New CA Expectation

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

pseudovector
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2021 6:28 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by pseudovector »

daedalusx wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 8:54 pm The solution is simple. Stop accepting the current AC offer.

As long as AC fills up every single GS with hundreds of pilots on flat pay then how much leverage do you really have ?

But because muh seniority number and muh pension and muh career progression, we have pilots crawling naked over broken glass to beg to fly a 777 for 65$ an hour.
The premise underpinning the suggestion that individuals should not come here and grab the earliest seniority number possible for themselves in order to improve working conditions for pilots currently here is beyond ludicrous. Same for hoping people leave for greener pastures in order to put a ‘supply squeeze’ on our employer. If you’re here, are YOU willing to leave for the USA?! Why did YOU come here?
If this was real frontline combat people saying crap like that would be the ones barking orders from the rear echelon.

As Air Canada pilots we need to stop dissing hard-working colleagues and predecessors. Check your emotions at the door the same way you do when flying a dark and dirty approach to a marginal runway on minimum fuel. Work with the tools you have.

Posters like Fanblade have it absolutely right. Pay attention to what he writes. Stop hoping/wishing for someone else to do your heavy lifting. Be part of the effort to act like a union. Do so quietly and assertively.

And while you’re at it, remember the first rule of Fight Club.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
daedalusx
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:51 am

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by daedalusx »

pseudovector wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2023 12:43 pm
daedalusx wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 8:54 pm The solution is simple. Stop accepting the current AC offer.

As long as AC fills up every single GS with hundreds of pilots on flat pay then how much leverage do you really have ?

But because muh seniority number and muh pension and muh career progression, we have pilots crawling naked over broken glass to beg to fly a 777 for 65$ an hour.
The premise underpinning the suggestion that individuals should not come here and grab the earliest seniority number possible for themselves in order to improve working conditions for pilots currently here is beyond ludicrous. Same for hoping people leave for greener pastures in order to put a ‘supply squeeze’ on our employer. If you’re here, are YOU willing to leave for the USA?! Why did YOU come here?
If this was real frontline combat people saying crap like that would be the ones barking orders from the rear echelon.

As Air Canada pilots we need to stop dissing hard-working colleagues and predecessors. Check your emotions at the door the same way you do when flying a dark and dirty approach to a marginal runway on minimum fuel. Work with the tools you have.

Posters like Fanblade have it absolutely right. Pay attention to what he writes. Stop hoping/wishing for someone else to do your heavy lifting. Be part of the effort to act like a union. Do so quietly and assertively.

And while you’re at it, remember the first rule of Fight Club.
You’re wrong. By accepting an unliveable wage in the hope on improving it down the road leads to ridiculous working conditions like those poor schmucks over at Jazz locked in their 17 year contract.
Porter was able to offer *significant* wage improvements that makes AC flat play look like the absolute shame that it is and they’ve done it without muh union and muh negots committee and muh ALPA ressources, simply because there is an actual shortage of competent drivers and they want to attract them.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Complex systems won’t survive the competence crisis
pseudovector
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2021 6:28 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by pseudovector »

daedalusx wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2023 1:13 pm
pseudovector wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2023 12:43 pm
daedalusx wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 8:54 pm The solution is simple. Stop accepting the current AC offer.

As long as AC fills up every single GS with hundreds of pilots on flat pay then how much leverage do you really have ?

But because muh seniority number and muh pension and muh career progression, we have pilots crawling naked over broken glass to beg to fly a 777 for 65$ an hour.
The premise underpinning the suggestion that individuals should not come here and grab the earliest seniority number possible for themselves in order to improve working conditions for pilots currently here is beyond ludicrous. Same for hoping people leave for greener pastures in order to put a ‘supply squeeze’ on our employer. If you’re here, are YOU willing to leave for the USA?! Why did YOU come here?
If this was real frontline combat people saying crap like that would be the ones barking orders from the rear echelon.

As Air Canada pilots we need to stop dissing hard-working colleagues and predecessors. Check your emotions at the door the same way you do when flying a dark and dirty approach to a marginal runway on minimum fuel. Work with the tools you have.

Posters like Fanblade have it absolutely right. Pay attention to what he writes. Stop hoping/wishing for someone else to do your heavy lifting. Be part of the effort to act like a union. Do so quietly and assertively.

