I don’t understand the question, because if you were in last semesters class, you would have known that your lead liberal is a major shareholder in the experimental gene therapy technology and has gotten very rich off of your demise. The Consevatives on the other hand did nothing to stop the scamdemic, so are actually accomplices.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 1:45 pmNo connection to this thread, Aviatard, but just curious these days if the Liberal government has your full support still, as you’ve expressed many times in the past.
3 in a month
Re: 3 in a month
- rookiepilot
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5064
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: 3 in a month
“My” lead Liberal? I think not.JerryRig wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:42 pmI don’t understand the question, because if you were in last semesters class, you would have known that your lead liberal is a major shareholder in the experimental gene therapy technology and has gotten very rich off of your demise. The Consevatives on the other hand did nothing to stop the scamdemic, so are actually accomplices.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 1:45 pmNo connection to this thread, Aviatard, but just curious these days if the Liberal government has your full support still, as you’ve expressed many times in the past.
What do you say, Aviatard? (And all Liberal supporters).
Are we good with blatant foreign interference in our elections? Payoffs?
Don’t be shy.
Re: 3 in a month
You made this up. I have never expressed support for any party. Pointing out conservative bullshit is not the same thing.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 1:45 pm No connection to this thread, Aviatard, but just curious these days if the Liberal government has your full support still, as you’ve expressed many times in the past.
- rookiepilot
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5064
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: 3 in a month
It sure is when it’s 100% one sided.Aviatard wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:45 pmYou made this up. I have never expressed support for any party. Pointing out conservative bullshit is not the same thing.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 1:45 pm No connection to this thread, Aviatard, but just curious these days if the Liberal government has your full support still, as you’ve expressed many times in the past.
Your party has been in power 8 years. The division and crashing living standards are shocking. Borderline scary.
Now third world type payoffs and corruption appear that would make the Americans blush.
The silence now speaks volumes from an active political critic. Its a tacit endorsement of everything going on in the Liberal Party.
Own it.
Re: 3 in a month
Meanwhile, the airhead regulators still can figure out, or won’t admit, that it’s the jab causing these cardiovascular events.
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/can ... of-pilots/
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/can ... of-pilots/
Re: 3 in a month
You’re a disgusting piece of s@#t, do you have any proof of this being related to the vaccine, or that the pilot who died was vaccinated.JerryRig wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:04 pm Meanwhile, the airhead regulators still can figure out, or won’t admit, that it’s the jab causing these cardiovascular events.
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/can ... of-pilots/
Re: 3 in a month
We’ve known soon after the rollout of the vax that severe adverse reactions were happening. Pfizer knew it too but they let it go. It’s all in the 3 month test report. Would you like me to post it again, or can you find it in the 3 other threads I posted in a year ago?cdnavater wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 5:19 pmYou’re a disgusting piece of s@#t, do you have any proof of this being related to the vaccine, or that the pilot who died was vaccinated.JerryRig wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:04 pm Meanwhile, the airhead regulators still can figure out, or won’t admit, that it’s the jab causing these cardiovascular events.
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/can ... of-pilots/
Your governments, doctors, favorite news channels, and company executives were all lying to you. Sorry.
Re: 3 in a month
Not a care in the world about personal health would fit their awful eating habit (In the States)BE02 Driver wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 7:32 am It's amazing to me the cultural differences between Canada and the US on this and most topics.
The pilots I fly with don't care one way or another about your personal decisions regarding medical procedures, masking or basically anything else you do in your life. It's a very much, you do you, I'll do me attitude. Very refreshing.

Re: 3 in a month
Please post this individual's autopsy results and his/her medical history so that we can all see what you see so clearly.JerryRig wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 6:02 pmWe’ve known soon after the rollout of the vax that severe adverse reactions were happening. Pfizer knew it too but they let it go. It’s all in the 3 month test report. Would you like me to post it again, or can you find it in the 3 other threads I posted in a year ago?cdnavater wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 5:19 pmYou’re a disgusting piece of s@#t, do you have any proof of this being related to the vaccine, or that the pilot who died was vaccinated.JerryRig wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:04 pm Meanwhile, the airhead regulators still can figure out, or won’t admit, that it’s the jab causing these cardiovascular events.
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/can ... of-pilots/
Your governments, doctors, favorite news channels, and company executives were all lying to you. Sorry.
I'm not sure how someone has an incapacitation event in another country and that he or she has an autopsy (very few people actually have one after death) and that it would be released to the public along with his or her entire medical history showing his vaccination status such that JerryRig could make a conclusion on the cause of death.
