TA

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
TheStig
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 870
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:34 pm

Re: TA

Post by TheStig »

I'm going to wade into the swamp. I can't believe how quickly everyone has gotten the pitch forks and torches out, every pilot is 100% entitled to their vote; but the amount of slander, speculation and misinformation that's been spread in 12 hours is a disservice to yourself. History may not repeat itself but it rhymes and I feel like anyone that was here for the 2011 TA has seen this all before. There isn't nearly enough information available in a 9 page brief to have any idea what is contained in this TA, attend a roadshow, make an informed decision.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: TA..old you so!!

Post by rudder »

khedrei wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 1:34 pm
‘Bob’ wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:23 pm
It’s so curious that airlines is the only place in the world where unions increase wage disparity rather than compressing it like in almost every other industry.
Interesting idea. At the railway, everyone makes the same for the service they provide in their position. Engineers who drive make more than conductors who are working the ground who make more thane brakeman who have a bit less responsibility but do similar work. The difference seniority brings is schedule, types of runs, vacation, overtime availability, etc which often did make a difference in pay. But job for job, hour for hour, everyone made the same.
It isn’t ‘the airline industry’.

It is just the airline industry ‘in Canada’. Totally self-inflicted.
---------- ADS -----------
 
khedrei
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: TA

Post by khedrei »

True.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flight94
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 9:38 am

Re: TA..old you so!!

Post by Flight94 »

‘Bob’ wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:23 pm Zero surprises here.

This will pass. For every vocal senior captain on here sticking to principle.. there’s ten more who only care about money.

Just like the US gerontocracy.. senior captains will vote for their big raises to cash out for their last few years because they “deserve it” and leave the problems of low pay to someone else.

I agree. Unfortunate, because I fly for an ALPA 705 and this contract would influence ours which is coming up.

You guys that fly with senior captains and think they are on your side, you know they are already spending that 425/hr on their 2nd retirement home in the carribean. If you're one of the genuine ones, then good for you.

Greed always wins.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptDukeNukem
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: TA..old you so!!

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

Flight94 wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 2:33 pm
‘Bob’ wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:23 pm Zero surprises here.

This will pass. For every vocal senior captain on here sticking to principle.. there’s ten more who only care about money.

Just like the US gerontocracy.. senior captains will vote for their big raises to cash out for their last few years because they “deserve it” and leave the problems of low pay to someone else.

I agree. Unfortunate, because I fly for an ALPA 705 and this contract would influence ours which is coming up.

You guys that fly with senior captains and think they are on your side, you know they are already spending that 425/hr on their 2nd retirement home in the carribean. If you're one of the genuine ones, then good for you.

Greed always wins.
Or paying off the ex wives
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
daedalusx
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 801
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:51 am

Re: TA

Post by daedalusx »

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
Complex systems won’t survive the competence crisis
newlygrounded
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: TA..old you so!!

Post by newlygrounded »

‘Bob’ wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:23 pm
It’s so curious that airlines is the only place in the world where unions increase wage disparity rather than compressing it like in almost every other industry.

TBH find me a single union in Canada doing a good job for their *average* workers? Though I think they're 100% necessary in any sort of safety field. (power, trains, planes, etc)

The public sector unions didn't get to keep WFH, grocery store unions don't do ANYTHING for their members, cupe screaming about a war and muting members who want to focus or their own bargaining issues.

They seem to exist only to protect the worst members
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
daedalusx
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 801
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:51 am

Re: TA..old you so!!

Post by daedalusx »

newlygrounded wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:18 pm
‘Bob’ wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:23 pm
It’s so curious that airlines is the only place in the world where unions increase wage disparity rather than compressing it like in almost every other industry.

TBH find me a single union in Canada doing a good job for their *average* workers? Though I think they're 100% necessary in any sort of safety field. (power, trains, planes, etc)

The public sector unions didn't get to keep WFH, grocery store unions don't do ANYTHING for their members, cupe screaming about a war and muting members who want to focus or their own bargaining issues.

They seem to exist only to protect the worst members
IUEC Elevator Union
120K a year + bennies + pension.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Complex systems won’t survive the competence crisis
newlygrounded
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: TA..old you so!!

Post by newlygrounded »

daedalusx wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:28 pm
newlygrounded wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:18 pm
‘Bob’ wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:23 pm
It’s so curious that airlines is the only place in the world where unions increase wage disparity rather than compressing it like in almost every other industry.

