So “being unable to afford to buy a $1.2 million dollar house as a new FO” — is now being spun as a compromise of safety?averageatbest wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 5:57 pmThere is nothing wrong with making all of the right choices and getting lucky enough times to make it.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 4:10 pm Don’t expect to be popular writing like this. I agree with every word, but its not popular to say it.
Mine?
My first (minimum wage) job was at 15, (delivery of newspapers, shoveled snow from age 10) I paid rent from 18, in my own apartment —moldy basement suite — at 19, paid one year of college then dropped out — couldn’t afford it — zero family help. Everything bought used, everything bought cash.
Started my business across the country at 30 with 25K. No RRSP, no house, pension, one old car. No debt. Kept living cheap. Made some money, eventually, bought a cheap house — cash. Still have it. Everything bought with cash. Only 2 cars bought new, rest used.
After — got my pilots license and ratings. Cash. Instructor quipped once “your lucky”.![]()
Uh —No.
Nobody owns me.
But nobody wants to pay that price.
Unfortunately, when someone is a professional pilot and is unable to afford the basics (rent, food, gas, internet, phone) without taking on more and more debt, there is a problem.
Safety is being compromised and the employers are willing to bet that it won't bite them in the ass.
Explain, please.