Re: 3 in a month
Not a single indication in that report relating to vaccines. You’re lying to us.JerryRig wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 6:02 pmWe’ve known soon after the rollout of the vax that severe adverse reactions were happening. Pfizer knew it too but they let it go. It’s all in the 3 month test report. Would you like me to post it again, or can you find it in the 3 other threads I posted in a year ago?cdnavater wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 5:19 pmYou’re a disgusting piece of s@#t, do you have any proof of this being related to the vaccine, or that the pilot who died was vaccinated.JerryRig wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:04 pm Meanwhile, the airhead regulators still can figure out, or won’t admit, that it’s the jab causing these cardiovascular events.
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/can ... of-pilots/
Your governments, doctors, favorite news channels, and company executives were all lying to you. Sorry.
Re: 3 in a month
When there is a collusion to reduce the population due to an unfounded satanic belief that there are too many people on the planet creating a (false) crisis of excess carbon induced climate change, they will stop at nothing short of massive non-compliance to achieve that goal. Bill gates stated this in a ted talk, prince (now king) Charles is also on record stating this disgusting idea.
Why would they admit they (the entitled elite) are the guilty ones and allow evidence such as autopsies to incriminate themselves?
This is the core of the issue. You are the carbon they want to reduce.
Sorry to break it to you, I know it’s a hard pill to swallow. Don’t shoot the messenger.
JR
Why would they admit they (the entitled elite) are the guilty ones and allow evidence such as autopsies to incriminate themselves?
This is the core of the issue. You are the carbon they want to reduce.
Sorry to break it to you, I know it’s a hard pill to swallow. Don’t shoot the messenger.
JR
Re: 3 in a month
Speaking about pills, go take your meds you need it.JerryRig wrote: ↑Sat Mar 18, 2023 11:18 am When there is a collusion to reduce the population due to an unfounded satanic belief that there are too many people on the planet creating a (false) crisis of excess carbon induced climate change, they will stop at nothing short of massive non-compliance to achieve that goal. Bill gates stated this in a ted talk, prince (now king) Charles is also on record stating this disgusting idea.
Why would they admit they (the entitled elite) are the guilty ones and allow evidence such as autopsies to incriminate themselves?
This is the core of the issue. You are the carbon they want to reduce.
Sorry to break it to you, I know it’s a hard pill to swallow. Don’t shoot the messenger.
JR
- rookiepilot
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5064
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: 3 in a month
It just gets better for the Lib—-s…..Aviatard wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:45 pmYou made this up. I have never expressed support for any party. Pointing out conservative bullshit is not the same thing.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 1:45 pm No connection to this thread, Aviatard, but just curious these days if the Liberal government has your full support still, as you’ve expressed many times in the past.
https://globalnews.ca/news/9570437/libe ... s-sources/
Of course they admire all this….
Re: 3 in a month
Yes the Lieberals are as rotten as they get but I’ve always wondered what happened to the 2 Michaels. They haven’t been seen or heard since they got released. I would have thought they would have done an interview. My guess is the Libs and ChiComs told them to zip it or else.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 3:42 pmIt just gets better for the Lib—-s…..Aviatard wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:45 pmYou made this up. I have never expressed support for any party. Pointing out conservative bullshit is not the same thing.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 1:45 pm No connection to this thread, Aviatard, but just curious these days if the Liberal government has your full support still, as you’ve expressed many times in the past.
https://globalnews.ca/news/9570437/libe ... s-sources/
Of course they admire all this….
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
Re: 3 in a month
This is also a distraction to take the heat of the covid criminal manoeuvring that was brought to light. Never let them forget.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 3:42 pmIt just gets better for the Lib—-s…..Aviatard wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:45 pmYou made this up. I have never expressed support for any party. Pointing out conservative bullshit is not the same thing.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 1:45 pm No connection to this thread, Aviatard, but just curious these days if the Liberal government has your full support still, as you’ve expressed many times in the past.
https://globalnews.ca/news/9570437/libe ... s-sources/
Of course they admire all this….
Re: 3 in a month
Even the most critical have to admit 5 in a month is a little excessive.
Better get your d-dimer test.
https://makismd.substack.com/p/southwes ... -departing
Better get your d-dimer test.
https://makismd.substack.com/p/southwes ... -departing
Re: 3 in a month
This wasn’t me, but maybe you have an ounce of humanity left to ponder what others are going through:
Re: 3 in a month
https://simpleflying.com/first-officer- ... 21-flight/
First Officer Incapacitated During Air Transat Airbus A321 Flight
BY
CHRIS LOH
PUBLISHED 15 HOURS AGO
A member of the flight crew was incapacitated during an Air Transat flight from Fort de France to Montreal.