TBH find me a single union in Canada doing a good job for their *average* workers? Though I think they're 100% necessary in any sort of safety field. (power, trains, planes, etc)

The public sector unions didn't get to keep WFH, grocery store unions don't do ANYTHING for their members, cupe screaming about a war and muting members who want to focus or their own bargaining issues.

They seem to exist only to protect the worst members
IUEC Elevator Union
120K a year + bennies + pension.
fair though they're so "good" it's the point of extortionate with how long it takes to repair elevators in Canada now
---------- ADS -----------
 
LongHaul89
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2023 5:25 pm

Re: TA

Post by LongHaul89 »

TheStig wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 1:40 pm I'm going to wade into the swamp. I can't believe how quickly everyone has gotten the pitch forks and torches out, every pilot is 100% entitled to their vote; but the amount of slander, speculation and misinformation that's been spread in 12 hours is a disservice to yourself. History may not repeat itself but it rhymes and I feel like anyone that was here for the 2011 TA has seen this all before. There isn't nearly enough information available in a 9 page brief to have any idea what is contained in this TA, attend a roadshow, make an informed decision.
So you think ALPA decided to hide all the good stuff in a 9 page brief and just share the lame excuse for a TA
---------- ADS -----------
 
khedrei
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: TA..old you so!!

Post by khedrei »

newlygrounded wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:39 pm
daedalusx wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:28 pm
newlygrounded wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:18 pm

TBH find me a single union in Canada doing a good job for their *average* workers? Though I think they're 100% necessary in any sort of safety field. (power, trains, planes, etc)

The public sector unions didn't get to keep WFH, grocery store unions don't do ANYTHING for their members, cupe screaming about a war and muting members who want to focus or their own bargaining issues.

They seem to exist only to protect the worst members
IUEC Elevator Union
120K a year + bennies + pension.
fair though they're so "good" it's the point of extortionate with how long it takes to repair elevators in Canada now
I know when I got stuck it took like 45 minutes. I didn't find that to be too bad.
---------- ADS -----------
 
khedrei
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: TA

Post by khedrei »

LongHaul89 wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:50 pm
TheStig wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 1:40 pm I'm going to wade into the swamp. I can't believe how quickly everyone has gotten the pitch forks and torches out, every pilot is 100% entitled to their vote; but the amount of slander, speculation and misinformation that's been spread in 12 hours is a disservice to yourself. History may not repeat itself but it rhymes and I feel like anyone that was here for the 2011 TA has seen this all before. There isn't nearly enough information available in a 9 page brief to have any idea what is contained in this TA, attend a roadshow, make an informed decision.
So you think ALPA decided to hide all the good stuff in a 9 page brief and just share the lame excuse for a TA
Not only that, but the wages are enough to vote no. Captains getting a raise worth 1.3 times the FOs entire new salary. It's sick.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Launchpad1
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 3:49 pm

Re: TA

Post by Launchpad1 »

This will pass. For every vocal senior captain on here sticking to principle.. there’s ten more who only care about money.
Ah but every vote is equal and probably 50% of the AC workforce was hired in the last 3 years.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: TA

Post by rudder »

Launchpad1 wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 4:06 pm
This will pass. For every vocal senior captain on here sticking to principle.. there’s ten more who only care about money.
Ah but every vote is equal and probably 50% of the AC workforce was hired in the last 3 years.
If this POS passes at 50%+1 (which is typically the company objective as it represents the lowest value TA) then you will have the most divided pilot group in the history of ALPA.

Good luck finding a year 1-4 FO/RP that will go for a beer with you. Better take a screen shot of your ‘no’ vote.

Perhaps there is more than meets the eye going on here, but on its face this is a train wreck.

Doing something good for the industry also means doing something good for your workmates. This is not good for a huge segment of the AC pilot workforce. It looks like a collection of all of the mistakes from the past.

The company has made it clear how it values the current year 1-4 pilots at AC, and all of the new hires to come under this TA. How do YOU value them?
---------- ADS -----------
 
khedrei
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: TA

Post by khedrei »

rudder wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 4:24 pm
Launchpad1 wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 4:06 pm
This will pass. For every vocal senior captain on here sticking to principle.. there’s ten more who only care about money.
Ah but every vote is equal and probably 50% of the AC workforce was hired in the last 3 years.
If this POS passes at 50%+1 (which is typically the company objective as it represents the lowest value TA) then you will have the most divided pilot group in the history of ALPA.

Good luck finding a year 1-4 FO/RP that will go for a beer with you. Better take a screen shot of your ‘no’ vote.

