That was a close one...

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

User avatar
RoAF-Mig21
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 471
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2021 6:43 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by RoAF-Mig21 »

So is this something that they would pull the CVR and FDR for? I understand that aircraft was inspected and quickly returned to service. Does the TSB need to be notified? The media attention this got is quite significant.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Army of one
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:02 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Army of one »

daedalusx wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:27 am Textbook ladies and gentlemen. Textbook.
Care to elaborate?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
‘Bob’
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1015
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by ‘Bob’ »

daedalusx wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:27 am Textbook ladies and gentlemen. Textbook.
I agree.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Me262
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 521
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:35 pm

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Me262 »

rigpiggy wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2023 9:58 am Something like 90% of the complaints in yyz are from 6 phone #s......most are on the approach for 15/33. If the airport authorities were smart they would track them down get a real estate professional to offer them 10% over appraisal, but then put a restrictive covenant preventing complaints as they were advised they were on an approach to Canada's busiest airport.
Or just ignore them. Was the airport build before your house? Yes? Go talk with the agent who sold you the house. Bye
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2554
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by cdnavater »

RoAF-Mig21 wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:37 am So is this something that they would pull the CVR and FDR for? I understand that aircraft was inspected and quickly returned to service. Does the TSB need to be notified? The media attention this got is quite significant.
The inspection would include the FDR data for the Gs on landing, they have parameters a guidelines for the inspection after a hard landing. I doubt the CVR would be included if it doesn’t meet the requirements for a reportable event.
I’m sure the pilots filed an SMS report that will likely be investigated by the safety department.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
RoAF-Mig21
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 471
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2021 6:43 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by RoAF-Mig21 »

cdnavater wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 12:16 pm
RoAF-Mig21 wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:37 am So is this something that they would pull the CVR and FDR for? I understand that aircraft was inspected and quickly returned to service. Does the TSB need to be notified? The media attention this got is quite significant.
The inspection would include the FDR data for the Gs on landing, they have parameters a guidelines for the inspection after a hard landing. I doubt the CVR would be included if it doesn’t meet the requirements for a reportable event.
I’m sure the pilots filed an SMS report that will likely be investigated by the safety department.
Thanks for the reply. I really hope that YYZ will make an effort to utilize 33L/33R more often. I understand the limitations, but at the same time, they're there for a reason. I also flew that day and the crosswinds were pretty nasty, landing on 24L. If EWR can make it happen with "2.5" runways (since 11/29 is barely used), I'm sure YYZ can make it happen.

Maybe some NAV Canada controllers can give us a better insight.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
complexintentions
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2186
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: of my pants is unknown.

Re: That was a close one...

Post by complexintentions »

8895 wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 8:57 am The “NHL of airlines” ladies and gentleman :rolleyes:
Ahhh don't feel bad.

Maybe you'll let you interview again one day. Not everyone gets into the NHL either.
---------- ADS -----------
 
I’m still waiting for my white male privilege membership card. Must have gotten lost in the mail.
Tedhitchcock
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2023 9:41 pm

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Tedhitchcock »

Wow.. Like a bull in a vagina shop!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
rookiepilot
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: That was a close one...

Post by rookiepilot »

Reported wind immediately after the landing was 310 at 10G22. Not 32, not 42. 22.

For a heavy jet.

🤔
---------- ADS -----------
 
AirCandida
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2023 5:39 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by AirCandida »

Wind sock steady and ailerons getting a good work out prior to flair. Text book PIO. Likely another training flight for a new FO fresh off a PC12
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Col. Panic
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:01 pm
Location: Abort, Retry, Fail?

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Col. Panic »

Army of one wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:14 am I have nearly 2000 hours on 777 alone, most in the left seat.
So probably a total of about 47 landings?
---------- ADS -----------
 
PostmasterGeneral
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 929
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:50 pm

Re: That was a close one...

Post by PostmasterGeneral »

AirCandida wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 7:30 pm Wind sock steady and ailerons getting a good work out prior to flair. Text book PIO. Likely another training flight for a new FO fresh off a PC12
FO has over 13 year’s experience on the 777. The captain even more so. Check your facts.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
cjp
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 503
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:16 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by cjp »

PostmasterGeneral wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 7:57 pm
AirCandida wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 7:30 pm Wind sock steady and ailerons getting a good work out prior to flair. Text book PIO. Likely another training flight for a new FO fresh off a PC12
FO has over 13 year’s experience on the 777. The captain even more so. Check your facts.
With that much experience in the cockpit, it's amazing how quickly a stable approach can turn into such an exciting landing.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Army of one
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:02 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Army of one »

Army of one wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:44 am
daedalusx wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:27 am Textbook ladies and gentlemen. Textbook.
Care to elaborate?
daedalusx

Where you at, where'd you disappear to?

Why don't you grab your 777 AOM and FCTM (there are some Policy references as well) and let's break it all down.

