Negotiations

Discuss topics relating to Jazz Aviation LP.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
mmm...bacon
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2022 11:51 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by mmm...bacon »

Fanblade wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 7:14 am

If AC’s strategy is to have the feds preempt a strike before it even starts like 2012, then it is flawed. That is very clearly unconstitutional. Any intervention would happen after the strike was in progress which is a little muddier. For this to be their strategy likely means enduring a strike for a few weeks. Then trying to ram a mediators report down our throat like the port of Vancouver. That playbook leaves a lot of uncertainty on future bookings for an extended time.
IMHO, unlikely that the Government will intervene in a strike for quite some period of time. They didn’t move on the longshoremen for ?3 or so?weeks, and then only to threaten; I’d argue that heavy freight movement is more valuable to the economy than a passenger airline..
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptDukeNukem
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

mmm...bacon wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:38 am
Fanblade wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 7:14 am

If AC’s strategy is to have the feds preempt a strike before it even starts like 2012, then it is flawed. That is very clearly unconstitutional. Any intervention would happen after the strike was in progress which is a little muddier. For this to be their strategy likely means enduring a strike for a few weeks. Then trying to ram a mediators report down our throat like the port of Vancouver. That playbook leaves a lot of uncertainty on future bookings for an extended time.
IMHO, unlikely that the Government will intervene in a strike for quite some period of time. They didn’t move on the longshoremen for ?3 or so?weeks, and then only to threaten; I’d argue that heavy freight movement is more valuable to the economy than a passenger airline..
I personally disagree.. Tons of business gets done with in person face to face meetings, people gotta fly to get this done efficiently. Especially with AC who deals with the premium business travelers more so than other airlines. Not being able to travel quickly from location to location has the ability to harm the economy quite badly.

While freight is a big part of aviation, much much more gets moved by rail and sea than by air.
---------- ADS -----------
 
throwawaycorporate
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 5:32 pm

Re: Negotiations

Post by throwawaycorporate »

CaptDukeNukem wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:48 am I personally disagree.. Tons of business gets done with in person face to face meetings, people gotta fly to get this done efficiently. Especially with AC who deals with the premium business travelers more so than other airlines. Not being able to travel quickly from location to location has the ability to harm the economy quite badly.

While freight is a big part of aviation, much much more gets moved by rail and sea than by air.
"Sorry guys, flight's cancelled. Let's do this meeting over zoom"
---------- ADS -----------
 
QKZXKV
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 7:46 am
Location: Nickelbelt/Concrete Jungle/Lobster country...

Re: Negotiations

Post by QKZXKV »

mmm...bacon wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:38 am
Fanblade wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 7:14 am

If AC’s strategy is to have the feds preempt a strike before it even starts like 2012, then it is flawed. That is very clearly unconstitutional. Any intervention would happen after the strike was in progress which is a little muddier. For this to be their strategy likely means enduring a strike for a few weeks. Then trying to ram a mediators report down our throat like the port of Vancouver. That playbook leaves a lot of uncertainty on future bookings for an extended time.
IMHO, unlikely that the Government will intervene in a strike for quite some period of time. They didn’t move on the longshoremen for ?3 or so?weeks, and then only to threaten; I’d argue that heavy freight movement is more valuable to the economy than a passenger airline..
They will if it causes public outrage. Our current govt is on life support in the polls and everything they do is to help with their leader's goal for winning a popularity contest. If they think it'll help in the polls, they'll legislate.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by QKZXKV on Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CaptDukeNukem
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

throwawaycorporate wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 11:08 am
CaptDukeNukem wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:48 am I personally disagree.. Tons of business gets done with in person face to face meetings, people gotta fly to get this done efficiently. Especially with AC who deals with the premium business travelers more so than other airlines. Not being able to travel quickly from location to location has the ability to harm the economy quite badly.

While freight is a big part of aviation, much much more gets moved by rail and sea than by air.
"Sorry guys, flight's cancelled. Let's do this meeting over zoom"
Yes that is an alternative. But a lot of business gets done in person. The big wigs love to write off a round of golf at fancy courses.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Transition9er2
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 239
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 8:18 pm

Re: Negotiations

Post by Transition9er2 »

throwawaycorporate wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 11:08 am
CaptDukeNukem wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:48 am I personally disagree.. Tons of business gets done with in person face to face meetings, people gotta fly to get this done efficiently. Especially with AC who deals with the premium business travelers more so than other airlines. Not being able to travel quickly from location to location has the ability to harm the economy quite badly.

While freight is a big part of aviation, much much more gets moved by rail and sea than by air.
"Sorry guys, flight's cancelled. Let's do this meeting over zoom"

“Sorry guys, AC pilots are striking. I guess we have to fly on WestJet, Flair, Lynx, Porter, Encore or Jazz to get to our meeting”.

If AC was the only airline in the country, I would agree with you. The simple fact that every customer has multiple options to get to their destination completely removes the “essential service” argument.

