Hiring demand vs supply?

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

philaviate
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:47 pm

Re: Hiring demand vs supply?

Post by philaviate »

jpilot77 wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 1:00 pm
philaviate wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:28 pm
leafs95 wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:34 pm

philaviate and lostav8r, I'm under the impression both of you don't realize you require an ATPL to even apply for a pilot position at AC.
Fair point.
But equally they could waive that for flow positions if it suited their business.
They require a ATPL and 2000 TT I don’t see AC waiving either of those to hire Jazz FOs (not to mention passing over higher seniority captains at Jazz which would contravene the PML).
But they can and will do so if they decide it makes sense for them as a business.I can see why it would, they're all struggling to hold captains at Jazz, encore etc etc, so why take some of those when you can take FO who are less of a loss to the regional.
---------- ADS -----------
 
goingnowherefast
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2463
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am

Re: Hiring demand vs supply?

Post by goingnowherefast »

Doing that would eventually put AC in the same spot as all the regionals. Shortage of upgradable FOs. There's a reason AC hires ATPL licensed "future captains". They don't want a roster that's 70% FOs that can't upgrade.
---------- ADS -----------
 
dustyroads
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 80
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:00 pm

Re: Hiring demand vs supply?

Post by dustyroads »

goingnowherefast wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:33 am Doing that would eventually put AC in the same spot as all the regionals. Shortage of upgradable FOs. There's a reason AC hires ATPL licensed "future captains". They don't want a roster that's 70% FOs that can't upgrade.
There must be reasons why regionals won’t hire 703/704 atpl captains. Working captains more at regionals likely is cheaper, sure they pay a bit more for each to work more hours but the costs other than flight hours can be significant for the benefits offered, 10 captains working 8 extra hours a month likely cheaper than 1 captain working those 80 hours when all compensation is calculated. It comes down to dollar and cents, regionals hiring 703/704 atpl captains make sense to use but not to the bean counters at the companies.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
jpilot77
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 757
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: North of YMX

Re: Hiring demand vs supply?

Post by jpilot77 »

philaviate wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 10:22 pm
jpilot77 wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 1:00 pm
philaviate wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:28 pm
Fair point.
But equally they could waive that for flow positions if it suited their business.
They require a ATPL and 2000 TT I don’t see AC waiving either of those to hire Jazz FOs (not to mention passing over higher seniority captains at Jazz which would contravene the PML).
But they can and will do so if they decide it makes sense for them as a business.I can see why it would, they're all struggling to hold captains at Jazz, encore etc etc, so why take some of those when you can take FO who are less of a loss to the regional.
Because then the captains would leave as well to Porter, WestJet etc…
---------- ADS -----------
 
Welcome to Redneck Airlines. We might not get you there but we'll get you close!
User avatar
BTD
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: Hiring demand vs supply?

Post by BTD »

dustyroads wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:50 am
goingnowherefast wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:33 am Doing that would eventually put AC in the same spot as all the regionals. Shortage of upgradable FOs. There's a reason AC hires ATPL licensed "future captains". They don't want a roster that's 70% FOs that can't upgrade.
There must be reasons why regionals won’t hire 703/704 atpl captains. Working captains more at regionals likely is cheaper, sure they pay a bit more for each to work more hours but the costs other than flight hours can be significant for the benefits offered, 10 captains working 8 extra hours a month likely cheaper than 1 captain working those 80 hours when all compensation is calculated. It comes down to dollar and cents, regionals hiring 703/704 atpl captains make sense to use but not to the bean counters at the companies.
There is a lot of more than just the hourly rates. All of those extra pilots will have sim days, in class training, employer paid benefits, pensions etc. All of that adds up big time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
lostav8r
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:54 pm

Re: Hiring demand vs supply?

Post by lostav8r »

BTD wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 7:33 am
dustyroads wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:50 am
goingnowherefast wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:33 am Doing that would eventually put AC in the same spot as all the regionals. Shortage of upgradable FOs. There's a reason AC hires ATPL licensed "future captains". They don't want a roster that's 70% FOs that can't upgrade.
There must be reasons why regionals won’t hire 703/704 atpl captains. Working captains more at regionals likely is cheaper, sure they pay a bit more for each to work more hours but the costs other than flight hours can be significant for the benefits offered, 10 captains working 8 extra hours a month likely cheaper than 1 captain working those 80 hours when all compensation is calculated. It comes down to dollar and cents, regionals hiring 703/704 atpl captains make sense to use but not to the bean counters at the companies.
There is a lot of more than just the hourly rates. All of those extra pilots will have sim days, in class training, employer paid benefits, pensions etc. All of that adds up big time.
Proof that most pilots don't have business acumen
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”