And while you’re at it, remember the first rule of Fight Club.
You’re wrong. By accepting an unliveable wage in the hope on improving it down the road leads to ridiculous working conditions like those poor schmucks over at Jazz locked in their 17 year contract.
Porter was able to offer *significant* wage improvements that makes AC flat play look like the absolute shame that it is and they’ve done it without muh union and muh negots committee and muh ALPA ressources, simply because there is an actual shortage of competent drivers and they want to attract them.
So I guess none of us should have ever applied here, ever. Right. Got it. Muh bad.

Suggesting that individuals playing the long career game by applying to AC are the cause of where we find ourselves is beyond ludicrous and is an embarrassment to you. Apparently you may not have enough self-awareness to comprehend that though.

Yes, flat pay is a travesty. Our WAWCON are a joke. Other employers are taking a more proactive approach to recruitment. There’s no disputing any of that. Those are cold, hard facts. But whining won’t change them.

Your prospective ‘solution’ is the equivalent of suggesting that we resign en masse to create a staffing crunch. Asking others to do what you would not be willing to do is beyond the pale. It’s easy to shoot someone else’s foot off. Why don’t you take aim at your own and see if you can pull the trigger?

In the meantime, muh preference is acknowledging the facts and then doing muh best to lead from the front of the pack with the tools I have. Fortunately for you there are many alongside me, many of them relatively new hires who bring a wealth of experience and perspective from working for other carriers. They’re simply invaluable in helping drive long-overdue change here.

So hang on to the rope at the very back and watch. But be careful not to spill your cup of tea or dirty your boots while you rail at people (from the safety of your soapbox) for applying to work here.
---------- ADS -----------
 
lowoleo22
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2021 1:24 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by lowoleo22 »

daedalusx wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 8:54 pm The solution is simple. Stop accepting the current AC offer.

As long as AC fills up every single GS with hundreds of pilots on flat pay then how much leverage do you really have ?

But because muh seniority number and muh pension and muh career progression, we have pilots crawling naked over broken glass to beg to fly a 777 for 65$ an hour.
Sums it up perfectly. They have no desire to pay more because they don't have to. Pilots will go to AC for a variety of reasons that have nothing to do with supply and demand or "unionism" but choice, lifestyle, they like the colour red, childhood dream, their dad flew there, metal chasing or whatever reason they deem fit. Other airlines may pay more but that doesn't matter. WAWCON's won't change unless the ground school's are half empty or until the pilot group stands up enough to demand it. And so far no other airline in Canada competes with the variety of equipment and destinations. And for the love of god, stop agreeing to a contract longer than 4 years. This industry changes far too quickly for that. Keep on "flying that flag".

:Canada:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
daedalusx
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:51 am

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by daedalusx »

Keep moving that rig over the Atlantic for 65$ per hour. You're doing the Lord's work.

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
Complex systems won’t survive the competence crisis
TeePeeCreeper
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1164
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: in the bush

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by TeePeeCreeper »

daedalusx wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2023 8:46 pm Keep moving that rig over the Atlantic for 65$ per hour. You're doing the Lord's work.

Image
OMFG! You owe me a new keyboard. I just spat out my drink! 🤬 😂
---------- ADS -----------
 
sstaurus
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:32 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by sstaurus »

daedalusx wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2023 1:13 pm
pseudovector wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2023 12:43 pm
daedalusx wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 8:54 pm The solution is simple. Stop accepting the current AC offer.

As long as AC fills up every single GS with hundreds of pilots on flat pay then how much leverage do you really have ?

But because muh seniority number and muh pension and muh career progression, we have pilots crawling naked over broken glass to beg to fly a 777 for 65$ an hour.
The premise underpinning the suggestion that individuals should not come here and grab the earliest seniority number possible for themselves in order to improve working conditions for pilots currently here is beyond ludicrous. Same for hoping people leave for greener pastures in order to put a ‘supply squeeze’ on our employer. If you’re here, are YOU willing to leave for the USA?! Why did YOU come here?
If this was real frontline combat people saying crap like that would be the ones barking orders from the rear echelon.

As Air Canada pilots we need to stop dissing hard-working colleagues and predecessors. Check your emotions at the door the same way you do when flying a dark and dirty approach to a marginal runway on minimum fuel. Work with the tools you have.

