The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:06 am
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Ripple,
Look at the numbers. AC staff are cheap as fuk
Look at the numbers. AC staff are cheap as fuk
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:38 pm
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Nearly half as much as Delta!!!apples2apples wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:22 pm Air Canada has an insane low labour cost and pilots are worried about locking in pathetic gains?
Labor costs are significantly LESS than Ultra Low Cost Carriers
Lol...what a joke!
Man AC pilots need to revolt. Embarrassing
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Change of this magnitude is a slow and painful process.
Whether or not you agree with this ratification doesn’t overshadow the simple fact it was at least a step forward and not back. Could it have been better? Absolutely yes. The more important question to ask is why the division and how to move forward on the next round to show and demonstrate a unified front.
Whether or not you agree with this ratification doesn’t overshadow the simple fact it was at least a step forward and not back. Could it have been better? Absolutely yes. The more important question to ask is why the division and how to move forward on the next round to show and demonstrate a unified front.
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
.
Last edited by Outlaw58 on Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:09 am
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Last MOA voted downMontrealCanucks wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 3:25 pmNearly half as much as Delta!!!apples2apples wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:22 pm Air Canada has an insane low labour cost and pilots are worried about locking in pathetic gains?
Labor costs are significantly LESS than Ultra Low Cost Carriers
Lol...what a joke!
Man AC pilots need to revolt. Embarrassing
MEC chair replaced
Local reps in yvr yul and YWG recalled
New union brought in
It’s happening slowly. But it happens one event at a time.
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2022 11:24 pm
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Traitors!!TheAlcalde wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:32 pmLast MOA voted downMontrealCanucks wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 3:25 pmNearly half as much as Delta!!!apples2apples wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:22 pm Air Canada has an insane low labour cost and pilots are worried about locking in pathetic gains?
Labor costs are significantly LESS than Ultra Low Cost Carriers
Lol...what a joke!
Man AC pilots need to revolt. Embarrassing
MEC chair replaced
Local reps in yvr yul and YWG recalled
New union brought in
It’s happening slowly. But it happens one event at a time.
My team was first class! And you can't spell that without ass
My memoir "The Art of Taking Permanent Concessions" will be published shortly released via my app
Regards,
Mike
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Ok, slow the bleeding not stop it, which will either bring them back or not but we had no way of knowing that and like westerncanuck said, 30% take home increase is pretty darn good, I’ll take it.
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
What fucken line? You took our tools away a long time ago!RippleRock wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:13 pmWhat a joke! LOL.Westerncanuck wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:02 pmNope didn’t say that. However if the economy tanks and the company’s revenue and outlook weakens, it will be an uphill battle for any negotiating team to make the gains they want.
Jazz basically said this on their last quarterly earnings call. They are waiting for a recession to take the pressure off. You would be foolish to think AC management is not thinking along these lines as well and hoping that it will reduce what they will ultimately have to pay.
Get out of the way and we'll show you how its done. First, value what you do. Second know that you are as essential as wings. Third, HOLD YOUR LINE. No concessions, NOT ONE.
What a joke. Lol!
You show us how it’s done, I’ll wait….
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:09 am
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
AC pilots are trying, we really are.cdnavater wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 8:30 pmWhat fucken line? You took our tools away a long time ago!RippleRock wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:13 pmWhat a joke! LOL.Westerncanuck wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:02 pm
Nope didn’t say that. However if the economy tanks and the company’s revenue and outlook weakens, it will be an uphill battle for any negotiating team to make the gains they want.
Jazz basically said this on their last quarterly earnings call. They are waiting for a recession to take the pressure off. You would be foolish to think AC management is not thinking along these lines as well and hoping that it will reduce what they will ultimately have to pay.
Get out of the way and we'll show you how its done. First, value what you do. Second know that you are as essential as wings. Third, HOLD YOUR LINE. No concessions, NOT ONE.
What a joke. Lol!
