Run ups at CYQB
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
Run ups at CYQB
Hi all,
Recently I visited CYQB in a piston aircraft. As I was preparing for a run up at the line up point for runway 29, tower/ground asked me "C-XXXX, you're not planning on doing a runup there, are you?", in a tone of voice that made it clear I should not ask too many questions. So I didn't.
This made me wonder if I missed anything. I looked into every piece of documentation regarding CYQB on foreflight, and I could not find any information regarding run ups at CYQB.
Did I miss anything?
As background info:
- there was no traffic around me at all
- there was no rush to depart, I still had to wait 4 minutes for other aircraft to land/depart ahead of me
- I was very close to the treshold, so noise shouldn't have been an issue either (?)
Any thoughts?
Recently I visited CYQB in a piston aircraft. As I was preparing for a run up at the line up point for runway 29, tower/ground asked me "C-XXXX, you're not planning on doing a runup there, are you?", in a tone of voice that made it clear I should not ask too many questions. So I didn't.
This made me wonder if I missed anything. I looked into every piece of documentation regarding CYQB on foreflight, and I could not find any information regarding run ups at CYQB.
Did I miss anything?
As background info:
- there was no traffic around me at all
- there was no rush to depart, I still had to wait 4 minutes for other aircraft to land/depart ahead of me
- I was very close to the treshold, so noise shouldn't have been an issue either (?)
Any thoughts?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am
Re: Run ups at CYQB
How did he know you were planning to do a run up? Did he issue you a take off clearance prior to them asking? Anyone behind you? There’s a lot of questions at play here. Maybe a run up would have been better suited at your original start up point? Not saying you were wrong.
As pilots, we only have the small picture.
As pilots, we only have the small picture.
Re: Run ups at CYQB
I was turning into the wind and was increasing engine rpm.CaptDukeNukem wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 9:24 pm How did he know you were planning to do a run up? Did he issue you a take off clearance prior to them asking? Anyone behind you? There’s a lot of questions at play here. Maybe a run up would have been better suited at your original start up point? Not saying you were wrong.
As pilots, we only have the small picture.
No takeoff clearance issued, no traffic around, nobody behind me.
Better suited somewhere else? Perhaps, but how would I know that if it isn't written anywhere?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:00 pm
Re: Run ups at CYQB
During RVOP conditions, runups will not be authorized on the maneuvering areas.digits_ wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:00 pm Hi all,
Recently I visited CYQB in a piston aircraft. As I was preparing for a run up at the line up point for runway 29, tower/ground asked me "C-XXXX, you're not planning on doing a runup there, are you?", in a tone of voice that made it clear I should not ask too many questions. So I didn't.
This made me wonder if I missed anything. I looked into every piece of documentation regarding CYQB on foreflight, and I could not find any information regarding run ups at CYQB.
Did I miss anything?
As background info:
- there was no traffic around me at all
- there was no rush to depart, I still had to wait 4 minutes for other aircraft to land/depart ahead of me
- I was very close to the treshold, so noise shouldn't have been an issue either (?)
Any thoughts?
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Weather was VMC. Blue skies.dustyroads wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:33 amDuring RVOP conditions, runups will not be authorized on the maneuvering areas.digits_ wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:00 pm Hi all,
Recently I visited CYQB in a piston aircraft. As I was preparing for a run up at the line up point for runway 29, tower/ground asked me "C-XXXX, you're not planning on doing a runup there, are you?", in a tone of voice that made it clear I should not ask too many questions. So I didn't.
This made me wonder if I missed anything. I looked into every piece of documentation regarding CYQB on foreflight, and I could not find any information regarding run ups at CYQB.
Did I miss anything?
As background info:
- there was no traffic around me at all
- there was no rush to depart, I still had to wait 4 minutes for other aircraft to land/depart ahead of me
- I was very close to the treshold, so noise shouldn't have been an issue either (?)
Any thoughts?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Curious what your plan was if you encountered an issue during your run-up?
Being stupid around airplanes is a capital offence and nature is a hanging judge!
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.”
Mark Twain
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.”
Mark Twain
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Is it possible that you were going to do your run up in a noted airport hotspot?
Daryl
Daryl
Re: Run ups at CYQB
There's an area at the north end of apron III (or is that a taxiway?? diagram seems to indicate just apron III) by the FTUs and AvJet where runups are typically done there... Not sure about aircraft coming from the other side of the airport. Nothing seems to be in writing though...
