Too much chatter on the radio rant!

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

User avatar
greenwich
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 455
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 10:17 pm

Too much chatter on the radio rant!

Post by greenwich »

We all know that pilots love to talk...OR, should I say...love to hear the sound of their own voice!

We all talk on the radio almost daily, but why do we keep adding pointless, time-wasting phrases on to our radio calls???

Some that come to mind when talking to Center or Radio:

"good morning"
"good day"
"good afternoon"
"good evening"
"so-long"
"talk to you later"
"see you on the way out"
"talk to you in a bit"
"thanks"
"hi there"

WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR TIME-WASTING FAVOURITES???

G
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Slow and steady wins the race"
Hoser
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 7:23 pm

Post by Hoser »

I can understand not using them if its busy, but when its quiet what the hell is wrong with pleasantries?
---------- ADS -----------
 
desksgo
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2850
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: Toy Poodle Town, Manitoba
Contact:

Re: Too much chatter on the radio rant!

Post by desksgo »

greenwich wrote: WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR TIME-WASTING FAVOURITES???

G
:smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 Image:smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091
:smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091 :smt091
---------- ADS -----------
 
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4791
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Post by co-joe »

I'd rather hear any of the above given with a clear concise radio call containing only pertinent onformation, than hear someone bumble through their call up.

AND!...ah, this is...ah...we're ahh...

YSC is the exception. That guy kills me. :lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
I_Drive_Planes
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 357
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Prince George

Re: Too much chatter on the radio rant!

Post by I_Drive_Planes »

greenwich wrote:why do we keep adding pointless, time-wasting phrases on to our radio calls???
Becasue some of us enjoy being personable and pleasant. I find that more often its ATS adding pleasantries than pilots anyway.

Planes
---------- ADS -----------
 
oates76
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:01 am
Location: Cowtown

Post by oates76 »

I agree, as long as it's kept short and simple, why not be pleasant on the radio, we're not all robots.

and Desks Go... best truffle shuffle ever!! Nice :lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
water wings
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:09 pm

Post by water wings »

wow. i just timed myself saying "good morning" = 0.6 seconds. i never knew i was such a chatty cathy... :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image
Donald
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2454
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Canada

Post by Donald »

My personal favourite?

At the end of any call: "...and any conflicting (sometimes conflictions) please advise C-FABC on 126.7 or 122.8 in nowheresville".

These people need to spend a couple days up in NWO when it's busy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
lilfssister
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 2783
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 2:51 pm
Location: Mysteryville Castle

Post by lilfssister »

Nothing wrong with a "good morning", "good night" etc. As already said, above, these pleasantries take about a second.
---------- ADS -----------
 
l_reason
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:37 am

Post by l_reason »

AC # 1
“Cooks bay traffic this is SC__ we are at 4500’ practicing slow flight on the east side of the bay”

AC # 2
“SC__….OH! Your at 4500 doing slow flight, OK. Well this is SC__ We are at 1000’ doing diversions for the next ½ hour then going back to Buttonville and we’ll keep a sharp eye for you on our way back ” (in a instructor like voice.)

I don’t mind at all when “good morning” is used but if you have 3500’ of separation do you really need to call or is it just chatting and plugging up 126.7? Some days flying around the GTA there would be nothing on the radio at all if it wasn’t for calls that started with “S C” and “Cooks bay traffic”
---------- ADS -----------
 
J31
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1251
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 7:21 am

Post by J31 »

Donald wrote:My personal favourite?
At the end of any call: "...and any conflicting please advise C-FABC".
I agree that quote is not required……as if someone that is conflicting is NOT going to speak up?!

I don’t see anything wrong with brief pleasantries like good night, good morning, Merry Christmas :wink: !
---------- ADS -----------
 
N2
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1301
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 9:23 am
Location: Under witness protection!

Post by N2 »

NO shit I had a certain aviation college aircraft respond to my position report while transiting a training zone when they were a good 30 miles away....ummmm no conflict!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Putting money into aviation is like wiping before you poop....it just don't make sense!
SkyWolfe
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1483
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:18 pm
Location: CYVR

Post by SkyWolfe »

Actually ATC got snippy with me when I didn't say "thanks" once... So ummmm.... I think I'll continue being pleasent, and your just going to have to live with it :P
---------- ADS -----------
 
lilfssister
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 2783
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 2:51 pm
Location: Mysteryville Castle

Post by lilfssister »

SkyWolfe wrote:Actually ATC got snippy with me when I didn't say "thanks" once... So ummmm.... I think I'll continue being pleasent, and your just going to have to live with it :P
Really??? I think it's funny when pilots thank me for...uhhh..doing my job? No thanks required, it's what we're paid for.

Now if they went WAY out of their way to get you something you requested that was out of the norm, then maybe a thanks would be nice, but hardly required.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dockjock
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:46 pm
Location: south saturn delta

Post by Dockjock »

"Thanks for the help" kills me when the controller did little more than vector the aircraft onto final in visual conditions. What help? "Thanks for the help" seems warranted when providing vectors around weather, providing ride reports, getting hockey scores, or something that might have actually involved the controller going out of their way a little.

The other one, and seems to be a YYC thing, is the absolutely excessive reading back of instructions, information, and so forth. "Heading 310 to join, cleared ILS 34, maintain 160 to the beacon, and contact tower" does NOT need to be read back in full. Just "ABCD cleared ILS 34" is fine. Now it's to the point where the bad habit has been passed on and on and it's a snowballing problem. Perhaps there should be a 5-yr renewal on the radio license?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dog
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:41 am
Location: next to the fire.
Contact:

Post by Dog »

I always say thanks to atc whenever someone makes an effort to give me more direct or save me a litttle time. I flew out of YVR for a while and the controlers there could save you easily an hour of flying by the end of the day by fitting you in rather than insisting that you fly the full published arrivals and departures. There are some truely superb people working in that tower.

