PAL doing regional flying for Air Canada continues to be in breach of the agreement they signed with Jazz when Jazz took over the Sky Regional flying, which gave Jazz exclusive rights to teir 2 flying until the end of 2025. Another part of the ULP.Man_in_the_sky wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 1:22 pmcdnavater wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 7:00 amI think he meant 200k per pilot or reinstatement of lost seniority, in addition all pilots who remain at Jazz are getting A220 pay scale minus 5% and a signing bonus of 50k(retro pay)PostmasterGeneral wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 6:40 am
Thats going to amount to a few hundred bucks per pilot, kind of insulting.
I meant 200k for each of the 285 pilots.
Nothing else was said. You guys signed an MOA 2 years ago with pay raise, why would you suddenly receive a other’s company wage -5%? Why aren’t you getting PAL’s wage, the other AC regional?
Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2023 10:52 am
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
You should refer to your rep cdnavater, they’re 100% transparent with us as compared to Claude. The ULP is for the 285 pilots, and yes, they unfortunately are ahead of you if you stayed at jazz.
That’s a decision you took, you had the option of jumping ship, and you decided to stay. There won’t be any compensation.
Time will tell us, but if ACA ALPA is switching role, it’s because our 285 numbers are on the table and they need to protect all or the 5600 members on property.
That’s a decision you took, you had the option of jumping ship, and you decided to stay. There won’t be any compensation.
Time will tell us, but if ACA ALPA is switching role, it’s because our 285 numbers are on the table and they need to protect all or the 5600 members on property.
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
The part of the ULP that involves the 285 ACA is involved in. But the ULP covers all aspects, and anything outside the 285 ACA has zero involvement in, as it doesn't have anything to do with them. You really have zero understanding of what is going on.Man_in_the_sky wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 6:44 pm You should refer to your rep cdnavater, they’re 100% transparent with us as compared to Claude. The ULP is for the 285 pilots, and yes, they unfortunately are ahead of you if you stayed at jazz.
That’s a decision you took, you had the option of jumping ship, and you decided to stay. There won’t be any compensation.
Time will tell us, but if ACA ALPA is switching role, it’s because our 285 numbers are on the table and they need to protect all or the 5600 members on property.
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Whatever helps you sleep at night, that may be the part they are dealing with but that is not the entire ULP, I’m done with you now, good luck!Man_in_the_sky wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 6:44 pm You should refer to your rep cdnavater, they’re 100% transparent with us as compared to Claude. The ULP is for the 285 pilots, and yes, they unfortunately are ahead of you if you stayed at jazz.
That’s a decision you took, you had the option of jumping ship, and you decided to stay. There won’t be any compensation.
Time will tell us, but if ACA ALPA is switching role, it’s because our 285 numbers are on the table and they need to protect all or the 5600 members on property.
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2023 10:52 am
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 1:33 pm
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
This is the shill ProtonPilot.Protonpilot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:51 pmYes!!! I remember that, it was something. 95% participation rate in the strike vote. 95% in favour of a strike. A unified group and a hard nosed bargaining team.
How did that work out for us...
We're still licking our wounds from the FOS brought to us by the NC2.
The P4C group taking the helm now is reading from the same playbook as the NC2 from 2012. Seeing huge leverage around every corner where there is very little (open border to the US), creating member expectations that a 30% upfront raise is coming down the pipe.
P4C is a fast track to arbitration, because there isn't going to be any offer coming across the table from the Company with a 30% raise.
Hopefully it's a traditional arbitration and not FOS.
Total moron. Wouldn't listen to a word he says.
Comparing us to the 3% raises from the rail workers. Totally different situation.
He would have voted yes to 5% raises. Pathetic. Hopefully he is far far away from any negotiating table.
We need adults around if we are going for more.
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Yikes.. whoever you are ProtonPilot...you are one stupid @#$!
