TA

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Protonpilot
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 10:06 am

Re: TA

Post by Protonpilot »

bcflyer wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 6:17 am You realize that binding arbitration needs to be agree to by both parties right?
That depends.
In 2012 Air Canada pilots didn't agree to binding arbitration, but got it anyway (Protection of Air Services Act and FOS).
In June, 204 the WestJet mechanics didn't want binding arbitration, but got it anyway (first contract clause of CLC imposed by Minister of Labour)
In August, 2024 the rail workers didn't want binding arbitration, but got it anyway (Section 107 of CLC imposed by Minister of Labour).
For now, the feds have said they'll let Air Canada and its pilots negotiate. We could very well have a new government in six months, as the Liberals are hanging on by the skin of their teeth. Public sentiment was with us this past month, we were lucky to have some extra leverage in the final hours. I think our NC and MEC used it as best they could. 26/4/4/4. Talk to your reps about what the offer was up until the last few hours.
Public sentiment and government involvement might change when the details of a 26/4/4/4 increase are made public.
---------- ADS -----------
 
tango308
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:43 am

Re: TA

Post by tango308 »

Protonpilot wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 12:13 pm
bcflyer wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 6:17 am You realize that binding arbitration needs to be agree to by both parties right?
That depends.
In 2012 Air Canada pilots didn't agree to binding arbitration, but got it anyway (Protection of Air Services Act and FOS).
In June, 204 the WestJet mechanics didn't want binding arbitration, but got it anyway (first contract clause of CLC imposed by Minister of Labour)
In August, 2024 the rail workers didn't want binding arbitration, but got it anyway (Section 107 of CLC imposed by Minister of Labour).
For now, the feds have said they'll let Air Canada and its pilots negotiate. We could very well have a new government in six months, as the Liberals are hanging on by the skin of their teeth. Public sentiment was with us this past month, we were lucky to have some extra leverage in the final hours. I think our NC and MEC used it as best they could. 26/4/4/4. Talk to your reps about what the offer was up until the last few hours.
Public sentiment and government involvement might change when the details of a 26/4/4/4 increase are made public.
I agree this was a concern of mine as well. However the Bloc just announced they will not back the Cons motion. I'm not a fan of trudeau but AC pilots need to ratify their contract (be it TA1, 2 or 3) before the govt falls.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bcflyer
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1357
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Canada

Re: TA

Post by bcflyer »

Protonpilot wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 12:13 pm
bcflyer wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 6:17 am You realize that binding arbitration needs to be agree to by both parties right?
That depends.
In 2012 Air Canada pilots didn't agree to binding arbitration, but got it anyway (Protection of Air Services Act and FOS).
In June, 204 the WestJet mechanics didn't want binding arbitration, but got it anyway (first contract clause of CLC imposed by Minister of Labour)
In August, 2024 the rail workers didn't want binding arbitration, but got it anyway (Section 107 of CLC imposed by Minister of Labour).
For now, the feds have said they'll let Air Canada and its pilots negotiate. We could very well have a new government in six months, as the Liberals are hanging on by the skin of their teeth. Public sentiment was with us this past month, we were lucky to have some extra leverage in the final hours. I think our NC and MEC used it as best they could. 26/4/4/4. Talk to your reps about what the offer was up until the last few hours.
Public sentiment and government involvement might change when the details of a 26/4/4/4 increase are made public.
None of the examples you used are valid comparisons to today’s situation. The CN/CPKC workers are challenging the ruling and unless the SC recind their last ruling it will be overturned.
As for public sentiment, if the MEC had turned the offer down AC would have locked us out and made the offer public away. (The current offer has already been leaked to the public anyway) Public sentiment doesn’t get us a better contract. We still have the same leverage. We can still strike, the government is still afraid of a non confidence vote and having continued labour unrest moving into the holiday season will be a huge negative for advance bookings.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
SmokinJoe
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:01 am
Location: Adrift at sea..

Re: TA

Post by SmokinJoe »

I’m not with AC, I’m with Jazz.

