Recall of the NC

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Tbayer2021
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 696
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2021 7:18 am

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by Tbayer2021 »

rookiepilot wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:34 am
altiplano wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:21 am This is formula pay though...

The 777 is that big and heavy that it incurs that much weight pay.
Interesting! So train engineers make even more money? Oil Supertanker Captains? Cruise ship captains responsible for 5000 lives?

All weigh more than a 777.
The formula actually accounts for height ASL and AGL as well as engine power. A train or ship engine isn't as powerful as a 777 GE engine.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
rookiepilot
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by rookiepilot »

Tbayer2021 wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 9:05 am
rookiepilot wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:34 am
altiplano wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:21 am This is formula pay though...

The 777 is that big and heavy that it incurs that much weight pay.
Interesting! So train engineers make even more money? Oil Supertanker Captains? Cruise ship captains responsible for 5000 lives?

All weigh more than a 777.
The formula actually accounts for height ASL and AGL as well as engine power. A train or ship engine isn't as powerful as a 777 GE engine.
Space Shuttle pilots.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tbayer2021
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 696
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2021 7:18 am

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by Tbayer2021 »

rookiepilot wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 9:20 am
Tbayer2021 wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 9:05 am
rookiepilot wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:34 am

Interesting! So train engineers make even more money? Oil Supertanker Captains? Cruise ship captains responsible for 5000 lives?

All weigh more than a 777.
The formula actually accounts for height ASL and AGL as well as engine power. A train or ship engine isn't as powerful as a 777 GE engine.
Space Shuttle pilots.
Geez, when was the last time you read up on nasa? They don't use those anymore. Plus, their pilots weren't unionized. Also, when the pilots actually flew the orbiter, it weighed a maximum of 240,000 lbs.

Try again.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dias
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:22 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by Dias »

rookiepilot wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 9:20 am Space Shuttle pilots.
They have to do crappy commercials to retire.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
flying4dollars
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1405
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by flying4dollars »

Aerkavo wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:59 am
flying4dollars wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 6:26 pm
Don't make the mistake of ignorantly assuming new hires at AC are all 20 nothing year olds with 2000 hours on mostly civilized aircraft living in mostly civilized cities. It amazes me how many senior folk I've spoken with that think junior AC pilot means junior industry pilot.

On another forum an AC pilot has made a post analysing flat pay and shown that the new rates (if accepted) will be the highest ever. That's taking the old rates from the last 30 years and adjusting for inflation. I don't appreciate being called a "greedy fu ck" and being accused of "throwing the juniors under the bus" for only paying them $80K/year. Flair is higher? Use your brain. Of course it's higher - it's a 3rd rate company with no future and marginal career potential.
I agree, I'd defend myself from being called that too if I was in those shoes. But keyboard warriors who sling mud will always be that when they are behind a computer screen. I wouldn't bother feeding the trolls.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
flying4dollars
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1405
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by flying4dollars »

rookiepilot wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 9:20 am
Tbayer2021 wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 9:05 am
rookiepilot wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:34 am

Interesting! So train engineers make even more money? Oil Supertanker Captains? Cruise ship captains responsible for 5000 lives?

All weigh more than a 777.
The formula actually accounts for height ASL and AGL as well as engine power. A train or ship engine isn't as powerful as a 777 GE engine.
Airbus pilots.
Fixed that for you :P
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6742
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by digits_ »

Aerkavo wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:59 am I don't appreciate being called a "greedy fu ck" and being accused of "throwing the juniors under the bus" for only paying them $80K/year.
Then don't be one? How can you deny that's true? Perhaps not 'you' personally, but the union sure is.

Again, your raise is higher than the new salary the junior pilots will get. There's no way around that.

It's not about the 80k as an absolute number. It's about its relation to the senior 100k raises.

The union absolutely has the power to give every pilot a 65k raise instead of 30k for juniors and 100k for seniors, to correct for the subpar ratio of FO/CPT wages. They don't. Ok, fine. Not much to do about that I suppose. But it does certainly make the top look extremely greedy!

That's the other danger of running a big public media campaign during negotiations: the public gets invested and wants to know how/what you guys did. And a thing like this looks really bad and selfish. Because it is.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
TPP
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2023 4:25 am

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by TPP »

digits_ wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:21 pm
Aerkavo wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:59 am I don't appreciate being called a "greedy fu ck" and being accused of "throwing the juniors under the bus" for only paying them $80K/year.
Then don't be one? How can you deny that's true? Perhaps not 'you' personally, but the union sure is.

Again, your raise is higher than the new salary the junior pilots will get. There's no way around that.

It's not about the 80k as an absolute number. It's about its relation to the senior 100k raises.