You show us how it’s done, I’ll wait….
Last MOA voted down. They also offered us free money, but it wasn’t enough
MEC chair replaced
Local reps in yvr yul and YWG recalled
New union brought in
Formed a strike committee
You guys did what AC wanted you to do, they wanted you to vote yes. This is a better deal for them.
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Somewhat related….
I see executives from Exchange Income corporation (EIC) , who own PAL , buying a lot of EIC stock lately.
Do you think they will buy Chorus? Are they expecting a huge windfall from Air Canada contracts?
Nothing surprises me anymore.
I see executives from Exchange Income corporation (EIC) , who own PAL , buying a lot of EIC stock lately.
Do you think they will buy Chorus? Are they expecting a huge windfall from Air Canada contracts?
Nothing surprises me anymore.
-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2022 9:32 am
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
You constantly ‘hurl insults’ at anyone who has a differing opinion to you on this website. Previous posts had you swearing at members with differing views.cdnavater wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 4:01 pmNobody is preventing anyone from voicing their opinion, however I’m responding to the ones that simply hurl insults without any facts or sound reasoning, which I’m all for if they account for everything.canadian_aviator_4 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 3:48 pmAgreed, let others voice their opinion. This is an open forum so it doesn’t matter where you work, it’s an open discussion. Everyone will make a decision based on their needs, and democracy will indicate whether or not the vote passes.Freshredmeat wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 2:32 pm I'd add "TrueDude" to the list of incessant posters
They made their point.
Now let others speak
So, far the only reason is because there’s a shortage, to which I say and I’ll say it LOUD SO IT’S CLEAR, OUR UNION NEGOTIATED FOR A YEAR AND HAD AN AGREEMENT WITH OUR COMPANY WHO THEN SENT IT TO AC FOR FINAL APPROVAL, SINCE THEY ACTUALLY PAY THE WAGES. THEY TURNED IT DOWN AND SENT BACK A PAY TABLE THEY “WERE WILLING TO DISCUSS” .
OUR UNION RESPONDED WITH, NO THANKS AND A COUPLE WEEKS AFTER THAT, THE COMPANY CAME BACK WITH WHAT AIR CANADA SAID WAS, “THE MOST THEY ARE WILLING TO PAY”. THIS WAS ALL DONE OUTSIDE OF NORMAL BARGAINING BECAUSE WE ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO FORCE THEM TO BARGAIN.
These are facts, they are the only facts that matter because the rest is pure speculation and supposition!
If this new pay isn’t enough to fix the problem, they may come back or they may just shrink us to a more manageable size, still pure speculation because no one knows.
It is important to know who is posting their opinion because without anything to lose, your opinion has no weight in this discussion!
How did all those Porter peeps respond when I suggested they get a proper union, I rest my case!
As well, it’s an opinion on an anonymous forum. So how could someone believe that you actually work for jazz. Maybe you say you do, but actually work at a competitor. There is no proof or evidence unless you start posting with your real name and employee number.
Until then, your opinion is as valid as anyone’s.
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Oh, okcanadian_aviator_4 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 11:56 pmYou constantly ‘hurl insults’ at anyone who has a differing opinion to you on this website. Previous posts had you swearing at members with differing views.cdnavater wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 4:01 pmNobody is preventing anyone from voicing their opinion, however I’m responding to the ones that simply hurl insults without any facts or sound reasoning, which I’m all for if they account for everything.canadian_aviator_4 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 3:48 pm
Agreed, let others voice their opinion. This is an open forum so it doesn’t matter where you work, it’s an open discussion. Everyone will make a decision based on their needs, and democracy will indicate whether or not the vote passes.
So, far the only reason is because there’s a shortage, to which I say and I’ll say it LOUD SO IT’S CLEAR, OUR UNION NEGOTIATED FOR A YEAR AND HAD AN AGREEMENT WITH OUR COMPANY WHO THEN SENT IT TO AC FOR FINAL APPROVAL, SINCE THEY ACTUALLY PAY THE WAGES. THEY TURNED IT DOWN AND SENT BACK A PAY TABLE THEY “WERE WILLING TO DISCUSS” .
