Isn't purchasing power tied to the CPI, or are you referring to another metric?
BTW excellent comments Red Comet, ****.
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
Isn't purchasing power tied to the CPI, or are you referring to another metric?
I'm on your side dude. Who exactly is derailing? You're providing unbiased info on Emirates, and the I would NEVER live in Dubai crowd is trying to defend our "world class contract" while being completely tone deaf to Canadian living standards for the majority of people. With some hypocritical moral superiority sprinkled in.MorePlates wrote: ↑Wed Oct 29, 2025 2:48 pm Alright, I’m calling it here before this turns into another political circus starring our usual trio of RedComet, D¡as, and thepoors — the holy trinity of derailment. Every time there’s a halfway decent discussion, they show up like clockwork to turn it into a soapbox audition.
You’re in AC, you already know the conditions, and I’ve done my part giving the most accurate info I can about EK. The rest is up to you.
I’ll leave the stage to the performers, may their next act involve a little self-awareness.

WJ NB CA money would have to be in the ballpark of $700k/year to claim parity with what you make at Emirates. Yes the tax structure is different, but that doesn't change the fact that you are still banking $350K a year. Let's also not forget you won't have a mortgage or tuition for the kiddos. So $350k/year effectively becomes what, $400k+ a year? And yes, you'll work more at Emirates, but there isn't enough OT here to even come close to putting $30k in your bank account, consistently. Yeesh the things I could do with that incomeBede wrote: ↑Mon Oct 27, 2025 5:19 amI don't want to turn this into a dick measuring contest, but is $350k (CAD?) all Emirates pilots earn? That's WJ NB CA money. If so, it would seem that the sole financial advantage is the low tax structure.MorePlates wrote: ↑Thu Oct 23, 2025 10:41 pm I’m sure the guy pulling in $200k - $350k a year can definitely afford to call up an accountant or lawyer to get everything sorted. It’s not exactly uncharted territory — thousands have done it before, plenty are doing it right now, and thousands more will keep doing it.
I don't think a handful of wealthy expats are who you need to worry about mooching off of healthcare. We have millions of immigrants and refugees bringing in their elderly under family reunification schemes that are doing a much better job of exploiting what we're paying for.Mr. North wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:41 am And I’ll say this: there’s a certain arrogance among some expats who return after a decade or two abroad, grumbling about taxes while readily availing themselves of the comforts of Canada — especially our healthcare system as they age into infirmity. As a life long taxpayer, I suppose that makes me the sucker — and them the ones who expect the benefits without the burden.


Thisthepoors wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:56 amI don't think a handful of wealthy expats are who you need to worry about mooching off of healthcare. We have millions of immigrants and refugees bringing in their elderly under family reunification schemes that are doing a much better job of exploiting what we're paying for.Mr. North wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:41 am And I’ll say this: there’s a certain arrogance among some expats who return after a decade or two abroad, grumbling about taxes while readily availing themselves of the comforts of Canada — especially our healthcare system as they age into infirmity. As a life long taxpayer, I suppose that makes me the sucker — and them the ones who expect the benefits without the burden.

No no no, say it all you want, Mr. North, it’s still nonsense. Pilots (and other skilled workers) in the UAE get paid better because they’ve got something our pilots here seem to have lost. It’s called self-respect.Mr. North wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:41 am To each their own.
But I take exception to the usual detractors who never miss an opportunity to lament Canadian pay rates and by extension, Canadian society itself. The reason the Middle East pays so handsomely for skilled labour is simple, few would choose to live in an oligarchic petrostate otherwise. Nearly 90% of the UAE’s “population” consists of expatriates (mostly low income) with very limited rights.
Canadian wages can and should improve, but pretending they’ll ever rival what’s on offer in the Gulf is wishful thinking, detached from reality.
And I’ll say this: there’s a certain arrogance among some expats who return after a decade or two abroad, grumbling about taxes while readily availing themselves of the comforts of Canada — especially our healthcare system as they age into infirmity. As a life long taxpayer, I suppose that makes me the sucker — and them the ones who expect the benefits without the burden.
No they don't get paid better- they operate in a jurisdiction with a lower tax structure. Even after the housing allowance, schooling, bonuses, etc., I'd be willing to bet that the cost per block hour that Emirates pays their pilots is less than the cost/block hour that a Canadian, let alone an American, carrier pays their WB captains.MorePlates wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 2:03 pm No no no, say it all you want, Mr. North, it’s still nonsense. Pilots (and other skilled workers) in the UAE get paid better because they’ve got something our pilots here seem to have lost. It’s called self-respect.