The union absolutely has the power to give every pilot a 65k raise instead of 30k for juniors and 100k for seniors, to correct for the subpar ratio of FO/CPT wages. They don't. Ok, fine. Not much to do about that I suppose. But it does certainly make the top look extremely greedy!

That's the other danger of running a big public media campaign during negotiations: the public gets invested and wants to know how/what you guys did. And a thing like this looks really bad and selfish. Because it is.
Spreading a 65k raise across the board means your total career earnings at AC will be significantly less.

Most ppl spend 30+ years at AC. Once you're at year 5 your income skyrockets as an FO. So it's not just skippers that got a massive raise.

I think everyone in this northern wasteland was cheering on for higher flat pay or no flat pay at all. But the gains on the FO side are also massive should u choose to never upgrade, and you'll spend the majority of your career at year 12 regardless of which seat u want to sit in.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6742
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by digits_ »

TPP wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:37 pm
digits_ wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:21 pm
Aerkavo wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:59 am I don't appreciate being called a "greedy fu ck" and being accused of "throwing the juniors under the bus" for only paying them $80K/year.
Then don't be one? How can you deny that's true? Perhaps not 'you' personally, but the union sure is.

Again, your raise is higher than the new salary the junior pilots will get. There's no way around that.

It's not about the 80k as an absolute number. It's about its relation to the senior 100k raises.

The union absolutely has the power to give every pilot a 65k raise instead of 30k for juniors and 100k for seniors, to correct for the subpar ratio of FO/CPT wages. They don't. Ok, fine. Not much to do about that I suppose. But it does certainly make the top look extremely greedy!

That's the other danger of running a big public media campaign during negotiations: the public gets invested and wants to know how/what you guys did. And a thing like this looks really bad and selfish. Because it is.
Spreading a 65k raise across the board means your total career earnings at AC will be significantly less.

Most ppl spend 30+ years at AC. Once you're at year 5 your income skyrockets as an FO. So it's not just skippers that got a massive raise.

I think everyone in this northern wasteland was cheering on for higher flat pay or no flat pay at all. But the gains on the FO side are also massive should u choose to never upgrade, and you'll spend the majority of your career at year 12 regardless of which seat u want to sit in.
Maybe, maybe not. Depends on what age you join, and how long quick upgrades are still happening. The TA is valid for 4 years only. After that, everything changes.

For older, more experienced pilots joining AC, spending 5 years as an FO can be 25% or 50% of their AC career.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
thepoors
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 406
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:27 am

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by thepoors »

Aerkavo wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 5:05 pm
thepoors wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 2:43 pm The only people that benefit from this TA are the greedy fu cks already at the top of the pay scale who want to cash out even more the last few years before they retire. It's throwing the juniors under the bus once again for selfish gains - but then again when have boomers ever done anything other that...
I've been in aviation for close to 40 years. Been through 9/11, SARS, the global financial crisis, mergers, bankruptcies, COVID, recessions, layoffs and now in the last few years before retirement I'm called greedy because I don't want to give it up for the juniors? You have no idea what crap most of the seniors have gone through but I can tell you it's a whole lot worse than living in your parent's basement after getting hired to fly a jet for a major airline with 2000 hours. Boo Hoo. Tell me how many years you spent working a dock in Yellowknife. Tell me how many years you spent living in a crewhouse on a reserve doing 24 hour/day oncall. OMG, you have to commute to your jet at AC because Toronto is too expensive - the horror.

You have a serious chip on your shoulder - should probably get some counselling for that as it will eat away at you.
Shut up boomer. No one wants to hear your whining about how hard you had it (I bet you walked to school uphill both ways didn't you?) You're the most entitled and spoiled generation in the history of mankind - who had it the easiest of anyone before or since. You were handed everything by the selfless generation of your parents and want to pass on nothing to the next. That's your legacy.

How many years have you been at the top of the payscale making $200k+ a year when the cost of living was a fraction of what it is now? How much did your house cost per sqft? What were your wages at all those "terrible" Northern jobs adjusted for inflation?

You want to talk about boohoo? How about boohoo you get an 80k raise instead of 100k and that means the guys at the bottom don't have to live paycheck to paycheck? Or need to have a second job as a pilot at the national carrier? Or have to go to the food bank to feed their kids? But no, you rather be selfish and confirm the boomer slogan once again: "fu ck you, I got mine." Don't worry nobody expects anything less from you at this point. If you're triggered by my comments about your greed, it's because they're true and you feel guilty. If you're going to behave like an a-hole at least own it, instead of crying about it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by thepoors on Sun Sep 22, 2024 7:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rookiepilot
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by rookiepilot »

