline would make any money on that, especially with YYZ landing fees, NAV Canada fees, aircraft leasing costs etc. Fuel isn't free either. 6000lbs/hr on a 3 hour flight would be 10229 litres. I have no idea what airlines pay for a litre of jet fuel.

I don't know how they do it. I hope Flair does ok though.
189 seats. I don't know what the profit margins are to be honest, but I know it's not $100 per seat. I'd say $10-20 per seat. Let's say it's $10. With 189 seats and 35 sectors on a given day, that's a total profit of $66,150 for the day or just under $2M for the month if the flights were ALWAYS full. Let's use a current average of 100 seats sold. That's $35,000 for the day or $1M for the month. Remember that's profit, after expenses. Total revenue will be higher but revenue doesn't include expenses. This number will grow as loads continue to increase, combined with additional routes, tails and sectors. Airline margins are very thin, especially for legacy carriers with legacy costs. Unless I missed something in that break down, it's not a bad start if you ask me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
acpaleaks
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:28 pm

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by acpaleaks »

Inverted2 wrote: Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:24 pm Even if they make $100 profit on a seat and there are 160ish seats(?) that is only $16000. I don't know how any airline would make any money on that, especially with YYZ landing fees, NAV Canada fees, aircraft leasing costs etc. Fuel isn't free either. 6000lbs/hr on a 3 hour flight would be 10229 litres. I have no idea what airlines pay for a litre of jet fuel.

I don't know how they do it. I hope Flair does ok though.
$100 profit is a lot. Does AC even make that much? Looking at the ticket break downs, so much of it is taxes and fees. What's left is then divvied up though leasing costs, fuel costs, crew, real estate, other employee salary etc. AC and WJ make their money on volume.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
BTD
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1576
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by BTD »

It’s not profit if you have to use it for expenses etc.
---------- ADS -----------
 
boeingboy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1620
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:57 pm
Location: West coast

Re: Flair Receivership

Post by boeingboy »

flying4dollars wrote: Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:56 pm
Inverted2 wrote: Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:24 pm Even if they make $100 profit on a seat and there are 160ish seats(?) that is only $16000. I don't know how any airline would make any money on that, especially with YYZ landing fees, NAV Canada fees, aircraft leasing costs etc. Fuel isn't free either. 6000lbs/hr on a 3 hour flight would be 10229 litres. I have no idea what airlines pay for a litre of jet fuel.

I don't know how they do it. I hope Flair does ok though.
189 seats. I don't know what the profit margins are to be honest, but I know it's not $100 per seat. I'd say $10-20 per seat. Let's say it's $10. With 189 seats and 35 sectors on a given day, that's a total profit of $66,150 for the day or just under $2M for the month if the flights were ALWAYS full. Let's use a current average of 100 seats sold. That's $35,000 for the day or $1M for the month. Remember that's profit, after expenses. Total revenue will be higher but revenue doesn't include expenses. This number will grow as loads continue to increase, combined with additional routes, tails and sectors. Airline margins are very thin, especially for legacy carriers with legacy costs. Unless I missed something in that break down, it's not a bad start if you ask me.
LOL! OK......if your grade 6 math was reality - there wouldn't be an airline anywhere that couldn't turn a healthy profit!

Yea - you missed a lot. For one - you do know that you cant use a fixed scale for cost? By your math - you simply could sell 10 seats and still make a profit of $10,500 for the month! Everyone here knows you cant make any money by only selling 10 seats on a 737.

The average cost of a 737 Max is in the neighborhood of $3700 USD per block hour. 35 sectors divided by 8 aircraft is (rounded off) 4 sectors. Lets be generous and average 5 block hours per sector. $3700 (per block hour) x 20 (block hours) x 30 (days) = $2,200,000 USD per month just for the aircraft. And you have 8 aircraft.

Lets break that down even more......4 (sectors a day) x 100 (your stated average seat sell) x 30 = 12,000 seats per month meaning that (after conversion) those 100 seats would each have to sell for $235.00 cad just for the aircraft to break even. Now add in the government taxes, Nav Canada fees, airport fees, contract fees, operating expenses for the company, interest on loans, plus a little profit and you need to charge about $500 per seat (based on 100 seats)

There are a lot of variables in there that could easily drive that cost up. Usually airlines need about a 60% load factor to break even (113 seats = about $470 per seat), and I suspect that Flairs block hour cost is a little higher than stated. I don't think your making $1 million profit a month.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Airline Industry Comments”