But they can and will do so if they decide it makes sense for them as a business.I can see why it would, they're all struggling to hold captains at Jazz, encore etc etc, so why take some of those when you can take FO who are less of a loss to the regional.jpilot77 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 1:00 pmThey require a ATPL and 2000 TT I don’t see AC waiving either of those to hire Jazz FOs (not to mention passing over higher seniority captains at Jazz which would contravene the PML).philaviate wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:28 pmFair point.
But equally they could waive that for flow positions if it suited their business.
Hiring demand vs supply?
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
-
philaviate
- Rank 2

- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:47 pm
Re: Hiring demand vs supply?
-
goingnowherefast
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: Hiring demand vs supply?
Doing that would eventually put AC in the same spot as all the regionals. Shortage of upgradable FOs. There's a reason AC hires ATPL licensed "future captains". They don't want a roster that's 70% FOs that can't upgrade.
-
dustyroads
- Rank 2

- Posts: 80
- Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:00 pm
Re: Hiring demand vs supply?
There must be reasons why regionals won’t hire 703/704 atpl captains. Working captains more at regionals likely is cheaper, sure they pay a bit more for each to work more hours but the costs other than flight hours can be significant for the benefits offered, 10 captains working 8 extra hours a month likely cheaper than 1 captain working those 80 hours when all compensation is calculated. It comes down to dollar and cents, regionals hiring 703/704 atpl captains make sense to use but not to the bean counters at the companies.goingnowherefast wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:33 am Doing that would eventually put AC in the same spot as all the regionals. Shortage of upgradable FOs. There's a reason AC hires ATPL licensed "future captains". They don't want a roster that's 70% FOs that can't upgrade.
Re: Hiring demand vs supply?
Because then the captains would leave as well to Porter, WestJet etc…philaviate wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 10:22 pmBut they can and will do so if they decide it makes sense for them as a business.I can see why it would, they're all struggling to hold captains at Jazz, encore etc etc, so why take some of those when you can take FO who are less of a loss to the regional.jpilot77 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 1:00 pmThey require a ATPL and 2000 TT I don’t see AC waiving either of those to hire Jazz FOs (not to mention passing over higher seniority captains at Jazz which would contravene the PML).philaviate wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:28 pm
Fair point.
But equally they could waive that for flow positions if it suited their business.
Welcome to Redneck Airlines. We might not get you there but we'll get you close!
Re: Hiring demand vs supply?
There is a lot of more than just the hourly rates. All of those extra pilots will have sim days, in class training, employer paid benefits, pensions etc. All of that adds up big time.dustyroads wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:50 amThere must be reasons why regionals won’t hire 703/704 atpl captains. Working captains more at regionals likely is cheaper, sure they pay a bit more for each to work more hours but the costs other than flight hours can be significant for the benefits offered, 10 captains working 8 extra hours a month likely cheaper than 1 captain working those 80 hours when all compensation is calculated. It comes down to dollar and cents, regionals hiring 703/704 atpl captains make sense to use but not to the bean counters at the companies.goingnowherefast wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:33 am Doing that would eventually put AC in the same spot as all the regionals. Shortage of upgradable FOs. There's a reason AC hires ATPL licensed "future captains". They don't want a roster that's 70% FOs that can't upgrade.
Re: Hiring demand vs supply?
Proof that most pilots don't have business acumenBTD wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 7:33 amThere is a lot of more than just the hourly rates. All of those extra pilots will have sim days, in class training, employer paid benefits, pensions etc. All of that adds up big time.dustyroads wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:50 amThere must be reasons why regionals won’t hire 703/704 atpl captains. Working captains more at regionals likely is cheaper, sure they pay a bit more for each to work more hours but the costs other than flight hours can be significant for the benefits offered, 10 captains working 8 extra hours a month likely cheaper than 1 captain working those 80 hours when all compensation is calculated. It comes down to dollar and cents, regionals hiring 703/704 atpl captains make sense to use but not to the bean counters at the companies.goingnowherefast wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:33 am Doing that would eventually put AC in the same spot as all the regionals. Shortage of upgradable FOs. There's a reason AC hires ATPL licensed "future captains". They don't want a roster that's 70% FOs that can't upgrade.

