
Seems relevant to me; maybe you weren’t born yet:braaap Braap wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:19 amExcept Mulroney isnt relevant in this situation and Poilievre is. Do you think things through before you post?rookiepilot wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 7:32 amGee, lets live in the past, go back to Mulroney.hithere wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 7:28 pm
Pierre Poilievre was the MP who defended the Harper legislation in the House of Commons to put AC pilots into Final Offer Selection Arbitration in 2012.
So in effect, he, not the Liberals, is somewhat responsible for how far behind the AC pilots are in compensation.
Supporting them now is the least he can do, although big business in Canada is going to have a hard time accepting this stance from Canada’s “pro-business” party(ie Conservatives)![]()
“ Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and his Conservative Party swept aside one of their nation’s many progressive labor laws last week in breaking a strike by about 70,000 government workers.
Many Canadians were inconvenienced by the strike, but there was no emergency--unless, as some suggested, the emergency was Mulroney’s plummeting rating in public opinion polls. And even strikebreaking may not help him.
By flagrantly setting aside public workers’ right to strike, the Mulroney government acted in the anti-union mode of the prime minister’s ideological pal, former President Ronald Reagan, who crushed a strike by U.S. air traffic controllers 10 years ago.
Reagan disrupted the nation’s air traffic and cost this country a bundle when he fired and permanently replaced 11,000 strikers. He didn’t deal fairly with the controllers; he fired them instead of asking the courts to impose lesser penalties on the strikers--whose aims, the Administration later admitted, were justified. But the controllers, at least, had violated the law that prohibits strikes against the federal government.
Unlike here, however, it was legal in Canada--until last week--for public workers to strike, unless their jobs are deemed essential to safety and health. About 45,000 are classified that way.
The Conservative government’s move to break the Canadian strike was unnecessary and violated the spirit of a reasonable law that had to be tossed out to avoid breaking it.”