In regards to “reading between the lines” with this TA, I’d like to share an excerpt from a communication we received post ratification of our last MOS:

“Usually, a successful ratification is met with satisfaction and optimism. I must say that I personally have never felt like I do now after a ratification. I am experiencing a mix of emotions, as I am pleased that many of our members will receive a much needed raise that they deserve. However, even with the positive advancements in this agreement, I believe it falls short of what is needed to right this ship, our airline.”

So our Chairman believed it fell short. So why put it forward for ratification? My belief is that it was hoped it would fail, and in turn send a message that the membership wouldn’t accept it. The union members would never admit that something would be put forward that they hope will fail. That would be in bad faith. But, if it did fail, it would set a bar in case government intervention happened.

Now a key difference is Jazz doesn’t control its flying whereas AC does, so Jazz pilots felt “pressured” to accept what was offered.

AC pilots aren’t pressured (at least not in the same way) So what is the rush in accepting a TA that does not meet your expectations.

Time is on your side, leverage is on your side and company record profits are on your side.

Best of luck
---------- ADS -----------
 
-Rockin In The Free World
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: TA

Post by rudder »

WJ NB FO 01/01/25

Yr 1 $86.79
Yr 2 $94.05
Yr 3 $120.16
Yr 4 $128.30

AC NB FO 30/09/24

Yr 1 $87.48
Yr 2 $94.81
Yr 3 $118.47
Yr 4 $126.62

Congrats. You almost caught up to WJ pay.
---------- ADS -----------
 
a2btrail
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: TA

Post by a2btrail »

What is the difference in pay between AC and WJ after year 4? Say year 5 & 6?
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: TA

Post by rudder »

a2btrail wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:22 am What is the difference in pay between AC and WJ after year 4? Say year 5 & 6?
You do understand the flat pay issue, right? You know the history? You know the effect that it has had on thousands of AC pilots?

And now (if hiring rumours are true) there will be 1000-1500 more as yet ‘unborn’ AC pilots that will be on the year 1-4 FO/RP pay from 2024-2027.

It appears that the for NB FO 1-4 that the goal of the NC was to match WJ. I doubt that was the goal anywhere else on the pay grid.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Canadaflyer46
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2021 4:27 pm

Re: TA

Post by Canadaflyer46 »

IMG_4318.jpeg
IMG_4318.jpeg (134.15 KiB) Viewed 3783 times
a2btrail wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:22 am What is the difference in pay between AC and WJ after year 4? Say year 5 & 6?
---------- ADS -----------
 
a2btrail
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: TA

Post by a2btrail »

rudder wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:34 am
a2btrail wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:22 am What is the difference in pay between AC and WJ after year 4? Say year 5 & 6?
You do understand the flat pay issue, right? You know the history? You know the effect that it has had on thousands of AC pilots?

And now (if hiring rumours are true) there will be 1000-1500 more as yet ‘unborn’ AC pilots that will be on the year 1-4 FO/RP pay from 2024-2027.

It appears that the for NB FO 1-4 that the goal of the NC was to match WJ. I doubt that was the goal anywhere else on the pay grid.
I was simply asking a question to be informed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
a2btrail
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: TA

Post by a2btrail »

Canadaflyer46 wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:37 am IMG_4318.jpeg
a2btrail wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:22 am What is the difference in pay between AC and WJ after year 4? Say year 5 & 6?
Thank you.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: TA

Post by cdnavater »

rudder wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:12 am WJ NB FO 01/01/25

Yr 1 $86.79
Yr 2 $94.05
Yr 3 $120.16
Yr 4 $128.30

AC NB FO 30/09/24

Yr 1 $87.48
Yr 2 $94.81
Yr 3 $118.47
Yr 4 $126.62

Congrats. You almost caught up to WJ pay.
The good news, there won’t be any 1-4 widebody FOs after this, year 5 is nearly 200/hr.
Also, yes the pay is close but you are showing WJ pay beginning Jan/25, Sep/25 AC pulls ahead and they are ahead for the remainder, so yes, selectively they are ahead for 9 months and then fall behind for the rest of the contract, by year 5 AC pulls way ahead for NB.
I also just realized, they are both potentially negotiating at the same time next round, WJ in January and AC in September of 2026.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: TA