Take a look around every apron in Canada, there’s multiple airlines hanging around.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Negotiations

Post by Fanblade »

CaptDukeNukem wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:48 am
mmm...bacon wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:38 am
Fanblade wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 7:14 am

If AC’s strategy is to have the feds preempt a strike before it even starts like 2012, then it is flawed. That is very clearly unconstitutional. Any intervention would happen after the strike was in progress which is a little muddier. For this to be their strategy likely means enduring a strike for a few weeks. Then trying to ram a mediators report down our throat like the port of Vancouver. That playbook leaves a lot of uncertainty on future bookings for an extended time.
IMHO, unlikely that the Government will intervene in a strike for quite some period of time. They didn’t move on the longshoremen for ?3 or so?weeks, and then only to threaten; I’d argue that heavy freight movement is more valuable to the economy than a passenger airline..
I personally disagree.. Tons of business gets done with in person face to face meetings, people gotta fly to get this done efficiently. Especially with AC who deals with the premium business travelers more so than other airlines. Not being able to travel quickly from location to location has the ability to harm the economy quite badly.

While freight is a big part of aviation, much much more gets moved by rail and sea than by air.
The Harper days of labour intervention based on economics was deemed unconstitutional.

The CIRB has been very clear. They will not interfere based on economics. There is no such labor legislation that makes something essential to the economy. The only thing is essential service, and on that front they have been very clear. Life and limb need to be in jeopardy.

You are suggesting that the government will act in an unconstitutional manner so that elite business passengers don’t have to endure regular cabin seating on other airlines? Or so they don’t have to go through Denver if that seat is so important to them?

Your economic angle is not only unconstitutional it is also not real. The options once you consider bouncing through the US back to a Canadian destination are plentiful. If they want a face to face they can do it. It’s a complete non issue.

With that said aviation is different than a port or rail strike in that it impacts voters immediately. The other two take a little time to start impacting the supply chain enough to impact voters.

We will have the right to strike. But there likely will be more upfront pressure on the government from voters. The question of how long before interference is a question mark. But probably at least a few weeks
---------- ADS -----------
 
Morg
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2023 9:00 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by Morg »

Just looking at AC Timetable that goes through sked change to November 12 at the end of October AC will do all SAN,SFO and DEN our of YVR so the only flying I can see for YVR is XE,QR,ZF looks like 319 doing some XY we will do one XY a day and one WG a day turn not sure which base will do EG- SFO but it's going to get grim looking at YC I can't figure out if they have any local flying at all this is why AC doesn't want to pay to keep pilots they just want to shrink Jazz but we'll see its only on paper for now.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Morg
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2023 9:00 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by Morg »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Negotiations

Post by Fanblade »

Morg wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:37 am No problem hiring pilots

https://ca-finance-yahoo-com.cdn.amppro ... 00401.html
It’s spin. The shortage is Captains or quickly upgradable. Yes Jazz can attract people just out of college. As soon as they have enough hours they too will move on.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Morg
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2023 9:00 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by Morg »

Exactly ! stock getting hammered today down to 2.80 the market is not happy with Jazz. The share price won't go up till dividend reintroduced which won't happen they need that money to pay for the leasing company they bought.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4145
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: Negotiations

Post by rudder »

There is another shoe that will drop. Not sure when. Not sure what.

And yet another member survey. Does not exactly inspire confidence in leadership decision making.
---------- ADS -----------
 
kiaszceski
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 10:29 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by kiaszceski »

Morg wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:37 am No problem hiring pilots

https://ca-finance-yahoo-com.cdn.amppro ... 00401.html
Everything is going as planned :twisted:
---------- ADS -----------
 
QKZXKV
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 7:46 am
Location: Nickelbelt/Concrete Jungle/Lobster country...

Re: Negotiations

Post by QKZXKV »

Fanblade wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 7:27 am
CaptDukeNukem wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:48 am
mmm...bacon wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:38 am

IMHO, unlikely that the Government will intervene in a strike for quite some period of time. They didn’t move on the longshoremen for ?3 or so?weeks, and then only to threaten; I’d argue that heavy freight movement is more valuable to the economy than a passenger airline..
I personally disagree.. Tons of business gets done with in person face to face meetings, people gotta fly to get this done efficiently. Especially with AC who deals with the premium business travelers more so than other airlines. Not being able to travel quickly from location to location has the ability to harm the economy quite badly.

While freight is a big part of aviation, much much more gets moved by rail and sea than by air.
The Harper days of labour intervention based on economics was deemed unconstitutional.

The CIRB has been very clear. They will not interfere based on economics. There is no such labor legislation that makes something essential to the economy. The only thing is essential service, and on that front they have been very clear. Life and limb need to be in jeopardy.

"You are suggesting that the government will act in an unconstitutional manner"
Fanblade where ya been in the last 3 yrs with this govt? The vaccine mandates are all you need for an example of that!

The way the Canadian political system works, the government can and will do anything it wants to win a popularity contest!
---------- ADS -----------
 
QKZXKV
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 7:46 am
Location: Nickelbelt/Concrete Jungle/Lobster country...