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
1) There's no way for you to know this with any certainty.Man_in_the_sky wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 1:25 pmCompany was walking off the table 72 hours prior to the strike, they were either discussing at the table, or putting their wind down plan in effect.Protonpilot wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 10:07 amNo, I'm not missing your point.thepoors wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 8:55 am
You're missing the point, which myself and 3rdWorldClassPilot have made over and over again: the MEC surrendered all of our leverage way before that needed to happen.
Everyone here keeps skipping ahead to arbitration... We still had 3 DAYS before the strike when these traitors agreed to a dogwater TA and started pushing it on the membership "or else." That was the failure point. The company felt no pain with hardly any cancelled flights or disruptions, and ALPA leadership exposed themselves as a bunch cowards once again.
So much could have happened in those 72hrs as the deadline drew closer but they chose to flush it all prematurely. I still haven't gotten a satisfactory answer as to why that happened and I don't think one exists. Just spineless suckers in over their depth who folded before there was any real pressure.
Midnight Saturday was the beginning of the 72 hour wind down announced by Air Canada to start cancelling flights and bringing home all aircraft that were out of country. This was the Rubicon. This wasn't about crossing the Rubicon and landing on the other side three days later - as soon as we started crossing, the government could step in and put a stop to it. That was the reality.
I'm willing to acknowledge that rejecting what the MEC believed was a best and final offer and pressing forward into that 72 hour wind down might have resulted in incremental gains to the 26/4/4/4 we eventually ratified. But I also argue that concomitant with that was an exponential increase in risk of a really substandard outcome. The MEC's job, supported by the advice of the ALPA professionals, was to weigh those two outcomes. We'll never know what could have resulted from pressing on past the Saturday midnight deadline. But we have a much better picture, thanks to the CN arbitration, of what an arbitrated result would have entailed.
I just don't think that you're acknowledging the risk reward equation.
Not the 2 at the same time. I was also under the impression we caved with 3 days left but the reality is, it was in the last hour..
2) It's called a bluff. And like I said, it's a bunch of suckers who fell for it.
You really think the company would just go ahead and wind down all operations, burning tens of millions a day and not continue to work towards a resolution?

Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Wow...that did NOT age well. Demonstrates the damage done by the ACPA lovers like ProtonPilot.3rdWorldClassPilot wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 7:51 pmThis is the shill ProtonPilot.Protonpilot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:51 pmYes!!! I remember that, it was something. 95% participation rate in the strike vote. 95% in favour of a strike. A unified group and a hard nosed bargaining team.
How did that work out for us...
We're still licking our wounds from the FOS brought to us by the NC2.
The P4C group taking the helm now is reading from the same playbook as the NC2 from 2012. Seeing huge leverage around every corner where there is very little (open border to the US), creating member expectations that a 30% upfront raise is coming down the pipe.
P4C is a fast track to arbitration, because there isn't going to be any offer coming across the table from the Company with a 30% raise.
Hopefully it's a traditional arbitration and not FOS.
Total moron. Wouldn't listen to a word he says.
Comparing us to the 3% raises from the rail workers. Totally different situation.
He would have voted yes to 5% raises. Pathetic. Hopefully he is far far away from any negotiating table.
We need adults around if we are going for more.
He must have creamed his pants with this deal. Obviously zero understanding of his value or what a union can do. Brutal
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2025 8:47 am
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Hey thepoors,
When can we expect to see you volunteering your expertise and wisdom on the Negotiating Committee or as MEC Chair? The members can only benefit from having you in a leadership position.
When can we expect to see you volunteering your expertise and wisdom on the Negotiating Committee or as MEC Chair? The members can only benefit from having you in a leadership position.
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Based on this post, I take away that you are a narcissist who thinks he knows better than advisors who’ve been dedicated to negotiating for years and years. You would’ve ignored the advice and went headlong into a very risky who the fuc k knows how it’s going to go situation!thepoors wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:52 am1) There's no way for you to know this with any certainty.Man_in_the_sky wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 1:25 pmCompany was walking off the table 72 hours prior to the strike, they were either discussing at the table, or putting their wind down plan in effect.Protonpilot wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 10:07 am
No, I'm not missing your point.
