Foggy today down at the Island

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Foggy today down at the Island

Post by photofly »

METAR CYTZ 242200Z AUTO 08005KT 0SM R26/1100FT/N FG VV001 03/02 A3010 RMK SLP198=
0SM is quite unusual. And they shut down the vehicle ferry operations because of poor visibility.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5956
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Foggy today down at the Island

Post by digits_ »

I am intrigued by the 1 degree dewpoint spread in such thick fog
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
McKinley
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 11:19 pm

Re: Foggy today down at the Island

Post by McKinley »

digits_ wrote: Thu Nov 24, 2022 4:42 pm I am intrigued by the 1 degree dewpoint spread in such thick fog
YXS is a classic example … there’s a pulp mill/ sewage plant / forestry nearby… you can have a 2-3 degree spread but due to the amount of condensation nuclei dense fog will form.. that’s all I got …
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Foggy today down at the Island

Post by photofly »

Ground level chemtrails, perhaps
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Foggy today down at the Island

Post by photofly »

Ground level chemtrails, perhaps
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”