Perhaps there is more than meets the eye going on here, but on its face this is a train wreck.

Doing something good for the industry also means doing something good for your workmates. This is not good for a huge segment of the AC pilot workforce. It looks like a collection of all of the mistakes from the past.

The company has made it clear how it values the current year 1-4 pilots at AC, and all of the new hires to come under this TA. How do YOU value them?
Well said! I'd very much enjoy seeing new hire classes dry up to nothing. Enough that the classrooms start growing mold.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
‘Bob’
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1014
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 am

Re: TA

Post by ‘Bob’ »

rookiepilot wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 8:56 am
rudder wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:46 am Other than WB CA (including 767F), where are the ‘yes’ votes going to come from?
Due to threats of frozen bank accounts and being trampled by horses?
Good thing it’s not tear gas and rubber bullets.
---------- ADS -----------
 
onspeed
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: yyz

Re: TA

Post by onspeed »

For those qualified its time to look at the US via the EB-2 Visa.

For some reason we can't seem to get it done in this country, yesterday they were saying how far apart they were, without evening issuing 72 hr notice for a strike you get this. There is a massive divergence between what you were being sold on and what you ended up getting offered. If you value yourself as a professional pilot working for Canada's top airline, i'm not sure how you swallow this.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptDukeNukem
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: TA..old you so!!

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

khedrei wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:51 pm
newlygrounded wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:39 pm
daedalusx wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 3:28 pm

IUEC Elevator Union
120K a year + bennies + pension.
fair though they're so "good" it's the point of extortionate with how long it takes to repair elevators in Canada now
I know when I got stuck it took like 45 minutes. I didn't find that to be too bad.
Can they fix the ones at Pearson?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Pilotguy007
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:24 am

Re: TA

Post by Pilotguy007 »

WoldAss contract. Enjoy sim outta block and no commuter policy. What a flop. Only good thing is money for the top end. Good job ALPA. Pilots now it's your job to turn this down. You deserve better.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6742
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: TA

Post by digits_ »

Note that you don't have to pay union dues, there's usually an option to pay a charity instead. Perhaps that's something ALPA would be sensitive to?

Then again 1 WB captain salary pays the same dues as 4 FOs on flat pay now?
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
User avatar
rookiepilot
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: TA

Post by rookiepilot »

‘Bob’ wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 4:32 pm
rookiepilot wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 8:56 am
rudder wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:46 am Other than WB CA (including 767F), where are the ‘yes’ votes going to come from?
Due to threats of frozen bank accounts and being trampled by horses?
Good thing it’s not tear gas and rubber bullets.
That was awesome.

Didn’t afterwards have the riots Vancouver had. Now need to bring kettling and tear gas onto university campuses….
---------- ADS -----------
 
apetogetherstrong
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2023 5:43 am

Re: TA

Post by apetogetherstrong »

Looking forward to the YES vote :roll: Shills gonna shill.
---------- ADS -----------
 
truedude
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 879
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 3:30 pm

Re: TA

Post by truedude »

apetogetherstrong wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 5:00 pm Looking forward to the YES vote :roll: Shills gonna shill.
55% yes is my guess. I hope I'm wrong.... But what a way to waste a once in a generation opertunity. A united pilot group. Record profits. And a goverment in complete disarray.

The pay table should be the same as Delta but in Canadian dollars. That alone still gives AC a massive leg up. And then better commuting rules, hotels, bidding, training paid for and in the window... the list goes on.

I guess you can take AC out of ACPA, but you can't get the ACPA mentality out of AC MEC.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
cjp
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 503
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:16 am

Re: TA

Post by cjp »

onspeed wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 4:42 pm For those qualified its time to look at the US via the EB-2 Visa.

For some reason we can't seem to get it done in this country, yesterday they were saying how far apart they were, without evening issuing 72 hr notice for a strike you get this. There is a massive divergence between what you were being sold on and what you ended up getting offered. If you value yourself as a professional pilot working for Canada's top airline, i'm not sure how you swallow this.
Missed the demand and opportunity window - companies have halted hiring or are laying off, they are about 8 months behind Canada with recession. Rates still through the roof and fear has taken hold, despite travel being strong.

Likely will be voting in a President who is not immigrant or Canada friendly.

EB-2 is not a solution, just Harvey law groups wet dream.
---------- ADS -----------
 
onspeed
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: yyz

Re: TA

Post by onspeed »

The EB-2 takes time if your qualified, 2 yrs plus to go through all the hoops. We'll see the number pick up over the next year as more and more who got the Visa get green cards.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”