Seems tough with the instruments removed.RatherBeFlying wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 8:23 pmGoing from point A to B under the hood is a very small subset of what has to be done to obtain an instrument rating.But you want to put a requirement on the night rating that's more onerous than that required for the instrument rating
When you do lose visual reference in night VFR, it's instrument proficiency that will keep you alive.
R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
- rookiepilot
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4413
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
Changes to night rating requirements are coming down the pipe. Will need a clear horizon or the flight must be under IFR or have night vision goggles.goldeneagle wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:01 pmThe vast majority of folks who get a night rating know about, understand, and respect weather. But you want to put a requirement on the night rating that's more onerous than that required for the instrument rating because of the rare few, and just ignore the fact that those few will figure out ways to kill themselves in spite of all the hurdles you put in front of them to try prevent it.RatherBeFlying wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:42 pm For a night rating, pilots should be required to do a night cross country under the hood.
The ones that can't handle it will understand why they should stick with day VFR - or get a TSB report for a tombstone.
Do you work at the TSB ?
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
Excuse me...night vision goggles?
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
It probably should be said here that there are very significant differences in flying a fixed wing at night, and a helicopter at night, especially one eager to chop its own tail off.
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
Yeah, helicopters don't really have the same positive stability as an airplane. In IMC or night without a horizon it gets demanding on pilot skill. This R44 was missing some required instruments, but did have a Stratus box giving high quality gyro info through his iPad that could have more than made up for it.It probably should be said here that there are very significant differences in flying a fixed wing at night, and a helicopter at night, especially one eager to chop its own tail off.
I flew a few years of hard IFR, some single pilot, on a Bell 222UT. Same stability as this R44, as in none except a force trim. But that was after a few thousand hours, the disconnect here is between the training and licensing and the reality of difficult winter flying.
The R44 is no more eager than any other helicopter to chop its tail off. Just like the Bell 429 that just did that in NJ isn't eager to do so either - and that was in daytime, not night. No relevance here, but does expose the poster as a classic "Robbie-basher", someone inclined to irrationally find fault in a helicopter type because it is an inexpensive piston instead of turbine heavy iron. A reputation consequence of the type's popularity with private pilots and their relative inexperience compared to professional pilots.
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
No it doesn't. They are dangerous shitboxes in the hands of the very people they are marketed to. That is complicated by TMS in this accident. I don't "irrationally find fault" Sonny. That is like saying "first responders irrationally find bodies of innocent passengers".
Carry on.
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
What conditions does an R44 cut its tail off
Probably same thing as mast bump in a semirigid Bell product.
In any case if you are in a rotorcraft that induces those conditions due to disorientation you are dead. Even an ASTAR or BK117. It’s just that in those helicopters you will fly into the ground intact.
Probably same thing as mast bump in a semirigid Bell product.
In any case if you are in a rotorcraft that induces those conditions due to disorientation you are dead. Even an ASTAR or BK117. It’s just that in those helicopters you will fly into the ground intact.
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
What is TMS?cncpc wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:52 pmNo it doesn't. They are dangerous shitboxes in the hands of the very people they are marketed to. That is complicated by TMS in this accident. I don't "irrationally find fault" Sonny. That is like saying "first responders irrationally find bodies of innocent passengers".
Carry on.
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
He got into a right hand spiral dive and recovered about 111 feet from the ground. The climbed up to 300 AGL and entered a left spiral dive and hit the ground intact.
From the report: "The main rotor severed the tail boom in front of the horizontal stabilizer during the impact sequence, which also severed the tail rotor drive shaft and tail rotor pitch control shaft. The main rotor transmission and mast had broken away from the airframe. The main rotor assembly was still mounted to the mast, and the mast to the transmission. The main rotor blades showed distortion from contact with the ground and the tail boom."
The Robbie is not he safest nor forgiving helicopter out there, however it would have been the same result in a JetRanger or AStar.
From the report: "The main rotor severed the tail boom in front of the horizontal stabilizer during the impact sequence, which also severed the tail rotor drive shaft and tail rotor pitch control shaft. The main rotor transmission and mast had broken away from the airframe. The main rotor assembly was still mounted to the mast, and the mast to the transmission. The main rotor blades showed distortion from contact with the ground and the tail boom."
The Robbie is not he safest nor forgiving helicopter out there, however it would have been the same result in a JetRanger or AStar.
Re: R-44 Fatal Accident - Alberta
Thurman Munson SyndromeJ31 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 9:33 pmWhat is TMS?cncpc wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:52 pmNo it doesn't. They are dangerous shitboxes in the hands of the very people they are marketed to. That is complicated by TMS in this accident. I don't "irrationally find fault" Sonny. That is like saying "first responders irrationally find bodies of innocent passengers".
Carry on.
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.