Run ups at CYQB

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

Hi all,

Recently I visited CYQB in a piston aircraft. As I was preparing for a run up at the line up point for runway 29, tower/ground asked me "C-XXXX, you're not planning on doing a runup there, are you?", in a tone of voice that made it clear I should not ask too many questions. So I didn't.

This made me wonder if I missed anything. I looked into every piece of documentation regarding CYQB on foreflight, and I could not find any information regarding run ups at CYQB.

Did I miss anything?

As background info:
- there was no traffic around me at all
- there was no rush to depart, I still had to wait 4 minutes for other aircraft to land/depart ahead of me
- I was very close to the treshold, so noise shouldn't have been an issue either (?)

Any thoughts?
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
CaptDukeNukem
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2028
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

How did he know you were planning to do a run up? Did he issue you a take off clearance prior to them asking? Anyone behind you? There’s a lot of questions at play here. Maybe a run up would have been better suited at your original start up point? Not saying you were wrong.

As pilots, we only have the small picture.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

CaptDukeNukem wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 9:24 pm How did he know you were planning to do a run up? Did he issue you a take off clearance prior to them asking? Anyone behind you? There’s a lot of questions at play here. Maybe a run up would have been better suited at your original start up point? Not saying you were wrong.

As pilots, we only have the small picture.
I was turning into the wind and was increasing engine rpm.
No takeoff clearance issued, no traffic around, nobody behind me.

Better suited somewhere else? Perhaps, but how would I know that if it isn't written anywhere?
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
dustyroads
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:00 pm

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by dustyroads »

digits_ wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:00 pm Hi all,

Recently I visited CYQB in a piston aircraft. As I was preparing for a run up at the line up point for runway 29, tower/ground asked me "C-XXXX, you're not planning on doing a runup there, are you?", in a tone of voice that made it clear I should not ask too many questions. So I didn't.

This made me wonder if I missed anything. I looked into every piece of documentation regarding CYQB on foreflight, and I could not find any information regarding run ups at CYQB.

Did I miss anything?

As background info:
- there was no traffic around me at all
- there was no rush to depart, I still had to wait 4 minutes for other aircraft to land/depart ahead of me
- I was very close to the treshold, so noise shouldn't have been an issue either (?)

Any thoughts?
During RVOP conditions, runups will not be authorized on the maneuvering areas.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

dustyroads wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:33 am
digits_ wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:00 pm Hi all,

Recently I visited CYQB in a piston aircraft. As I was preparing for a run up at the line up point for runway 29, tower/ground asked me "C-XXXX, you're not planning on doing a runup there, are you?", in a tone of voice that made it clear I should not ask too many questions. So I didn't.

This made me wonder if I missed anything. I looked into every piece of documentation regarding CYQB on foreflight, and I could not find any information regarding run ups at CYQB.

Did I miss anything?

As background info:
- there was no traffic around me at all
- there was no rush to depart, I still had to wait 4 minutes for other aircraft to land/depart ahead of me
- I was very close to the treshold, so noise shouldn't have been an issue either (?)

Any thoughts?
During RVOP conditions, runups will not be authorized on the maneuvering areas.
Weather was VMC. Blue skies.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
User avatar
5x5
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1570
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:30 pm

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by 5x5 »

Curious what your plan was if you encountered an issue during your run-up?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Being stupid around airplanes is a capital offence and nature is a hanging judge!

“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.”
Mark Twain
BGH
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:12 pm

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by BGH »

Is it possible that you were going to do your run up in a noted airport hotspot?

Daryl
---------- ADS -----------
 
I WAS Pez
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 12:29 pm

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by I WAS Pez »

There's an area at the north end of apron III (or is that a taxiway?? diagram seems to indicate just apron III) by the FTUs and AvJet where runups are typically done there... Not sure about aircraft coming from the other side of the airport. Nothing seems to be in writing though...
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

I WAS Pez wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 8:56 am There's an area at the north end of apron III (or is that a taxiway?? diagram seems to indicate just apron III) by the FTUs and AvJet where runups are typically done there... Not sure about aircraft coming from the other side of the airport. Nothing seems to be in writing though...
That's possible, there were some piston planes moving around there, but no signs or procedures that mention this.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

BGH wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 8:54 am Is it possible that you were going to do your run up in a noted airport hotspot?

