AMA vs MEF
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:52 pm
AMA vs MEF
Does anyone know what the difference is between Area Minimum Altitude on the Low Chart and Maximum Elevation Figure on the VNC? I know the AMA provides a minimum 1000ft obstacle clearance and MEF 328ft.
But if you look at the images below (Ottawa Area) the is several thousand feet difference between the AMA and MEF. Anyone know why?
Thank you!
But if you look at the images below (Ottawa Area) the is several thousand feet difference between the AMA and MEF. Anyone know why?
Thank you!
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
- Location: On final so get off the damn runway!
Re: AMA vs MEF
AMA shows minimum obstacle or terrain clearance of 1000 feet (2000 feet in mountainous areas) and the MEF shows the lowest possible VFR flight in a quadrant (about 500 feet above obstacles or terrain)
- Conflicting Traffic
- Rank 4
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:58 pm
Re: AMA vs MEF
I'm not sure why there's a discrepancy there. It's possible the areas covered don't match. The quadrangles are not defined by regulation, and the chart maker has the discretion to use larger (or smaller) areas. I can't tell from the screenshots if that's the case here.aholenstein wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 6:43 pm Does anyone know what the difference is between Area Minimum Altitude on the Low Chart and Maximum Elevation Figure on the VNC? I know the AMA provides a minimum 1000ft obstacle clearance and MEF 328ft.
But if you look at the images below (Ottawa Area) the is several thousand feet difference between the AMA and MEF. Anyone know why?
Thank you!
Your clearance for the MEF is zero feet for human-made obstructions and 328 feet (100 meters) for natural obstructions, both rounded up to the next 100 feet. I don't know why there's a distinction made here between natural and human-made, but I *think* it's because natural obstructions include trees, which can grow.
----------------------------------------
Conflicting Traffic please advise.
Conflicting Traffic please advise.
Re: AMA vs MEF
The difference is over 6000 ft though. Do they use different quadrant dimensions on the IFR charts?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
- oldncold
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 11:17 am
- Location: south of 78N latitude , north of 30'latitude
Re: AMA vs MEF
Many restricted sites in the yow area ie 3000agl parliment. Etc. You will see this as terrain elevation changes out west too. Where you on the same lo chart ,will be required to fly higher alt. (Stepup. Segment) .Or will not be cleared by atc due to obstructions . 

-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:58 pm
Re: AMA vs MEF
VNCs are Lambert Conformal Conic Projection. And I believe LOs are Transverse Mercator? Also the scales are different (much more area covered on a Lo). So, the quadrants by default would be different dimensions.