OUR UNION RESPONDED WITH, NO THANKS AND A COUPLE WEEKS AFTER THAT, THE COMPANY CAME BACK WITH WHAT AIR CANADA SAID WAS, “THE MOST THEY ARE WILLING TO PAY”. THIS WAS ALL DONE OUTSIDE OF NORMAL BARGAINING BECAUSE WE ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO FORCE THEM TO BARGAIN.
These are facts, they are the only facts that matter because the rest is pure speculation and supposition!
If this new pay isn’t enough to fix the problem, they may come back or they may just shrink us to a more manageable size, still pure speculation because no one knows.
It is important to know who is posting their opinion because without anything to lose, your opinion has no weight in this discussion!
How did all those Porter peeps respond when I suggested they get a proper union, I rest my case!
As well, it’s an opinion on an anonymous forum. So how could someone believe that you actually work for jazz. Maybe you say you do, but actually work at a competitor. There is no proof or evidence unless you start posting with your real name and employee number.
Until then, your opinion is as valid as anyone’s.
- Chips&Pops
- Rank 1
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:56 pm
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
or a free everyone works 20 days a month now? sheeeeeeeeshcdnavater wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 1:01 pmAs I said in another thread, Encore was in a similar position where the corp offered some improvements outside of normal bargaining and every Tom, Dick and Harry said don’t do it, they will come back with more, here we are a year later, they have only shrunk since then and nothing, not a hint of more coming.truedude wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:04 amThat is not at all the position the union has. I have talked to my rep, perhaps you should talk to yours (so long as they don't already have one foot out the door).
They are disappointed with it, and think it should be higher. They also know there is a risk to saying no.
They have a maximum they are willing to pay for regional lift, this is likely what it is for now and after AC wages come in, there might be some more room.
I’ve done the wage comparison on a per seat basis in the past and it’s met with the same response every time, “that’s ridiculous “ well guess what, I guarantee that’s the metric they use. Maybe they call it something different like CASM, but it is the wages that form part of that. If we make too much, we have a higher CASM and that makes the 220s a lot more attractive.
To the author of this thread, I do not have a single regret to my YES vote, I will sleep fine and truly hope all Jazz pilots ignore the noise and see it for what it is, a free raise in pay.
Just giver bud
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
No one’s going to work 20 days unless they tick the box that says it’s ok. Can’t say I ever would
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
True,
But we went from working an average of 14-15 days (some people as low as 10 on the torch) when I started, to 16-17 days through 'The flu' and FTDT changes and now we will work right to the 12 mins days off every month. So a 31 day month ig going to mean 19 work days. For effectively less money (inflation etc). Oh sure. An hour added to our time banks. So thats what? $30 a month after taxes for an FO...
Also, in case anyone missed the memo, they have reinstituted the 'program' last month. 8 book offs in a 12 month rolling window and you're getting a phone call.
Ouch.
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2022 5:09 pm
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
Yes we get it...you love concessions.
Re: The "Yes" side will be full of regret
It’ll just cause everyone to book off sick more. I plan on it 100%. I won’t be working 19 days a month. That is a fact.Rowdy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 8:14 amTrue,
But we went from working an average of 14-15 days (some people as low as 10 on the torch) when I started, to 16-17 days through 'The flu' and FTDT changes and now we will work right to the 12 mins days off every month. So a 31 day month ig going to mean 19 work days. For effectively less money (inflation etc). Oh sure. An hour added to our time banks. So thats what? $30 a month after taxes for an FO...
Also, in case anyone missed the memo, they have reinstituted the 'program' last month. 8 book offs in a 12 month rolling window and you're getting a phone call.
Ouch.

DEI = Didn’t Earn It