C-GTCY Air Transat Airbus A321-211 Photo: Vincenzo Pace | Simple Flying
On March 18th, an Air Transat Airbus A321 was flying from Fort-de-France to Montreal when the aircraft's first officer became incapacitated. The incident occurred as the aircraft was flying over the United States, 200NM south of Montreal.
Incident details
According to The Aviation Herald, the March 18th incident took place aboard Air Transat flight TS739, an Airbus A321-200 service from Fort-de-France, capital of the French territory of Martinique to Montreal, Canada.
The flight departed took off at 13:34, 34 minutes past its scheduled departure time. According to FlightRadar24.com data, reached a cruising altitude of FL320 approximately 25 minutes after takeoff. The aircraft increased its cruising altitude twice more during the flight, going up to FL340, and then FL360. 191 people were onboard the A321-200, which was registered C-GTCY.
Screen Shot 2023-03-23 at 8.21.17 PM
Photo: FlightRadar24.com
At FL360, about 200NM south of Montreal, the first officer reportedly became incapacitated. The Canadian Transportation Safety Board reported that a second officer was available onboard and was thus able to replace the incapacitated first officer. Unfortunately, no additional details on the first officer's condition were made available.
Get the latest aviation news straight to your inbox: Sign up for our newsletters today.
The first of two incapacitated pilot incidents within a week
This Air Transat incident was actually the first of two incidents of its kind happening within the span of a week. Indeed days later, on March 22nd, a Southwest Airlines flight from Las Vegas (Nevada) to Columbus (Ohio), saw its captain become incapacitated.
Southwest Boeing 737
Photo: PlanespotterA320 via Wikimedia commons
The Aviation Herald notes that the Boeing 737-700 was en route at FL370 about 160nm northeast of Las Vegas when the first officer radioed air traffic control to notify them that the captain was complaining about stomach pain. It was then noted that the captain then became incapacitated. In a similar resolution to the Air Transat situation, another pilot was available to step in. In this case, it was a passenger that was an off-duty, fully-licensed pilot for a different airline.
A case against single-pilot operations
Despite two such instances taking place within a week, these cases are thankfully quite rare. However, the top priority for aviation is safety. Thus, the reality of the occasional "incapacitated pilot" incident is one strong argument against the possibility of single pilot operations. Two pilots in the cockpit provide redundancy so that if one of the aircraft's pilots were to become incapacitated, the other pilot could take over the full operation of the aircraft and perform a landing.
Last month, a Reuters report noted that the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) had ruled out single-pilot flights by 2030. However, the regulator was reportedly still evaluating proposals from Airbus and Dassault Aviation. This could see lmited single-pilot operation for parts of the flight as early as 2027.
It would appear, however, that some proposals for single-pilot operations would still include at least one other pilot onboard the aircraft. This is the case for Airbus and Cathay Pacific's 'Project Connect', which envisions a fatigued pilot being able to rest in the crew rest area while the other pilot flies solo during less-demanding portions of the flight, and not takeoff or landing
First Officer Incapacitated During Air Transat Airbus A321 Flight
BY
CHRIS LOH
PUBLISHED 15 HOURS AGO
A member of the flight crew was incapacitated during an Air Transat flight from Fort de France to Montreal.
C-GTCY Air Transat Airbus A321-211 Photo: Vincenzo Pace | Simple Flying
On March 18th, an Air Transat Airbus A321 was flying from Fort-de-France to Montreal when the aircraft's first officer became incapacitated. The incident occurred as the aircraft was flying over the United States, 200NM south of Montreal.
Incident details
According to The Aviation Herald, the March 18th incident took place aboard Air Transat flight TS739, an Airbus A321-200 service from Fort-de-France, capital of the French territory of Martinique to Montreal, Canada.
The flight departed took off at 13:34, 34 minutes past its scheduled departure time. According to FlightRadar24.com data, reached a cruising altitude of FL320 approximately 25 minutes after takeoff. The aircraft increased its cruising altitude twice more during the flight, going up to FL340, and then FL360. 191 people were onboard the A321-200, which was registered C-GTCY.
Screen Shot 2023-03-23 at 8.21.17 PM
Photo: FlightRadar24.com
At FL360, about 200NM south of Montreal, the first officer reportedly became incapacitated. The Canadian Transportation Safety Board reported that a second officer was available onboard and was thus able to replace the incapacitated first officer. Unfortunately, no additional details on the first officer's condition were made available.
Get the latest aviation news straight to your inbox: Sign up for our newsletters today.
