GROUNDED One Eye Open : Request for Legal Representation.

[T.J.]

Subject: Request for Legal Representation –Jurisdictional Challenge for U.S.-Registered Aircraft N3140D (former 9Y-THB)

I am seeking legal representation to bring a Judicial Misconduct and Fraudulent Concealment case to U.S. courts involving my March 7, 1994 injury caused by a hydraulic fluid leak from U.S.-registered aircraft N3140D (L1011-Tristar) while operated by BWIA West Indies Airways. This case has been deliberately obstructed for 30 years, and I believe the actions of BWIA, its CEO Conrad Aleong, and the Government of Trinidad & Tobago (BWIA’s lease guarantor) were designed to suppress evidence of potential corruption in the lease and sale of the aircraft.
Despite winning multiple legal victories—including in the Appeal Court and Privy Council—the case was deliberately delayed for decades, files were repeatedly lost, and product liability was never addressed. More critically, BWIA failed to report my accident to U.S. aviation authorities (NTSB/FAA), violating U.S. federal law.
Evidence of Fraudulent Concealment & Judicial Misconduct
1. BWIA’s Non-Compliance with U.S. Law
o Under 49 CFR § 830.15, accidents involving U.S.-registered aircraft must be reported to the NTSB and FAA.
o BWIA never reported my injury, which resulted in permanent blindness in my right eye.
o The airline’s failure to report raises questions of fraudulent concealment, regulatory violations, and obstruction of justice.
2. Deliberate Case Delays & Judicial Corruption
o A 30-year delay in a civil case is highly unusual—it suggests judicial misconduct and a systematic effort to suppress key evidence.
o My court files were lost multiple times, preventing timely legal action.
o If High Court judges were involved in delaying proceedings or obstructing evidence, this would indicate corruption within the judiciary.
3. Potential Fraud in the 1982 Aircraft Lease & Sale
o The lease of N3140D involved six leasing companies, FNB Services Inc. (Boston), and the Government of Trinidad as a guarantor.
o If government officials received kickbacks or engaged in financial misconduct in the aircraft’s lease, BWIA had every reason to prevent this from coming to light.
o The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) may apply if financial fraud was committed during the sale of this aircraft.
Why This Case Can Be Moved to U.S. Courts
There are multiple legal pathways to U.S. jurisdiction, including violations of U.S. aviation regulations, financial ties to U.S. entities, and fraudulent concealment.
1. Failure to Report a U.S.-Registered Aircraft Accident (FAA/NTSB Violations)
• BWIA never reported this accident to the NTSB/FAA, despite operating a U.S.-registered aircraft (N3140D).
• Regulatory violations of FAA/NTSB reporting laws could justify U.S. legal action.
• If this failure was intentional, it could be grounds for a civil lawsuit under fraudulent concealment laws.
2. Guarantor Liability – The Government of Trinidad & Tobago
• The Government of Trinidad guaranteed BWIA’s lease of N3140D, making them financially involved.
• If BWIA’s failure to report the accident was to protect the government’s financial interests, this may be grounds for sovereign liability litigation in the U.S.
• The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) may apply if financial misconduct was involved.
3. Fraudulent Concealment & Tolling of the Statute of Limitations
• Fraudulent concealment is a recognized exception to the statute of limitations.
• BWIA, the Trinidadian government, and possibly the judiciary actively concealed this case for 30 years.
• Because I was denied access to U.S. legal remedies due to jurisdictional manipulation, a U.S. court may pause (toll) the statute of limitations and allow this case to proceed.
4. U.S. Court Jurisdiction – Aircraft’s U.S. Registration & Ownership
• The aircraft was U.S.-registered (N3140D) at the time of the incident, subjecting it to FAA/NTSB oversight.
• If the financial owner/lessor of the aircraft was a U.S. entity, this could establish U.S. court jurisdiction.
• If the Boston-based financial institution (FNB Services Inc.) that leased the aircraft to BWIA had liability insurance or regulatory compliance obligations, it may still be accountable.
5. Conflict of Interest & Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Against Conrad Aleong & CIC Insurers)
• As BWIA’s CEO, Conrad Aleong was responsible for ensuring fair treatment of injured employees.
• As a director of CIC Insurers (BWIA’s insurer), he had a direct financial interest in limiting payouts to claimants (like me).
• This is a clear conflict of interest—he influenced both BWIA’s defense and the insurer’s compensation decisions against me.
• If he used his dual roles to suppress my rightful compensation, that could be grounds for legal action.
6. Bad Faith Insurance Practices (Against CIC Insurers)
• CIC Insurers had a legal duty to process claims fairly and in good faith.
• They failed to conduct a fair investigation into my injury and acted to minimize or deny compensation unfairly.
• Evidence suggests they deliberately delayed my claim and relied on false information to deny me just compensation.
• If CIC Insurers acted in bad faith, a lawsuit could be brought against them under U.S. bad faith insurance laws.
• ________________________________________
Additional Evidence – Lease Agreement in My Possession
I possess the original lease agreement for N3140D, which provides critical details:
✔ The role of a U.S.-based financial institution in leasing the aircraft to BWIA, reinforcing U.S. jurisdiction.
✔ Any maintenance, liability, and reporting clauses that BWIA and the Government of Trinidad may have violated.
✔ Financial ties that may indicate corruption in the lease agreement.
This lease further strengthens the legal pathway for U.S. litigation.
Evidence of Judicial Obstruction & Systematic Delays
The Trinidadian justice system repeatedly obstructed my case, extending it for 30 years through procedural delays, missing documents, and legal maneuvering.
1. 2003 – Initial Ruling Against Me & Deliberate Withholding of Evidence
o Justice Mark Mohammed ruled in favor of the defendants.
o To appeal, my attorneys needed the "Notes of Evidence" from Justice Mohammed.
o Despite multiple requests, he refused to release them.
o My attorneys had to obtain a High Court order to force him to release the notes.
o He still refused until another High Court request was made.
2. 2006 – Appeal Court Ruled in My Favor, But No Award Given
o The Appeal Court overturned the ruling in my favor.
o However, instead of issuing the award, they sent the matter back to Justice Mark Mohammed to determine the compensation.
o He did not issue any award.
3. 2013 – Direct Presidential Intervention Required
o After years of delay, I wrote to the President of Trinidad, Anthony Carmona.
o He summoned the Chief Justice to get the case moving.
o Justice Mark Mohammed returned to issue an award, but still no award was given.
4. 2018 – Case Transferred to Another Judge
o The case was reassigned to Justice Robin Mohammed. By this time all the Court Files went missing, no where to be found.
5. 2023 – Final Conclusion After Four Appeals
o The defendants filed four separate appeals to delay the matter further.
o The case was finally concluded on June 6, 2023.
6. Canadian Medical Witness & Private Investigator in Canada
o My Canadian doctor, Dr. Sasthri Maharajh, notarized all my medical documents and submitted them to the Trinidad court.
o However, he later refused to testify, weakening my case.
o The defendants hired a private investigator and a Law Firm in Canada and obtained all of my Canadian medical records.
Implications for a U.S. Legal Case
• Judicial Obstruction & Corruption:
o The intentional delays, missing evidence, and failure to issue an award indicate judicial corruption.
o If the courts deliberately obstructed justice, this could be grounds for denial of due process claims. The entire court files went missing.
• Fraudulent Concealment & Tolling the Statute of Limitations:
o If the judicial system actively concealed my right to a fair trial, this may allow a U.S. court to override standard time limitations under fraudulent concealment laws.
• Jurisdiction Manipulation & Forum Shopping:
o The deliberate shifting of the case from Canada to Trinidad suggests forum shopping, a practice that can be challenged in U.S. courts.
• Violation of International Human Rights Standards:
o Denying me access to justice for three decades may violate international legal standards for fair trials.


