AMA vs MEF

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
aholenstein
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:52 pm

AMA vs MEF

Post by aholenstein »

Does anyone know what the difference is between Area Minimum Altitude on the Low Chart and Maximum Elevation Figure on the VNC? I know the AMA provides a minimum 1000ft obstacle clearance and MEF 328ft.

But if you look at the images below (Ottawa Area) the is several thousand feet difference between the AMA and MEF. Anyone know why?

Thank you!
Screenshot_20231221_204222_FltPlan Go.jpg
Screenshot_20231221_204222_FltPlan Go.jpg (1.49 MiB) Viewed 1278 times
Screenshot_20231221_204209_FltPlan Go.jpg
Screenshot_20231221_204209_FltPlan Go.jpg (677.38 KiB) Viewed 1278 times
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: AMA vs MEF

Post by linecrew »

AMA shows minimum obstacle or terrain clearance of 1000 feet (2000 feet in mountainous areas) and the MEF shows the lowest possible VFR flight in a quadrant (about 500 feet above obstacles or terrain)
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Conflicting Traffic
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:58 pm

Re: AMA vs MEF

Post by Conflicting Traffic »

aholenstein wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 6:43 pm Does anyone know what the difference is between Area Minimum Altitude on the Low Chart and Maximum Elevation Figure on the VNC? I know the AMA provides a minimum 1000ft obstacle clearance and MEF 328ft.

But if you look at the images below (Ottawa Area) the is several thousand feet difference between the AMA and MEF. Anyone know why?

Thank you!
I'm not sure why there's a discrepancy there. It's possible the areas covered don't match. The quadrangles are not defined by regulation, and the chart maker has the discretion to use larger (or smaller) areas. I can't tell from the screenshots if that's the case here.

Your clearance for the MEF is zero feet for human-made obstructions and 328 feet (100 meters) for natural obstructions, both rounded up to the next 100 feet. I don't know why there's a distinction made here between natural and human-made, but I *think* it's because natural obstructions include trees, which can grow.
---------- ADS -----------
 
----------------------------------------
Conflicting Traffic please advise.
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6742
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: AMA vs MEF

Post by digits_ »

linecrew wrote: Sun Dec 24, 2023 1:01 pm AMA shows minimum obstacle or terrain clearance of 1000 feet (2000 feet in mountainous areas) and the MEF shows the lowest possible VFR flight in a quadrant (about 500 feet above obstacles or terrain)
The difference is over 6000 ft though. Do they use different quadrant dimensions on the IFR charts?
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
User avatar
oldncold
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 11:17 am
Location: south of 78N latitude , north of 30'latitude

Re: AMA vs MEF

Post by oldncold »

Many restricted sites in the yow area ie 3000agl parliment. Etc. You will see this as terrain elevation changes out west too. Where you on the same lo chart ,will be required to fly higher alt. (Stepup. Segment) .Or will not be cleared by atc due to obstructions . :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fly0nTheWall
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:58 pm

Re: AMA vs MEF

Post by Fly0nTheWall »

digits_ wrote: Sun Dec 24, 2023 3:29 pm
linecrew wrote: Sun Dec 24, 2023 1:01 pm AMA shows minimum obstacle or terrain clearance of 1000 feet (2000 feet in mountainous areas) and the MEF shows the lowest possible VFR flight in a quadrant (about 500 feet above obstacles or terrain)
The difference is over 6000 ft though. Do they use different quadrant dimensions on the IFR charts?
VNCs are Lambert Conformal Conic Projection. And I believe LOs are Transverse Mercator? Also the scales are different (much more area covered on a Lo). So, the quadrants by default would be different dimensions.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”