Re: Negotiations

Post by QKZXKV »

Morg wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:19 am Just looking at AC Timetable that goes through sked change to November 12 at the end of October AC will do all SAN,SFO and DEN our of YVR so the only flying I can see for YVR is XE,QR,ZF looks like 319 doing some XY we will do one XY a day and one WG a day turn not sure which base will do EG- SFO but it's going to get grim looking at YC I can't figure out if they have any local flying at all this is why AC doesn't want to pay to keep pilots they just want to shrink Jazz but we'll see its only on paper for now.
You can expect a YYC reduction/closure in 2 weeks without any doubt!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3903
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by Inverted2 »

Or they’ll just keep deadheading YYC crews out east. I don’t know if they could afford to lose that many more pilots. YYZ is already short with YYC coming here to fly. :rolleyes:
---------- ADS -----------
 
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
QKZXKV
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 7:46 am
Location: Nickelbelt/Concrete Jungle/Lobster country...

Re: Negotiations

Post by QKZXKV »

Inverted2 wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:18 pm Or they’ll just keep deadheading YYC crews out east. I don’t know if they could afford to lose that many more pilots. YYZ is already short with YYC coming here to fly. :rolleyes:
Well I've been told by temp based pilots that they haven't posted any for Sept like they were supposed to. No idea if this is accurate.
---------- ADS -----------
 
truedude
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 927
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 3:30 pm

Re: Negotiations

Post by truedude »

QKZXKV wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:31 pm
Inverted2 wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:18 pm Or they’ll just keep deadheading YYC crews out east. I don’t know if they could afford to lose that many more pilots. YYZ is already short with YYC coming here to fly. :rolleyes:
Well I've been told by temp based pilots that they haven't posted any for Sept like they were supposed to. No idea if this is accurate.
The August Bid results wouldn't be known until Sept 1st. And even if they shut down a base or something drastic, which they won't, it wouldn't mean YYZ suddenly has more pilots.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3903
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by Inverted2 »

If they have a bid at all…. I don’t think they’ve got training and staffing completed from the last bid. Plus with all the resignations there wouldn’t be much in the way of reductions for anyone.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
QKZXKV
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 7:46 am
Location: Nickelbelt/Concrete Jungle/Lobster country...

Re: Negotiations

Post by QKZXKV »

The lack of departures out of YYC this fall hardly justify a base. As it is, the mainline FAs are worried about a YYC reduction.
---------- ADS -----------
 
truedude
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 927
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 3:30 pm

Re: Negotiations

Post by truedude »

QKZXKV wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:58 pm The lack of departures out of YYC this fall hardly justify a base. As it is, the mainline FAs are worried about a YYC reduction.
Justified or not, there are pilots there. The vast majority of which won't move or commute.
---------- ADS -----------
 
QKZXKV
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 7:46 am
Location: Nickelbelt/Concrete Jungle/Lobster country...

Re: Negotiations

Post by QKZXKV »

truedude wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:44 pm
QKZXKV wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:58 pm The lack of departures out of YYC this fall hardly justify a base. As it is, the mainline FAs are worried about a YYC reduction.
Justified or not, there are pilots there. The vast majority of which won't move or commute.
We've continually talked about how management isn't aware or doesn't seem to care about those realities... Honest question, do you think they will take that into consideration? because I sure don't!
---------- ADS -----------
 
truedude
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 927
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 3:30 pm

Re: Negotiations

Post by truedude »

QKZXKV wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:49 pm
truedude wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:44 pm
QKZXKV wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:58 pm The lack of departures out of YYC this fall hardly justify a base. As it is, the mainline FAs are worried about a YYC reduction.
Justified or not, there are pilots there. The vast majority of which won't move or commute.
We've continually talked about how management isn't aware or doesn't seem to care about those realities... Honest question, do you think they will take that into consideration? because I sure don't!
Yes, I do. Maybe not before. But they don't have pilots to lose, and they know this. Those temp bases have also chased people away, so it might be worthwhile to stop that too.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptDukeNukem
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: Negotiations

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

truedude wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:44 pm
QKZXKV wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:58 pm The lack of departures out of YYC this fall hardly justify a base. As it is, the mainline FAs are worried about a YYC reduction.
Justified or not, there are pilots there. The vast majority of which won't move or commute.
I’m curious if there was a base closure or reduction if porter would fire up a western base sooner than later.
---------- ADS -----------
 
truedude
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 927
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 3:30 pm

Re: Negotiations

Post by truedude »

QKZXKV wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:31 pm
Inverted2 wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:18 pm Or they’ll just keep deadheading YYC crews out east. I don’t know if they could afford to lose that many more pilots. YYZ is already short with YYC coming here to fly. :rolleyes:
Well I've been told by temp based pilots that they haven't posted any for Sept like they were supposed to. No idea if this is accurate.
Well now know why there are no September temp bases. The company received a massive penalty for using them improperly.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Jazz Aviation LP - Air Canada Express”