Post by rudder »

cdnavater wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:00 am
rudder wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:12 am WJ NB FO 01/01/25

Yr 1 $86.79
Yr 2 $94.05
Yr 3 $120.16
Yr 4 $128.30

AC NB FO 30/09/24

Yr 1 $87.48
Yr 2 $94.81
Yr 3 $118.47
Yr 4 $126.62

Congrats. You almost caught up to WJ pay.
The good news, there won’t be any 1-4 widebody FOs after this, year 5 is nearly 200/hr.
Also, yes the pay is close but you are showing WJ pay beginning Jan/25, Sep/25 AC pulls ahead and they are ahead for the remainder, so yes, selectively they are ahead for 9 months and then fall behind for the rest of the contract, by year 5 AC pulls way ahead for NB.
I also just realized, they are both potentially negotiating at the same time next round, WJ in January and AC in September of 2026.
Incorrect.

AC 30/09/2027

Duration and Effective Date • 4 years, from September 30, 2023 until September 29, 2027
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: TA

Post by cdnavater »

rudder wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:03 am
cdnavater wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:00 am
rudder wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:12 am WJ NB FO 01/01/25

Yr 1 $86.79
Yr 2 $94.05
Yr 3 $120.16
Yr 4 $128.30

AC NB FO 30/09/24

Yr 1 $87.48
Yr 2 $94.81
Yr 3 $118.47
Yr 4 $126.62

Congrats. You almost caught up to WJ pay.
The good news, there won’t be any 1-4 widebody FOs after this, year 5 is nearly 200/hr.
Also, yes the pay is close but you are showing WJ pay beginning Jan/25, Sep/25 AC pulls ahead and they are ahead for the remainder, so yes, selectively they are ahead for 9 months and then fall behind for the rest of the contract, by year 5 AC pulls way ahead for NB.
I also just realized, they are both potentially negotiating at the same time next round, WJ in January and AC in September of 2026.
Incorrect.

AC 30/09/2027

Duration and Effective Date • 4 years, from September 30, 2023 until September 29, 2027
My mistake, the pay scale ends at 2026 so I made that assumption, so WJ pilots contract expires Dec 31,2026, that’s good, I was thinking the next round was closer together with AC and WJ management potentially setting up a CN/CPKC type situation
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6743
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: TA

Post by digits_ »

cdnavater wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:41 am
My mistake, the pay scale ends at 2026 so I made that assumption, so WJ pilots contract expires Dec 31,2026, that’s good, I was thinking the next round was closer together with AC and WJ management potentially setting up a CN/CPKC type situation
Meh, doesn't matter. It's not like WJ or AC are ever going to go ahead with a strike anyway :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: TA

Post by cdnavater »

digits_ wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:49 am
cdnavater wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:41 am
My mistake, the pay scale ends at 2026 so I made that assumption, so WJ pilots contract expires Dec 31,2026, that’s good, I was thinking the next round was closer together with AC and WJ management potentially setting up a CN/CPKC type situation
Meh, doesn't matter. It's not like WJ or AC are ever going to go ahead with a strike anyway :wink:
Regardless of pulling the trigger, the leverage was there, AC was getting ready for an orderly shutdown, bookings dropped off, could they get more, who knows!
---------- ADS -----------
 
khedrei
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: TA

Post by khedrei »

How about this? I will step back from the criticism for a bit to have a genuine question answer period. Hopefully some of the pro TA people will come and meet me there.

Genuine questions for the ones that are on board with senior guys getting a new guys salary x 1.3 for a raise while the new guy doesn't even get past wages+inflation.