thepoors wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 7:36 am
Aerkavo wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 5:05 pm
thepoors wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 2:43 pm The only people that benefit from this TA are the greedy fu cks already at the top of the pay scale who want to cash out even more the last few years before they retire. It's throwing the juniors under the bus once again for selfish gains - but then again when have boomers ever done anything other that...
I've been in aviation for close to 40 years. Been through 9/11, SARS, the global financial crisis, mergers, bankruptcies, COVID, recessions, layoffs and now in the last few years before retirement I'm called greedy because I don't want to give it up for the juniors? You have no idea what crap most of the seniors have gone through but I can tell you it's a whole lot worse than living in your parent's basement after getting hired to fly a jet for a major airline with 2000 hours. Boo Hoo. Tell me how many years you spent working a dock in Yellowknife. Tell me how many years you spent living in a crewhouse on a reserve doing 24 hour/day oncall. OMG, you have to commute to your jet at AC because Toronto is too expensive - the horror.

You have a serious chip on your shoulder - should probably get some counselling for that as it will eat away at you.
Shut up boomer. No one wants to hear your whining about how hard you had it (I bet you walked to school uphill both ways didn't you?) You're the most entitled and spoiled generation in the history of mankind - who had it the easiest of anyone before or since. You were handed everything by the selfless generation of your parents and want to pass on nothing to the next. That's your legacy.

How many years have you been at the top of the payscale making $200k+ a year? How much did your house cost per sqft? What were your wages at all those "terrible" Northern jobs adjusted for inflation? How low was the cost of living?

You want to talk about boohoo? How about boohoo you get an 80k raise instead of 100k and that means the guys at the bottom don't have to live paycheck to paycheck? Or need to have a second job as a pilot at the national carrier? Or have to go to the food bank to feed their kids? But no, you rather be a selfish prick and confirm the boomer slogan once again: "fu ck you, I got mine." Don't worry nobody expects anything less from you at this point.
Not wrong.

The boomer generation is directly to blame for why housing and living prices vs incomes are today where they are, debt and tax levels are where they are.

You happily voted for it. Don’t be surprised there are a lot of pissed off younger folks. In the US too. You don’t pay your fair share. Never have. These are Facts and not debatable.

Politicians have sucked up to the powerful boomer voting block for decades, and are happy to dump the problems on the younger generations while calling them lazy bums.

Most selfish generation in history is a title well earned.

If I was in power I would remove voting rights from, say, 75+ You no longer contribute to the tax base through working. (Most of you). Too young to vote is ok, so is too old to vote. I’d make voting mandatory too, to increase the younger vote. Other countries do this.

I was working at 14, driving at 15, can solo an airplane by then.

Yet You can’t vote at these ages, yet dementia laden 80 year olds can. Why.

I would means test every retirement benefit in existence, based on assets, not income. CPP, OAS, JT’s dental and drug crap, the works. Not a right. Too much assets, none for you. And BTW CPP isn’t yours. Its a collective pension plan to benefit Canadians. Not a private pension.

I’d charge for every single DR visit, every single ER visit, poor by assets could claim it back. User fees on everything.

You’re too expensive. Pay your way.

All of this is coming, my entitled friend , cause the young won’t stand for it.

(BTW, I am barely not a boomer myself, well into my 50’s , for context)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by rookiepilot on Sun Sep 22, 2024 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5676
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by altiplano »

rookiepilot wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:34 am
altiplano wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:21 am This is formula pay though...

The 777 is that big and heavy that it incurs that much weight pay.
Interesting! So train engineers make even more money? Oil Supertanker Captains? Cruise ship captains responsible for 5000 lives?

All weigh more than a 777.
Ever see what a coast pilotage operator makes?
---------- ADS -----------
 
itsgrosswhatinet
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2023 5:15 pm
Location: Upper Rubber Boot Airways

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by itsgrosswhatinet »

I'm voting no to the TA, I am not voting yes to Charlene resigning. If Charlene feels she must resign that's her decision but I don't agree. If they wanted to replace the NC I'd be for it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Safety starts with two
Tigger
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:56 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by Tigger »

khedrei wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 2:57 pm First year captains make between 3-4 times what first year FOs make. Pretty obvious who was doing the negotiating. If you guys want a fair deal, these guys need to go.
Seriously? Unbelievably short sighted. You will be a first year FO for precisely 365 days of your 30+ year career. That’s 0.03 percent of your career. You will spend the overwhelming majority of your career on that captain list. Have a little perspective.
---------- ADS -----------
 
khedrei
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by khedrei »

Edit: misunderstood what you said. It's not just the first year. The first 4 are pretty bad. The first 2 are really bad.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by khedrei on Sun Sep 22, 2024 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
itsgrosswhatinet
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2023 5:15 pm
Location: Upper Rubber Boot Airways

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by itsgrosswhatinet »

I changed my mind. Now that her resignation promise is in the media she has to go. Thank you for your service.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Safety starts with two
Tigger
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:56 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by Tigger »

khedrei wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 12:22 pm That is very misleading. Only a small % of FOs are upgrading in a year. and that will be drying up very quickly moving forward.
Of course you’re correct, but the point I’m making is that flat pay doesn’t last long in the grand scheme of things (though I know from first hand experience that it sure can feel that way sometimes) and that once you’re into formula pay it gets a LOT better. Improving those first two years (again, 0.67 percent of a 30 year career) at the expense of the next 99.3% — in either seat — seems incredibly shortsighted.