Posters like Fanblade have it absolutely right. Pay attention to what he writes. Stop hoping/wishing for someone else to do your heavy lifting. Be part of the effort to act like a union. Do so quietly and assertively.

And while you’re at it, remember the first rule of Fight Club.
You’re wrong. By accepting an unliveable wage in the hope on improving it down the road leads to ridiculous working conditions like those poor schmucks over at Jazz locked in their 17 year contract.
Porter was able to offer *significant* wage improvements that makes AC flat play look like the absolute shame that it is and they’ve done it without muh union and muh negots committee and muh ALPA ressources, simply because there is an actual shortage of competent drivers and they want to attract them.
Are you still at Jazz? Whether one accepted the crap pay at AC or at jazz, they did the same, and cannot now expect everyone else to fall on their sword.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JHR
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 11:21 am

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by JHR »

---------- ADS -----------
 
noreasterYHZ
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 5:59 am

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by noreasterYHZ »

Reading about how the only way to raise rates at AC is to make it so no one else comes has to be among the dumbest $hit I have ever read in my life

It now makes sense how poorly unionized pilots have done in this country. They literally have no clue

Luckily we have US pilots at ALPA who actually know a thing or two on how to raise our horrific WAWCON

And no, they don't give a rats ass about how many applications their employer has
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2600
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by cdnavater »

noreasterYHZ wrote: Fri Aug 11, 2023 12:32 pm Reading about how the only way to raise rates at AC is to make it so no one else comes has to be among the dumbest $hit I have ever read in my life

It now makes sense how poorly unionized pilots have done in this country. They literally have no clue

Luckily we have US pilots at ALPA who actually know a thing or two on how to raise our horrific WAWCON

And no, they don't give a rats ass about how many applications their employer has
Clearly it doesn’t work, the application pool at Jazz is mostly inexperienced pilots sub 750 hours, the company doesn’t care, it just goes to the lower on the experience pile and fills the class.
Would AC do this if more experienced pilots stopped applying, absolutely, it would take zero applications to make a difference and one thing I can say with 100% certainty is that a 750 hour pilot wouldn’t think twice if AC called and offered them an internship with no pay for the first year and then 4 years of flat pay after that. They could easily justify the long term career for the short term pay, many have!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Torontomaplelaughs
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:17 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by Torontomaplelaughs »

Lol...Canada...

Where a pilot's worth according to pilots is based on the number of applications the flag carrier has...

:rolleyes:
---------- ADS -----------
 
stall
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2023 2:58 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by stall »

Does anyone know if ALPA is going to do an "applications on file" comparison for a comparable document?

This might prove highly useful so we can accurately calculate the pilot value by comparing the number of applications on file at United, Delta, and American

Surely those airlines use that data to calculate their worth

Right?
---------- ADS -----------
 
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2553
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by DanWEC »

I'm not at AC- out of curiosity, what's the timeline here? Have negots started?

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
fish4life
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2535
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:32 am

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by fish4life »

We have a much bigger leverage option than asking people to stop applying, it’s called a strike and everyone better be saving up so if required we can shut this place down
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by Fanblade »

DanWEC wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 8:50 pm I'm not at AC- out of curiosity, what's the timeline here? Have negots started?

Cheers
Started in June. Current contract expires end of September.

Based on Canadian law a strike position happens about 100 days after declaring impasse and entering conciliation.

The earliest impasse could be declared is Oct 1.

So the earliest to be in a strike position is early January. My guess is early to mid February
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Ash Ketchum
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 451
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2019 11:52 am

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by Ash Ketchum »

Fanblade wrote: Sun Aug 13, 2023 7:09 am
DanWEC wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 8:50 pm I'm not at AC- out of curiosity, what's the timeline here? Have negots started?

Cheers
Started in June. Current contract expires end of September.

Based on Canadian law a strike position happens about 100 days after declaring impasse and entering conciliation.

The earliest impasse could be declared is Oct 1.

So the earliest to be in a strike position is early January. My guess is early to mid February
May as well wait for March break...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by Fanblade »

Ash Ketchum wrote: Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:06 pm
Fanblade wrote: Sun Aug 13, 2023 7:09 am
DanWEC wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 8:50 pm I'm not at AC- out of curiosity, what's the timeline here? Have negots started?

Cheers
Started in June. Current contract expires end of September.