Do you think a captain is legitimately worth 3-5x an FO? Previous claims say they don't do the same job. I claimed they do, with added responsibility. I think that's accurate. Perhaps this is a wording issue. Yes they make more decisions, but do they not perform the same tasks in the cockpit aside from what... filling out the log book and taxiing? If you think that the added responsibility and decision making is worth 3-5 times the wage, fine. We have our answer. I don't agree, same as most people who have commented here along with the entire industry in the US. I guess the vote will see. Also, not all captains are in that spot because they have more experience. There are plenty who could have 3k hours and upgraded in 2 years. A new FO might have way more experience but worked up north for 10 years. Seniority is a bitch that way, but I get it. I just think the experience argument falls apart in plenty of situations but I digress, that's not the point. Please tell me how much you think a captain is worth compared to an FO?

If you don't think they are worth 3-5x the wage, I ask why you still think what happened is ok? Because they got it? Because it benefits you? Because you had to do the 4-6 years of pain so you don't think they should jump that high that fast? Because they don't deserve it? And if they don't, why not? These are all legitimate answers, just say it and be honest.

Referencing the other thread, is it because making the wages more even just because is communism and we shouldn't do it for that reason alone?

Do you support this disparity because you think it's the best we can do?

The things that I don't think anyone would argue is that the union did not do what they promised. Not a world class contract. The pilots said if you don't get one, strike. They didn't do that.

Do you believe this contract is pretty good because the captains wages got close to the US captains wages? I have heard this claim. So I ask, why are you satisfied that the Captains got close but the FOs didn't. If you are fine with that, I'm curious why. Are the reasons the same as I listed above?

You're answer might be "I don't care, my wages went up a lot". Fine, that's an answer. I think it's selfish, but it's still a legitimate answer. If it's your answer, at least be honest about it. Say it.

If this passes I'm glad I won't be in the cockpit. The unity will be non existent.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: TA

Post by cdnavater »

khedrei wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 11:55 am How about this? I will step back from the criticism for a bit to have a genuine question answer period. Hopefully some of the pro TA people will come and meet me there.

Genuine questions for the ones that are on board with senior guys getting a new guys salary x 1.3 for a raise while the new guy doesn't even get past wages+inflation.

Do you think a captain is legitimately worth 3-5x an FO? Previous claims say they don't do the same job. I claimed they do, with added responsibility. I think that's accurate. Perhaps this is a wording issue. Yes they make more decisions, but do they not perform the same tasks in the cockpit aside from what... filling out the log book and taxiing? If you think that the added responsibility and decision making is worth 3-5 times the wage, fine. We have our answer. I don't agree, same as most people who have commented here along with the entire industry in the US. I guess the vote will see. Also, not all captains are in that spot because they have more experience. There are plenty who could have 3k hours and upgraded in 2 years. A new FO might have way more experience but worked up north for 10 years. Seniority is a bitch that way, but I get it. I just think the experience argument falls apart in plenty of situations but I digress, that's not the point. Please tell me how much you think a captain is worth compared to an FO?

If you don't think they are worth 3-5x the wage, I ask why you still think what happened is ok? Because they got it? Because it benefits you? Because you had to do the 4-6 years of pain so you don't think they should jump that high that fast? Because they don't deserve it? And if they don't, why not? These are all legitimate answers, just say it and be honest.

Referencing the other thread, is it because making the wages more even just because is communism and we shouldn't do it for that reason alone?

Do you support this disparity because you think it's the best we can do?

The things that I don't think anyone would argue is that the union did not do what they promised. Not a world class contract. The pilots said if you don't get one, strike. They didn't do that.

Do you believe this contract is pretty good because the captains wages got close to the US captains wages? I have heard this claim. So I ask, why are you satisfied that the Captains got close but the FOs didn't. If you are fine with that, I'm curious why. Are the reasons the same as I listed above?

You're answer might be "I don't care, my wages went up a lot". Fine, that's an answer. I think it's selfish, but it's still a legitimate answer. If it's your answer, at least be honest about it. Say it.