And this contract also improves (albeit maybe not enough) the captain to FO pay percentage, in addition to the across the board pay bump. There’s a table in the summary that shows third year widebody FO’s jump over 70% in pay from current year 3 flat pay.
---------- ADS -----------
 
khedrei
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by khedrei »

Not everyone has a 30 year career ahead of them at AC. Some people only have 10-15. It's far from .67% of anyone's career even if they stay 30 years.

I do get your point. The disparity in pay raise isn't fair, no matter how you slice it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
rookiepilot
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by rookiepilot »

Tigger wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 12:01 pm
khedrei wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 2:57 pm First year captains make between 3-4 times what first year FOs make. Pretty obvious who was doing the negotiating. If you guys want a fair deal, these guys need to go.
Seriously? Unbelievably short sighted. You will be a first year FO for precisely 365 days of your 30+ year career. That’s 0.03 percent of your career. You will spend the overwhelming majority of your career on that captain list. Have a little perspective.
1 year is 0.03% of 30 years?

I didn’t know that. But I dropped out of college to start my business.
---------- ADS -----------
 
khedrei
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by khedrei »

Don't get me wrong, I think the bulk of the raises are VERY good. Which begs the question, why give great raises to ALMOST all of the pilot group? If the union could secure raises like that for the bulk of the members, why can't they get something comparable for the rest?

Seems like a pretty big screw you. Whether you agree or not that today's money is more valuable than tomorrow's, there certainly I'd a fairness aspect to it that was overlooked. This doesn't create unity.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tigger
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:56 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by Tigger »

khedrei wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 1:03 pm Not everyone has a 30 year career ahead of them at AC. Some people only have 10-15. It's far from .67% of anyone's career even if they stay 30 years.

I do get your point. The disparity in pay raise isn't fair, no matter how you slice it.
It’s very rarely I fly with a new hire who’s over 30 these days. And sadly, almost none of them get my clever 80’s pop culture references.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tigger
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:56 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by Tigger »

rookiepilot wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 1:07 pm
1 year is 0.03% of 30 years?

I didn’t know that. But I dropped out of college to start my business.
[/quote]

Oh god, I’m an idiot and it looks like I should have stayed an extra year in uni — THREE percent. :rolleyes: And then I went and doubled down on it too…. :oops: In my defense, it’s nice here and I’m on my fourth rum. Tell you what, I’ll buy the next round!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
rookiepilot
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by rookiepilot »

Tigger wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 1:29 pm
rookiepilot wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 1:07 pm
1 year is 0.03% of 30 years?

I didn’t know that. But I dropped out of college to start my business.
Oh god, I’m an idiot and it looks like I should have stayed an extra year in uni — THREE percent. :rolleyes: And then I went and doubled down on it too…. :oops: In my defense, it’s nice here and I’m on my fourth rum. Tell you what, I’ll buy the next round!
[/quote]

Done!
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by rudder »

What exactly were the QOL improvements effective 2025?

Will any block holder be working less days? Will anybody be working less days?

Will any RSV pilot know in advance what their callout period is? Will it be assigned within seniority? Will there be any seniority rights for assignment of flight duty?

Will a 3 day 9:45 credit pairing still be worth 9:45?

Is AC still the only legacy carrier in North America with an ‘RP’ Pilot category?

Is this yet another contract being sold on ‘growth’?

It seems the entire discourse on yes-or-no is based excessively on pay. Too often that is how pilots think. And that is the company strategy knowing how pilots think. Save on efficiency. Spend on salary.

Individuals vote individually with equal weight per ballot cast. That is democracy. And priorities differ.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Recall of the NC

Post by Bede »

khedrei wrote: Sun Sep 22, 2024 1:17 pm Don't get me wrong, I think the bulk of the raises are VERY good. Which begs the question, why give great raises to ALMOST all of the pilot group? If the union could secure raises like that for the bulk of the members, why can't they get something comparable for the rest?

Seems like a pretty big screw you. Whether you agree or not that today's money is more valuable than tomorrow's, there certainly I'd a fairness aspect to it that was overlooked. This doesn't create unity.
Didn't the junior pilots get a raise of higher percentage than the senior pilots?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”