Too much chatter on the radio rant!
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
Too much chatter on the radio rant!
We all know that pilots love to talk...OR, should I say...love to hear the sound of their own voice!
We all talk on the radio almost daily, but why do we keep adding pointless, time-wasting phrases on to our radio calls???
Some that come to mind when talking to Center or Radio:
"good morning"
"good day"
"good afternoon"
"good evening"
"so-long"
"talk to you later"
"see you on the way out"
"talk to you in a bit"
"thanks"
"hi there"
WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR TIME-WASTING FAVOURITES???
G
We all talk on the radio almost daily, but why do we keep adding pointless, time-wasting phrases on to our radio calls???
Some that come to mind when talking to Center or Radio:
"good morning"
"good day"
"good afternoon"
"good evening"
"so-long"
"talk to you later"
"see you on the way out"
"talk to you in a bit"
"thanks"
"hi there"
WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR TIME-WASTING FAVOURITES???
G
"Slow and steady wins the race"
-
desksgo
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:05 pm
- Location: Toy Poodle Town, Manitoba
- Contact:
Re: Too much chatter on the radio rant!
greenwich wrote: WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR TIME-WASTING FAVOURITES???
G

-
I_Drive_Planes
- Rank 5

- Posts: 357
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:18 am
- Location: Prince George
Re: Too much chatter on the radio rant!
Becasue some of us enjoy being personable and pleasant. I find that more often its ATS adding pleasantries than pilots anyway.greenwich wrote:why do we keep adding pointless, time-wasting phrases on to our radio calls???
Planes
-
water wings
- Rank 8

- Posts: 928
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:09 pm
-
lilfssister
- Rank Moderator

- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 2:51 pm
- Location: Mysteryville Castle
AC # 1
“Cooks bay traffic this is SC__ we are at 4500’ practicing slow flight on the east side of the bay”
AC # 2
“SC__….OH! Your at 4500 doing slow flight, OK. Well this is SC__ We are at 1000’ doing diversions for the next ½ hour then going back to Buttonville and we’ll keep a sharp eye for you on our way back ” (in a instructor like voice.)
I don’t mind at all when “good morning” is used but if you have 3500’ of separation do you really need to call or is it just chatting and plugging up 126.7? Some days flying around the GTA there would be nothing on the radio at all if it wasn’t for calls that started with “S C” and “Cooks bay traffic”
“Cooks bay traffic this is SC__ we are at 4500’ practicing slow flight on the east side of the bay”
AC # 2
“SC__….OH! Your at 4500 doing slow flight, OK. Well this is SC__ We are at 1000’ doing diversions for the next ½ hour then going back to Buttonville and we’ll keep a sharp eye for you on our way back ” (in a instructor like voice.)
I don’t mind at all when “good morning” is used but if you have 3500’ of separation do you really need to call or is it just chatting and plugging up 126.7? Some days flying around the GTA there would be nothing on the radio at all if it wasn’t for calls that started with “S C” and “Cooks bay traffic”
I agree that quote is not required……as if someone that is conflicting is NOT going to speak up?!Donald wrote:My personal favourite?
At the end of any call: "...and any conflicting please advise C-FABC".
I don’t see anything wrong with brief pleasantries like good night, good morning, Merry Christmas
-
lilfssister
- Rank Moderator

- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 2:51 pm
- Location: Mysteryville Castle
Really??? I think it's funny when pilots thank me for...uhhh..doing my job? No thanks required, it's what we're paid for.SkyWolfe wrote:Actually ATC got snippy with me when I didn't say "thanks" once... So ummmm.... I think I'll continue being pleasent, and your just going to have to live with it
Now if they went WAY out of their way to get you something you requested that was out of the norm, then maybe a thanks would be nice, but hardly required.
"Thanks for the help" kills me when the controller did little more than vector the aircraft onto final in visual conditions. What help? "Thanks for the help" seems warranted when providing vectors around weather, providing ride reports, getting hockey scores, or something that might have actually involved the controller going out of their way a little.
The other one, and seems to be a YYC thing, is the absolutely excessive reading back of instructions, information, and so forth. "Heading 310 to join, cleared ILS 34, maintain 160 to the beacon, and contact tower" does NOT need to be read back in full. Just "ABCD cleared ILS 34" is fine. Now it's to the point where the bad habit has been passed on and on and it's a snowballing problem. Perhaps there should be a 5-yr renewal on the radio license?
The other one, and seems to be a YYC thing, is the absolutely excessive reading back of instructions, information, and so forth. "Heading 310 to join, cleared ILS 34, maintain 160 to the beacon, and contact tower" does NOT need to be read back in full. Just "ABCD cleared ILS 34" is fine. Now it's to the point where the bad habit has been passed on and on and it's a snowballing problem. Perhaps there should be a 5-yr renewal on the radio license?
I always say thanks to atc whenever someone makes an effort to give me more direct or save me a litttle time. I flew out of YVR for a while and the controlers there could save you easily an hour of flying by the end of the day by fitting you in rather than insisting that you fly the full published arrivals and departures. There are some truely superb people working in that tower.
If I'm in a particularly cranky mood the student pilot format position reports rub me the wrong way. Just tell people type/ident, position, altitude and trend (climbing/decending to) and direction of travel or intentions. That's all we need to know, if it's a conflict it should become clear.
Goodmorning, thankyou, and have a nice day. out
If I'm in a particularly cranky mood the student pilot format position reports rub me the wrong way. Just tell people type/ident, position, altitude and trend (climbing/decending to) and direction of travel or intentions. That's all we need to know, if it's a conflict it should become clear.
Goodmorning, thankyou, and have a nice day. out
-
flystraightin
- Rank 3