If this passes I'm glad I won't be in the cockpit. The unity will be non existent.
The thing about your claim that they didn’t even get inflation, bank of Canada inflation calculator says 48,000 in the year 2000 is equivalent to 81,153 today, very close to actual inflation for the approximate starting wage in 2000.
It’s not that FOs aren’t worth 66 2/3% of a Captain, this was tongue in cheek a little, it’s that there is value to how long someone spends at their airline, there is value in their past concessions, past lets, past bankruptcy forced changes, they are essentially being paid back for all of that, some would even argue not enough.
Just because they are making 300k and will now make 400k does not mean they didn’t earn it, it’s also worth noting that in the last 25 years that it took most of them to hold left seat 777, there have been many, many downturns and the subsequent fallout. Layoffs, mergers, the list is long and they should be paid back for that.
The reality is, anyone on the first four years has a choice, vote no and see if there are enough no votes, if not the other choice is find employment elsewhere, I hear Flair pays more but really your desire for more money does not trump the senior pilots who’ve been through some shit to finally see a payback.
I find this whole thing funny really, I was at Jazz when we signed our best ever contract, 2010, most of the gains went to the junior, year 1 had the highest increase, year 2 a little less, year 3 less, 4, 5, 6 all a bit less, 7-9 almost nothing, then increasing back up to the top scale, I was right in the spot that had almost nothing and I thought well, that kind of sucks but I didn’t go around yelling that the junior and senior pilots screwed me.
Then after that, we signed the worst contract we’ve ever signed, and literally any chance at improving since then has gone to fixing those changes which were all at the bottom and for those hired after 2015, every single improvement has been for them and what do we get for that, shitheads giving us grief how we screwed them, we didn’t screw anyone, they screwed themselves by taking the job. But, we tried to get back to where we once were and all I’ve had since the contract in 2010 is 2% per year, which has not kept up with inflation. Then last Sept we had some money thrown at us, by thrown I mean hard fought because yet again the company only wanted to put money where the problems were and our union said no way, all or nothing!
So as a top scale pilot, I got a lot of flack about my long service award of 6000, barely scratches the surface of where I should have been if not for pilots taking job at an airline who’s entire purpose for existence was to bring our union and wages down.
I’ve been through several downturns, I’m not saying this because I want others to experience it, I’m merely pointing out I’ve had to start over a few times, it’s not pleasant and I’m finally at a point where I get to enjoy life and not worry so much about if I can pay my bills, I won’t apologize for thinking that seniority friggen counts, it’s literally everything in this business, it rules your entire career and handcuffs you to your chosen airline and why you make more at the top.
---------- ADS -----------
 
TPP
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2023 4:25 am

Re: TA

Post by TPP »

This TA is far from perfect.

But a 41% uplift in 4 years isn't exactly peanuts. Plus all other gravy like benefits bump, per diems, vacation credit etc that equates to 1.9 billion dollars in extra compensation the MEC fought tirelessly for the last 15 months.

Once the dust settles, just like post WJs TA rage, most will realize that for a first post bankruptcy contract this is a solid step in the right direction with massive gains.

Hopefully AC continues to make record profits in the next 4 years so the MEC can justify another few billion dollars in compensation on the next round.

I think this TA will absolutely be voted through. Even if there's a few grumpy yes votes.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: TA

Post by Bede »

TPP wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:27 pm This TA is far from perfect.

But a 41% uplift in 4 years isn't exactly peanuts. Plus all other gravy like benefits bump, per diems, vacation credit etc that equates to 1.9 billion dollars in extra compensation the MEC fought tirelessly for the last 15 months.

Once the dust settles, just like post WJs TA rage, most will realize that for a first post bankruptcy contract this is a solid step in the right direction with massive gains.

Hopefully AC continues to make record profits in the next 4 years so the MEC can justify another few billion dollars in compensation on the next round.

I think this TA will absolutely be voted through. Even if there's a few grumpy yes votes.
Probably the best post of this thread.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: TA

Post by rudder »

TPP wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:27 pm
Once the dust settles, just like post WJs TA rage, most will realize that for a first post bankruptcy contract this is a solid step in the right direction with massive gains.
Just for historical accuracy, this will be the third AC post-CCAA contract.