Midnight Saturday was the beginning of the 72 hour wind down announced by Air Canada to start cancelling flights and bringing home all aircraft that were out of country. This was the Rubicon. This wasn't about crossing the Rubicon and landing on the other side three days later - as soon as we started crossing, the government could step in and put a stop to it. That was the reality.
I'm willing to acknowledge that rejecting what the MEC believed was a best and final offer and pressing forward into that 72 hour wind down might have resulted in incremental gains to the 26/4/4/4 we eventually ratified. But I also argue that concomitant with that was an exponential increase in risk of a really substandard outcome. The MEC's job, supported by the advice of the ALPA professionals, was to weigh those two outcomes. We'll never know what could have resulted from pressing on past the Saturday midnight deadline. But we have a much better picture, thanks to the CN arbitration, of what an arbitrated result would have entailed.
I just don't think that you're acknowledging the risk reward equation.
Not the 2 at the same time. I was also under the impression we caved with 3 days left but the reality is, it was in the last hour..
2) It's called a bluff. And like I said, it's a bunch of suckers who fell for it.
You really think the company would just go ahead and wind down all operations, burning tens of millions a day and not continue to work towards a resolution?![]()
Here’s what I know from two decades of dealing with Air Canada, they don’t bluff! The wind down would have went ahead and they likely knew there was going to be government intervention as soon as that plan was activated!
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2025 8:47 am
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
How DARE you talk that way towards our generation's gift to unionism and labour negotiations!!! Why if thepoors had any time or effort to spare over the last 2 years, he would have heroically led a full recall of the MEC, assumed control and marched us all out onto the picket line. After a few short quarters, His Excellency would've single handedly brought the company to its knees and negotiated a Delta+++ CA before karate chopping Mike Rousseau in the throat. I would imagine at that point the Prime Minister would bow down, kiss the ring and award our Dear Leader the Order of Canada.
"For courage, valour and selflessness in the face of an overwhelming enemy force."
Learn to show some respect
"For courage, valour and selflessness in the face of an overwhelming enemy force."
Learn to show some respect

-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 1:33 pm
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
I can guarantee he would not have voted yes to some shill deal 72 hrs out.
And thats the point.
And thats the point.
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
This is hilarious except for the fact that you idiots think these esteemed advisors and negotiators have your best interests in mind. Many of them are the same people that did such a great job "negotiating" the 10 year deal (and Leafs box seats from the company).unitatis super omnia wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 8:42 pm How DARE you talk that way towards our generation's gift to unionism and labour negotiations!!! Why if thepoors had any time or effort to spare over the last 2 years, he would have heroically led a full recall of the MEC, assumed control and marched us all out onto the picket line. After a few short quarters, His Excellency would've single handedly brought the company to its knees and negotiated a Delta+++ CA before karate chopping Mike Rousseau in the throat. I would imagine at that point the Prime Minister would bow down, kiss the ring and award our Dear Leader the Order of Canada.
"For courage, valour and selflessness in the face of an overwhelming enemy force."
Learn to show some respect![]()
For the record, I do welcome any opportunity to give Mikey a chop to the throat.

-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 10:06 am
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Some career advice for you…I would take down that post ASAP.
Google the SkyRegional pilot who included similar comments in an email. Or the AC pilot who posted about Gaza last year.
You’re not as anonymous as you think.
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Protonpilot wrote: ↑Sun Apr 13, 2025 10:54 amSome career advice for you…I would take down that post ASAP.
Google the SkyRegional pilot who included similar comments in an email. Or the AC pilot who posted about Gaza last year.
You’re not as anonymous as you think.
Mikey? Is that you?
Thepoors must be trembling with fear…
(FYI… those examples you provided are not even remotely similar.)
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
How is this anything similar?Protonpilot wrote: ↑Sun Apr 13, 2025 10:54 amSome career advice for you…I would take down that post ASAP.