- Posts: 175
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 6:28 pm
- Location: not YYC
- Contact:
-
linecrew
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
- Location: On final so get off the damn runway!
I always thank atc if I request and get approval for south fields circuits at CYOW where they have to fit you in with their IFR movements...especially considering they don't have to and for them having me stay over in the North field circuit is (usually) an easier option. There's also, from what I've been told, a couple of controllers that aren't fans of general aviation in the tower so I want to show my appreciation for putting up with me.Dockjock wrote:"Thanks for the help" kills me when the controller did little more than vector the aircraft onto final in visual conditions.
I don't think there's anything wrong with being friendly. That said, most people seem to be able to gauge how busy the controllers are, and if things are pretty hectic, then they cut out the chit-chat.
Up North, a couple of things.
The "conflicts please advise" thing is obvious.
I don't think there is a good reason for calling final on 126.7 122.8 or 123.2 would suffice for that one.
150 miles North of Winnipeg means much less than 35 South West of Berens.
Estimating Island in 46.5 minutes is silly.
We've all been over the "getting the weather briefing on 126.7" thing before I think. There's lots of other options.
I have a question though. We all go direct from point to point and make our radio calls accordingly. What do you guys suggest when it's time to dodge CBs? I have never heard anyone mention that on a 126.7 call, yet it would seem reasonable that everyone could be heading (in IMC) for that sweet little gap on the radar. Does anyone have any advice on this one?
Up North, a couple of things.
The "conflicts please advise" thing is obvious.
I don't think there is a good reason for calling final on 126.7 122.8 or 123.2 would suffice for that one.
150 miles North of Winnipeg means much less than 35 South West of Berens.
Estimating Island in 46.5 minutes is silly.
We've all been over the "getting the weather briefing on 126.7" thing before I think. There's lots of other options.
I have a question though. We all go direct from point to point and make our radio calls accordingly. What do you guys suggest when it's time to dodge CBs? I have never heard anyone mention that on a 126.7 call, yet it would seem reasonable that everyone could be heading (in IMC) for that sweet little gap on the radar. Does anyone have any advice on this one?
Last edited by RFN on Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Too much chatter on the radio rant!
Amateurs who create threads like this.greenwich wrote:WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR TIME-WASTING FAVOURITES???
-
Justwannafly
- Rank 8

- Posts: 896
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:12 am
- Location: Cyberspace
-
. ._
- Top Poster

- Posts: 7374
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:50 pm
- Location: Cowering in my little room because the Water Cooler is locked.
- Contact:
I was taught to say, "Any conflicting please advise." But unless I was with an instructor who insisted I say it, I didn't, and don't say it. It pisses some people on AvCanada off, and IMHO, it's a little bit useless.
I'll say "thanks" every once in a while.
And I say "roger" as much as I can, because you can only get away with it on the radio. If I said "roger" at the Beer Store, they might not serve me again:
"Beer Store employee, this is ISTP. Request six bottles Lakeport Pilsner."
"OK sir....uh, six Lakeport Pilsner, that's $7.45."
"Roger, seven four five." Gives the cute beer girl a ten.
"And uh...$2.55 change." Cute girl gives me wierd look.
"Roger, two five five change, g'day."
See. It only works in the plane, so I'm gonna fuckin' use it as much as possible, I don't care who it pisses off. IT SOUNDS COOL!
-istp
I'll say "thanks" every once in a while.
And I say "roger" as much as I can, because you can only get away with it on the radio. If I said "roger" at the Beer Store, they might not serve me again:
"Beer Store employee, this is ISTP. Request six bottles Lakeport Pilsner."
"OK sir....uh, six Lakeport Pilsner, that's $7.45."
"Roger, seven four five." Gives the cute beer girl a ten.
"And uh...$2.55 change." Cute girl gives me wierd look.
"Roger, two five five change, g'day."
See. It only works in the plane, so I'm gonna fuckin' use it as much as possible, I don't care who it pisses off. IT SOUNDS COOL!
-istp
Now that is some funny stuff. I might try that next time i go to the vendor. But then again in Churchill that would be the least weird thing they would see that day, that plus there are NO cute girls here....Well aside from my lovely wonderful perfect Fiance..........................istp wrote:I was taught to say, "Any conflicting please advise." But unless I was with an instructor who insisted I say it, I didn't, and don't say it. It pisses some people on AvCanada off, and IMHO, it's a little bit useless.
I'll say "thanks" every once in a while.
And I say "roger" as much as I can, because you can only get away with it on the radio. If I said "roger" at the Beer Store, they might not serve me again:
"Beer Store employee, this is ISTP. Request six bottles Lakeport Pilsner."
"OK sir....uh, six Lakeport Pilsner, that's $7.45."
"Roger, seven four five." Gives the cute beer girl a ten.
"And uh...$2.55 change." Cute girl gives me wierd look.
"Roger, two five five change, g'day."
See. It only works in the plane, so I'm gonna fuckin' use it as much as possible, I don't care who it pisses off. IT SOUNDS COOL!
-istp
FSS: puting the Service back in Flight Services....