They pay that number because they know it all goes straight into your pocket. If there were 10, 20, 30% income taxes, that number would shoot way up but sure, keep telling yourself otherwise. Like I told Mr. North, same goes for you: maybe if you repeat it enough times, it’ll start sounding true.Bede wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 2:09 pm No they don't get paid better- they operate in a jurisdiction with a lower tax structure. Even after the housing allowance, schooling, bonuses, etc., I'd be willing to bet that the cost per block hour that Emirates pays their pilots is less than the cost/block hour that a Canadian, let alone an American, carrier pays their WB captains.

AND CANCELLED THEIR DISNEY PLUS ON THE BOOB TUBE
JUST ANOTHER ENTITLED RENTER
YOU'RE OKAY BOOMER.The Brantford Boomer wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:12 pmAND CANCELLED THEIR DISNEY PLUS ON THE BOOB TUBE
JUST ANOTHER ENTITLED RENTER
Let’s be clear, it’s not “self-respect” that drives higher pay in the UAE - it’s compensation for instability.MorePlates wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 2:03 pm Pilots (and other skilled workers) in the UAE get paid better because they’ve got something our pilots here seem to have lost. It’s called self-respect.

Oh here we go again, the “Canada = rights, UAE = sellouts” sermon.Mr. North wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:15 pm Let’s be clear, it’s not “self-respect” that drives higher pay in the UAE - it’s compensation for instability.
Pilots there are paid more because the system has to make up for everything else that’s missing. No citizenship, no job security, no pension, and the constant risk of termination and deportation. It’s hazard pay for a transient life, not a badge of professional pride. You may draw a handsome salary, but in the eyes of local Emiratis, you are no different than the man digging a ditch on the side of the road — scum masquerading in a white shirt and tie.
Canadian pilots, for all our frustrations, work in a society of equals, under enforceable contracts, with due process, benefits, and democratic oversight. If anything, our self-respect shows in our insistence on rights — not just pay.
You sold yourself out to fly the big iron for cash. No shame in that — but don’t lecture me on self-respect.

Oh, I see.
Let’s use a simple, everyday example.
Yeah, I get it. I have this conversation often. There's not really any published metric that supports the argument, but it seems that nearly everyone, including me feels the effects. The best explanation that I can come up with is that the basket of goods that StatsCan uses for the CPI calculation is not reflective of how a large number of Canadians allocate their resources. For example, I pay nothing for housing. A 25 year old has to pay 70% of their income to housing. The result: StatsCan allocates 35% of the basket to housing. This underweights the effect of rising housing prices for a young person and overweights it for a person who has their house paid off. Same goes for food, transportation, etc. The percentage that older, richer Canadian spend on these items is a far lower percentage of total income than younger Canadians pay distorting the CPI for different demographics.Tanker299 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 31, 2025 12:19 amLet’s use a simple, everyday example.
Back in 2016, a Two-Can-Dine meal at Rotten Ronnie’s was $10.99. Nine years later, even if you apply a steady 2.5 % CPI increase per year, the price should be around $13.70.
But the real price today is $18.79 — that’s a 6.1 % annual increase, not 2.5 %.
That’s more than 70 % higher than the “official” inflation rate would suggest.
Housing tells the same story. My one house that my grandfather built in the 50s has appreciated at 7.85 % per year. Another property I sold just after the pandemic returned 9.8 % annually over eight years.
Meanwhile, the CPI keeps insisting inflation is “under control.” It’s not. Real-world prices — for food, housing, and almost everything people actually need — have been rising far faster than the official numbers admit.

I CAN DO YOU ONE BETTER BUB MY HOUSE PAYS ME WITH A CHIP REVERSE MORTGAGE YOU CAN ACCESS THE VALUE OF YOUR HOME IN TAX FREE CASH WITHOUT HAVING TO SELL IT CALL NOW FOR YOUR FREE NO OBLIGATION GUIDE 55+ ONLY REMEMBER YOU CANT SPEND IT WHEN YOURE GONE
It works for Tom SelleckThe Brantford Boomer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 31, 2025 3:49 pmI CAN DO YOU ONE BETTER BUB MY HOUSE PAYS ME WITH A CHIP REVERSE MORTGAGE YOU CAN ACCESS THE VALUE OF YOUR HOME IN TAX FREE CASH WITHOUT HAVING TO SELL IT CALL NOW FOR YOUR FREE NO OBLIGATION GUIDE 55+ ONLY REMEMBER YOU CANT SPEND IT WHEN YOURE GONE
Where exactly do you get those numbers from? The salary’s in the 90’s were not good in Canada. Recession hurt wages a lot. I can’t see any data that points to needing $350,000 to have the buying power of the median salary in the 90’s.Daniel Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Oct 29, 2025 3:16 pm Yes, that's what I meant. Your $350k CAD salary is meaningless today because its buying power is less than the median Canadian income in the 90s.