Google the SkyRegional pilot who included similar comments in an email. Or the AC pilot who posted about Gaza last year.
You’re not as anonymous as you think.
The AC pilot had his uniform on and regardless of his views, put aircanada in a political situation.
Also, posting on an anonymous website is much different than sending emails using your company Hotmail account.
Some career advice for you, use a VPN when watching your ACPA porn.
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 5:59 am
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
ProtonPilot...a shill and a pussyProtonpilot wrote: ↑Sun Apr 13, 2025 10:54 amSome career advice for you…I would take down that post ASAP.
Google the SkyRegional pilot who included similar comments in an email. Or the AC pilot who posted about Gaza last year.
You’re not as anonymous as you think.
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:50 pm
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
After the latest AC-ALPA message, sounds like this whole thing is a big nothing burger.
- Jean-Pierre
- Rank 6
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:56 pm
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Word is 200k + lump sum for every of the 285 affe tesMan_in_the_sky wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:17 pm
I came to see the word on the street about this grievance
Or full restatement of seniority
[/quote]
Congratulation to Jazz pilots. I would much rather have that $200k now instead of a few seniority number.
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Congratulation to Jazz pilots. I would much rather have that $200k now instead of a few seniority number.Jean-Pierre wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 11:58 amWord is 200k + lump sum for every of the 285 affe tesMan_in_the_sky wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:17 pm
I came to see the word on the street about this grievance
Or full restatement of seniority
[/quote]
Some of the 285 pilots could receive a 800 number boost in seniority. A totally different game for schedules, vacation, pay progression eventual upgrades
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:50 pm
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Some of the 285 pilots could receive a 800 number boost in seniority. A totally different game for schedules, vacation, pay progression eventual upgradestango308 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:18 pmCongratulation to Jazz pilots. I would much rather have that $200k now instead of a few seniority number.Jean-Pierre wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 11:58 amWord is 200k + lump sum for every of the 285 affe tesMan_in_the_sky wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:17 pm
I came to see the word on the street about this grievance
Or full restatement of seniority
[/quote]
It was pretty evident after the latest ACA MEC email that seniority isn’t on the table.
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
It was pretty evident after the latest ACA MEC email that seniority isn’t on the table.PostmasterGeneral wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:14 pmSome of the 285 pilots could receive a 800 number boost in seniority. A totally different game for schedules, vacation, pay progression eventual upgradestango308 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:18 pmCongratulation to Jazz pilots. I would much rather have that $200k now instead of a few seniority number.Jean-Pierre wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 11:58 am
Word is 200k + lump sum for every of the 285 affe tes
Or full restatement of seniority
[/quote]
Why would they get involved if seniority wasn’t on the table.
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Why would they get involved if seniority wasn’t on the table.Nick678 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 7:12 pmIt was pretty evident after the latest ACA MEC email that seniority isn’t on the table.PostmasterGeneral wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:14 pmSome of the 285 pilots could receive a 800 number boost in seniority. A totally different game for schedules, vacation, pay progression eventual upgrades
[/quote]
That email did not indicate that seniority was not involved. If anything, it says they don't even have a full picture of what is going on.
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2375
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: Grievance update for the 285ish former Jazz pilots affected by Flow
Why would they get involved if seniority wasn’t on the table.Nick678 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 7:12 pmIt was pretty evident after the latest ACA MEC email that seniority isn’t on the table.PostmasterGeneral wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:14 pmSome of the 285 pilots could receive a 800 number boost in seniority. A totally different game for schedules, vacation, pay progression eventual upgrades
[/quote]
Just guessing. Because AC MEC took it off the table? Someone proposed it and they said "no, absolutely not".
It's a shitty situation created by AC management. It's not fair to punish AC pilots with seniority rearranging. The best way out is for monetary compensation. Maybe a lump sum for loss of bidding power, and starting at level 2 or 3 pay. No harm done to AC pilots and the penalty is paid purely by AC management. It still sucks for the 285 pilots.