Daryl
No, no marked hotspots there.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

5x5 wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 8:48 am Curious what your plan was if you encountered an issue during your run-up?
Taxi back to the FBO?
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4162
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by CpnCrunch »

Some airports that don't have dedicated run-up areas have preferred places to do run-ups which cause the least impact to operations, e.g. YYJ rw 27. (I've forgotten where the spot is, so I'd need to hunt around for the info, but I see it's not mentioned anywhere in the CFS).

Anyway, it's not a big deal. I would just have told tower yes I need a run-up, where am I supposed to do it, and taxied to that spot.
---------- ADS -----------
 
dustyroads
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:00 pm

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by dustyroads »

digits_ wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 9:05 am
BGH wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 8:54 am Is it possible that you were going to do your run up in a noted airport hotspot?

Daryl
No, no marked hotspots there.
Confirm you’re talking about Quebec City CYQB? I’m thinking you’re not as you said you read nothing about runups but it’s published, runups aren’t authorized during RVOP conditions, now you’re saying no Hotspots there when in fact there are 3 Hotspots.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

dustyroads wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:25 am
digits_ wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 9:05 am
BGH wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 8:54 am Is it possible that you were going to do your run up in a noted airport hotspot?

Daryl
No, no marked hotspots there.
Confirm you’re talking about Quebec City CYQB? I’m thinking you’re not as you said you read nothing about runups but it’s published, runups aren’t authorized during RVOP conditions, now you’re saying no Hotspots there when in fact there are 3 Hotspots.
Cyqb yes. Yes there are hotspots but to my knowledge I was not near a hotspot.
Weather was cavok. Rvop was not in effect. Most traffic was using 24. I was waiting for takeoff on 29.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
dustyroads
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:00 pm

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by dustyroads »

digits_ wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:51 am
dustyroads wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:25 am
digits_ wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 9:05 am

No, no marked hotspots there.
Confirm you’re talking about Quebec City CYQB? I’m thinking you’re not as you said you read nothing about runups but it’s published, runups aren’t authorized during RVOP conditions, now you’re saying no Hotspots there when in fact there are 3 Hotspots.
Cyqb yes. Yes there are hotspots but to my knowledge I was not near a hotspot.
Weather was cavok. Rvop was not in effect. Most traffic was using 24. I was waiting for takeoff on 29.
Correct the hotspots are nowhere near threshold 29.

Maybe next time don’t make it obvious you’re doing one by turning into the wind towards the grass when the taxiways aren’t wide. They don’t want you to have a mishap and end up in the grass
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

dustyroads wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 11:05 am
digits_ wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:51 am
dustyroads wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:25 am

Confirm you’re talking about Quebec City CYQB? I’m thinking you’re not as you said you read nothing about runups but it’s published, runups aren’t authorized during RVOP conditions, now you’re saying no Hotspots there when in fact there are 3 Hotspots.
Cyqb yes. Yes there are hotspots but to my knowledge I was not near a hotspot.
Weather was cavok. Rvop was not in effect. Most traffic was using 24. I was waiting for takeoff on 29.
Correct the hotspots are nowhere near threshold 29.

Maybe next time don’t make it obvious you’re doing one by turning into the wind towards the grass when the taxiways aren’t wide. They don’t want you to have a mishap and end up in the grass
It was a 30 degree turn, well clear of any grass. "Don't make it obvious" sounds as if I was doing something I wasn't supposed to do. A run up in a piston aircraft just before departure should not be considered odd IMO.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
User avatar
‘Bob’
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1029
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by ‘Bob’ »

5x5 wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 8:48 am Curious what your plan was if you encountered an issue during your run-up?
What’s your plan if you reject a takeoff?

Seriously.. what kind of dumb question is this?
---------- ADS -----------
 
SE7EN
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 12:07 pm

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by SE7EN »

There’s a hotspot on B off R29, but hot spots are just areas where a risk of collision exists & demand heightened awareness & mitigation strategies. They don’t explicitly prohibit run-ups, thought it wouldn’t be a good idea if the airport was busy. Either way, sounds like you were on C.