Re: Run ups at CYQB
That's possible, there were some piston planes moving around there, but no signs or procedures that mention this.I WAS Pez wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 8:56 am There's an area at the north end of apron III (or is that a taxiway?? diagram seems to indicate just apron III) by the FTUs and AvJet where runups are typically done there... Not sure about aircraft coming from the other side of the airport. Nothing seems to be in writing though...
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Run ups at CYQB
No, no marked hotspots there.
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Taxi back to the FBO?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Some airports that don't have dedicated run-up areas have preferred places to do run-ups which cause the least impact to operations, e.g. YYJ rw 27. (I've forgotten where the spot is, so I'd need to hunt around for the info, but I see it's not mentioned anywhere in the CFS).
Anyway, it's not a big deal. I would just have told tower yes I need a run-up, where am I supposed to do it, and taxied to that spot.
Anyway, it's not a big deal. I would just have told tower yes I need a run-up, where am I supposed to do it, and taxied to that spot.
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:00 pm
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Confirm you’re talking about Quebec City CYQB? I’m thinking you’re not as you said you read nothing about runups but it’s published, runups aren’t authorized during RVOP conditions, now you’re saying no Hotspots there when in fact there are 3 Hotspots.
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Cyqb yes. Yes there are hotspots but to my knowledge I was not near a hotspot.dustyroads wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:25 amConfirm you’re talking about Quebec City CYQB? I’m thinking you’re not as you said you read nothing about runups but it’s published, runups aren’t authorized during RVOP conditions, now you’re saying no Hotspots there when in fact there are 3 Hotspots.
Weather was cavok. Rvop was not in effect. Most traffic was using 24. I was waiting for takeoff on 29.
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:00 pm
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Correct the hotspots are nowhere near threshold 29.digits_ wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:51 amCyqb yes. Yes there are hotspots but to my knowledge I was not near a hotspot.dustyroads wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:25 amConfirm you’re talking about Quebec City CYQB? I’m thinking you’re not as you said you read nothing about runups but it’s published, runups aren’t authorized during RVOP conditions, now you’re saying no Hotspots there when in fact there are 3 Hotspots.
Weather was cavok. Rvop was not in effect. Most traffic was using 24. I was waiting for takeoff on 29.
Maybe next time don’t make it obvious you’re doing one by turning into the wind towards the grass when the taxiways aren’t wide. They don’t want you to have a mishap and end up in the grass
Re: Run ups at CYQB
It was a 30 degree turn, well clear of any grass. "Don't make it obvious" sounds as if I was doing something I wasn't supposed to do. A run up in a piston aircraft just before departure should not be considered odd IMO.dustyroads wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 11:05 amCorrect the hotspots are nowhere near threshold 29.digits_ wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:51 amCyqb yes. Yes there are hotspots but to my knowledge I was not near a hotspot.dustyroads wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:25 am
Confirm you’re talking about Quebec City CYQB? I’m thinking you’re not as you said you read nothing about runups but it’s published, runups aren’t authorized during RVOP conditions, now you’re saying no Hotspots there when in fact there are 3 Hotspots.
Weather was cavok. Rvop was not in effect. Most traffic was using 24. I was waiting for takeoff on 29.
Maybe next time don’t make it obvious you’re doing one by turning into the wind towards the grass when the taxiways aren’t wide. They don’t want you to have a mishap and end up in the grass
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Run ups at CYQB
What’s your plan if you reject a takeoff?
Seriously.. what kind of dumb question is this?
Re: Run ups at CYQB
There’s a hotspot on B off R29, but hot spots are just areas where a risk of collision exists & demand heightened awareness & mitigation strategies. They don’t explicitly prohibit run-ups, thought it wouldn’t be a good idea if the airport was busy. Either way, sounds like you were on C.
Sounds like ATC was stretching their assertiveness legs, might be a good time to stretch yours..
Sounds like ATC was stretching their assertiveness legs, might be a good time to stretch yours..
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Just looked it up and yes I was holding at C.SE7EN wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 11:20 am There’s a hotspot on B off R29, but hot spots are just areas where a risk of collision exists & demand heightened awareness & mitigation strategies. They don’t explicitly prohibit run-ups, thought it wouldn’t be a good idea if the airport was busy. Either way, sounds like you were on C.