Ive only been flying 40 years, I love learning new things.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Army of one
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:02 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Army of one »

cjp wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 8:10 pm
PostmasterGeneral wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 7:57 pm
AirCandida wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 7:30 pm Wind sock steady and ailerons getting a good work out prior to flair. Text book PIO. Likely another training flight for a new FO fresh off a PC12
FO has over 13 year’s experience on the 777. The captain even more so. Check your facts.
With that much experience in the cockpit, it's amazing how quickly a stable approach can turn into such an exciting landing.
I flew with that CA as a kid, was also an FO I flew with. CA has probably near 20,000 hours experience, teeth were cut flying in some of the most challenging and inhospitable environments in the world. Lots of heavy time, lots of 777 time. Golden hands and feet.

Wanna challenge the result relying on AOM FCTM or Company Policy then feel free to set it out.

More disheartening to me, honestly, is the capacity and the ease, where one pilot, shits on another pilot, where instances such as these arise. To me, it's unfortunate, to me it's indicative of a bigger problem. I feel in some ways, it also contributes to the overarching issues facing pilots in Canada in general, which results in the WAWCON realities we find ourselves in.

Not pointing at you in particular, but there are many, too many.

A bit messed up
---------- ADS -----------
 
Army of one
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:02 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Army of one »

Col. Panic wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 7:44 pm
Army of one wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:14 am I have nearly 2000 hours on 777 alone, most in the left seat.
So probably a total of about 47 landings?
Brilliant. You are brilliant. Your wit, fully exhilarating. Bravo.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Army of one on Fri Nov 17, 2023 6:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jet Jockey
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 373
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:42 am
Location: CYUL

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Jet Jockey »

Shit happens!

No one here that has been flying for many years can say they never fucked up before.

Yes, that was one rough landing but without further info who knows what lead to it.

I’d cut the pilots some slack on this incident.
---------- ADS -----------
 
AirCandida
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2023 5:39 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by AirCandida »

Funny, if it was another airline, the air canada kids would be shit posting with the holier than thou attitude. You reap what you sow.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Old fella
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2482
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:04 am
Location: I'm retired. I don't want to'I don't have to and you can't make me.

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Old fella »

Normally I wouldn’t comment on such a thread simply because I have zero knowledge of airline ops and the various types other to acknowledge a B777 is a big airplane. I cut my teeth for a few years in YYT when one does develop decent stick and rudder skills, especially when the gales of November come slashing. I did a decent share of “ slip, sliding, away “ landings and it happens, simple as that, and it happens to all regardless of aircraft type, airline, total flying and previous background. No doubt that crew are embarrassed, who wouldn’t and bet there was some interesting detail discussion after shutdown. Some of the peanut gallery commentary here though is expected, typically.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Stu Pidasso
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:55 pm

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Stu Pidasso »

CYYZ is a shameful place that I go to the ends of the earth to avoid. Putting a T7 on 24L (shortest runway at that Airport) is outrageous. The GTAA and Nav Canada, both highly incompetent organizations.
---------- ADS -----------
 
chaster
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:50 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by chaster »

For The Grace Of God . There ain’t no one driving an Airplane that this can’t happen to. Nooo Onee ! Be careful what one says KARMAS a bitch. SHIT can arise anytime,anywhere TOP GUN or not!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Jet Jockey
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 373
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:42 am
Location: CYUL

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Jet Jockey »

Stu Pidasso wrote: Fri Nov 17, 2023 8:07 am CYYZ is a shameful place that I go to the ends of the earth to avoid. The GTAA and Nav Canada, both highly incompetent organizations.

Could not agree more... one of the worst airports in the world.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
rookiepilot
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: That was a close one...

Post by rookiepilot »

AirCandida wrote: Fri Nov 17, 2023 7:50 am Funny, if it was another airline, the air canada kids would be shit posting with the holier than thou attitude. You reap what you sow.
+100

Really. Look in the mirror.
---------- ADS -----------
 
J31
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 7:21 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by J31 »

Stu Pidasso wrote: Fri Nov 17, 2023 8:07 am Putting a T7 on 24L (shortest runway at that Airport) is outrageous.
9000 ft runway is short for a B777! :roll:
Stu Pidasso wrote: Fri Nov 17, 2023 8:07 am The GTAA and Nav Canada, both highly incompetent organizations.
So we go from bashing AC pilots to bashing ATC? While GTAA and NavCan have their issues, lets deal with them in a constructive dialogue. It is pretty disrespectful to make wild accusations like that, it disrespects a lot of very competent professionals.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Army of one
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:02 am

Re: That was a close one...

Post by Army of one »

Im Air Canada, 30 years Air Canada.
AirCandida wrote: Fri Nov 17, 2023 7:50 am Funny, if it was another airline, the air canada kids would be shit posting with the holier than thou attitude. You reap what you sow.
Not me. Not any of my friends.

I choose to be better than that.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”