Sounds like ATC was stretching their assertiveness legs, might be a good time to stretch yours..
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

SE7EN wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 11:20 am There’s a hotspot on B off R29, but hot spots are just areas where a risk of collision exists & demand heightened awareness & mitigation strategies. They don’t explicitly prohibit run-ups, thought it wouldn’t be a good idea if the airport was busy. Either way, sounds like you were on C.
Just looked it up and yes I was holding at C.
SE7EN wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 11:20 am Sounds like ATC was stretching their assertiveness legs, might be a good time to stretch yours..
Now that I know I didn't miss anything, absolutely! I feel like just flying there and taxi to do a run up at the holding point :twisted:
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2561
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by DanWEC »

Digits, dustyroads is troll account, don't give it any regard.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flight94
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 9:38 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by Flight94 »

Phone the tower and ask, then report back. I'm curious.
---------- ADS -----------
 
A346Dude
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by A346Dude »

I don't have an answer for you, but if it was me I would just say "yes I need to do a run up... where should I do it?" and punt the issue back to Ground. If a controller gets mad at you for needing a runup, but there is no guidance on this matter in the CFS, ATIS, or when receiving taxi instructions, that's not on you.

As a controller I expect pistons may need to do a runup before departure, and if that's a problem due to taxiway width I'll ask them. If they do and that might cause them to block other traffic, I'll specify where they can do it.

That being said, if you're departing from a large ramp with lots of open space you can just do it there and avoid the whole issue.
---------- ADS -----------
 
TeePeeCreeper
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: in the bush

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by TeePeeCreeper »

Digits,

YQB is a strange strange place. I flew out of there for a couple of years. Not that long ago really.

What really pissed me off was canceling the IFR and still being expected to fly the STAR even though they weren’t sequencing any other traffic! No rhyme or reason what so ever.

A new friend of mine that I met golfing turned out to be a recently retired as a tower supervisor. While playing a round of virtual golf at his place one winter I asked him… why the STAR all the f’ing time.

“They are being lazy”.

I suspect that this kind of attitude may have contributed your ops. Sounds like you were dealing with the shortest controller on the YQB roaster.

Take care,

TPC
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6820
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by digits_ »

TeePeeCreeper wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 9:53 pm Digits,

YQB is a strange strange place. I flew out of there for a couple of years. Not that long ago really.

What really pissed me off was canceling the IFR and still being expected to fly the STAR even though they weren’t sequencing any other traffic! No rhyme or reason what so ever.

A new friend of mine that I met golfing turned out to be a recently retired as a tower supervisor. While playing a round of virtual golf at his place one winter I asked him… why the STAR all the f’ing time.

“They are being lazy”.

I suspect that this kind of attitude may have contributed your ops. Sounds like you were dealing with the shortest controller on the YQB roaster.

Take care,

TPC
Thank you for this background info! Do you know how a run up would increase a controller's workload or why it would piss them off?
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2634
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Run ups at CYQB

Post by cdnavater »

digits_ wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 2:45 pm
SE7EN wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 11:20 am There’s a hotspot on B off R29, but hot spots are just areas where a risk of collision exists & demand heightened awareness & mitigation strategies. They don’t explicitly prohibit run-ups, thought it wouldn’t be a good idea if the airport was busy. Either way, sounds like you were on C.
Just looked it up and yes I was holding at C.
SE7EN wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 11:20 am Sounds like ATC was stretching their assertiveness legs, might be a good time to stretch yours..
Now that I know I didn't miss anything, absolutely! I feel like just flying there and taxi to do a run up at the holding point :twisted:
For reference, the RJ and other jet aircraft need to do a post de-icing run up, we ask ground every time where they would like us to do that.
If I were flying at a controlled airport in a piston, 100% I would ask where they want me to do that, just because it doesn’t specify something doesn’t mean you have carte blanche to do whatever you want.
If I were flying at an uncontrolled airport, I would advertise that I was about to run up, you may see that no one is around when you start the run up but you will be somewhat distracted and ground needs to know to not taxi anyone behind you.
Further to the point, you could have been at an area that has noise restrictions and lastly, it says in the CFS during RVOP engine run ups and towing will not be “authorized”, let’s focus in on that word for a second, auhthorized; having official permission or approval.
This seems to me a no brainer, you need permission to do a run up, not sure why you thought you didn’t!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”