CCAA was 2003.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by rudder on Sat Sep 21, 2024 5:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ash Ketchum
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 451
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2019 11:52 am

Re: TA

Post by Ash Ketchum »

I still think this TA will not pass. Too many flat pay/junior pilots who will mostly all be voting it down for good reason.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ant_321
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 936
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:43 pm

Re: TA

Post by ant_321 »

I personally would be a no vote even if the money was doubled. Basically no QOL improvements. Nearly everyone on a narrow body at AC works 16 days/month. Then train outside the block. I have a friend on the 787 that has worked 20 days several times in the last 6 months.
---------- ADS -----------
 
khedrei
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: TA

Post by khedrei »

cdnavater wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 2:53 pm
khedrei wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 11:55 am How about this? I will step back from the criticism for a bit to have a genuine question answer period. Hopefully some of the pro TA people will come and meet me there.

Genuine questions for the ones that are on board with senior guys getting a new guys salary x 1.3 for a raise while the new guy doesn't even get past wages+inflation.

Do you think a captain is legitimately worth 3-5x an FO? Previous claims say they don't do the same job. I claimed they do, with added responsibility. I think that's accurate. Perhaps this is a wording issue. Yes they make more decisions, but do they not perform the same tasks in the cockpit aside from what... filling out the log book and taxiing? If you think that the added responsibility and decision making is worth 3-5 times the wage, fine. We have our answer. I don't agree, same as most people who have commented here along with the entire industry in the US. I guess the vote will see. Also, not all captains are in that spot because they have more experience. There are plenty who could have 3k hours and upgraded in 2 years. A new FO might have way more experience but worked up north for 10 years. Seniority is a bitch that way, but I get it. I just think the experience argument falls apart in plenty of situations but I digress, that's not the point. Please tell me how much you think a captain is worth compared to an FO?

If you don't think they are worth 3-5x the wage, I ask why you still think what happened is ok? Because they got it? Because it benefits you? Because you had to do the 4-6 years of pain so you don't think they should jump that high that fast? Because they don't deserve it? And if they don't, why not? These are all legitimate answers, just say it and be honest.

Referencing the other thread, is it because making the wages more even just because is communism and we shouldn't do it for that reason alone?

Do you support this disparity because you think it's the best we can do?

The things that I don't think anyone would argue is that the union did not do what they promised. Not a world class contract. The pilots said if you don't get one, strike. They didn't do that.

Do you believe this contract is pretty good because the captains wages got close to the US captains wages? I have heard this claim. So I ask, why are you satisfied that the Captains got close but the FOs didn't. If you are fine with that, I'm curious why. Are the reasons the same as I listed above?

You're answer might be "I don't care, my wages went up a lot". Fine, that's an answer. I think it's selfish, but it's still a legitimate answer. If it's your answer, at least be honest about it. Say it.