Based on Canadian law a strike position happens about 100 days after declaring impasse and entering conciliation.

The earliest impasse could be declared is Oct 1.

So the earliest to be in a strike position is early January. My guess is early to mid February
May as well wait for March break...
The timing is not the exclusive control of the union. The company can declare impasse as well. I suspect they will do so early November to prevent a March break strike.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bcflyer
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1357
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Canada

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by bcflyer »

Blueontop wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:39 am
bcflyer wrote: Sun Aug 06, 2023 11:35 pm
CaptDukeNukem wrote: Sun Aug 06, 2023 2:58 pm

I absolutely think they will compare many pay scales during negotiations. I’m personally curious as to others want for improvements other than pay.
Higher daily credit, proper vacation credit, training inside the blocking widow, better reserve rules, better bidding, better pairing construction. That’s just off the top of my head. Do I think we’ll get all of that? Not all on this contract. But we need to get a start on it.
And I’m sure that’s exactly the mindset the Americans are going into their negotiations with with their unparalleled gains.

Canadian pilot mentality succinctly exhibited right here folks. Defeatist attitude right from the get go.

AC CEO was thinking that when he started his own negotiations.

Canadian pilots are so far behind the industry average, this is not the time for a half-assed conciliatory mindset where we expect to really only negotiate for half of what we need and then accept half of that at the end.

No pilots no flights. Simple as that. Remember your worth. AC CEO sure knows his.
Get off your high horse. You have no idea who I am or what I believe in. I’m well aware of my value. What you don’t seem to be aware of is how long it took the US airlines to get to the level they are at now. I’ll give you a hint. It wasn’t done in one contract. So why do you think we will get 15+ years of concessions back in one contract?

Being realistic is not giving up.
---------- ADS -----------
 
alkaseltzer
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:16 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by alkaseltzer »

We have ALPA lanyards.

Next, I want ALPA epaulettes. Bars in proportion to the captain pay. I.e. Flat pay WB RP/FO's should have 1 bar to represent 25% of the pay of the WB captains.

Not 2 bars. 1 bar. Represents 25% of the current pay.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptDukeNukem
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2001
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

alkaseltzer wrote: Sat Aug 19, 2023 12:32 pm We have ALPA lanyards.

Next, I want ALPA epaulettes. Bars in proportion to the captain pay. I.e. Flat pay WB RP/FO's should have 1 bar to represent 25% of the pay of the WB captains.

Not 2 bars. 1 bar. Represents 25% of the current pay.
Cool. You can look like the cabin crew from Philippine airlines or Cathay.

Fight the power.
---------- ADS -----------
 
FL030
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2020 3:10 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by FL030 »

bcflyer wrote: Sun Aug 13, 2023 8:08 pm So why do you think we will get 15+ years of concessions back in one contract?
Why wouldn't you be able to?
---------- ADS -----------
 
sstaurus
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:32 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by sstaurus »

More ACPA thinking. You can only have one bread crumb back at a time. (I kid...) But seriously, the whole notion of horse trading and 'bargaining capital' needs to go away.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Blueontop
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 509
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:01 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by Blueontop »

FL030 wrote: Sat Aug 19, 2023 8:23 pm
bcflyer wrote: Sun Aug 13, 2023 8:08 pm So why do you think we will get 15+ years of concessions back in one contract?
Why wouldn't you be able to?
Exactly my point, Canadian pilot defeatism right from the get go.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Blueontop on Sun Aug 20, 2023 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2553
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by DanWEC »

I think the corporation had gotten enough discount labour below market value for the last 10 years to be able to give back a LOT, and all at once.
---------- ADS -----------
 
alkaseltzer
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:16 pm

Re: New CA Expectation

Post by alkaseltzer »

CaptDukeNukem wrote: Sat Aug 19, 2023 1:06 pm
alkaseltzer wrote: Sat Aug 19, 2023 12:32 pm We have ALPA lanyards.

Next, I want ALPA epaulettes. Bars in proportion to the captain pay. I.e. Flat pay WB RP/FO's should have 1 bar to represent 25% of the pay of the WB captains.

Not 2 bars. 1 bar. Represents 25% of the current pay.
Cool. You can look like the cabin crew from Philippine airlines or Cathay.

Fight the power.
Guess you don’t know how to read sarcasm.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”