Now that I know I didn't miss anything, absolutely! I feel like just flying there and taxi to do a run up at the holding point

As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Digits, dustyroads is troll account, don't give it any regard.
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Phone the tower and ask, then report back. I'm curious.
Re: Run ups at CYQB
I don't have an answer for you, but if it was me I would just say "yes I need to do a run up... where should I do it?" and punt the issue back to Ground. If a controller gets mad at you for needing a runup, but there is no guidance on this matter in the CFS, ATIS, or when receiving taxi instructions, that's not on you.
As a controller I expect pistons may need to do a runup before departure, and if that's a problem due to taxiway width I'll ask them. If they do and that might cause them to block other traffic, I'll specify where they can do it.
That being said, if you're departing from a large ramp with lots of open space you can just do it there and avoid the whole issue.
As a controller I expect pistons may need to do a runup before departure, and if that's a problem due to taxiway width I'll ask them. If they do and that might cause them to block other traffic, I'll specify where they can do it.
That being said, if you're departing from a large ramp with lots of open space you can just do it there and avoid the whole issue.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: in the bush
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Digits,
YQB is a strange strange place. I flew out of there for a couple of years. Not that long ago really.
What really pissed me off was canceling the IFR and still being expected to fly the STAR even though they weren’t sequencing any other traffic! No rhyme or reason what so ever.
A new friend of mine that I met golfing turned out to be a recently retired as a tower supervisor. While playing a round of virtual golf at his place one winter I asked him… why the STAR all the f’ing time.
“They are being lazy”.
I suspect that this kind of attitude may have contributed your ops. Sounds like you were dealing with the shortest controller on the YQB roaster.
Take care,
TPC
YQB is a strange strange place. I flew out of there for a couple of years. Not that long ago really.
What really pissed me off was canceling the IFR and still being expected to fly the STAR even though they weren’t sequencing any other traffic! No rhyme or reason what so ever.
A new friend of mine that I met golfing turned out to be a recently retired as a tower supervisor. While playing a round of virtual golf at his place one winter I asked him… why the STAR all the f’ing time.
“They are being lazy”.
I suspect that this kind of attitude may have contributed your ops. Sounds like you were dealing with the shortest controller on the YQB roaster.
Take care,
TPC
Re: Run ups at CYQB
Thank you for this background info! Do you know how a run up would increase a controller's workload or why it would piss them off?TeePeeCreeper wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 9:53 pm Digits,
YQB is a strange strange place. I flew out of there for a couple of years. Not that long ago really.
What really pissed me off was canceling the IFR and still being expected to fly the STAR even though they weren’t sequencing any other traffic! No rhyme or reason what so ever.
A new friend of mine that I met golfing turned out to be a recently retired as a tower supervisor. While playing a round of virtual golf at his place one winter I asked him… why the STAR all the f’ing time.
“They are being lazy”.
I suspect that this kind of attitude may have contributed your ops. Sounds like you were dealing with the shortest controller on the YQB roaster.
Take care,
TPC
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Run ups at CYQB
For reference, the RJ and other jet aircraft need to do a post de-icing run up, we ask ground every time where they would like us to do that.digits_ wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 2:45 pmJust looked it up and yes I was holding at C.SE7EN wrote: ↑Sun Aug 24, 2025 11:20 am There’s a hotspot on B off R29, but hot spots are just areas where a risk of collision exists & demand heightened awareness & mitigation strategies. They don’t explicitly prohibit run-ups, thought it wouldn’t be a good idea if the airport was busy. Either way, sounds like you were on C.Now that I know I didn't miss anything, absolutely! I feel like just flying there and taxi to do a run up at the holding point![]()
If I were flying at a controlled airport in a piston, 100% I would ask where they want me to do that, just because it doesn’t specify something doesn’t mean you have carte blanche to do whatever you want.
If I were flying at an uncontrolled airport, I would advertise that I was about to run up, you may see that no one is around when you start the run up but you will be somewhat distracted and ground needs to know to not taxi anyone behind you.
Further to the point, you could have been at an area that has noise restrictions and lastly, it says in the CFS during RVOP engine run ups and towing will not be “authorized”, let’s focus in on that word for a second, auhthorized; having official permission or approval.
This seems to me a no brainer, you need permission to do a run up, not sure why you thought you didn’t!