The first of two incapacitated pilot incidents within a week
This Air Transat incident was actually the first of two incidents of its kind happening within the span of a week. Indeed days later, on March 22nd, a Southwest Airlines flight from Las Vegas (Nevada) to Columbus (Ohio), saw its captain become incapacitated.
Southwest Boeing 737
Photo: PlanespotterA320 via Wikimedia commons
The Aviation Herald notes that the Boeing 737-700 was en route at FL370 about 160nm northeast of Las Vegas when the first officer radioed air traffic control to notify them that the captain was complaining about stomach pain. It was then noted that the captain then became incapacitated. In a similar resolution to the Air Transat situation, another pilot was available to step in. In this case, it was a passenger that was an off-duty, fully-licensed pilot for a different airline.
A case against single-pilot operations
Despite two such instances taking place within a week, these cases are thankfully quite rare. However, the top priority for aviation is safety. Thus, the reality of the occasional "incapacitated pilot" incident is one strong argument against the possibility of single pilot operations. Two pilots in the cockpit provide redundancy so that if one of the aircraft's pilots were to become incapacitated, the other pilot could take over the full operation of the aircraft and perform a landing.
Last month, a Reuters report noted that the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) had ruled out single-pilot flights by 2030. However, the regulator was reportedly still evaluating proposals from Airbus and Dassault Aviation. This could see lmited single-pilot operation for parts of the flight as early as 2027.
It would appear, however, that some proposals for single-pilot operations would still include at least one other pilot onboard the aircraft. This is the case for Airbus and Cathay Pacific's 'Project Connect', which envisions a fatigued pilot being able to rest in the crew rest area while the other pilot flies solo during less-demanding portions of the flight, and not takeoff or landing
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:43 am
Re: 3 in a month
Wow, mental gymnastics with that one. Good for you. I can see why you find the world so confusing.No Smoke, No Fire wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 8:54 amYet you feel compelled to ask each pilot you’ve flown their vaccination status? Curious.BE02 Driver wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 7:32 am It's amazing to me the cultural differences between Canada and the US on this and most topics.
The pilots I fly with don't care one way or another about your personal decisions regarding medical procedures, masking or basically anything else you do in your life. It's a very much, you do you, I'll do me attitude. Very refreshing.
How about, they ask me without fail why I left the Utopia that is Canada, I tell them my story and they volunteer their position. People like you is why Canada is a mess.
Re: 3 in a month
I get you're impressed because Bill Makis is/was a physician, but he's the poster child for mental illness. Ignore the fact that he is a radiologist and has no specialty training in immunology/virology/pharmacology/epidemiology, and worry about why he's been declared a vexatious litigant for over 5 years and why he believes entire hospitals and everyone of the staff members is out to get him. This has been his life for a decade plus.
https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abcpsdc/do ... ltIndex=12
https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abcpsdc/do ... ltIndex=12
JerryRig wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 10:09 am 7
https://makismd.substack.com/p/young-pi ... d-suddenly
2D97DA27-F10A-4B14-81F2-01B8C1EFA427.jpeg
Re: 3 in a month
I would also like to point out that you haven't proven that any of the above individuals were even vaccinated in the first place. Many companies now hire individuals who refused the shot.
Are you going to blame the vaccine on this guy's death too?
https://globalnews.ca/news/9399041/pede ... n-toronto/
Are you going to blame the vaccine on this guy's death too?
https://globalnews.ca/news/9399041/pede ... n-toronto/
Re: 3 in a month
The other thing to consider, is that a lot of the language used in that release/article/obituary, tends to be that used in cases of suicide in an attempt to shield family and friends from further heartache and occasionally stigma.
Re: 3 in a month
Yes, I had the same thought when I read that, that or an accident! I would think they would come out and say it if it were suspected to be vaccine related.
I’ll give rig credit for persistence though, still not vaccinated and still outta work, must be mentally exhausting!
Re: 3 in a month
I have no opinion on the article, but if the main reason you don't trust it is because of the credentials of the doctor, would you trust a bunch of other doctors that recommend against the vaccine who are immunological, vaccinologists, epidemiologist etc?kgb531 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 9:36 pm I get you're impressed because Bill Makis is/was a physician, but he's the poster child for mental illness. Ignore the fact that he is a radiologist and has no specialty training in immunology/virology/pharmacology/epidemiology, and worry about why he's been declared a vexatious litigant for over 5 years and why he believes entire hospitals and everyone of the staff members is out to get him. This has been his life for a decade plus.
https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abcpsdc/do ... ltIndex=12
JerryRig wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 10:09 am 7
https://makismd.substack.com/p/young-pi ... d-suddenly
2D97DA27-F10A-4B14-81F2-01B8C1EFA427.jpeg