If this passes I'm glad I won't be in the cockpit. The unity will be non existent.
The thing about your claim that they didn’t even get inflation, bank of Canada inflation calculator says 48,000 in the year 2000 is equivalent to 81,153 today, very close to actual inflation for the approximate starting wage in 2000.
It’s not that FOs aren’t worth 66 2/3% of a Captain, this was tongue in cheek a little, it’s that there is value to how long someone spends at their airline, there is value in their past concessions, past lets, past bankruptcy forced changes, they are essentially being paid back for all of that, some would even argue not enough.
Just because they are making 300k and will now make 400k does not mean they didn’t earn it, it’s also worth noting that in the last 25 years that it took most of them to hold left seat 777, there have been many, many downturns and the subsequent fallout. Layoffs, mergers, the list is long and they should be paid back for that.
The reality is, anyone on the first four years has a choice, vote no and see if there are enough no votes, if not the other choice is find employment elsewhere, I hear Flair pays more but really your desire for more money does not trump the senior pilots who’ve been through some shit to finally see a payback.
I find this whole thing funny really, I was at Jazz when we signed our best ever contract, 2010, most of the gains went to the junior, year 1 had the highest increase, year 2 a little less, year 3 less, 4, 5, 6 all a bit less, 7-9 almost nothing, then increasing back up to the top scale, I was right in the spot that had almost nothing and I thought well, that kind of sucks but I didn’t go around yelling that the junior and senior pilots screwed me.
Then after that, we signed the worst contract we’ve ever signed, and literally any chance at improving since then has gone to fixing those changes which were all at the bottom and for those hired after 2015, every single improvement has been for them and what do we get for that, shitheads giving us grief how we screwed them, we didn’t screw anyone, they screwed themselves by taking the job. But, we tried to get back to where we once were and all I’ve had since the contract in 2010 is 2% per year, which has not kept up with inflation. Then last Sept we had some money thrown at us, by thrown I mean hard fought because yet again the company only wanted to put money where the problems were and our union said no way, all or nothing!
So as a top scale pilot, I got a lot of flack about my long service award of 6000, barely scratches the surface of where I should have been if not for pilots taking job at an airline who’s entire purpose for existence was to bring our union and wages down.
I’ve been through several downturns, I’m not saying this because I want others to experience it, I’m merely pointing out I’ve had to start over a few times, it’s not pleasant and I’m finally at a point where I get to enjoy life and not worry so much about if I can pay my bills, I won’t apologize for thinking that seniority friggen counts, it’s literally everything in this business, it rules your entire career and handcuffs you to your chosen airline and why you make more at the top.
Thanks for the answer. To clarify, there was no tongue and cheeks in my post. No sarcasm. These were legitimate normal toned questions.

Yes, it looks like the FO raises ALMOST caught up to inflation, thanks for the correction. But they came up just short. The new effective salary of the FOs is 78k. Hard to accurately compare annual airline salaries vs hourly to an average persons salary because under the old system it was 75 hrs per month, now it's 84.

Regardless, it seems that in summary you think the old guys are bring repaid for past confessions and their time value for many years of service earned them the big raise. The 66% thing doesn't much matter for the FOs as they will be paid appropriately when they put in their time.

Again, no sarcasm here. If I got something wrong, let me know.

But I ask you this follow up question. The old guys had to pay long ago. They are being paid back deservedly now. I think youd agree that they shouldnt have had to make these consessions back then. So, how do we stop the cycle? The guys starting off today will say the same thing in 10-15 years when raises are again much bigger for the top than they are for the bottom because they had to go through it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
sportingrifle
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:29 am

Re: TA

Post by sportingrifle »

The webinar was interesting- the more I read about the deal the more I like it. As Charlene says, we didn’t get everything we wanted but we got a lot. And we can build on this for more QOL things in 3 years.
But more importantly, we have no choice now but to accept the deal. The labor minister was in the room, watching AC negotiate in good faith while bringing $$$ to the table.
If we turn down a deal that the union recommends (which they now have), under labor law the minister sends the whole matter to binding arbitration - the same arbitration the company so desperately wanted all along. Like the previous MOU we voted down, right now the BOD is desparately hoping we vote this down. The most likely arbitration “spanking” for us greedy pilots would be the company’s previous offer less the retro pay.
If the “bearded children” vote this down, they are going to get an incredibly expensive lesson in labor law and negotiations they will remember for the rest of their careers.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by sportingrifle on Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: TA

Post by cdnavater »

ant_321 wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 3:47 am I personally would be a no vote even if the money was doubled. Basically no QOL improvements. Nearly everyone on a narrow body at AC works 16 days/month. Then train outside the block. I have a friend on the 787 that has worked 20 days several times in the last 6 months.
Ant, have you read the 37 page document provided to AC pilots or are you going by the executive summary?
I talked to a buddy, he basically said the executive summary was terrible and should not have been published, it leads one to think there were no improvements, after he read the new information, he feels he doesn’t need to go to the road show now, much more information and it’s section by section of what’s changed. I’m pretty sure training outside the block is double time, so if the company trains you outside the block, there is a cost for them.
I haven’t read it, so it’s hearsay at this point but it did sound like there were enough improvements, his biggest request and only things he put on his survey was scheduling and pension contributions, he’s a yes!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”