Supporting Documentation Available
In addition to the lease agreement, I have extensive documentation, including:
✔ Aircraft registration & ownership records confirming U.S. jurisdiction.
✔ Medical records & legal documents proving the severity of my injury.
✔ NTSB & FAA correspondence confirming that BWIA never reported the incident.
✔ Proof of jurisdictional manipulation showing how BWIA fought to move the case from Canada to Trinidad to avoid stricter liability laws.
✔ Records of the U.S. financial institution that leased the aircraft, which may hold liability under U.S. law.

Next Steps
I am seeking legal expertise in aviation law, product liability, fraudulent concealment, and judicial corruption to bring this matter before U.S. courts. Given:
✔ BWIA’s failure to report a U.S.-registered aircraft accident,
✔ Fraudulent concealment of evidence over 30 years,
✔ Potential corruption involving government officials and financial institutions,
✔ The original lease agreement linking U.S. financial institutions to this aircraft,
I believe there is a strong legal basis for pursuing this case in the U.S.
Would you be available to discuss this further? I appreciate any guidance on the best legal strategy to proceed.
Sincerely,
Tajo Beharry
tajobeharry@gmail.com

[canadianfly]

Hey brother, i'm sorry to read about your predicament.
Try Ms Rima Zamat, Zamat & Associates, she is good at what she does, you can find her on linkedin.
Best of luck.