If I'm in a particularly cranky mood the student pilot format position reports rub me the wrong way. Just tell people type/ident, position, altitude and trend (climbing/decending to) and direction of travel or intentions. That's all we need to know, if it's a conflict it should become clear.

Goodmorning, thankyou, and have a nice day. out
---------- ADS -----------
 
flystraightin
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 6:28 pm
Location: not YYC
Contact:

Post by flystraightin »

It kills me when ATC, after a readback, puts in a "roger".

like:

ATC: "Skyhawk ZMA, taxi runway 09 via B, runway 02, E. Contact the tower holding short."

Me: "09 via B, 02, E. Tower holding short, ZMA."

ATC: "Roger"
---------- ADS -----------
 
fly straight in
--
Image
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Post by linecrew »

Dockjock wrote:"Thanks for the help" kills me when the controller did little more than vector the aircraft onto final in visual conditions.
I always thank atc if I request and get approval for south fields circuits at CYOW where they have to fit you in with their IFR movements...especially considering they don't have to and for them having me stay over in the North field circuit is (usually) an easier option. There's also, from what I've been told, a couple of controllers that aren't fans of general aviation in the tower so I want to show my appreciation for putting up with me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
HO Driver
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:58 am
Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Lane

Post by HO Driver »

Some of you whiners have to get the hell out of the circuit once and a while. Will this useless topic ever die?!? :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
niss
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: I'm a CPL trapped in a PPL's Body.
Contact:

Post by niss »

I pay the people at Tim Hortons to get me coffee, but I still thank them politly after. If I dont they spit in my coffee.
---------- ADS -----------
 
She’s built like a Steakhouse, but she handles like a Bistro.

Let's kick the tires, and light the fires.... SHIT! FIRE! EMERGENCY CHECKLIST!
RFN
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 6:26 pm

Post by RFN »

I don't think there's anything wrong with being friendly. That said, most people seem to be able to gauge how busy the controllers are, and if things are pretty hectic, then they cut out the chit-chat.

Up North, a couple of things.
The "conflicts please advise" thing is obvious.
I don't think there is a good reason for calling final on 126.7 122.8 or 123.2 would suffice for that one.
150 miles North of Winnipeg means much less than 35 South West of Berens.
Estimating Island in 46.5 minutes is silly.
We've all been over the "getting the weather briefing on 126.7" thing before I think. There's lots of other options.

I have a question though. We all go direct from point to point and make our radio calls accordingly. What do you guys suggest when it's time to dodge CBs? I have never heard anyone mention that on a 126.7 call, yet it would seem reasonable that everyone could be heading (in IMC) for that sweet little gap on the radar. Does anyone have any advice on this one?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by RFN on Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
ch135146
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 7:23 pm

Re: Too much chatter on the radio rant!

Post by ch135146 »

greenwich wrote:WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR TIME-WASTING FAVOURITES???
Amateurs who create threads like this.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Justwannafly
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 896
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:12 am
Location: Cyberspace

Post by Justwannafly »

Nothing wrong with a "good morning", "good night" etc. As already said, above, these pleasantries take about a second.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image
. ._
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7374
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:50 pm
Location: Cowering in my little room because the Water Cooler is locked.
Contact:

Post by . ._ »

I was taught to say, "Any conflicting please advise." But unless I was with an instructor who insisted I say it, I didn't, and don't say it. It pisses some people on AvCanada off, and IMHO, it's a little bit useless.

I'll say "thanks" every once in a while.

And I say "roger" as much as I can, because you can only get away with it on the radio. If I said "roger" at the Beer Store, they might not serve me again:

"Beer Store employee, this is ISTP. Request six bottles Lakeport Pilsner."

"OK sir....uh, six Lakeport Pilsner, that's $7.45."

"Roger, seven four five." Gives the cute beer girl a ten.

"And uh...$2.55 change." Cute girl gives me wierd look.

"Roger, two five five change, g'day."

See. It only works in the plane, so I'm gonna fuckin' use it as much as possible, I don't care who it pisses off. IT SOUNDS COOL!

-istp :smt023
---------- ADS -----------
 
bigfssguy
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 365
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 8:10 am
Location: Churchill MB

Post by bigfssguy »

istp wrote:I was taught to say, "Any conflicting please advise." But unless I was with an instructor who insisted I say it, I didn't, and don't say it. It pisses some people on AvCanada off, and IMHO, it's a little bit useless.

I'll say "thanks" every once in a while.

And I say "roger" as much as I can, because you can only get away with it on the radio. If I said "roger" at the Beer Store, they might not serve me again:

"Beer Store employee, this is ISTP. Request six bottles Lakeport Pilsner."

"OK sir....uh, six Lakeport Pilsner, that's $7.45."

"Roger, seven four five." Gives the cute beer girl a ten.

"And uh...$2.55 change." Cute girl gives me wierd look.

"Roger, two five five change, g'day."

See. It only works in the plane, so I'm gonna fuckin' use it as much as possible, I don't care who it pisses off. IT SOUNDS COOL!

-istp :smt023
Now that is some funny stuff. I might try that next time i go to the vendor. But then again in Churchill that would be the least weird thing they would see that day, that plus there are NO cute girls here....Well aside from my lovely wonderful perfect Fiance..........................
---------- ADS -----------
 
FSS: puting the Service back in Flight Services....
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”